Search

NV-5138 (or SPN-820) is a novel small molecule activator of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) currently under development for use in treatment- resistant depression. This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics (as measured by quantitative electroencephalography, qEEG) of two sequential oral doses of NV-5138 in healthy adult males. Twenty-five participants were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with a single dose of placebo or 2400 mg NV-5138 on Day 1, and a second dose of the same treatment on Day 3. The two doses of NV-5138 were safe and well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events, or discontinuations due to adverse events. Spectral band amplitudes, derived frequency measures, and magnitude squared coherences were computed from qEEG recordings during resting state eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions at multiple timepoints. In the NV-5138 group only, significant changes in qEEG measures occurred at 1 hour post-dose on both days (near NV-5138 T max ), including decreases in low-frequency band amplitudes (theta) and increases in high-frequency EEG band amplitudes (high beta and gamma). These effects were mirrored by a decrease in the theta/beta ratio, a measure negatively associated with arousal and cognitive processing capability. Significantly increased high beta and gamma band coherences were also detected at several specific electrode pairs in both eyes-open and eye-closed conditions. NV-5138 actively modulated functional brain parameters consistent with positive effects on mood, cognition, and arousal. These results indicate that qEEG measures may be useful biomarkers of NV-5138 target engagement and related changes in neural activity.

Introduction Apathy is common in neurocognitive disorders (NCD) but NCD-specific diagnostic criteria are needed. Methods The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials Methodology Apathy Work Group convened an expert group and sought input from academia, health-care, industry, and regulatory bodies. A modified Delphi methodology was followed, and included an extensive literature review, two surveys, and two meetings at international conferences, culminating in a consensus meeting in 2019. Results The final criteria reached consensus with more than 80% agreement on all parts and included: limited to people with NCD; symptoms persistent or frequently recurrent over at least 4 weeks, a change from the patient's usual behavior, and including one of the following: diminished initiative, diminished interest, or diminished emotional expression/responsiveness; causing significant functional impairment and not exclusively explained by other etiologies. Discussion These criteria provide a framework for defining apathy as a unique clinical construct in NCD for diagnosis and further research.

We wanted to examine tolerability and efficacy of NSI-189, a benzylpiperizine-aminiopyridine neurogenic compound for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). This was a Phase 1B, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multiple-dose study with three cohorts. The first cohort received 40 mg q.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2), the second cohort 40 mg b.i.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2), and the third cohort 40 mg t.i.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2). Twenty-four patients with MDD were recruited, with the diagnosis and severity confirmed through remote interviews. Eligible patients received NSI-189 or placebo for 28 days in an inpatient setting with assessments for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Outpatient follow-up visits were conducted until day 84 (±3). NSI-189 was relatively well tolerated at all doses, with no serious adverse effects. NSI-189 area under the curve increased in a dose-related and nearly proportional manner across the three cohorts, with a half-life of 17.4–20.5 h. The exploratory efficacy measurements, including Symptoms Of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions—Improvement (CGI-I), and The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) showed a promising reduction in depressive and cognitive symptoms across all measures for NSI-189, with significant improvement in the SDQ and CPFQ, and a medium to large effect size for all measures. These improvements persisted during the follow-up phase. In summary, NSI-189 shows potential as a treatment for MDD in an early phase study. The main limitation of this preliminary study was the small sample size of each cohort.

Background Efforts to identify fluid biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease (PD) have intensified in the last decade. As the role of inflammation in PD pathophysiology becomes increasingly recognized, investigators aim to define inflammatory signatures to help elucidate underlying mechanisms of disease pathogenesis and aid in identification of patients with inflammatory endophenotypes that could benefit from immunomodulatory interventions. However, discordant results in the literature and a lack of information regarding the stability of inflammatory factors over a 24-h period have hampered progress. Methods Here, we measured inflammatory proteins in serum and CSF of a small cohort of PD (n = 12) and age-matched healthy control (HC) subjects (n = 6) at 11 time points across 24 h to (1) identify potential diurnal variation, (2) reveal differences in PD vs HC, and (3) to correlate with CSF levels of amyloid β (Aβ) and α-synuclein in an effort to generate data-driven hypotheses regarding candidate biomarkers of PD. Results Despite significant variability in other factors, a repeated measures two-way analysis of variance by time and disease state for each analyte revealed that serum IFNγ, TNF, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) were stable across 24 h and different between HC and PD. Regression analysis revealed that C-reactive protein (CRP) was the only factor with a strong linear relationship between CSF and serum. PD and HC subjects showed significantly different relationships between CSF Aβ proteins and α-synuclein and specific inflammatory factors, and CSF IFNγ and serum IL-8 positively correlated with clinical measures of PD. Finally, linear discriminant analysis revealed that serum TNF and CSF α-synuclein discriminated between PD and HC with a minimum of 82% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Conclusions Our findings identify a panel of inflammatory factors in serum and CSF that can be reliably measured, distinguish between PD and HC, and monitor inflammation as disease progresses or in response to interventional therapies. This panel may aid in generating hypotheses and feasible experimental designs towards identifying biomarkers of neurodegenerative disease by focusing on analytes that remain stable regardless of time of sample collection.

