Search

Background: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (RHC) with D3 resection, similar to complete mesocolic excision, is an oncologically satisfying procedure; however, it remains controversial in elderly patients. There are no reports of the procedure for tumors fed by middle colic vessels because it is a difficult procedure. We evaluated the feasibility and oncological outcomes of the procedure in elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 336 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with D3 resection for Stage I–III ascending and transverse colon cancer between 2010 and 2021. Patients were divided into the EP (age ≥ 75 years) and nEP (age < 75 years) groups, and short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed using propensity score matching. Results: The median follow-up period was 60.7 months. After matching, we enrolled 129 patients. The surgery time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complication rate, number of harvested lymph nodes, and recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the groups; however, the adjuvant chemotherapy rate was significantly lower in the EP group. The EP group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (p < 0.01) than the nEP group; however, the cancer-specific (p = 0.15) and recurrence-free (p = 0.36) survivals did not differ significantly from those in the nEP group. In multivariate analyses, age ≥ 75 years, ASA ≥ 3, and pT4 were independent prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.02, < 0.01, < 0.01, respectively); however, only pT4 was an independent prognostic factor for CSS and RFS (p < 0.01 for both). Conclusions: This procedure offers safe, feasible, and satisfactory oncological outcomes for elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials support the safety of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer (RSCC). Few studies, however, examine the learning curve of this operation and its impact on safety during an implementation period. We aim to evaluate the learning curve and safety of the implementation of laparoscopic CME with intracorporeal anastomosis for RSCC. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for RSCC between January 2016 and June 2023 were included. Clinical, perioperative, and histopathological variables were collected. Correlation and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses between the operating time and case number were performed. Breakpoints of the learning curve were estimated using the broken-line model. CME and conventional laparoscopic right colectomy outcomes were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). Results: Two hundred and ninety patients underwent laparoscopic right colectomy during study period. One hundred and eight met inclusion criteria. After PSM, 56 non-CME and 28 CME patients were compared. CME group had a non-statistically significant tendency to a longer operating time (201 versus 195 min; p = 0.657) and a shorter hospital stay (3 versus 4 days; p = 0.279). No significant differences were found in total complication rates or their profile. Correlation analysis identified a significant trend toward operating time reduction with increasing case numbers (Pearson correlation coefficient = − 0.624; p = 0.001). According to the CUSUM analysis, an institutional learning curve was deemed completed after 13 cases and the broken-line model identified three phases: learning (1–6 cases), consolidation (7–13 cases), and mastery (after 13 cases). Conclusion: The learning curve of laparoscopic CME for RSCC can be achieved after 13 cases in centers with experience in advanced laparoscopic surgery and surgeons with familiarity with this technique. Its implementation within this setting seems to be as safe as performing a conventional right colectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The present study examined the incidence of incisional hernia by comparing patients from whom a specimen was extracted either through a Pfannenstiel incision (PI) with an intracorporeal anastomosis or via a midline incision (MI) with an extracorporeal anastomosis. Methods: The records of 370 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic or robotically-assisted colectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Regardless of the clinical symptoms, incisional hernia was objectively diagnosed based on abdominal computed tomography findings. The surgical outcomes and incisional hernia incidence were retrospectively compared between the groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance background differences between the groups. Results: Eighty-seven and 283 patients were in the PI group and MI group, respectively. After PSM, 71 patients were selected from each group. The median observation time was 572 and 1110 days in the PI and MI group, respectively. The PI group had no incidence of incisional hernia whereas the MI group had a 14% incidence, demonstrating that the former had significantly fewer incisional hernias (p=0.0014). The median interval from surgery to incisional hernia development was 295 days. The PI with an intracorporeal anastomosis was not associated with an increased complication rate. Conclusions: The PI was preferable for intraoperative specimen extraction owing to the low, associated incidence of incisional hernia.

Although colorectal cancer frequently invades adjacent organs, colon-to-colon invasion is rarely observed, and colo-colonic fistula formation due to colorectal cancer is uncommon. Here we report a case of preoperative diagnosis of cecal cancer that has invaded the transverse colon. A 69-year-old woman presented with diarrhea and a palpable mass in the lower right abdomen. After being diagnosed with double cancer involving the cecum and transverse colon at a previous hospital, she was referred to our hospital. CT scans revealed enhanced mass-like wall thickening in both the cecum and transverse colon, with 3D-CT suggesting a cecal tumor invading the transverse colon. The accurate preoperative diagnosis and prediction of fistula formation led us to perform curative en bloc resection using laparoscopic surgery. The resected specimen contained an ulcerated moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 6.0 cm × 4.5 cm in the cecum. Additionally, a fistula originating from the cecal cancer and communicating with the transverse colon was identified. The tumor was classified as stage IIIC (T4b, N1, M0). When multiple masses are identified in the colon, it is important to consider the possibility of the primary tumor invading neighboring organs and the potential for fistula formation.

Endoscopic tattooing with India ink is a common practice before the laparoscopic resection of polyps/tumours. Sometimes, due to inadvertent intramuscular instead of submucosal injection, it may lead to peritoneal spillage precluding the laparoscopic approach and warrant open resection. There are a few reports of post-operative abdominal sepsis. We report a case where spillage led to open conversion due to poor visibility and post-operative abdominal sepsis necessitating a change of antibiotics and prolonged hospital stay. Surgeons should be aware of these complications from this apparently innocuous step. We also did a review of the literature to see how this can be prevented and what alternative approaches have been developed.

