Search

Despite cross-cultural differences in knowledge and attitudes toward menstruation, most studies on menstruation in women's sport have been conducted in high-income countries, such as in Europe, and none have been conducted in Africa. The aim of this study was to explore the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of African elite women football players, and their support personnel toward the menstrual cycle and menstruation. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all participants (n = 564) at two African women football tournaments. Ultimately, 238 women football players, 44 coaches, 18 health personnel, and 17 referees completed it. From 317 questionnaires analyzed, 17%, 27%, 56%, and 0% of players, coaches, health personnel, and referees, respectively, knew at least one menstrual cycle hormone; 91%, 95%, and 100% of players, coaches, and referees, respectively, did not know at least one menstrual cycle phase. Over 70% of health personnel believed that menstruation negatively affects women's performance in sports compared with 36% of players; 18%, 28%, and 18% of players, health personnel, and referees, respectively, believed that, for convenience, the menstrual cycle should be changed by drugs like contraceptives; and 54%, 61%, 62%, and 40% of players, coaches, health personnel, and referees, respectively, were confident providing advice about the menstrual cycle to teammates. Minimal knowledge of the menstrual cycle has implications on the development of menstrual cycle considerate training environments and educational materials in African women's football. Furthermore, the relatively low perceived effect of the menstrual cycle on sporting performance and belief in the use of contraceptives may be attributable to differences in community-level religiocultural and social contexts which influence menstrual experiences, and shape behavioral expectations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past ten years there has been a dramatic rise in female sport participation and accompanying female professional national leagues across multiple sports, yet research has not followed suit. Although there are known variations between female and male physiology, training protocols in female sport are predominantly underpinned by research undertaken in male athletes. The hormonal variability experienced by women across the menstrual cycle, as well as the menstrual cycle variability between women, may contribute to the complexity of conducting rigorous physiological studies, leading to a paucity of robust sports-specific research that can be confidently applied to female athletes. Moreover, barriers exist in female sport that potentially limit the ability to conduct research, including the lack of full-time programs and limited resources. Recently, there has been increased interest in the potential effects of fluctuations in the female sex hormones, progesterone and oestrogen, on sport performance across different phases of the menstrual cycle. However, current research evaluating the menstrual cycle and physical performance (such as strength, speed, aerobic fitness, and athletes' perception of their performance) have shown inconsistent results. Additionally, methodological design across studies has shown little consistency, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions, which potentially prevents female athletes optimising their physical and sporting performance. It further impacts coaches and sports science researchers in their ability to provide appropriate training recommendations and educational opportunities. It is important to progress in female athlete research with an understanding of how the unique physiology of female athletes may influence their ability to physically perform in their respective sport, which requires representation in sports science research. This paper will provide an overview on current evidence and limitations within menstrual cycle research and provide considerations and directions for future research in this space within team sports. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional continuous training and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) can increase maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max). However, there is conflicting evidence regarding which form of training demonstrates the greatest improvements to V̇O2max , and data in women is sparse. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess whether moderate to vigorous-intensity continuous training (MVICT) or HIIT was superior at improving V̇O2max in women. Randomised controlled and parallel studies examined the influence of MVICT and/or HIIT on V̇O2max in women. There was no statistical difference in V̇O2max improvements after training between women in the MVICT and HIIT cohorts (mean difference [MD]: −0.42, 95%CI: −1.43 to 0.60, p>0.05). Both MVICT and HIIT increased V̇O2max from baseline (MD: 3.20, 95% CI: 2.73 to 3.67 and MD: 3.16, 95% CI 2.09 to 4.24, respectively, p<0.001). Greater improvements in V̇O2max were observed in women who participated in more training sessions in both training formats. Long-HIIT was superior to short-HIIT protocols at increasing V̇O2max. Although MVICT and long-HIIT sessions elicited greater increases in V̇O2max in younger women compared to short-HIIT protocols, these differences were negligible in older women. Our findings suggest MVICT and HIIT are equally effective strategies for improving V̇O2max and indicate an effect of age on its response to training in women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The relationship between the menstrual cycle and various markers of health is complex and variable, influenced by the ever-changing associated hormonal