Objective This study aimed to investigate the effect of prandial status and caloric and fat composition of meals on the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone. Methods Two randomized, open-label, crossover studies were conducted in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Study 1 (n = 16) evaluated the effect of fasting and three meal types (100 kcal/medium fat, 200 kcal/medium fat, and 800–1000 kcal/high fat), and Study 2 (n = 26) evaluated the effect of fasting and five meal types (350 kcal/high fat, 500 kcal/low fat, 500 kcal/high fat, 800–1000 kcal/low fat, and 800–1000 kcal/high fat) on the bioavailability of lurasidone. Subjects received lurasidone 120 mg once daily. Maximum serum concentration (Cmax) and area under the serum concentration–time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0–tau) were determined on Day 5 for each meal type. Results In Study 1, the geometric mean Cmax in the fasted state was 56.7 ng/mL compared with 123.0 ng/mL for the 800- to 1000-kcal meal; mean AUC0–tau was 360.0 versus 752.4 ng·h/mL (both p

ELND005 (scyllo-inositol), an endogenous inositol stereoisomer, is being investigated as an oral treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Pharmacokinetics of ELND005 in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain was characterized in healthy young subjects. Eight men received 2000 mg ELND005 every 12 hours for 10 days. Plasma and CSF samples were collected at predetermined time points; ELND005 and amyloid-beta (Aβ) fragments were measured by validated bioanalytical methods. Brain ELND005 levels, estimated by (1) H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) scans were obtained from gray/white matter voxels at baseline and Day 8. ELND005 was well-tolerated during the study. During the apparent steady state, ELND005 plasma levels rapidly peaked at 39.8 µg/mL and decreased to an average trough concentration of 10.6 µg/mL at the end of the 12-hour dosing regimen. In contrast, CSF drug levels slowly peaked at 13.7 µg/mL and remained near the same level with average trough concentrations of 12.4 µg/mL. At Day 8, Brain ELND005 concentrations increased by 58-76% compared to baseline levels. The CSF concentrations achieved in this study were similar to those associated with efficacy in transgenic models of AD. No changes were detected in plasma and CSF levels of Aβ fragments.

AZD3293 (LY3314814) is a promising new potentially disease-modifying BACE1 (β-secretase) inhibitor in Phase III clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Reported here are the first two Phase I studies: (1) a single ascending dose study evaluating doses of 1-750 mg with a food-effect component (n = 72), and (2) a 2-week multiple ascending dose study evaluating doses of 15 or 50 mg once daily (QD) or 70 mg once weekly (QW) in elderly subjects (Part 1, n = 31), and 15, 50, or 150 mg QD in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (Part 2, n = 16). AZD3293 was generally well tolerated up to the highest doses given. No notable food effects were observed. PK following multiple doses (Part 2) were tmax of 1 to 3 h and mean t1/2 of 16 to 21 h across the 15 to 150 mg dose range. For single doses of ≥5 mg, a ≥70% reduction was observed in mean plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 concentrations, with prolonged suppression for up to 3 weeks at the highest dose level studied. Following multiple doses, robust reductions in plasma (≥64% at 15 mg and ≥78% at ≥50 mg) and cerebrospinal fluid (≥51% at 15 mg and ≥76% at ≥50 mg) Aβ peptides were seen, including prolonged suppression even with a QW dosing regimen. AZD3293 is the only BACE1 inhibitor for which prolonged suppression of plasma Aβ with a QW dosing schedule has been reported. Two Phase III studies of AZD3293 (AMARANTH, NCT02245737; and DAYBREAK-ALZ, NCT02783573) are now ongoing.

β-Amyloid (Aβ) peptides are thought to be critically involved in the etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The aspartyl protease β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) is required for the production of Aβ, and BACE1 inhibition is thus an attractive target for the treatment of AD. We show that verubecestat (MK-8931) is a potent, selective, structurally unique BACE1 inhibitor that reduced plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain concentrations of Aβ40, Aβ42, and sAPPβ (a direct product of BACE1 enzymatic activity) after acute and chronic administration to rats and monkeys. Chronic treatment of rats and monkeys with verubecestat achieved exposures40-fold higher than those being tested in clinical trials in AD patients yet did not elicit many of the adverse effects previously attributed to BACE inhibition, such as reduced nerve myelination, neurodegeneration, altered glucose homeostasis, or hepatotoxicity. Fur hypopigmentation was observed in rabbits and mice but not in monkeys. Single and multiple doses were generally well tolerated and produced reductions in Aβ40, Aβ42, and sAPPβ in the CSF of both healthy human subjects and AD patients. The human data were fit to an amyloid pathway model that provided insight into the Aβ pools affected by BACE1 inhibition and guided the choice of doses for subsequent clinical trials.

In recent years, the growing numbers of patients seeking care for a wide range of psychiatric illnesses in the primary care setting has resulted in an increase in the number of psychotropic medications prescribed. Along with the increased utilization of psychotropic medications, considerable variability is noted in the prescribing patterns of primary care providers and psychiatrists. Because psychiatric patients also suffer from a number of additional medical comorbidities, the increased utilization of psychotropic medications presents an elevated risk of clinically significant drug interactions in these patients. While life-threatening drug interactions are rare, clinically significant drug interactions impacting drug response or appearance of serious adverse drug reactions have been documented and can impact long-term outcomes. Additionally, the impact of genetic variability on the psychotropic drug's pharmacodynamics and/or pharmacokinetics may further complicate drug therapy. Increased awareness of clinically relevant psychotropic drug interactions can aid clinicians to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes in patients in the primary care setting.