Background: Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) have emerged to enhance surgical outcomes and decrease expenses. However, these are still opposed by the traditional measures in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma Objectives: This study aimed to compare laparoscopic versus open left-side cancer colon resection under the guidelines of ERP. Subjects and methods: sixty-two patients with left side cancer colon were divided into two equal groups: group (A) received laparoscopic colectomy (LC) and group (B) received open colectomy (OC). ERP were applied. Follow-up was planned for 1 month for the early outcomes. Results: the mean age of the included subjects was 49.2 ± 6.23 and 47.8 ± 6.9 years in LC and OC groups respectively. There was a significantly less hospital stay in LC group when compared with OC group (P=0.001). Significantly more pain was reported in OC Group (P=0.001%). There was a significant difference regarding postoperative complications where Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), ileus, wound infection and wound dehiscence were statistically higher in OC group when compared with patients who received LC (P=0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic left-sided colectomy, when establishing ERP, is safer, more dependable, easier to use, and more appropriate than open left-sided colon cancer surgery--especially when performed by skilled surgeons with fewer postoperative problems and shorter hospital stays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Indications for combined colon surgery together with other procedures include oncologic multivisceral resections and abdominal trauma. It is unclear if combining minimally invasive (MI) colon surgery with unrelated other procedures increases the risk for complications. Patients and Methods: The surgical database from two institutions during a 10-year period was queried for combined colon surgeries together with other interventions. All open cases, combined cases performed for one pathology and MI colectomies together with a minor procedure, were excluded. Results: Median age of the 6 men and 7 women was 64.4 (range 42.7–75.4) years. Colon surgeries included right (5), sigmoid (4) transverse (1) colectomies, rectum resection (1), rectopexy (1), and colostomy reversal (1) with indications of colorectal cancer (5), diverticulitis (3), benign ileocecal mass (1), colonic volvulus (3) and rectal prolapse (1). Second procedures included two splenectomies (sarcoidosis, ITP), paraesophageal hernia repairs (4), right diaphragmatic repairs [eventration (2) and Morgagni type hernia]; cholecystectomies (2), appendectomy (acute appendicitis), duodenal wedge resection (carcinoid), reversal of a gastric bypass (Roux limb stricture) one each. Cases were done laparoscopically (7) and robotic assisted (6). In most cases only 4 trocars were used. Median OR time was 4.3 (range 2.5 to 6.6) hours. No anastomotic breakdown was observed. Conclusions: Combining MI colectomy and other major abdominal surgeries can be safely done and in this series did not increase morbidity or mortality but avoids a second operation. Patient selection seems important and port placement may need to be altered to achieve good exposure for both procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although laparoscopy has demonstrated growing applications for either primary colorectal resections or reoperations, no standardized criteria for implementing laparoscopy in revisional surgery have been reported. This study analyzes a single‐center series of major complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery, undergoing laparoscopic (LR), or open reoperations in compliance with a hemodynamics‐based institutional management. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzes a series of consecutive patients who primarily underwent either laparoscopic left colectomy or low anterior resection in a tertiary referral center between 2016 and 2021. Major complications requiring reoperation (MCR) were managed through an interdisciplinary protocol and submitted to reoperation according to patient hemodynamics and intra‐abdominal contamination. A cohort analysis primarily assessed treatment failure rates (i.e., 90‐day mortality and need for further surgery), while postoperative morbidity was secondarily examined. Results: Out of 1137 laparoscopic colorectal resections, 497 patients met eligibility criteria, while 45 (9.1%) developed MCRs were managed according to the standardized interdisciplinary protocol. Revisional surgery was performed through either LR (66.7%) or (33.3%). Treatment failure was 13.3% overall, including additional surgery (11.1%) and 90‐day mortality (6.6%) after reoperation. In both overall and anastomotic leak‐specific MCRs, relaparoscopy resulted in minimized length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, and intensity of care. Conclusions: Relaparoscopy for MCR preserves clinical benefits related to minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Further studies should investigate applicative determinants and impediments related to the center volume. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic tattooing with India ink is a common practice before the laparoscopic resection of polyps/ tumours. Sometimes, due to inadvertent intramuscular instead of submucosal injection, it may lead to peritoneal spillage precluding the laparoscopic approach and warrant open resection. There are a few reports of post‑operative abdominal sepsis. We report a case where spillage led to open conversion due to poor visibility and post‑operative abdominal sepsis necessitating a change of antibiotics and prolonged hospital stay. Surgeons should be aware of these complications from this apparently innocuous step. We also did a review of the literature to see how this can be prevented and what alternative approaches have been developed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: Intestinal malrotation (IM) often remains undetected until adulthood, being discovered during testing or surgery for other comorbidities. Preoperative understanding of this anatomical abnormality is crucial. Case Report: An 80-year-old woman presented with cecal cancer. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) revealed that the cecum was located at the midline of the abdominal cavity, the duodenum did not cross the midline, and the ileocolic vein ran to the left. Clinically diagnosed with stage IVc cecal cancer complicated by IM, the patient underwent laparoscopic surgery. The ascending colon and cecum were not fixed to the retroperitoneum. The duodenum lacked the second, third, and fourth portions and the small bowel was distributed on the left and right sides of the abdominal cavity. Adhesions had shortened the mesentery, which were released close to their normal positions. Conclusion: Although laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in terms of securing the field of view in a narrow space, providing a magnifying effect, and minimal invasiveness, it has a limited field of view and is inferior in terms of grasping the overall anatomy, which may be disadvantageous in cases of anatomical abnormalities. Colorectal cancer with IM is rare; however, the rate of preoperative diagnosis seems to be increasing thanks to improvements in diagnostic imaging, such as three-dimensional CT scans. In this study, we also reviewed 49 cases of colorectal cancer associated with IM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Numerous factors can influence bowel movement recovery and anastomotic healing in colorectal surgery, and poor healing can lead to severe complications and increased medical expenses. Collagen patch cover (CPC) is a promising biomaterial that has been demonstrated to be safe in animal models and has been successfully applied in various surgical procedures in humans. This study. Methods A retrospective review of medical records from July 2020 to June 2022 was conducted to identify consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Patients who received CPC at the anastomotic site were assigned to the collagen group, whereas those who did not receive CPC were assigned to the control group. Results Data from 241 patients (collagen group, 109; control group, 132) were analyzed. Relative to the control group, the collagen group exhibited a faster recovery of bowel function, including an earlier onset of first flatus (2.93 days vs. 3.43 days, p

