Search

We sought to evaluate hospital outcomes of cirrhosis patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB).NVUGIB is common in patients with cirrhosis. However, national outcome studies of these patients are lacking.We utilized the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to evaluate NVUGIB in patients with cirrhosis, further stratified as no cirrhosis (NC), compensated cirrhosis (CC), or decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes captured diagnoses and interventions. Outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, index admission mortality rates, health care utilization, and predictors of readmission and mortality using multivariable regression analysis.Overall, 13,701 patients with cirrhosis were admitted with NVUGIB. The 30-day readmission rate was 20.8%. Patients with CC were more likely to undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 1 calendar day of admission (74.1%) than patients with DC (67.9%) or NC (69.4%). Patients with DC had longer hospitalizations (4.1 d) and higher costs of care ($11,834). The index admission mortality rate was higher in patients with DC (6.2%) than in patients with CC (1.7%, P0.001) or NC (1.4%, P0.001). Predictors of 30-day readmission included performing an EGD1 calendar day from admission (OR: 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.46) and DC (OR: 1.78; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.06). DC was a predictor of index admission mortality (OR: 3.68; 95% CI, 2.67 to 5.05).NVUGIB among patients with DC is associated with higher readmission rates, mortality rates, and health care utilization compared with patients with CC and NC. Early EGD is a modifiable variable associated with reduced readmission rates. Early identification of high-risk patients and adherence to guidelines may improve clinical outcomes.

Background and Aim The effect of an influenza infection on patients with cirrhosis remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the rate of influenza hospitalizations, influenza associated complications, and healthcare outcomes in patients with and without cirrhosis. Methods Utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2005 and 2013, hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of influenza were identified. Patients with cirrhosis were classified as compensated or decompensated based on the Baveno criteria. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate complications of influenza, inpatient mortality and healthcare utilization including length of stay and cost of admission. Results In total, 236,513 patients with a diagnosis of influenza were admitted during the study period, including 1,553 (0.66%) with cirrhosis. Of those with cirrhosis, 1,176 (75.7%) were compensated and 377 (24.3%) were decompensated. On multivariable analysis, influenza patients with cirrhosis had a higher total cost of admission [$1,030; CI: $710-$1,351] compared to the general population. Influenza patients with decompensated cirrhosis had a longer length of stay [1.92 days; CI:1.63-2.21], higher total cost of admission [$5,005; CI: $4,459-$5,551] and increased rates of influenza complications [OR: 2.56; CI:1.32-4.93] compared to patients with compensated cirrhosis. Conclusions Patients with cirrhosis have increased healthcare utilization when admitted with influenza compared to the general population. Providers must advocate for patients with cirrhosis to obtain the influenza vaccine.

INTRODUCTION Given the increased rates of pregnancy in liver transplant recipients, evaluating the safety of pregnancy is crucial. We aim to evaluate pregnancy-related complications and outcomes in liver transplant recipients. METHODS A retrospective nationwide review comparing pregnancy outcomes in liver transplant recipients vs the general population was performed between 2005 and 2013. Propensity-matched and multivariable regression analyses were performed to study pregnancy- and delivery-related complications in addition to patient and hospital outcomes. RESULTS A total of 38,449,030 pregnancy-related admissions were evaluated in this study including 1,469 (0.004%) admissions in liver transplant recipients. Liver transplant recipients were more likely to undergo a caesarean delivery (60% vs 36%) and have a pregnancy-related complication (56% vs 27%) including miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, portpartum hemorrhage, hypertension, preeclampsia, and thromboembolism (P < 0.001) compared with the general population. Propensity-weighted analysis revealed higher rates of pregnancy complications (odds ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.63-2.73), cost ($3,023, 95% CI $850-$5,197), and longer length of stay (1.52 days, 95% CI 0.62-2.41) in transplant recipients. Liver transplant recipients experienced zero inpatient mortalities compared with 0.01% of the general population. Transplant recipients with at least 1 complication had a longer length of stay (2.45 days, 95% CI 1.44-3.45) and higher cost of admission ($5,205, 95% CI $2,848-$7,561) compared with transplant recipients without a complication. DISCUSSION Pregnancy after liver transplant is associated with higher rates of complications and worse outcomes without an increased risk of mortality.