Background β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) is associated with neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Emerging evidence indicates that Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may serve as an early clinical biomarker for evaluating pharmacological activity of new drug candidates targeting Aβ production or Aβ clearance. Therefore, it is critical to understand whether intrasubject levels of CSF Aβ are consistent between sampling intervals to determine whether Aβ can be used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for drug candidates. Previous studies have produced seemingly conflicting observations for the intrasubject stability of CSF Aβ levels; we attempt to reconcile these conflicting observations. Methods The current study examined the Aβ levels in CSF collected with various sampling frequencies from three clinical studies conducted in healthy young or elderly subjects at the same investigative site for the purpose of designing future studies. Results The results suggest that CSF sampling frequency and/or sampling volume contributes to intrasubject variability in CSF Aβ levels, and that lowering the CSF sampling frequency may help minimize this effect. Conclusion These results will help guide clinical trial design for Alzheimer's disease therapy.

Objective: To investigate the effects of rifampin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of gepirone and metabo- lites after multiple dosing of both drugs. Methods: 24 subjects completed a randomized crossover study with 2 study phases separated by a washout period of at least 4 weeks. The subjects received multiple dosing of gepirone extended-release (gepirone ER) (20 mg daily for 2 days titrated to 40 mg daily for 5 days) with and without concurrent use of rifampin 600 mg daily. Plasma concentrations of gepirone and two principal metabolites were determined for up to 48 hours after dosing on day 7. Urinary 6 - hydroxycortisol:cortisol ratio was also used to assess the extent of enzyme induction during both study periods. Results: Rifampin significantly decreased the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) of gepirone and 3´-OH-gepirone by 95% and 65%, respectively. The peak concentration (Cmax) values also were reduced by 92% and 58%, respectively. On the other hand, there were minimal changes in AUC and Cmax of 1-PP during concurrent use of rifampin. Gepirone dosing did not change the urinary 6 -hydroxycortisol:cortisol ratio, in contrast to a 4.1-fold increase in the ratio with concurrent use of rifampin. Conclusions: Rifampin significantly decreased the systemic exposure of gepirone and 3´-OH-gepirone. The likely mecha- nism is induction of CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism in the intestine and the liver. Concurrent use of potent CYP3A4 enzyme inducers might lead to significant reduction in pharmacologic effect of gepirone. On the other hand, gepirone does not appear to have CYP3A4 induction or inhibition effects.

Objectives: Evaluate efficacy and safety of the histamine-H 1 antagonist doxepin at doses of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in elderly adults with primary insomnia. Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design was used in this population of elderly adults with primary insomnia (DSM-IV). Each treatment period consisted of 2 poly-somnographic (PSG) assessment nights with a 5- or 12-day drug-free interval between periods. The study was conducted from September 2004 to January 2005. Setting: Sleep laboratories in 11 sleep centers in the United States. Participants: Elderly adults with primary insomnia. Intervention: Doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg. Measurements: Efficacy was assessed using PSG and patient-reported measures. Results: Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned. All 3 doxepin doses produced dose-related significant improvements in PSG-determined wake time during sleep (p

OBJECTIVE The most common ways of assessing adherence to oral antipsychotic medications in research and in clinical practice are self-report and physician report. This prospective study examined the agreement among measures of adherence to oral antipsychotic medications among 52 outpatients with schizophrenia. METHODS Participants were assessed at baseline during a visit to their outpatient clinic and followed for 12 weeks. Adherence was assessed by using subjective measures (self-report and physician report) and objective measures (pill counts conducted in the home, electronic monitoring, and blood plasma concentrations). Electronic monitoring was used as an imperfect standard against which other methods were judged. RESULTS Data from pill counts and from electronic monitoring were strongly correlated (r(k)=.61). Self-report and physicians' ratings of compliance were weakly correlated with pill count and electronic monitoring when compliance scores were examined with rank-order correlations (r(k)=.18-.32). When the sample was dichotomized into adherent and nonadherent groups on the basis of electronic monitoring or pill count (at least 80% adherent), neither physicians nor patients identified adherent behavior (kappa

The effects of supratherapeutic dosages of duloxetine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, on blood pressure and pulse rate were assessed in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 117 healthy women aged 19 to 74 years. Dosages were escalated from 60 mg twice daily (BID) to 200 mg BID over 16 days. Vital signs were monitored at baseline, before morning dosing, and sequentially at steady state. Duloxetine produced increases in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressures, which reached maximums of approximately 12 mm Hg and approximately 7 mm Hg above baseline, respectively, during dosing at 120 mg BID and then stabilized. Supine pulse rate increased gradually with dose, reaching 10 to 12 bpm above baseline after 4 days of dosing at 200 mg BID. Duloxetine caused changes in orthostatic blood pressures and pulse rate that reached plateau values after 3 to 4 days of dosing at 160 mg BID and were generally not associated with subjectively reported orthostatic-related adverse events. All vital signs normalized by 1 to 2 days after study drug discontinuation. Prehypertensive subjects may become hypertensive upon initial duloxetine dosing, but this can be predicted from predose blood pressure. Short-term supratherapeutic duloxetine dosages up to 200 mg BID are not well tolerated but are generally not associated with severe, clinically important adverse events. Overall, the types of adverse events reported in this study were similar to those in other studies of duloxetine in healthy subjects.