Background: Numerous factors can influence bowel movement recovery and anastomotic healing in colorectal surgery, and poor healing can lead to severe complications and increased medical expenses. Collagen patch cover (CPC) is a promising biomaterial that has been demonstrated to be safe in animal models and has been successfully applied in various surgical procedures in humans. This study. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records from July 2020 to June 2022 was conducted to identify consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy. Patients who received CPC at the anastomotic site were assigned to the collagen group, whereas those who did not receive CPC were assigned to the control group. Results: Data from 241 patients (collagen group, 109; control group, 132) were analyzed. Relative to the control group, the collagen group exhibited a faster recovery of bowel function, including an earlier onset of first flatus (2.93 days vs. 3.43 days, p < 0.01), first defecation (3.73 days vs. 4.18 days, p = 0.01), and oral intake (4.30 days vs. 4.68 days, p = 0.04). CPC use was also associated with lower use of postoperative intravenous analgesics. The complication rates in the two groups did not differ significantly. Conclusions: CPCs can be safely and easily applied to the anastomotic site during laparoscopic colectomy, and can accelerate bowel movement recovery. Further studies on the effectiveness of CPCs in colorectal surgery involving larger sample sizes are required. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT05831956 (26/04/2023). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical high dependency (SHD) allows for intermediate care provision between general ward (GW) and intensive care unit (ICU) for surgical patients but no universally accepted admission criteria exists. Unnecessary SHD admissions should be minimized to limit resource wastage and maintain spare critical care capacity. This study evaluates the utility of SHD admissions following elective laparoscopic colectomy by comparing post-operative outcomes and interventions performed between SHD and GW patients. Methodology: A retrospective review of all colorectal cancer patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy in our institution between January 2019 and December 2021 was conducted. Patients converted to open surgery or admitted to IC post-operatively were excluded. Peri-operative parameters and outcomes between patients admitted to GW and SHD post-operatively were evaluated. Results: The cohort comprised 393 patients. There were 153 patients (38.93%) who required SHD admission. SHD patients had higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, body mass index, age and intra-operative blood loss. Majority of post-operative morbidity were minor (Clavien–Dindo II or lower) in both groups and the interventions required were safely instituted in both SHD and GW. None of the patients in the cohort required inotropic or ventilatory support in the SHD. Conclusions: GW patients were "healthier" but post-operative morbidity and interventions required were similar to the SHD group. Nonetheless, treatment delays, absence of continuous monitoring, and decreased nurse-to-patient ratio may be significant for patients with limited physiological reserves. Further studies should evaluate safety and cost-effectiveness of managing high risk surgical patients in GW using continuous remote vital signs monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resection of multiple organ metastasis of breast cancer is rare. We experienced a case of breast cancer with resection of metachronous metastases to the colon and heart. The case was a 76-year-old woman with a complaint of epigastric pain. Nineteen years ago, she had undergone radical mastectomy for right breast cancer. Endoscopic examination revealed a stenosis in the transverse colon which was diagnosed by a biopsy specimen as metastasis from breast cancer. Enhanced CT scan revealed a mass of the right ventricle which was suspected to be cardiac metastasis. We decided on surgical resection initially, and performed laparoscopy assisted colectomy for resection of the transverse colon in September 2021. Pathological diagnosis was colonic metastasis from breast cancer. After discharge, she underwent adjuvant therapy. Because the cardiac tumor had grown, cardiac tumor was resected at another hospital in January 2022. Pathological diagnosis was cardiac metastasis from breast cancer. She had no recurrence for 14 months after colectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the experience in laparoscopic resective colorectal surgery in older than 75 years old, during 2004 to 2019 in INDISA Clinic. Material and Methods: It’s a transversal study about all the elective laparoscopic surgeries with colorectal anastomosis in elderly people, based on electronic clinical records. Results: 48 full laparoscopic surgeries, the majority by colorectal cancer (89.6%) shows optimal quality indicators about nodal harvest in 73.2%. The median duration of hospital stay after surgery was 6 days with 30 days mortality of 2.1%. These results are comparable to the international reports. Discussion: The laparoscopic approach in elderly patients has benefits over the open approach with acceptable morbility and mortality. The intraoperatory balance between surgical risk/security and oncologic prognostic it’s a factor to consider in the decision-making process besides the morbility by the age and the own functional reserve. Conclusion. It’s the first series in Chile about over 75 years patients with laparoscopic resective colorectal surgery. Is feasible and secure to do minimal invasive surgery with acceptable morbility and mortality. Only the age isn’t a contraindication to laparoscopic colorectal surgery. It’s necessary more studies with mayor number of patients to known better the national results and long-term results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Complex machine learning (ML) models have revolutionized predictions in clinical care. However, for laparoscopic colectomy (LC), prediction of morbidity by ML has not been adequately analyzed nor compared against traditional logistic regression (LR) models. Methods: All LC patients, between 2017 and 2019, in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were identified. A composite outcome of 17 variables defined any post-operative morbidity. Seven of the most common complications were additionally analyzed. Three ML models (Random Forests, XGBoost, and L1-L2-RFE) were compared with LR. Results: Random Forests, XGBoost, and L1-L2-RFE predicted 30-day post-operative morbidity with average area under the curve (AUC): .709, .712, and .712, respectively. LR predicted morbidity with AUC = .712. Septic shock was predicted with AUC ≤ .9, by ML and LR. Conclusion: There was negligible difference in the predictive ability of ML and LR in post-LC morbidity prediction. Possibly, the computational power of ML cannot be realized in limited datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Colon cancer is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy worldwide and accounts for more than half of all gastrointestinal tumors, with overl million new cases and 500 000 deaths peryear. Objectives: The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for colon cancer surgery by evaluating the lymph nodes. It is crucial to remove an adequate number of lymph nodes, as a more extensive nodal removal has been associated with higher survival rates and fewer relapses. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 120 patients (57 females and 63 males) with colon cancer, who were registered and analyzed in our unit from 2019 to 2021. Of these patients, 78 underwent open surgery and 42 underwent laparoscopic surgery. A checklist comprising 8 variables including postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, site infection during the first 30 days, number of lymph nodes removed in pathology, hemoglobin drop, anastomotic leak, urinary tract injury, and time of operation was completed for all patients. SPSS version 21 software was used for data analysis, and a P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The age of the patients was between 30 to 60 years. The variables of site infection during the first 30 days (P = 0.7), anastomotic leak complication (P = 0.5), urinary tract injury (P = 0.02), and number of lymph nodes removed (P = 0.13) were not statistically significant between the two groups of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery. However, the variables of duration of operation (P < 0.05), decrease in hemoglobin of postoperative patients compared to preoperative (P < 0.05), severe postoperative pain (P< 0.05), and number of days of hospital stay(P< 0.05) between the groups of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery were statistically significant. Conclusions: Our experience suggests that laparoscopic colectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with better short-term outcomes and comparable oncological efficacy to the open approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 30th Albanian Conference of Surgery (ACS 2023) and the 7th Albanian Congress of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ACTES 2023) represent significant milestones in the medical community. These concurrent events provide a platform for the exchange of knowledge, collaboration, and the advancement of surgical science in Albania. ACS 2023 & ACTES 2023 gather experts, scholars, practitioners, and enthusiasts from the field of surgery, both in traumatic and non-traumatic areas, in the vibrant city of Tirana. The comprehensive program encompasses a diverse range of surgical topics, from abdominal and chest injuries to vascular injuries, emergency surgery, and the challenge of nurse services in the new millennium. The theme of this year's events, "Surgery and not only...," reflects the commitment to innovation, best practices, and groundbreaking discoveries. The programs include plenary sessions with renowned experts, scientific presentations, panel discussions, networking opportunities, an industry exhibition, poster awards, cultural and social activities, and Continuing Medical Education (CME) credits. Participants can expect a professionally enriching experience that also offers personal rewards. ACS 2023 & ACTES 2023 value the role of each attendee in contributing to the advancement of surgical knowledge and patient care. The events promise to chart new horizons in the field of surgery and foster international collaboration. The Event is poised to create lasting memories, and their success hinges on the active participation of every attendee. It is an opportunity to inspire, collaborate, and make a lasting impact on surgical care worldwide.

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colectomy in children. All children who underwent a colectomy with a laparoscopic (LapC) or robotic-assisted (RobC) approach in our institution (January 2010–March 2023) were included. Demographics, surgical data, and post-operative outcomes within 30 days were collected. Additional cost related to the robotic approach was calculated. Comparisons were performed using Fisher tests for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney tests for continuous variables. A total of 55 colectomies were performed: 31 LapC and 24 RobC (median age: 14.9 years). Main indications included: inflammatory bowel disease (n = 36, 65%), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 6, 11%), sigmoid volvulus (n = 5, 9%), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 3, 5%). LapC included 22 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. RobC included 15 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with increased operative time (3 h vs 2.5 h, p = 0.02), with a median increase in operative time of 36 min. There were no conversions. Post-operative complications occurred in 35% of LapC and 38% of RobC (p = 0.99). Complications requiring treatment under general anesthesia (Clavien–Dindo 3) occurred in similar rates (23% in LapC vs 13% in RobC, p = 0.49). Length of hospitalization was 10 days in LapC and 8.5 days in RobC (p = 0.39). The robotic approach was associated with a median additional cost of 2156€ per surgery. Robotic-assisted colectomy is as safe and feasible as laparoscopic colectomy in children, with similar complication rates but increased operative times and cost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: There is still insufficient discussion of the mid- to long-term safety of the intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) method of reconstruction after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) for colon cancer. The present study clarified the postoperative mid-term results of IA based on recurrence and the incidence of incision hernia. Methods: This single-institution observational retrospective study included 268 patients with colon cancer who underwent IA or extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) after LAC at our institution between 2018 and 2021. The mid-term results of the IA group were compared with those of the EA group using a propensity score matching method. Results: The median follow-up periods were 36 and 25 months in the EA and IA groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). In this matched cohort study, the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were comparable between the IA and EA groups (each group, n = 72; 3-year RFS: IA, 92.1%; EA, 88.2%; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–2.40; p = 0.66). The cumulative incisional hernia rates were 9.8% and 9.9% (p = 0.99) for the IA and EA groups, respectively. Conclusion: The safety of IA after LAC was demonstrated in this study, as IA after LAC showed good mid-term results, including with regard to the rates of recurrence and incisional hernia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To compare the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) during laparoscopic colectomy to those undergoing extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). Methods and materials: The study was a single-centre retrospective propensity score-matched analysis conducted. Consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy without the double stapling technique between January 2018 and June 2021 were investigated. The main outcome was overall postoperative complications within 30 days after the procedure. The authors also performed a sub-analysis of the postoperative results of ileocolic anastomosis and colocolic anastomosis, respectively. Results: A total of 283 patients were initially extracted; after propensity score matching, there were 113 patients in each of the IA and EA groups. There were no differences in patient characteristics between the two groups. The IA group had a significantly longer operative time than the EA group (208 vs. 183 min, P =0.001). The rate of overall postoperative complications was significantly lower in the IA group (n =18, 15.9%) than in the EA group (n =34, 30.1%; P=0.02), especially in colocolic anastomosis after left-sided colectomy (IA: 23.8% vs. EA: 59.1%; P= 0.03). Postoperative inflammatory marker levels were significantly higher in the IA group on postoperative day 1 but not on postoperative day 7. There was no difference in the postoperative lengths of hospital stay between the two groups, and no deaths occurred. Conclusion: The data suggest that performing IA during laparoscopic colectomy can potentially reduce the risk of postoperative complications, especially in colocolic anastomosis after left-sided colectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older with colon cancer who underwent robotic colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy. Data for patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center between January 2006 and November 2018 were collected retrospectively. Outcomes from minimally invasive laparoscopic or robotic colectomy were compared. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method with significance evaluated by the log-rank test. The laparoscopic (n = 104) and the robotic (n = 75) colectomy groups did not differ across baseline characteristics. Patients who underwent a robotic colectomy had a shorter median length of hospital stay (5 versus 6 days; p < 0.001) and underwent fewer conversions to open surgery (3% versus 17%; p = 0.002) compared to the laparoscopic cohort. The groups did not differ in postoperative complication rates, overall survival or disease-free survival. Elderly patients undergoing robotic colectomy for colon cancer have a shorter hospital stay and lower rates of conversion without compromise to oncologic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A notable advantage of laparoscopic colorectal surgery is that only a small incision at the extraction site is necessary, which is considered to be cosmetically beneficial. Meanwhile, the optimal extraction site for the resected specimen in laparoscopic colectomy is controversial in terms of cosmetic benefit. This randomized controlled trial compares midline and off-midline extraction sites in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer, with consideration of cosmetic benefits as the primary endpoint. Methods: Included were patients that underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy at WMUH between October 2014 and February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to either midline incision group or off-midline incision group. Prospectively collected data included cosmetic results (patients and observer assessment scale) and complications including incidence of incisional hernia, SSI, and pain. This trial was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials (UMIN000028943). Results: Finally, 98 patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the two groups in patient and observer assessment scales of cosmetic results (midline 8 ± 1.1 vs off-midline 11 ± 5.9 p = 0.16, midline 13.5 ± 6.6 vs off-midline 15 ± 11 p = 0.58, respectively) or in postoperative pain. However, incisional hernia occurred in four cases in the midline group (8%), which was significantly higher than that in the off-midline group (no cases, 0%). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in terms of cosmetic benefit, the primary endpoint, between the two groups. In this study, only the extraction site location was compared; future studies will examine differences depending on the incisional direction, including the incidence of incisional hernia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Owing to important differences in surgical technique, laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal (ICA) compared to extracorporeal (ECA) anastomotic technique may result in improved patient outcomes. We aimed to compare both techniques according to incisional hernias and other pertinent perioperative characteristics, post-operative complications, and oncologic quality markers. Methods: All adult patients undergoing laparoscopic right colectomies between 2015 and 2020 at a single institution were included. ICA and ECA techniques were compared based on selected outcomes using univariable and multivariable statistical analyses, as appropriate. Subgroup analyses were restricted to patients with neoplastic indications for surgery and non-urgent operations. Results: A total of 517 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 139 (26.9%) underwent ICA and 378 (73.1%) underwent ECA. ICA and ECA patients had similar baseline characteristics. At two years of follow-up, a lower proportion of ICA patients developed a hernia at the extraction incision (1.5% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.02) and ICA was associated with an 80% reduction in extraction incision hernias (aHR 0.20, p = 0.03). These results were stable through subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Median operative time was longer in the ICA group (186 min vs. 135 min, p < 0.001), but the gap in operative time narrowed during the study period. Median length of stay was one calendar day shorter in the ICA group (3 days vs. 4 days, p = 0.007) and ICA was associated with a 13% decrease in the length of stay (aRR 0.87, p = 0.02). The incidence of superficial wound infections, anastomotic leaks and re-interventions was lower in ICA patients, but this difference was not statistically significant. 90-day unscheduled visits, readmissions, and mortalities were similar across both groups, as were oncologic outcomes. Conclusion: Laparoscopic right colectomies with intracorporeal anastomoses are associated with a reduction in incisional hernias and shorter hospital lengths of stay without compromising on patient safety or oncologic principles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy (ALC), meaning discharge within 24 h of surgical colonic resection, has recently been proposed in a few, selected patients. This systematic review was performed with the aim of reviewing protocols for ALC and assessing feasibility, safety and outcomes after ALC. Method: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic review and pooled analysis was performed searching all English studies published until October 2022 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (PROSPERO, CRD42022334463). Inclusion criteria were original articles including patients undergoing ALC, specifying at least one outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were articles reporting a robotic‐assisted procedure; unable to retrieve patient data from articles; the same patient series included in different studies. Primary outcomes were success, overall complications and readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included mortality and specific complications such us surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, bleeding, rate of ALC acceptance, and unscheduled consultation and reoperation rate. Results: Among 1087 studies imported for screening, 11 were included (1296 patients). The success rate was 47% with an overall morbidity of 14%. Readmission and reoperation rates were 5% and 1%, respectively. No mortality was recorded. Protocols of ALC differ significantly among published studies. Conclusions: Overall, ALC appears to be safe and feasible in selected cases with an acceptable success rate and a low risk of readmission after hospital discharge. Future studies should evaluate patients' benefits and discharge criteria, as well as uniformity and standardization of eligibility criteria. This systematic review may help inform on ALC adoption in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is increasing evidence to support discharge prior to gastrointestinal recovery following colorectal surgery. Furthermore, many patients are discharged early despite being excluded from an ambulatory colectomy pathway. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients discharged early following laparoscopic colectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). Methods: A retrospective review of all adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy at a single university-affiliated colorectal referral center (08/2017–06/2021) was performed. Patients were included if they had undergone elective laparoscopic colectomy or ileostomy closure and excluded if they had been enrolled in an ambulatory colectomy pathway. Patients were then divided into three groups: LOS =1 day, LOS 2–3 days, and LOS 4+ days. The main outcomes were 30-day emergency room (ER) visits and readmissions. Reasons for inpatient stay per post-operative day (POD) were also recorded. Results: A total of 497 patients were included [LOS1 n = 63 (13%), LOS2–3 n = 284 (57%), and LOS4+ n = 150 (30%)]. There were no differences in patient characteristics, diagnosis, or procedure between the groups. Patients were discharged with gastrointestinal recovery (GI-3) in 54% LOS1 vs. 98% LOS2–3 vs. 100% LOS4+ (p<0.001). Shorter procedure duration, transversus abdominus plane block, and lower opioid requirements were associated with shorter LOS (p<0.001). The absence of flatus was the most common reason to keep patients hospitalized: 61% on POD1, 21% on POD2, and 8% on POD3 (p<0.001). There were no differences in 30-day emergency visits, or readmission between the groups. In the LOS1 group, there were no differences in outcomes between patients with full return of bowel function at discharge compared to those without. Conclusion: Discharge on POD1 was not associated with increased