Search

•The CLL-IPI retains prognostic value for PFS, but its impact appears diminished in predicting survival with targeted drugs.•Improved survival with targeted therapies vs chemoimmunotherapy underscores the need to reevaluate prognostic tools amid treatment shifts.

Although BTK inhibitors provide long-term disease-control in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, they need to be combined with BCL2 inhibitors or antibodies to achieve deep responses with undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), which allows for time-limited treatment. This trial aims to evaluate the triple combination of obinutuzumab, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax after an optional debulking with bendamustine.

The coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) shows a remarkable symptomatic heterogeneity. Several risk factors including advanced age, previous illnesses, and a compromised immune system contribute to an unfavorable outcome. In patients with hematologic malignancy, the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is significantly reduced explaining why the mortality rate of hematologic patients hospitalized for a SARS-CoV-2 infection is about 34%. Active immunization is an essential pillar to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with hematologic malignancy. However, the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may be significantly impaired, as only half of patients with hematologic malignancy develop a measurable antiviral antibody response. The subtype of hematologic malignancy and B cell–depleting treatment predict a poor immune response to vaccination. Recently, antiviral drugs and monoclonal antibodies for pre-exposure or postexposure prophylaxis and for early treatment of COVID-19 have become available. These therapies should be offered to patients at high risk for severe COVID-19 and vaccine nonresponders. Importantly, as the virus evolves, some therapies may lose their clinical efficacy against new variants. Therefore, the ongoing pandemic will remain a major challenge for patients with hematologic malignancy and their caregivers who need to constantly monitor the scientific progress in this area.

Observation is the current standard of care for patients with early-stage asymptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as chemotherapy-based interventions have failed to prolong survival. We hypothesized that early intervention with ibrutinib would be well tolerated and lead to superior disease control in a subgroup of early-stage patients with CLL. The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLL12 trial randomly assigned asymptomatic, treatment-naïve Binet stage A CLL patients at increased risk of progression in a 1:1 ratio to receive ibrutinib (n = 182) or placebo (n = 181) at a dose of 420 mg daily. At a median follow-up of 31 months, the study met its primary endpoint by significantly improving event-free survival in the ibrutinib group (median, not reached vs 47.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.25; 95% confidence interval = 0.14-0.43, P < .0001). Compared with placebo, ibrutinib did not increase overall toxicity, yielding similar incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). The most common serious AEs were atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, and rash in the ibrutinib group, and basal cell carcinoma, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction in the placebo group. Ibrutinib-associated risk for bleeding (33.5%) was decreased by prohibiting the use of oral anticoagulants through an amendment of the study protocol and by avoiding CYP3A4 drug–drug interactions. Ibrutinib confirms efficacy in CLL patients at an early stage with an increased risk of progression. However, the results do not justify changing the current standard of “watch and wait.” This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02863718.

Fifty-one of 189 evaluable patients from 3 prospective phase 2 trials evaluating a sequential targeted treatment had high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with a 17p deletion, TP53 mutation, or both. Twenty-seven patients started treatment with bendamustine debulking before induction and maintenance treatment, which was ibrutinib/ofatumumab (IO) in 21 patients, ibrutinib/obinutuzumab (IG) in 13, and venetoclax/obinutuzumab (AG) in 17. The primary end point was overall response rate after 8 months of induction treatment, which was 81%, 100%, and 94% for IO, IG, and AG, respectively. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was undetectable (uMRD) in peripheral blood (<10−4 by flow cytometry) in 0%, 23%, and 82% of patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45 months. Seventeen patients discontinued maintenance treatment due to uMRD: 9 progressed, 2 died without progression (median PFS, 28 months after discontinuation of treatment), and 6 remained in remission after a median observation time of 46 months (range, 6-47 months) after treatment discontinuation. Thus, MRD-guided fixed-duration therapies combining obinutuzumab with venetoclax or ibrutinib can induce deep and durable remissions in CLL patients with high-risk genetic lesions, which can persist after treatment discontinuation (due to a predefined fixed-duration or MRD-guided early termination). The median PFS was 45 months. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02345863, #NCT02401503, and #NCT02689141.