A transdermal patch has been developed for the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivastigmine and NAP226-90, and compared drug exposure between patch and capsule administrations. This was an open-label, parallel-group study in Alzheimer's disease patients randomized to receive either capsule (1.5-6 mg Q12H, i.e., 3-12 mg/day) or patch (5-20 cm2) in ascending doses through four 14-day periods. The patch showed lower Cmax (ca. 30% lower at 20 cm2, 19.5 versus 29.3 ng/ml), longer tmax (8.0 versus 1.0 h), and greater AUC (ca. 1.8-fold at 20 cm2, 345 versus 191 ng x h/ml) compared with the 6 mg Q12H capsule dose, with markedly less fluctuation between peak and trough plasma levels (80% at 20 cm2 versus 620% at 1.5 mg Q12H). Plasma butyrylcholinesterase inhibition rose slowly after patch administration, whereas two distinct peaks were seen after capsule administration. Average exposure with the 10 cm2 patch was comparable to the highest capsule dose (6 mg Q12H, i.e., 12 mg/day).

The electrophysiological effects of duloxetine at supratherapeutic exposures were evaluated to ensure compliance with regulatory criteria and to assess the QT prolongation potential.Electrocardiograms were collected in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study that enrolled 117 healthy female subjects aged 19 to 74 years. Duloxetine dosages escalated from 60 mg twice daily to 200 mg twice daily; a single moxifloxacin 400 mg dose was used as a positive control. Data were analyzed using 3 QT interval correction methods: mixed-effect analysis of covariance model with RR interval change from baseline as the covariate, the QT Fridericia's correction method, and the individual QT correction method. Concentrations of duloxetine and its 2 major metabolites were measured.Compared with placebo, the mean change from baseline in QTc decreased with duloxetine 200 mg twice daily. The upper limits of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals for duloxetine vs. placebo were0 msec at each time point by any correction method. No subject had absolute QT Fridericia's correction values445 msec with duloxetine, and the change in QT Fridericia's correction from baseline with duloxetine did not exceed 36 msec. No relationship was detected between QTc change and plasma concentrations of duloxetine or its metabolites even though average duloxetine concentrations ranged to more than 5 times those achieved at therapeutic doses. Moxifloxacin significantly prolonged QTc at all time points, regardless of correction method.Duloxetine does not affect ventricular repolarization as assessed by both mean changes and outliers in QT corrected by any method.

Hypofunction of NMDA receptors has been implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia. NMDA receptor neurotransmission can be enhanced through inhibition of glycine reuptake by the glycine transporter type 1 (GlyT1). The primary objective of these studies was to explore the relationship between plasma exposure and glycine cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations following administration of bitopertin and RG7118 in healthy volunteers. The bitopertin study comprised four dose levels (3, 10, 30 and 60 mg) administered once daily for 10 days. In the RG7118 study, placebo, 15 or 30 mg RG7118 was administered once daily for 28 days. CSF samples were taken on day −2 and day 10, and day −1 and day 26 for bitopertin and RG7118, respectively. Twenty-two and 24 subjects participated in the bitopertin and RG7118 study, respectively. In the bitopertin study, CSF glycine concentrations showed a dose-dependent increase from baseline to day 10. The geometric mean ratios (coefficient of variation) of AUC0–12 h on day 10 over baseline were 1.3 (17 %), 1.3 (49 %), 1.7 (18 %) and 2.3 (14 %) after 3, 10, 30 and 60 mg, respectively. In the RG7118 study, the geometric mean ratio of glycine concentration (CV) on day 26 at 6 h post-dose over time-matched baseline was approx. 1.9 (24 and 15 %) for 15 and 30 mg. The mechanism of action of bitopertin and RG7118, i.e. inhibition of glycine reuptake in the brain, was confirmed. The maximal increase observed in healthy volunteers was similar to the one observed in animals showing the good translatability of this biomarker.

BACE1 is a key protease controlling the formation of amyloid β, a peptide hypothesized to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Therefore, the development of potent and selective inhibitors of BACE1 has been a focus of many drug discovery efforts in academia and industry. Herein, we report the nonclinical and early clinical development of LY2886721, a BACE1 active site inhibitor that reached phase 2 clinical trials in AD. LY2886721 has high selectivity against key off-target proteases, which efficiently translatesin vitroactivity into robustin vivoamyloid β lowering in nonclinical animal models. Similar potent and persistent amyloid β lowering was observed in plasma and lumbar CSF when single and multiple doses of LY2886721 were administered to healthy human subjects. Collectively, these data add support for BACE1 inhibition as an effective means of amyloid lowering and as an attractive target for potential disease modification therapy in AD.

