Search

Background: The possibility of keeping liver grafts viable and functioning until transplantation has been explored since the 1950s. However, the current modalities of Normothermic Machine Perfusion (NMP) have shown several limitations, such as the inability to correct electrolytes and pH derangements efficiently. Combining NMP with continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) might provide a promising new model to overcome these issues. Methods: An NMP that covers the organ perfusion, oxygenation, carbon dioxide removal, and thermal balance was connected to a CKRT circuit to ensure physiological hydro-electrolytes, acid–base balance, and catabolite removal from the perfusate. Results: The integration of NMP and CKRT maintains a neoplastic liver in a perfusion system with physiological perfusate for 100 h. CKRT re-established and maintained the hydro-electrolyte and acid–base status throughout the 100 h of perfusion. Significant limitations were the need for frequent monitoring of electrolytes and acid–base disorders and the loss of low molecular weight nutrients, which have to be replenished by manual infusion into the system. Conclusions: This novel CKRT-NMP integrated system may represent a practical and versatile model to support organs' perfusion and extend preservation times. Further experiments are needed to fix monitoring and adjusting processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sarcopenia and frailty are common complications in patients with cirrhosis evaluated for liver transplantation (LT). Although the negative impact of sarcopenia on patient's outcome has been well studied, the prognostic role of frailty is not as clear. We assessed the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty and the clinical impact of frailty in a prospective cohort of cirrhosis patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) listed for LT. Patients with cirrhosis were prospectively recruited at the time of admission into the waiting list. Clinical and lab values were collected. Physical frailty was assessed by liver frailty index (LFI) and patients were categorized into robust (< 3.2); pre-frail (between 3.2 and 4.5), and frail (> 4.5). Skeletal muscle mass was evaluated via skeletal muscle index (SMI) obtained from last CT scan before LT; sarcopenia was defined by SMI < 50 cm2/m2 in males and < 39 cm2/m2 in females. 105 patients were included, of which 42 (40%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In patients without HCC (63.5% males, median age 61 years), 36.5% were frail, 50.8% were pre-frail and 12.7% were robust. Frail patients were older than non-frail patients (63 vs. 56; p = 0.008) and had more severe liver disease (Child C: 65% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.02). Prevalence of sarcopenia in patients without HCC was 63%, with similar value of median SMI between frail and not frail patients (p = 0.454). Patients with HCC (78.6% males, 65 years old) were 21.4% frail, 61.9% pre-frail, and 16.7% robust. Frail patients had more severe liver disease (Child C: 77% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.004), whereas age was comparable to non-frail patients; among patients without HCC, during a median follow-up of 263 days, 17% died (of which 72% were frail) and 10 patients were delisted due to clinical improvement (none of whom were frail). Among those with HCC, during a median follow-up of 289 days, 4 (9%) patients died of which 50% were frail. Frailty and sarcopenia are common complications in patients with cirrhosis awaiting LT. Frailty appears to be associated with an increased risk of mortality during wait-list time especially in those with decompensated cirrhosis. At univariate analysis Meld score, Child score and presence of frailty were found to be associated with shorter survival, however, at multivariate analysis presence of frailty and Child C vs. A/B were the only independent predictor of death. Larger cohorts are required to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Major hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients still represents a great challenge for liver surgeons. Hence, the aim in the present study is to investigate the clinical impact of major hepatectomy and to assess whether the surgical approach influences the outcome of cirrhotic patients. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study including cirrhotic patients undergoing major laparoscopic (mjLLR) and open liver resection (mjOLR) in 14 Western liver centers was performed (2009–2020). Clinical, demographic, and perioperative data were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Long‐term outcome after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma was analyzed. Results: Overall, 352 patients were included; 108 after mjLLR and 244 after mjOLR. After PSM, 88 patients were matched in each group. In the mjLLR group, compared to mjOLR, less blood loss (P =.042), lower overall and severe complication (P <.001,.020), such as surgical site infection, acute kidney injury and liver failure were observed, parallel to a shorter length of hospital stay. Stratifying patients based on the type of resection, less severe complications was observed only after laparoscopic left hepatectomy (P =.044), while the advantages of laparoscopy tend to decrease during right hepatectomy. Subgroup analysis of long‐term survivals following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma showed no difference between mjLLR and mjOLR. Conclusions: This multicenter experience suggests potential short‐term benefits of mjLLR in cirrhotic patients compared to mjOLR, without compromising long‐term outcome. These findings might have interesting clinical implications for the management of patients with chronic liver disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The only potentially curative treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is complete (R0) resection. This is difficult to achieve and great effort should be made to optimise surgical margins assessment and to thoroughly define their prognostic value. When considering resections for PHC, not only bile duct margins (ductal margins, DM), but also the liver transection plane and the dissection plane in the hepatoduodenal ligament (radial margins, RM) should be examined. Studies concerning PHC resections with comprehensive analyses of the recurrence and survival related to margins status most frequently consider only ductal margins. The importance of also assessing radial margins' prognostic value was recently introduced and deserves to be further studied. To our knowledge, there is currently no evidence of prognostic value of isolated positive RM. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and to investigate the effects on the recurrence and survival of positive isolated RM in resected PHC. In resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), positive ductal margin (DM) is associated with poor survival. There is currently little knowledge about the impact of positive radial margin (RM) when DM is negative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the role of positive RM. Patients who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017 where retrospectively reviewed and stratified according to margin positivity: an isolated RM-positive group and DM ± RM group. Of the 75 patients identified; 34 (45.3%) had R1 resection and 17 had positive RM alone. Survival was poorer in patients with R1 resection compared to R0 (p = 0.019). After stratification according to margin positivity; R0 patients showed better survival than DM ± RM-positive patients (p = 0.004; MST 43.9 vs. 23.6 months), but comparable to RM-positive patients (p = 0.361; MST 43.9 vs. 39.5 months). Recurrence was higher in DM ± RM group compared to R0 (p = 0.0017; median disease-free survival (DFS) 15 vs. 30 months); but comparable between RM and R0 group (p = 0.39; DFS 20 vs. 30 months). In univariate and multivariate analysis, DM positivity resulted as a negative prognostic factor both for survival and recurrence. In conclusion, positive RM resections appear to have different recurrence patterns and survival rates than positive DM resections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic liver surgery is increasingly used for more challenging procedures. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization., Methods: This was an international retrospective multicentre study of patients with colorectal liver metastases who underwent open or laparoscopic right and extended right hepatectomy after portal vein embolization between 2004 and 2020. The perioperative and oncological outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic and open approaches were compared using propensity score matching., Results: Of 338 patients, 84 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure and 254 patients underwent an open procedure. Patients in the laparoscopic group less often underwent extended right hepatectomy (18% versus 34.6% (P = 0.004)), procedures in the setting of a two-stage hepatectomy (42% versus 65% (P < 0.001)), and major concurrent procedures (4% versus 16.1% (P = 0.003)). After propensity score matching, 78 patients remained in each group. The laparoscopic approach was associated with longer operating and Pringle times (330 versus 258.5 min (P < 0.001) and 65 versus 30 min (P = 0.001) respectively) and a shorter length of stay (7 versus 8 days (P = 0.011)). The R0 resection rate was not different (71% for the laparoscopic approach versus 60% for the open approach (P = 0.230)). The median disease-free survival was 12 (95% c.i. 10 to 20) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 20 (95% c.i. 13 to 31) months for the open approach (P = 0.145). The median overall survival was 28 (95% c.i. 22 to 48) months for the laparoscopic approach versus 42 (95% c.i. 35 to 52) months for the open approach (P = 0.614)., Conclusion: The advantages of a laparoscopic over an open approach for (extended) right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases after portal vein embolization are limited., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.)