AIM To determine if racial disparities continue to exist in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS A retrospective database analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed including patients with a primary diagnosis of HCC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to determine racial disparities in liver decompensation, treatment, inpatient mortality, and metastatic disease. RESULTS A total of 62604 patients with HCC were included consisting of 32428 Caucasian, 9726 African-American, 8988 Hispanic, and 11462 patients of other races. Caucasian patients were more likely to undergo curative therapies of liver transplant (OR: 2.66, 95%CI: 1.92-3.68), resection (OR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.48-2.23), and ablation (OR: 1.77, 95%CI: 1.36-2.30) than African-American patients. Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo transplant (OR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.40-3.39) and ablation (OR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.05-2.03) than African-American patients. Patients of other races were more likely to receive a liver transplant (OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.62-3.61), resection (OR: 1.79 95%CI: 1.39-2.32), and ablation (OR: 2.03, 95%CI: 1.47-2.80) than African-American patients. There are no differences in the rates of transarterial chemoembolization between races. CONCLUSION Racial disparities in HCC treatment exist despite emphasis to support equality in healthcare. African-American patients are less likely to undergo curative treatments for HCC.

Background and aim Cirrhosis-related complications are associated with high inpatient mortality, cost, and length of stay. There is a lack of multi-centered studies on interventions for hepatic hydrothorax and its impact on patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of performing thoracentesis for hepatic hydrothorax on hospital length of stay, mortality, cost, and 30-day readmission. Methods A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2002 and 2013 and Nationwide Readmission Database during 2013 was performed including patients with a primary diagnosis of hydrothorax or pleural effusion and a secondary diagnosis of cirrhosis based on International Classification of Disease 9 codes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of thoracentesis on patient outcomes during their hospital stay. Results Of the 37 443 patients included from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 26 889 (72%) patients underwent thoracentesis. Thoracentesis was associated with a longer length of stay (4.56 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.40-6.72) and higher total cost ($9449, 95% CI: 3706-15 191). There was no significant difference in inpatient mortality between patients who underwent thoracentesis compared with those who did not. Of the 2371 patients included from the Nationwide Readmission Database, 870 (33%) were readmitted within 30 days. Thoracentesis was not a predictor of readmission; however, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (odds ratio: 4.89, 95% CI: 1.17-20.39) and length of stay (odds ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.001-1.05) on index admission were predictors of readmission. Conclusion When considering treatment for hepatic hydrothorax, many factors should contribute to determining the best intervention. While performing thoracentesis may provide immediate relief to symptomatic patients, it should not be considered a long-term intervention given that it increases hospital cost, was associated with longer length of stays, and did not improve mortality.

AIM To determine the readmission rate, its reasons, predictors, and cost of 30-d readmission in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. METHODS A retrospective analysis of the nationwide readmission database (NRD) was performed during the calendar year 2013. All adults cirrhotics with a diagnosis of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, or hepatic encephalopathy were identified by ICD-9 codes. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess predictors of 30-d readmission and cost of readmission. RESULTS Of the 59597 patients included in this study, 18319 (31%) were readmitted within 30 d. Majority (58%) of readmissions were for liver related reasons. Paracentesis was performed in 29832 (50%) patients on index admission. Independent predictors of 30-d readmission included age < 40 (OR: 1.39; CI: 1.19-1.64), age 40-64 (OR: 1.19; CI: 1.09-1.30), Medicaid (OR: 1.21; CI: 1.04-1.41) and Medicare coverage (OR: 1.13; CI: 1.02-1.26), > 3 Elixhauser comorbidity (OR: 1.13; CI: 1.05-1.22), nonalcoholic cirrhosis (OR: 1.16; CI: 1.10-1.23), paracentesis on index admission (OR: 1.28; CI: 1.21-1.36) and having hepatocellular carcinoma (OR: 1.21; CI: 1.05; 1.39). Cost of index admission was similar in patients readmitted and not readmitted (P-value: 0.34); however cost of care was significantly more on 30 d readmission ($30959 ± 762) as compared to index admission ($12403 ± 378), P-value: < 0.001. CONCLUSION Cirrhotic patients with ascites have a 33% chance of readmission within 30-d. Younger patients, with public insurance, nonalcoholic cirrhosis and increased comorbidity who underwent paracentesis are at increased risk of readmission. Risk factors for unplanned readmission should be targeted given these patients have higher healthcare utilization.