Drug-drug interactions continue to be underappreciated and misunderstood by most clinicians. Although life-threatening drug interactions are rare, serious clinical consequences, including altered drug response, poor tolerability with reduced medication adherence, and increased costs for care tied to the increased complexity of therapy, are fairly commonplace. Drug interactions may be further complicated by genetic differences in metabolic capacity. Patients who routinely require long-term treatment for depression have an increased likelihood of experiencing a drug-drug interaction since they will take over-the-counter and prescription medications for intercurrent and/or co-morbid illness. Antidepressants can be the object of drug interactions when their metabolic pathways are affected by other substances, or they can precipitate interactions by inhibiting enzyme pathways. Clinicians can improve the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with a depressive disorder by considering the possibility of drug-drug interactions both before prescribing a specific antidepressant and while monitoring for response, adverse effects and patient compliance.

Vortioxetine is an antidepressant with multimodal activity which has shown efficacy in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients in six of ten short-term, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (completed end 2012).We performed meta-regression analyses to indirectly compare vortioxetine to seven marketed antidepressants with different mechanisms of action. To ensure study comparability, only experimental drug and placebo arms from placebo-controlled registration studies were included in primary analyses. The main outcomes were efficacy (standardized mean difference in change from baseline to 2 months on primary endpoint [MADRS/HAM-D]), and tolerability (withdrawal rate due to adverse events).For efficacy, estimates of treatment effect (negative estimates favor vortioxetine) for vortioxetine versus comparators were: agomelatine, -0.16 (p = 0.11); desvenlafaxine, 0.03 (p = 0.80); duloxetine, 0.09 (p = 0.42); escitalopram, -0.05 (p = 0.70); sertraline, -0.04 (p = 0.83); venlafaxine IR/XR, 0.12 (p = 0.33); and vilazodone, -0.25 (p = 0.11). For tolerability, all but one combination was numerically in favor of vortioxetine (odds ratio1), although not all differences were statistically significant: agomelatine, 1.77 (p = 0.03); desvenlafaxine, 0.58 (p = 0.04); duloxetine, 0.75 (p = 0.26); escitalopram, 0.67 (p = 0.28); sertraline, 0.30 (p = 0.01); venlafaxine, 0.47 (p = 0.01); and vilazodone, 0.64 (p = 0.18). Sensitivity analyses did not significantly alter antidepressant effect estimates or relative ranking.These meta-regression data show that vortioxetine offers a comparable or favorable combination of efficacy (measured by MADRS/HAM-D) and tolerability (measured by withdrawal rate due to adverse events) versus other antidepressants in registration studies in MDD. Alternative methods like mixed-treatment comparison and inclusion of all randomized studies and active reference arms may provide complementary information to this analysis (more evidence but also more heterogeneity). Key messages: Indirect comparisons based on registration studies allow a useful comparison between a recently approved antidepressant and an approved drug. Vortioxetine offers a comparable or favorable combination of efficacy (measured by MADRS/HAM-D assessments) and tolerability (measured by withdrawal rate due to adverse events) versus other antidepressants in registration studies in MDD.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate potential drug-drug interactions with the atypical antipsychotic lurasidone. METHODS: Seven phase I studies were conducted to investigate the effects of repeated dosing of ketoconazole, diltiazem, rifampin, or lithium on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single oral doses of lurasidone, or the effects of repeated dosing of lurasidone on the PK of digoxin, midazolam, or the oral contraceptive norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol. Two 6-week, phase III studies included evaluation of the potential for interaction between lurasidone and lithium or valproate. Maximum serum or plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Concomitant ketoconazole administration resulted in a 6.8-fold increase in lurasidone Cmax and a 9.3-fold increase in lurasidone AUC; concomitant diltiazem administration resulted in 2.1- and 2.2-fold increases, respectively. Rifampin decreased lurasidone Cmax and AUC (one-seventh and one-fifth of lurasidone alone, respectively). Steady-state dosing with lurasidone increased Cmax and AUC0-24 (AUC from time 0 to 24 h postdose) of digoxin by 9% and 13%, respectively, and of midazolam by 21% and 44%, respectively. There were no significant interactions between lurasidone and lithium, valproate, ethinyl estradiol, or norelgestromin (the major active metabolite of norgestimate). CONCLUSIONS: Lurasidone PK is altered by strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors or inducers, and coadministration is contraindicated; whereas moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors have less effect, and lurasidone dosage restrictions are recommended. No dose adjustment for lurasidone is needed when administered with lithium or valproate. Dose adjustment is not required for lithium, valproate, digoxin (a P-glycoprotein substrate), or midazolam or oral contraceptives (CYP3A4 substrates) when coadministered with lurasidone.

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder characterized by cognitive deficits, and positive and negative symptoms. The development of effective pharmacological compounds for the treatment of schizophrenia has proven challenging and costly, with many compounds failing during clinical trials. Many failures occur due to disease heterogeneity and lack of predictive preclinical models and biomarkers that readily translate to humans during early characterization of novel antipsychotic compounds. Traditional early-phase trials consist of single- or multiple-dose designs aimed at determining the safety and tolerability of an investigational compound in healthy volunteers. However, by incorporating a translational approach employing methodologies derived from preclinical studies, such as EEG measures and imaging, into the traditional Phase I program, critical information regarding a compound’s dose–response effects on pharmacodynamic biomarkers can be acquired. Furthermore, combined with the use of patients with stable schizophrenia in early-phase clinical trials, significant ‘de-risking’ and more confident ‘go/no-go’ decisions are possible.