emergency department use, complications, or readmissions. Importantly, full return of bowel function at discharge did not affect outcomes. There may be potential to expand eligibility criteria for ambulatory colectomy protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer, complete mesocolic excision is a standard procedure that involves extended lymphadenectomy and blood vessel ligation. This study aimed to establish a nomogram to facilitate evaluation of the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy based on preoperative parameters. Materials and methods: The preoperative clinical and computed tomography-related parameters, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The difficulty of laparoscopic colectomy was defined using the scoring grade reported by Escal et al. with modifications. Multivariable logistic analysis was performed to identify parameters that increased the surgical difficulty. A preoperative nomogram to predict the surgical difficulty was established and validated. Results: A total of 418 consecutive patients with right colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection at a single tertiary medical center between January 2016 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to a training data set (n=300, 71.8%) and an internal validation data set (n=118, 28.2%). Meanwhile, an external validation data set with 150 consecutive eligible patients from another tertiarymedical center was collected. In the training data set, 222 patients (74.0%) comprised the non-difficulty group and 78 (26.0%) comprised the difficulty group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that adipose thickness at the ileocolic vessel drainage area, adipose area at the ileocolic vessel drainage area, adipose density at the ileocolic vessel drainage area, presence of the right colonic artery, presence of type III Henle's trunk, intra-abdominal adipose area, plasma triglyceride concentration, and tumor diameter at least 5 cm were independent risk factors for surgical difficulty; these factors were included in the nomogram. The nomogram incorporating seven independent predictors showed a high C-index of 0.922 and considerable reliability, accuracy, and net clinical benefit. Conclusions: The study established and validated a reliable nomogram for predicting the surgical difficulty of laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer. The nomogram may assist surgeons in preoperatively evaluating risk and selecting appropriate patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with improved recovery and decreased complications when compared to an open approach. Consequently, the rates of laparoscopic colectomy have increased. Race has been identified as a factor that influences a patient's likelihood of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the rates of laparoscopic colectomy stratified by race over time. Methods: Patients were selected using procedure codes for colectomy within the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2009 to 2018. The primary independent variable was race (Black, BL; Hispanic, HI; White, WH), and the primary outcome was surgical approach (laparoscopic vs open). Covariates included age, sex, case complexity, insurance status, income, year of surgery, urbanicity, region, bedsize, and teaching status. We examined the univariable association of race with laparoscopic vs open colectomy with chi-square. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association of race with procedure type adjusting for covariates. All analyses were done using SAS (version 9.4, Cary, NC) with p <.05 considered significant. Results: 267,865 patients (25,000 BL, 19,685 HI, and 223,180 WH) were identified. Laparoscopy was used in 47% of cases, and this varied significantly by race (BL 44%, HI 49%, WH 47%, p <.0001). After adjusting for covariates, Black patients had significantly lower adjusted odds of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy vs White patients (aOR 0.92, p < 0.0001). Utilization of laparoscopy was similar in Hispanic compared to White patients (aOR 1.00, p = 0.9667). Racial disparity in the adjusted odds of undergoing laparoscopic colectomy was persistent over time. Conclusion: Race was independently associated with the rate of laparoscopic colectomy, with Black patients less likely to receive laparoscopic surgery than White patients. This disparity persisted over a decade. Attention should be paid to increasing the rates of laparoscopic colectomy in under-represented populations in order to optimize surgical care and address racial disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic D3 lymph node (LN) dissection between ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (LIMA) and preservation of the IMA (PIMA) for descending colon cancer using propensity score-matched analysis. Methods: This retrospective study included 101 patients with stage I–III descending colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic D3 LN dissection with LIMA (n = 60) or PIMA (n = 41) at a single center between January 2005 and March 2022. After propensity score matching, 64 patients (LIMA, n = 32; PIMA, n = 32) were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was the long-term outcomes, and the secondary endpoint was the surgical outcomes. Results: In the matched cohort, no significant difference was noted in the surgical outcomes, including the operative time, estimated blood loss, number of harvested LNs, number of harvested LN 253, and complication rate. The long-term outcomes were also not significantly different between the LIMA and PIMA groups (3-year recurrence-free survival, 72.2% vs. 75.6%, P = 0.862; 5-year overall survival, 69.8% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.888; 5-year cancer-specific survival, 84.2% vs. 82.8%, P = 0.607). No recurrence of LN metastasis was observed around the IMA root. Conclusion: Laparoscopic D3 dissection in PIMA was comparable to that in LIMA regarding both short- and long-term outcomes. The optimal LN dissection for descending colon cancer should be investigated in future large-scale studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Given the progression of laparoscopic surgery, questions continue to arise as to the ideal technique for a laparoscopic colectomy. The most debated of these questions is whether it is best to complete an intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal (ECA) intestinal anastomosis. Here, we review the literature to date and report the equivalent safety and efficacy of ICA and ECA for laparoscopic right colectomy. However, these studies also indicate that when completed, ICA may prove beneficial with respect to earlier return of bowel function, less postoperative pain, shorter incision length, and reduced risk of wound infections. For this, we present the tips and tricks for completing all forms of laparoscopic ICAs during laparoscopic colectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, robotic-assisted surgery has demonstrated remarkable progress as a minimally invasive procedure for colorectal cancer. While there have been fewer studies investigating robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of colon cancer than rectal cancer, evidence regarding robotic-assisted colectomy has been accumulating due to increasing use of the procedure. Robotic-assisted colectomy generally requires a long operative time and involves high costs. However, as evidence is increasingly supportive of its higher accuracy and less invasive nature compared to laparoscopic colectomy, the procedure is anticipated to improve the ratio of conversion to laparotomy and accelerate postoperative recovery. Robotic-assisted surgery has also been suggested for a specific level of effectiveness in manipulative procedures, such as intracorporeal anastomosis, and is increasingly indicated as a less problematic procedure compared to conventional laparoscopy and open surgery in terms of long-term oncological outcomes. Although robotic-assisted colectomy has been widely adopted abroad, only a limited number of institutions have been using this procedure in Japan. Further accumulation of experience and studies investigating surgical outcomes using this approach are required in Japan.