INTRODUCTION: Liver cancer–secreted serine protease inhibitor Kazal (LC-SPIK) is a protein that is specifically elevated in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We assessed the performance of LC-SPIK in detecting HCC, including its early stages, in patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: We enrolled 488 patients, including 164 HCC patients (81 early HCC) and 324 controls in a blinded, prospective, case–control study. Serum LC-SPIK levels were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based assay. The performance of serum LC-SPIK and α-fetoprotein (AFP), including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity, are compared. The performance of LC-SPIK was evaluated in an independent validation cohort with 102 patients. RESULTS: In distinguishing all HCC patients from those with cirrhosis and chronic HBV/HCV, LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.87, with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity using a cutoff of 21.5 ng/mL. This is significantly higher than AFP, which had an AUC of 0.70 and 52% sensitivity and 86% specificity using a standard cutoff value of 20.0 ng/mL. For early-stage HCC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0 and A), LC-SPIK had an AUC of 0.85, with 72% sensitivity and 90% specificity, compared with AFP, which had an AUC of 0.61, with 42% sensitivity and 86% specificity. In addition, LC-SPIK accurately detected the presence of HCC in more than 70% of HCC patients with false-negative AFP results. DISCUSSION: The study provided strong evidence that LC-SPIK detects HCC, including early-stage HCC, with high sensitivity and specificity, and might be useful for surveillance in cirrhotic and chronic HBV/HCV patients, who are at an elevated risk of developing HCC.

Background and Aims The United States spends more money per person on health care than any other country in the world. Patients with cirrhosis are at an increased risk of health‐care utilization. The aim of this study is to evaluate differences in health‐care utilization based on the region of treatment during the inpatient management of patients with cirrhosis. Method A retrospective database analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed, including adult patients with a primary diagnosis of cirrhosis determined by ICD‐9 codes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze liver decompensation, mortality, length of stay, and total charges in different regions across the United States. Results A total of 75 280 patients with cirrhosis who received treatment in nine different regions across the United States were included. Rates of liver decompensation were significantly decreased in the Pacific region compared to the New England region (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51–0.94). Length of stay was significantly different between regions; however, the means only varied by half a day and were of minimal clinical significance. Inpatient mortality rates were not significantly different between regions. Total charges for inpatient management between regions were significantly different, with the Pacific region having the highest total hospital charges with a mean of $82 731. Conclusions Health‐care utilization during the inpatient management of cirrhosis varies based on the region. The charges for treatment were the highest in the West despite no impact on mortality, minimal improvement in length of stay, and fewer features of decompensation on admission.

Geographic differences have existed in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and efforts to reduce regional disparities have been initiated. The aim of this study is to use the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to determine if regional disparities in the treatment of HCC continue to exist.A retrospective database analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed that included patients with a primary diagnosis of HCC. Logistic regression models were utilized to determine geographic disparities in liver decompensation, treatment, inpatient mortality, and metastatic disease.This study's locational reach of 62 604 patients included 22 769 patients from the South (36%), 14 554 in the Northeast (23%), 14 041 in the West (22%), and 11 240 in the Midwest (18%). Patients who received treatment in the West were more likely to have inpatient mortality (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03, 1.53) than patients who received treatment in the Midwest. No significant differences were observed between rates of resection, ablation, and transarterial chemoembolization when comparing by region. Rates of liver transplantation were lower in the West compared with the Midwest (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29, 0.87). There was no significant difference between other regions.Geographic disparities in the treatment of HCC are improving.

AIM To examine the effect of center size on survival differences between simultaneous liver kidney transplantation (SLKT) and liver transplantation alone (LTA) in SLKT-listed patients. METHODS The United Network of Organ Sharing database was queried for patients ≥ 18 years of age listed for SLKT between February 2002 and December 2015. Post-transplant survival was evaluated using stratified Cox regression with interaction between transplant type (LTA vs SLKT) and center volume. RESULTS During the study period, 393 of 4580 patients (9%) listed for SLKT underwent a LTA. Overall mortality was higher among LTA recipients (180/393, 46%) than SLKT recipients (1107/4187, 26%). The Cox model predicted a significant survival disadvantage for patients receiving LTA vs SLKT [hazard ratio, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.85; 95%CI: 2.21, 3.66; P < 0.001] in centers performing 30 SLKT over the study period. This disadvantage was modestly attenuated as center SLKT volume increased, with a 3% reduction (HR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.95, 0.99; P = 0.010) for every 10 SLKs performed. CONCLUSION In conclusion, LTA is associated with increased mortality among patients listed for SLKT. This difference is modestly attenuated at more experienced centers and may explain inconsistencies between smaller-center and larger registry-wide studies comparing SLKT and LTA outcomes.