Background: It is well known that laparoscopic liver surgery can offer advantages over open liver surgery in selected patients. However, what type of procedures can benefit most from a laparoscopic approach has been investigated poorly thus far. The aim of this study is thus to define the extent of advantages of laparoscopic over open liver surgery for lesions in the anterolateral (AL) and posterosuperior (PS) segments., Methods: In this international multicentre retrospective cohort study, laparoscopic and open minor liver resections for lesions in the AL and PS segments were compared after propensity score matching. The differential benefit of laparoscopy over open liver surgery, calculated using bootstrap sampling, was compared between AL and PS resections and expressed as a Delta of the differences., Results: After matching, 3,040 AL and 2,336 PS resections were compared, encompassing open and laparoscopic procedures in a 1:1 ratio. AL and PS laparoscopic liver resections were more advantageous in comparison to open in terms of blood loss, transfusion rate, complications, and length of stay. However, AL resections benefitted more from laparoscopy than PS in terms of overall and severe complications (D-difference were 4.8%, P=0.046 and 3%, P=0.046) and blood loss (D-difference was 195 mL, P<0.001). Similar results were observed in the subset for high-volume centres, while in recent years no significant differences were found in the differential benefit between AL and PS segments., Conclusions: The advantage of laparoscopic over open liver surgery is greater in the AL segments than in the PS segments., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/hbsn-23-494/coif). M.A.H. and L.A.A. serve as unpaid editorial board members of HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition. Outside of the submitted work, S.L.B. reported payment or honoraria from Baxter, Olympus, Siemens and Johnson & Johnson, and A.A.F. reported speaker’s honoraria from Bayer and Olympus. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Major hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients still represents a great challenge for liver surgeons. Hence, the aim in the present study is to investigate the clinical impact of major hepatectomy and to assess whether the surgical approach influences the outcome of cirrhotic patients., Methods: Multicenter retrospective study including cirrhotic patients undergoing major laparoscopic (mjLLR) and open liver resection (mjOLR) in 14 Western liver centers was performed (2009-2020). Clinical, demographic, and perioperative data were compared using propensity score matching (PSM). Long-term outcome after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma was analyzed., Results: Overall, 352 patients were included; 108 after mjLLR and 244 after mjOLR. After PSM, 88 patients were matched in each group. In the mjLLR group, compared to mjOLR, less blood loss (P = .042), lower overall and severe complication (P < .001, .020), such as surgical site infection, acute kidney injury and liver failure were observed, parallel to a shorter length of hospital stay. Stratifying patients based on the type of resection, less severe complications was observed only after laparoscopic left hepatectomy (P = .044), while the advantages of laparoscopy tend to decrease during right hepatectomy. Subgroup analysis of long-term survivals following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma showed no difference between mjLLR and mjOLR., Conclusions: This multicenter experience suggests potential short-term benefits of mjLLR in cirrhotic patients compared to mjOLR, without compromising long-term outcome. These findings might have interesting clinical implications for the management of patients with chronic liver disease., (© 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate immunological risk factors associated with BS (Biliary Strictures) after LT (Liver Transplantation)., Material and Methods: The study included 192 patients out of 273 adult liver transplantations performed from August 2005 to December 2012, with a radiological or surgically proven biliary stricture. About 35 potential risk factors for biliary strictures were studied. Results A biliary stricture was diagnosed in 22.9% of transplants; the anastomotic type and the non-anastomotic type complicated the transplantation in 18.2% and 7.8% of cases, respectively. Six patients (3.1%) presented both of forms. Univariate analysis using logistic regression showed that preoperative serum bilirubin level >2 mg/dl (P=0.040), donor age >46 years old (P=0.007), positive crossmatch (P=0.007), product of donor age and preoperative Model for End Stage Liver Disease (DMELD) >710 (P=0.011), occurrence of acute or chronic rejection (P=0.004; P=0.003), and biliary leak (P=0.002) were all significantly associated with the development of biliary stricture. At the multivariate analysis, Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC) (P=0.019), donor age >46 years (P=0.008), crossmatch positivity (P=0.001), and acute or chronic rejection (P=0.005; P=0.043) appeared to be the only variables independently associated with the development of a biliary stricture. Conclusions Immunological risk factors (PBC, crossmatch positivity, acute and chronic rejection) emerged as being the most important variables associated to the development of biliary strictures after LT.