The authors report the CYP2D6 inhibitory effects of fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine in an open-label, multiple-dose, crossover design. Twelve CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers were phenotyped, using the dextromethorphan/dextrorphan (DM/DX) urinary ratio, before and after administration of fluoxetine 60 mg (loading dose strategy), paroxetine 20 mg, sertraline 100 mg, and venlafaxine 150 mg. Paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine sequences were randomized with 2-week washouts between treatments; fluoxetine was the last antidepressant (AD) administered. Comparing within groups, baseline DM/DX ratios (0.017) were significantly lower than DM/DX ratios after treatment (DM/DXAD) with fluoxetine (0.313, p < 0.0001) and paroxetine (0.601, p < 0.0001) but not for sertraline (0.026, p = 0.066) or venlafaxine (0.023, p = 0.485). Between groups, DM/DXAD ratios were significantly higher for fluoxetine and paroxetine compared to sertraline and venlafaxine. No differences between DM/DXAD ratios were found for fluoxetine and paroxetine although more subjects phenocopied to PM status after receiving the latter (42% vs. 83%; chi 2 = 4.44, p = 0.049, df = 1). Similarly, no differences between DM/DXAD ratios were found for sertraline and venlafaxine. Of note, the DM/DXAD for 1 subject was much lower after treatment with paroxetine (0.058) compared to fluoxetine (0.490), while another subject exhibited a much lower ratio after treatment with fluoxetine (0.095) compared to paroxetine (0.397). Significant correlations between AD plasma concentration and DM/DXAD were found for paroxetine (r2 = 0.404, p = 0.026) and sertraline (r2 = 0.64, p = 0.002) but not fluoxetine or venlafaxine. In addition, DM/DXAD correlated with baseline isoenzyme activity for paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine groups. These results demonstrate the potent, but variable, CYP2D6 inhibition of fluoxetine and paroxetine compared to sertraline and venlafaxine. CYP2D6 inhibition may be related, in part, to dose, plasma concentration, and baseline isoenzyme activity, and these correlations merit further investigation.

Improving outcomes for patients with depression involves selecting the best possible drug therapy. Considerations relevant to drug product selection include: 1) pharmacokinetic issues such as half-life and time to steady-state, and protein binding; 2) pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions; and 3) drug metabolism-related drug interactions. A comparison of selected antidepressants with an emphasis on venlafaxine's similarities and differences is presented. Based on these parameters, selecting an antidepressant medication, such as venlafaxine, that has a low potential for drug interactions at the Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system, and is easy to monitor and dose, facilitate successful treatment of patients. Venlafaxine has been evaluated in clinical studies that demonstrate low to negligible drug interaction potential at CYP2D6, CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4. Its short half-life and time to steady-state, when coupled with the extended release characteristics of the preferred dosage formulation allow for once daily dosing and rapid attainment of therapeutic effects. The CYP3A4 system is involved in both first-pass metabolism and systemic clearance of medications. Drug interactions at this isoenzyme have proven to be of high clinical relevance ranging from cardiovascular toxicity and death with commonly used drugs such as cisapride, to subtherapeutic levels of cyclosporine or protease inhibitors leading to transplant rejection or HIV relapse. Reasons for the under detection and reporting of drug interaction mediated adverse events include healthcare system structure, the poor return to follow up of non-adherent patients, the need for greater education and training of clinicians to recognize drug-related adverse events, and the reluctance of patients to spontaneously communicate about the unpleasant effects of their medication.

