Search

Background: Systematic literature searches are the cornerstone of systematic reviews. In this study, we evaluated database coverage of randomized clinical trials for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods: We searched 12 databases (BIOSIS Previews, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central, Current Contents Connect, Data Citation Index, Derwent Innovations Index, EMBASE, KCI-Korean Journal Database, MEDLINE, PubMed, SciELO Citation Index, and Web of Science Core Collection) on 10 April 2023 for randomized clinical trials for CSC. After identifying all eligible studies across all databases, we investigated the coverage of these studies within each database, including the coverage of any combination of two databases. Results: The 12 databases yielded 848 records for screening, of which 76 were randomized clinical trials for CSC. No single database provided full coverage. The most comprehensive coverage was provided by EMBASE (88%), the Cochrane Central (87%), and PubMed (75%). A combined search in the Cochrane Central and PubMed led to complete coverage (100%) while reducing the number of records for screening from 848 to 279. Conclusions: Systematic review search design should include multiple databases. For randomized clinical trials for CSC, the combination of the Cochrane Central and PubMed provides an excellent balance between coverage and workload.

PURPOSE To investigate the epidemiology of Gunn's dots and their associations in a population-based cohort of children. METHODS Red-free fundus photographs from 2,286 children aged 11 years to 14 years from the Sydney Myopia Study were graded. Gunn's dots were manually marked and counted within a 6 mm grid centered on the optic disc. RESULTS One or more Gunn's dots were seen in at least one eye in 82.6% of children. The median number of Gunn's dots per eye was 46 (range 0-482). Most Gunn's dots were found inferior and superior of the optic disc (49.3% and 45.8%, respectively, of the total number of Gunn's dots in the population). The odds for having 1 or more Gunn's dots were 3-fold greater in children with dark brown irides compared with children with blue irides (odds ratio 2.99, 95% CI 1.81 to 4.94, P < 0.0001 adjusted for age, sex, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, refraction, ethnicity, and axial length). In the same analysis, the presence of 1 or more Gunn's dots was less frequent in children with thin retinal nerve fiber layers (first quartile) compared with children with thick retinal nerve fiber layers (fourth quartile) (odds ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.93, P = 0.016). No disease or disease-marker associations were identified. CONCLUSION Gunn's dots were visible on fundus photographs in most of the school children, most of the dots being located inferiorly and superiorly to the optic disc. Fundus photographically visible Gunn's dots were associated with darker irides and thicker retinal nerve fiber layers. Gunn's dots are a common and apparently harmless finding in children. Assessment of their clinical significance will require long-term follow-up.