Abstract Background There were differences in the recovery of bowel function and prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) between laparoscopic right colectomy (RC) and left colectomy (LC) under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery. Methods We selected 870 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy from June 2016 to December 2021, including 272 patients who had RC and 598 who had LC. According to 1:1 proportion for propensity score matching and correlation analysis, 247 patients who had RC and 247 who had LC were finally enrolled. Results The incidence of PPOI in all patients was 13.1%. Age, sex, smoking habit, preoperative serum albumin level, operation type, and operation time were the important independent risk factors based on multivariate logistic regression and correlation analysis for PPOI (p0.05). The incidence of PPOI in patients who had RC was 21.9%, while that in patients who had LC was 13.0%. The first flatus, first semi-liquid, and length of stay in LC patients were lower than those in RC patients (p

The present prospective, randomized, double-blind study aimed to determine the impact of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on propofol and remifentanil consumption, when administered by closed-loop titration guided by processed electroencephalography, i.e., bispectral index (BIS) values. Following institutional review board approval, 60 patients were scheduled for laparoscopic colectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive bilateral TAP block with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine (TAP group) or 20 ml 0.9% saline [control (CON) group]. General anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil administration using closed-loop titration guided by BIS values. The primary outcome was perioperative propofol and remifentanil consumption. The secondary outcomes were hypertensive or hypotensive events requiring treatment, recovery time in PACU and time to first rescue analgesia following surgery. A total of 58 patients participated in the present study. At similar depths of anesthesia, as measured by BIS during the maintenance phase (45-55), patients who received TAP blocks required less propofol (4.2±1.3 vs. 5.5±1.6 mg/kg/h; P0.05). In conclusion, TAP block combined with general anesthesia reduced propofol and remifentanil consumption, shortened time to tracheal extubation and promoted hemodynamic stability in laparoscopic colectomy.

Aim: Laparoscopic surgery of splenic flexure cancers (SFCs) is one of the most challenging operations among other colorectal surgical procedures. The most commonly performed and recommended laparoscopic surgical technique is the medial‐to‐lateral approach. On the other hand, in obstructive splenic flexure cancers (OSFCs), the medial‐to‐lateral approach may not be possible due to the narrowed surgical field by dilated bowel and difficulty in positioning the bowel. This study aims to present the surgical technique and feasibility of laparoscopic left colectomy with cranial‐to‐caudal dissection as a new alternative method in OSFCs. Method: All consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic left colectomy with cranial‐to‐caudal dissection for OSFC between December 2018 and February 2022 were analysed. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon experienced in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and video recorded. Result: Five consecutive cases of OSFC who underwent laparoscopic surgery with a cranial‐to‐caudal approach were evaluated. The median operating time was 180 (165–195) min, and the length of hospital stay was nine (7–12) days. The surgical margins were tumour‐free, and the median number of harvested lymph nodes was 20 (17–36). Four patients had pTNM stage 3B disease, and one patient had stage 2A disease. There were no major complications and mortality. Conclusion: In this study, a new alternative surgical approach was used for OSFCs, one of the most challenging procedures in laparoscopic surgery. This technique can also be safely used not only in OSFCs but also in other left colon tumours (adhesions, obesity, etc.) that require splenic flexure mobilization and pose difficulty in a medial‐to‐lateral approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has been developed as a means of decreasing the incidence of surgical wound complications. We refined the procedure for totally laparoscopic colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction using the reduced port surgery technique with the ultimate goal of attenuating damage to the abdominal wall. We herein report this innovative technique and its short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: We prospectively collected data on seven patients who underwent totally laparoscopic colectomy using transvaginal specimen extraction with a 10-mm-long abdominal incision for right-sided colon cancer from January 2014 to December 2021. Two 5-mm ports were used in the procedure without laparotomy. Transverse transabdominal posterior colpotomy was then performed. We introduced a GelPOINT Mini advanced access platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) into the transvaginal route for the insertion of a laparoscope, forceps, and stapling device. Lymph node dissection and transection of the ileum and distal colon were performed with transvaginal assistance. A specimen was then extracted transvaginally. Intracorporeal functional end-to-end anastomosis was conducted using a linear stapler through the vagina. After the removal of GelPOINT Mini, the vaginal incision was closed transvaginally. Results: Seven patients successfully underwent this procedure. Median operative time was 219 min (range 174–255 min), median blood loss was 23 ml (range 10–37 ml), median number of harvested lymph nodes was 21 (range 17–35 lymph nodes) and median margins were 17.0 cm (range 9.0–25.0 cm) for the proximal margin and 9.5 cm (range 5.0–13.0 cm) for the distal margin. There were no complications more severe than Clavien–Dindo Grade II and there was no mortality. The median frequency of use intravenous analgesics from postoperative day 1 to discharge was once. Two patients did not require analgesics. A node-positive patient developed recurrence at the lung and paraaortic lymph nodes. Conclusions: This procedure appears to be feasible, safe, and oncologically acceptable for selected cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The present study examined the incidence of incisional hernia by comparing patients from whom a specimen was extracted either through a Pfannenstiel incision (PI) with an intracorporeal anastomosis or via a midline incision (MI) with an extracorporeal anastomosis., Methods: The records of 370 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic or robotically-assisted colectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Regardless of the clinical symptoms, incisional hernia was objectively diagnosed based on abdominal computed tomography findings. The surgical outcomes and incisional hernia incidence were retrospectively compared between the groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance background differences between the groups., Results: Eighty-seven and 283 patients were in the PI group and MI group, respectively. After PSM, 71 patients were selected from each group. The median observation time was 572 and 1110 days in the PI and MI group, respectively. The PI group had no incidence of incisional hernia whereas the MI group had a 14% incidence, demonstrating that the former had significantly fewer incisional hernias (p=0.0014). The median interval from surgery to incisional hernia development was 295 days. The PI with an intracorporeal anastomosis was not associated with an increased complication rate., Conclusions: The PI was preferable for intraoperative specimen extraction owing to the low, associated incidence of incisional hernia., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Japan Society of Coloproctology.)