Selection of an antidepressant is influenced by many factors, including the patient's current drug regimen and the drug's potential for drug-drug interactions. Many psychotropic agents are known to be involved in drug-drug interactions because they are metabolized by various cytochrome pigment 450 (CYP) isoenzymes. In vitro testing with human hepatic microsomal preparations and monoclonal antibody techniques has allowed for the identification and investigation of many of these isoenzymes. Also, screening of substrates (both drug and probe) at the level of the various enzymes expressed in the human liver has allowed for the development of models that predict the risk for drug-drug interactions in vivo. Antidepressants are metabolized by and are competitive inhibitors of several isoenzymes: CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP3A3/4, CYP2C8/9, CYP2C19, and others. Of these, CYP2D6 has been the most thoroughly investigated and is the most extensively characterized, whereas CYP3A3/4 are more abundant and play a major role in the metabolism of many commonly used drugs. CYP2D6, but not CYP3A3/4, is subject to genetic polymorphism, which has been identified through the administration of a probe drug (sparteine, debrisoquin, or dextromethorphan). This analysis allows for the determination of an individual's "metabolizer status." This article discusses the CYP isoenzyme system in general terms and presents selected in vitro information that has been used to determine the likelihood of in vivo drug-drug interactions with various antidepressants. Of the marketed antidepressants, venlafaxine seems to have one of the most favorable drug-interaction profiles, and data specific to it are highlighted. In vitro and in vivo data indicate that venlafaxine either does not significantly inhibit or weakly inhibits the activity of isoenzymes CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP1A2, or CYP3A3/4.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and venlafaxine display the following rank order of in vitro potency against the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme CYP2D6 as measured by their inhibition sparteine and/or dextromethorphan metabolism: paroxetine > fluoxetine identical to norfluoxetine > or = sertraline > or = fluvoxamine > venlafaxine. On this basis, paroxetine would appear to have the greatest and fluvoxamine and venlafaxine the least potential for drug interactions with CYP2D6-dependent drugs. In vivo, inhibitory potency is affected by the plasma concentration of the free (unbound) drug, a potentially important consideration since many CYP2D6-metabolised drugs exhibit nonlinear (saturable) kinetics, and by the presence of metabolites, which might accumulate and interact with the CYP system. Under steady-state conditions, paroxetine and fluoxetine are approximately clinically equipotent inhibitors of CYP2D6 in vivo (as determined through their effects on desipramine metabolism); sertraline, in contrast, shows lower steady-state plasma concentrations than fluoxetine and, hence, a less pronounced inhibition of CYP2D6. Of the drugs that are metabolised by CYP2D6, secondary amine tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics (e.g. phenothiazines, and risperidone), codeine, some antiarrhythmics (e.g. flecainide) and beta-blockers form the focus of clinical attention with regard to their potential interactions with the SSRIs. Coadministration of desipramine and fluoxetine (20 mg/day) at steady-state produced an approximately 4-fold elevation in peak plasma desipramine concentrations, while the long half-life of the active metabolite norfluoxetine was responsible for a significant and long lasting (approximately 3 weeks) elevation of plasma desipramine concentrations after discontinuation of fluoxetine. Similarly, coadministration of desipramine with paroxetine produced an approximately 3-fold increase in plasma desipramine concentration. In contrast, coadministration of desipramine and sertraline (50 mg/day) for 4 weeks resulted in a considerably more modest (approximately 30%) elevation in plasma desipramine concentrations. Coadministration of fluoxetine (60 mg/day, as a loading dose) [equivalent to serum concentrations obtained with 20 mg/day at steady-state] with imipramine or desipramine resulted in approximately 3- to 4-fold increases in plasma area under the curve (AUC) values for both imipramine and desipramine (illustrating a significant drug interaction potential at multiple isoenzymes). Consistent with its minimal in vitro effect on CYP2D6, fluvoxamine shows minimal in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction with desipramine, but does interact with imipramine (approximately 3- to 4-fold increase in AUC) through inhibition of CYP3A3/4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C19. Thus, the extent of the in vivo interaction between the SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants mirrors to a large extent their in vitro inhibitory potencies against CYP2D6 and other isoenzyme systems, especially if one takes into account pharmacokinetic factors.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of prandial status and caloric and fat composition of meals on the pharmacokinetics of lurasidone.Two randomized, open-label, crossover studies were conducted in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Study 1 (n = 16) evaluated the effect of fasting and three meal types (100 kcal/medium fat, 200 kcal/medium fat, and 800-1000 kcal/high fat), and Study 2 (n = 26) evaluated the effect of fasting and five meal types (350 kcal/high fat, 500 kcal/low fat, 500 kcal/high fat, 800-1000 kcal/low fat, and 800-1000 kcal/high fat) on the bioavailability of lurasidone. Subjects received lurasidone 120 mg once daily. Maximum serum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the serum concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-tau ) were determined on Day 5 for each meal type.In Study 1, the geometric mean Cmax in the fasted state was 56.7 ng/mL compared with 123.0 ng/mL for the 800- to 1000-kcal meal; mean AUC0-tau was 360.0 versus 752.4 ng·h/mL (both p 0.001). Lurasidone exposure following meals containing 100 and 200 kcal was substantially lower than with meals containing 800-1000 kcal. In Study 2, the geometric mean Cmax was 52.9 ng/mL in the fasted state, 161 ng/mL for the 350-kcal/high-fat meal, 135 ng/mL for the 500-kcal/high-fat meal, and 131 ng/mL for the 800- to 1000-kcal/high-fat meal; mean AUC0-tau was 390, 743, 727, and 769 ng·h/mL, respectively. For all comparisons, the 90% confidence interval of the fed to fasted ratios indicated nonequivalence. Lurasidone exposure was similar following meals containing 350-1000 kcal and was independent of fat content.Lurasidone should be administered with food-at least 350 kcal-to ensure maximum exposure.

ABT-384 is a potent, selective inhibitor of 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (HSD-1). One milligram of ABT-384 daily fully inhibited hepatic HSD-1. Establishing the dose that fully inhibits central nervous system (CNS) HSD-1 would enable definitive clinical studies in potential CNS indications. [9,11,12,12-(2)H4] cortisol (D4 cortisol), a stable labeled tracer, was used to characterize HSD-1 inhibition by ABT-384. D4 cortisol and its products were measured in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of healthy male volunteers during D4 cortisol infusions, for up to 40 h after five daily doses of 1-50 mg ABT-384. Similar procedures were conducted in control subjects who received no ABT-384. Peripheral HSD-1 inhibition was calculated from plasma levels of D4 cortisol and its products. CNS HSD-1 inhibition was characterized from plasma and CSF levels of D4 cortisol and its products. ABT-384 regimens ≥2 mg daily maintained peripheral HSD-1 inhibition ≥88%. ABT-384 1 mg daily maintained peripheral HSD-1 inhibition ≥81%. No CNS formation of D3 cortisol (the mass-labeled product of HSD-1) was detected following ABT-384 ≥2 mg daily, indicating full CNS HSD-1 inhibition by these regimens. Partial CNS HSD-1 inhibition was associated with 1 mg ABT-384 daily. CNS HSD-1 inhibition was characterized by strong hysteresis and increased with maximum post-dose plasma concentration of ABT-384 and its active metabolites. ABT-384 has a wide potential therapeutic window for potential indications including Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder. Stable labeled substrates may be viable tools for measuring CNS effect during new drug development for other enzyme targets.