Fifty-one of 189 evaluable patients from 3 prospective phase 2 trials evaluating a sequential targeted treatment had high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with a 17p deletion, TP53mutation, or both. Twenty-seven patients started treatment with bendamustine debulking before induction and maintenance treatment, which was ibrutinib/ofatumumab (IO) in 21 patients, ibrutinib/obinutuzumab (IG) in 13, and venetoclax/obinutuzumab (AG) in 17. The primary end point was overall response rate after 8 months of induction treatment, which was 81%, 100%, and 94% for IO, IG, and AG, respectively. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was undetectable (uMRD) in peripheral blood (<10−4by flow cytometry) in 0%, 23%, and 82% of patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45 months. Seventeen patients discontinued maintenance treatment due to uMRD: 9 progressed, 2 died without progression (median PFS, 28 months after discontinuation of treatment), and 6 remained in remission after a median observation time of 46 months (range, 6-47 months) after treatment discontinuation. Thus, MRD-guided fixed-duration therapies combining obinutuzumab with venetoclax or ibrutinib can induce deep and durable remissions in CLL patients with high-risk genetic lesions, which can persist after treatment discontinuation (due to a predefined fixed-duration or MRD-guided early termination). The median PFS was 45 months. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.govas #NCT02345863, #NCT02401503, and #NCT02689141.

•Time-limited acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and obinutuzumab induced deep and ongoing remission in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL.•The addition of ctDNA-based analyses to conventional FCM appears to improve early detection of molecular and clinical relapses.

The coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) shows a remarkable symptomatic heterogeneity. Several risk factors including advanced age, previous illnesses and a compromised immune system contribute to an unfavorable outcome. In patients with hematologic malignancy, the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is significantly reduced explaining why the mortality rate of hematologic patients hospitalized for a SARS-CoV-2 infection is about 34%.

Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are diagnosed with early-stage disease and managed with active surveillance. The individual course of patients with early-stage CLL is heterogeneous, and their probability of needing treatment is hardly anticipated at diagnosis. We aimed at developing an international prognostic score to predict time to first treatment (TTFT) in patients with CLL with early, asymptomatic disease (International Prognostic Score for Early-stage CLL [IPS-E]). Individual patient data from 11 international cohorts of patients with early-stage CLL (n = 4933) were analyzed to build and validate the prognostic score. Three covariates were consistently and independently correlated with TTFT: unmutated immunoglobulin heavy variable gene (IGHV), absolute lymphocyte count higher than 15 × 109/L, and presence of palpable lymph nodes. The IPS-E was the sum of the covariates (1 point each), and separated low-risk (score 0), intermediate-risk (score 1), and high-risk (score 2-3) patients showing a distinct TTFT. The score accuracy was validated in 9 cohorts staged by the Binet system and 1 cohort staged by the Rai system. The C-index was 0.74 in the training series and 0.70 in the aggregate of validation series. By meta-analysis of the training and validation cohorts, the 5-year cumulative risk for treatment start was 8.4%, 28.4%, and 61.2% among low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively. The IPS-E is a simple and robust prognostic model that predicts the likelihood of treatment requirement in patients with early-stage CLL. The IPS-E can be useful in clinical management and in the design of early intervention clinical trials.

Background and Significance:PRT2527 is an investigational, potent, and highly selective cyclin-dependent kinase 9 inhibitor that is being developed for select relapsed or refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. CDK9, a key regulator of transcription elongation, has been studied as a potential target for therapy in transcriptionally addicted cancers that are dependent on oncogenic drivers with short half-lives. Although most of these drivers do not respond to direct inhibition, studies suggest that a subset of drivers, eg MYC, MYB, and MCL-1, may be targeted indirectly via CDK9 inhibition. Several nonselective CDK9 inhibitors have shown clinical activity in multiple tumor types, however, tolerability was poor (Mandal, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2021). PRT2527 has demonstrated high specificity and promising antitumor activity in preclinical studies, and a favorable tolerability profile in preliminary data from a Phase 1 study (NCT05159518) in adults with advanced solid tumors. These support further development of PRT2527 in hematologic malignancies as monotherapy and in combination with targeted agents. Combination of CDK9 inhibition and Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition may drive a durable response by enhancing apoptotic priming and shifting dependency toward CDK9 targets MCL1 and BFL1. Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) is a highly selective, potent, irreversible BTK inhibitor that upregulates the proapoptotic signaling molecule BCL2 modifying factor, an endogenous inhibitor of BCL2, BCLXL, and BCLW (Kong, et al. ChemMedChem. 2018). PRT2527 as monotherapy or in combination with zanubrutinib may be an effective treatment option for select R/R hematologic malignancies.

Background

Introduction:Targeted agents, in particular BCL2-inhibitors (BCL2i) and BTK-inhibitors (BTKi), have profoundly improved the outcome of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and are considered standard treatment. However, the transition from treatments evaluated within clinical trials into routine clinical practice can be complex. We here present real-world data from the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) registry and report outcomes and treatment sequences of pts treated with either BCL2i (venetoclax) or BTKi (acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, spebrutinib, tirabrutinib, or zanubrutinib) as first administered targeted agent.