Although colorectal cancer frequently invades adjacent organs, colon-to-colon invasion is rarely observed, and colo-colonic fistula formation due to colorectal cancer is uncommon. Here we report a case of preoperative diagnosis of cecal cancer that has invaded the transverse colon. A 69-year-old woman presented with diarrhea and a palpable mass in the lower right abdomen. After being diagnosed with double cancer involving the cecum and transverse colon at a previous hospital, she was referred to our hospital. CT scans revealed enhanced mass-like wall thickening in both the cecum and transverse colon, with 3D-CT suggesting a cecal tumor invading the transverse colon. The accurate preoperative diagnosis and prediction of fistula formation led us to perform curative en bloc resection using laparoscopic surgery. The resected specimen contained an ulcerated moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma measuring 6.0 cm × 4.5 cm in the cecum. Additionally, a fistula originating from the cecal cancer and communicating with the transverse colon was identified. The tumor was classified as stage IIIC (T4b, N1, M0). When multiple masses are identified in the colon, it is important to consider the possibility of the primary tumor invading neighboring organs and the potential for fistula formation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Japan Society of Coloproctology.)

Laparoscopic colon surgery is performed frequently in the clinical setting for a multitude of reasons including cancer, infection, and autoimmune disease. As a result, extensive research has been conducted in relation to clinical outcomes after surgery, but more recently, in relation to the impact of surgery and other patient factors on physiologic homeostasis including the host microbiome. Despite this, experimental surgical models for laparoscopic colon surgery are scarce in the literature with most studies utilizing rodents. While rodent studies provide valuable insights into basic mechanistic processes, the translation of novel therapeutic approaches to clinical practice often requires the use of large animal models. In exploring the intricate systems biology linking surgery and medicine, sophisticated models such as nonhuman primates (NHPs) play a pivotal role. By closely resembling human anatomical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics, NHPs facilitate the development and refinement of complex surgical techniques and peri-operative practices. Furthermore, they enable longitudinal studies that comprehensively assess both immediate and long-term outcomes. The availability and utilization of multiple robust models enhance the validity of surgical research, leading to more successful translation to human clinical practice. Here we describe our technique for performing a laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with a primary anastomosis in an NHP. The entire procedure was well tolerated without significant ventilation or hemodynamic issue. To our knowledge, this represents the first laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with primary anastomosis performed in an NHP. Furthermore, this demonstrates the feasibility of the technique and provides a relevant, preclinical model for the study of surgical colon disease. Although the surgical colectomy model in NHPs closely resembles the clinical scenario, it is crucial to recognize that a 'model' inherently comes with limitations. The intended use of any model should be carefully evaluated concerning the target patient population with the consideration of potential disparities in anatomy, physiology, environmental factors, and disease to properly interpret results. This model provides an opportunity to study mechanisms, from a systems biology perspective, underlying both innovative surgical treatments and their effects on diseases such as colon cancer, as well as benign conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis, and anastomotic leak, offering high predictive value., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-24-25/coif). M.L.G. holds the endowed Robert and Katherine Goodale Chair in Minimally Invasive Surgery which was appointed by the Department of Surgery at the University of Minnesota. The endowment is to be used at the Chairperson’s discretion, therefore M.L.G. used it to fund this work. There is no third-party interest. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.)

A minimally invasive approach using laparoscopy or robotics has become the standard procedure in surgery for colorectal cancer. However, obesity is considered to be associated with a poor prognosis in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Perioperative management, as well as the surgical procedure, is particularly important in severely obese patients. A case of colon cancer with severe obesity that underwent laparoscopic colectomy and was managed safely by multidisciplinary perioperative management in collaboration with a bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) team is presented. The patient was severely obese, with a body mass index (BMI) of 50.4 kg/m 2 . After one month of preoperative weight loss intervention by the BMS team, the patient's weight was successfully decreased by approximately 15 kg (BMI: 46 kg/m 2 ), and the patient underwent laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer in collaboration with the BMS team. In the laparoscopic surgery, a small incision for specimen removal was made above the umbilicus to insert the first trocar safely, and five additional trocars, whose placement was determined based on the target vessels of the dissected lymph nodes in reference to preoperative computed tomography (CT), were also inserted above the umbilicus. Gastrointestinal reconstruction was performed intracorporeally by an overlap technique using an endoscopic linear stapler to perform the procedure safely with minimal invasiveness. The patient was discharged on postoperative day eight without any postoperative complications, following early postoperative rehabilitation with intervention by the BMS team. The proportion of colorectal cancer patients with obesity is expected to increase in the future, and the establishment of multidisciplinary perioperative management and surgical techniques will be useful to improve the surgical outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients with severe obesity., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: Yuki Matsumi declare(s) a grant from JSPS KAKENHI, grant number JP24K19391. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Matsumi et al.)