Search

Aims: Aural atresia is a congenital disease constituted by partial or complete lack of development of the external auditory canal, which is generally associated with malformations of the auricle and middle ear. Reconstruction of the auditory canal and correction of any deformities of the middle ear have yielded unpredictable results and variable functional outcomes, and there is a high rate of complications. Therefore, the use of bone-conduction hearing aids, such as the Baha, may represent a valid alternative for subjects who have conductive hearing loss with cochlear reserve that, as a rule, is fully conserved. The aim of this work is to reexamine our experience with the management of conductive and mixed hearing loss using the Baha system in children with bilateral aural atresia., Methods: We examined 31 patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia in whom a Baha system had been implanted. The patients, 16 males and 15 females, were between 5 and 14 years of age (mean 8.7). The following parameters were assessed for each patient: mean preoperative air and bone conduction for frequencies between 0.5 and 4kHz; mean preoperative threshold with conventional bone-conduction hearing aids; mean postoperative threshold with the Baha system; improvement in quality of life evaluated with the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory; rate and type of surgical complications., Results: The mean preoperative air- and bone-conduction thresholds were 51.2±12.5 and 14.1±6.3dB HL, respectively. The mean preoperative threshold with a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid was 29.3±7.2dB HL, and the mean postoperative threshold with the Baha system was 18.1±7.5dB HL. Quality of life improved for all operated patients., Conclusions: The results of our study of the Baha system to treat patients with bilateral aural atresia were extremely satisfactory compared both with those of surgical reconstruction of the auditory canal and those of traditional bone-conduction hearing aids. Furthermore, great improvement was noted in quality of life, while the rate of complications was very low. Therefore, we are convinced that the Baha system is the treatment of choice for hearing loss due to bilateral congenital aural atresia., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Nasal-breathing impairment has been described as a possible determinant of maxillofacial development in children with adenoids/tonsils hypertrophy. However little is known about the possible influence of nasal septum deviation on craniofacial growth in childhood. We conducted a multicenter cephalometric study to compare skeletal and dental features in children with chronic nasal-breathing obstruction secondary to nasal septum deviation and nose-breathing controls., Methods: Ninety-eight children (59M, 39F; mean age 8.8 years; age range 7-12 years) with obligate mouth-breathing secondary to nasal septum deviation (group 1) and 98 age- and sex-matched nasal-breathing controls (group 2) were evaluated. Nasal-breathing function was assessed in all patients with clinical history, ENT instrumental examination and anterior active rhinomanometry. Cephalometric parameters were recorded in all subjects., Results: Patients of group 1 showed a statistically significant increase of upper anterior facial height (N-palatal plane) and total anterior facial height (N-Me) with regards to group 2. The angular relationships of the sella-nasion, palatal, and occlusal planes to the mandibular plane were greater in group 1 in comparison to controls. The gonial angle (Ar-Go-Me), palatal height and overjet were significantly higher in the mouth-breathing group. A significantly retrognatic position of the maxilla and mandible was recorded in group 1 in comparison to group 2. Most mouth-breathing children showed class II malocclusion, while the majority of control subjects presented normal occlusion. The prevalence of cross-bite was higher in group 1 with respect to controls (p=0.02)., Conclusion: Children with obligate mouth-breathing due to nasal septum deviations show facial and dental anomalies in comparison to nose-breathing controls. Possible physiologic explanations of our findings are reported., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)