Background

Background:Watch and wait is standard of care in patients with early stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In the CLL12 trial, 515 stage Binet-A patients were risk stratified and randomized 1:1 to ibrutinib (ibr, n=182) or placebo (pcb, n=181) when assigned to (very) high or intermediate risk, while low risk patients were only observed (w&w, n=152). Treatment with ibr was associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) (event defined as progression or death) and event-free survival (EFS) (event defined as death, symptomatic progression or initiation of CLL treatment) but not overall survival (OS) when compared to pcb (Langerbeins et al. EHA 2023). However, it is unclear if specific subgroups defined by genetic markers may derive particular benefit from early ibr treatment.

Introduction

Cramer: Gilead: Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Von Tresckow:Celgene: Other: travel grants; AbbVie: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Fink:AbbVie: Other: travel grants; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding. Tausch:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Knauf:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria. Al-Sawaf:BeiGene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees. Langerbeins:AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Fischer:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel grants; AbbVie: Honoraria. Kreuzer:Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ritgen:Gilead: Other: travel grants; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kneba:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Wendtner:Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Eichhorst:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Hallek:F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Despite promising results with targeted drugs, chemoimmunotherapy with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (FC), and rituximab (R) remains the standard therapy for fit patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Herein, we present the long-term follow-up of the randomized CLL8 trial reporting safety and efficacy of FC and FCR treatment of 817 treatment-naïve patients with CLL. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). With a median follow-up of 5.9 years, median PFS were 56.8 and 32.9 months for the FCR and FC group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.69, P < .001). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached for the FCR group and was 86.0 months for the FC group (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.89, P = .001). In patients with mutated IGHV (IGHV MUT), FCR improved PFS and OS compared with FC (PFS: HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.68, P < .001; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.11, P = .1). This improvement remained applicable for all cytogenetic subgroups other than del(17p). Long-term safety analyses showed that FCR had a higher rate of prolonged neutropenia during the first year after treatment (16.6% vs 8.8%; P = .007). Secondary malignancies including Richter’s transformation occurred in 13.1% in the FCR group and in 17.4% in the FC group (P = .1). First-line chemoimmunotherapy with FCR induces long-term remissions and highly relevant improvement in OS in specific genetic subgroups of fit patients with CLL, in particular those with IGHV MUT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00281918.

Al-Sawaf: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees; BeiGene: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: personal fees. Fink:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: travel grants. Cramer:F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: travel support. Herling:Roche: Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Von Tresckow:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: travel grants; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria. Böttcher:Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dreyling:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Jaeger:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; CDR Life AG: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria; True North: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gregor:Roche: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Ritgen:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants; F. Hoffman-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Gilead: Other: travel grants. Dürig:Janssen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Tausch:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Stilgenbauer:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Wendtner:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Fischer:F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel grants; AbbVie: Honoraria. Goede:AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hallek:F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Eichhorst:Oxford Biomedica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Langerbeins:AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-LaRoche: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding.

The head of Gundelia tournefortiiis composed of several groups of flowers. Each group terminates in a large flower which is the first in developing and flowering. Additionally, each flower is surrounded by sterile bracts. So, the whole synflorescence, apparently, is a monotelic pleiocephaloid. — This kind of inflorescence is not in correspondance with the usual interpretation of the inflorescence of Asteraceae.However, considering aggregation, reduction, centralization and ontogenetic abbreviation, the transformation of a cephalium into a cephaloid seems possible. In this phylogenetic line, which is discussed with regard to the Compositae, secondary monotely is postulated.

Observation is the current standard of care for patients with early stage asymptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as chemotherapy-based interventions have failed to prolong survival. We hypothesized that early intervention with ibrutinib would be well tolerated and lead to superior disease control in a subgroup of early stage patients with CLL. The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLL12 trial randomly assigned asymptomatic, treatment-naïve Binet stage A CLL patients at increased risk of progression in a 1:1 ratio to receive ibrutinib (N=182) or placebo (N=181) at a dose of 420 mg daily. At a median follow up of 31 months the study met its primary endpoint by significantly improving event-free survival in the ibrutinib group (median, not reached vs. 47.8 months; hazard ratio=0.25; 95% confidence interval=0.14-0.43, P<0.0001). Compared to placebo, ibrutinib did not increase overall toxicity, yielding similar incidence and severity of adverse events. The most common serious adverse events were atrial fibrillation, pneumonia and rash in the ibrutinib group, and basal cell carcinoma, pneumonia and myocardial infarction in the placebo group. Ibrutinib-associated risk for bleeding (33.5%) was decreased by prohibiting use of oral anticoagulants through an amendment of the study protocol and by avoiding CYP3A4 drug-drug interactions. Taken together, ibrutinib confirms efficacy in CLL patients at early stage with increased risk of progression. However, the results do not justify to change the current standard of ‘watch and wait’. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02863718.