Org 26576 acts by modulating ionotropic AMPA-type glutamate receptors to enhance glutamatergic neurotransmission. The aim of this Phase 1b study ( N=54) was to explore safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of Org 26576 in depressed patients. Part I ( N=24) evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and optimal titration schedule in a multiple rising dose paradigm (range 100 mg BID to 600 mg BID); Part II ( N=30) utilized a parallel groups design (100 mg BID, 400 mg BID, placebo) to examine all endpoints over a 28-day dosing period. Based on the number of moderate intensity adverse events reported at the 600 mg BID dose level, the MTD established in Part I was 450 mg BID. Symptomatic improvement as measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was numerically greater in the Org 26576 groups than in the placebo group in both study parts. In Part II, the 400 mg BID dose was associated with improvements in executive functioning and speed of processing cognitive tests. Org 26576 was also associated with growth hormone increases and cortisol decreases at the end of treatment but did not influence prolactin or brain-derived neurotrophic factor. The quantitative electroencephalogram index Antidepressant Treatment Response at Week 1 was able to significantly predict symptomatic response at endpoint in the active treatment group, as was early improvement in social acuity. Overall, Org 26576 demonstrated good tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties in depressed patients, and pharmacodynamic endpoints suggested that it may show promise in future well-controlled, adequately powered proof of concept trials.

Background A key challenge to dose selection in early central nervous system (CNS) clinical drug development is that patient tolerability profiles often differ from those of healthy volunteers (HVs), yet HVs are the modal population for determining doses to be investigated in phase II trials. Without clear tolerability data from the target patient population, first efficacy trials may include doses that are either too high or too low, creating undue risk for study participants and the development program overall. Bridging trials address this challenge by carefully investigating safety and tolerability in the target population prior to full-scale proof-of-concept trials. Objective Org 26576 is an alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor positive allosteric modulator that acts by modulating ionotropic AMPA-type glutamate receptors to enhance glutamatergic neurotransmission. In preparation for phase II efficacy trials in major depressive disorder (MDD), two separate phase I trials were conducted to evaluate safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in HVs and in the target patient population. Methods Both trials were randomized and placebo controlled, and included multiple rising-dose cohorts (HV range 100–400 mg bid; MDD range 100–600mg bid). HVs (n = 36) and patients with MDD (n = 54) were dosed under similarly controlled conditions in an inpatient facility, HVs for up to 14 days and MDD patients for up to 28 days. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics were assessed frequently. Results Despite comparable pharmacokinetic profiles, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in depressed patients was 450 mg bid, twice the MTD established in HVs. No clinically relevant safety issues associated with Org 26576 were noted. Conclusion This article presents safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data from two different populations examined under similar dosing conditions. The important implications of such bridging work in phase II dose selection are discussed, as are study design and data interpretation challenges.

ELND005 (scyllo-inositol), an endogenous inositol stereoisomer, is being investigated as an oral treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Pharmacokinetics of ELND005 in plasma, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and brain was characterized in healthy young subjects. Eight men received 2000 mg ELND005 every 12 hours for 10 days. Plasma and CSF samples were collected at predetermined time points; ELND005 and amyloid-beta (Aβ) fragments were measured by validated bioanalytical methods. Brain ELND005 levels, estimated by (1) H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) scans were obtained from gray/white matter voxels at baseline and Day 8. ELND005 was well-tolerated during the study. During the apparent steady state, ELND005 plasma levels rapidly peaked at 39.8 µg/mL and decreased to an average trough concentration of 10.6 µg/mL at the end of the 12-hour dosing regimen. In contrast, CSF drug levels slowly peaked at 13.7 µg/mL and remained near the same level with average trough concentrations of 12.4 µg/mL. At Day 8, Brain ELND005 concentrations increased by 58-76% compared to baseline levels. The CSF concentrations achieved in this study were similar to those associated with efficacy in transgenic models of AD. No changes were detected in plasma and CSF levels of Aβ fragments.

To assess persistence on SSRIs (most prescribed antidepressants) and associated healthcare costs in a naturalistic setting.For this retrospective cohort study based on a US reimbursement claims database, all adults with a claim for a SSRI (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine or sertraline) related to a diagnosis of depression were included. Patients should have had no previous reimbursement for any antidepressant within the previous 6 months. Non-persistence was defined as failing to renew prescription within 30 days in the 6-month period after the index date.In the 45,481 patients included, persistence decreased from 95.5% at 1 month, to 52.6% at 2 months, 37.6% at 3 months and 18.9% at 6 months. Among factors associated with higher 6-month persistence were age 18-34 years, physician's specialty, treatment with escitalopram, absence of abuse history and psychotropic prescription history. During the 6-month after index date, healthcare costs tended to be higher in non-persistent than in persistent patients although not significantly (RR=1.05, adjusted p=0.055).Despite some limitations associated with the use of computerized administrative claims data (residual unmeasured confounding), these results highlight a generally low persistence rate at 6 months. Special attention should be given to persistence on treatment, with consideration of potential antidepressant impact.