profile. Female athletes have reported negative impacts on daily life and training as a result of their menstrual cycle, such as abdominal and back pain to migraines, which can result in missed training sessions or needing to alter training sessions. It is important to understand how the unique physiology of female athletes influences their ability to perform, and with only 35-37% of sports science research participants being female, it is imperative to increase representation of female participants in sport science research. This study investigates the effect of menstrual cycle phase on maximal strength across team sport athletes. Eumenorrheic female athletes (N=10, age; 25.3 ± 4.5yrs, weight; 70.2 ± 11.6kg) undertook maximal isometric squat testing three times per week for one complete menstrual cycle after reporting two months of consistent menstrual cycle activity. Absolute and relative maximal strength and rate of force development were analysed at each phase of the menstrual cycle as a group. Data were also assessed individually to identify participants with similar trends in their strength profile across the menstrual cycle, resulting in three individual groups. As a collective, there were no significant differences in maximal strength characteristics across the menstrual cycle phases tested. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in absolute peak force (APF) and relative peak force (RPF) between Menstrual Phase (MP) and Follicular Phase (FP), MP and Luteal Phase (LP), Ovulation (OV) and LP in Individual Group One with reduced peak force in FP (10.5% APF, 7.7% RPF), LP (13.5%, 13%), and OP (10%, 11.8%) respectively. There were significant differences in Individual Group Two between FP and OP, and FP and LP for APF and RPF with decreased peak force in FP for both comparisons (12.6%, 12.4% & 15.2%, 18.3%). Data for APF in each phase of the menstrual cycle for each participant can be seen in Figure 1. Considering the menstrual cycle can affect individuals differently, assessing menstrual cycle data collectively may be a disservice to the female athlete and prohibits further understanding of how individual athletes are impacted across the various menstrual cycle phases. Thus, assessing data individually or grouping data sets with similar patterns may provide more nuanced information about the influence of menstrual cycle phase on strength characteristics, which could have implications for athletes’ training. Further research is needed, however the results from this study highlight that an individual athlete’s maximal strength may vary on an individual bases during the different phases of the menstrual cycle. It is recommended female athletes monitor fluctuations in strength across different phases of the menstrual cycle to see how each phase may alter strength expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the acute inflammatory response to a repeat-sprint training session in hypoxia. Eleven amateur teamsport athletes completed a repeat-sprint training in hypoxia (RSH) protocol (4 sets of 4x4-s running sprints) in both normoxia and normobaric hypoxia (FiO2 0.145 to simulate an altitude of 3000 m) on separate days. Participants provided venous blood samples prior to (PRE), immediately after (POST), and 3 h after (3 h) completion of the protocol, and capillary blood lactate samples were taken upon arrival, at PRE, and at POST. Distance was recorded for each sprint. Venous blood samples were analysed to determine plasma concentrations of cytokines IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL- 6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNFα. There was no interaction or main effect of condition for any cytokine (p > 0.05). However, time effects indicated that IL-10 was decreased by an average of 19% across the two experimental trials at 3 h compared to POST (p = 0.04), IL-6 increased by 55% from PRE to POST (p = 0.03) then decreased by 43% from POST to 3 h (p = 0.02), and IL-8 decreased by 30% from PRE to POST (p = 0.04) and was further reduced at 3 h compared to POST (by an additional 23%; p = 0.02). A time x condition interaction (p = 0.03) indicated that lactate was higher in hypoxia. There was no interaction effect or effect of condition for sprint distance (p > 0.05). These results suggest that team-sport athletes can perform a RSH session without increasing inflammation when compared to the same training session performed in normoxia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study compared the immune and stress response of oral contraceptive users (WomenOC; n = 9) to normally-menstruating women (WomenNM; n = 9) at rest and during exercise in temperate (TEMP; 22°C) and hot (HEAT; 35°C) conditions. Participants performed a 3-stage cycling trial in each condition at 90% (Stage 1; 30 min), 135% (Stage 2; 15 min), and 180% (Stage 3; 7.5 min) of lactate threshold 1. C-reactive protein (CRP) and immune cell counts were measured at rest, and serum cytokines (IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α) and salivary cortisol were evaluated before and after exercise in both the TEMP and HEAT conditions. There were no differences in resting immune cell counts between groups, nor any differences in cortisol or any of the pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines measured at rest or after completion of the exercise trials (p > 0.05). However, a trend for a higher resting CRP concentration was observed in WomenOC relative to WomenNM (1.102 ± 1.182 and 0.326 ± 0.228, respectively, p = 0.07). The results obtained in the current study indicate similar immunoendocrine function in WomenOC and WomenNM both at rest and after exercise in temperate and hot environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]