Search

While biomechanical registrations of the rowing movement were recently published(1), more functional anatomical analyses of rowing movements remain relatively scarce. The present study therefore concentrates on rotational motions in shoulder and elbow, with respect to upper and lower arm, namely humerus, ulna and radius respectively, and the role of pronator muscles during the movements of the radius in the lower arm. Rowing consists of cyclic movements, performed by oarsmen, each of their strokes alternated by subsequent recovery phases. During a stroke from catch on, the pulling phase starts with extended arms in which shoulders are in anteflexion and elbows in extension. Thereby the humerus of the upper arm is in medial rotation, while in the lower arm radius and ulna are relatively parallel to each other - this is called "supination". From about halfway the pulling phase until the finish of the stroke, the shoulders move to retroflexion and elbows are flexed. Meanwhile, the humerus of the upper arm goes to lateral rotation, coupled to the crossing of the radius over the ulna in the lower arm - this is called "pronation". The question arises, which of the pronator muscles contributes to this pronation. Our current research focuses on the anatomical features of the pronator teres muscle, investigted in normal human anatomical specimens by means of dissection, morphometry and roentgenphotogrammetry. Humeral and ulnar heads of m.pronator teres fuse, their common tendon inserting on the tuberositas pronatoria of the radius. Mathematical vector analysis of forces indicates that the effective contribution of m. pronator teres to pronation of the forearm may be considered as somewhat limited. An important vector of the pronator teres muscle contributes to elbow flexion. Strong pronation can be produced by a deep muscle of the forearm m. pronator quadratus. Finally our analysis indicates, that funtional anatomy can be used to elucidate possible active insufficiencies of muscles during sports.

Aim: The goal of this European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) guideline project is to give an overview of the existing evidence on the management of diverticular disease, primarily as a guidance to surgeons. Methods: The guideline was developed during several working phases including three voting rounds and one consensus meeting. The two project leads (JKS and EA) appointed by the ESCP guideline committee together with one member of the guideline committee (WB) agreed on the methodology, decided on six themes for working groups (WGs) and drafted a list of research questions. Senior WG members, mostly colorectal surgeons within the ESCP, were invited based on publication records and geographical aspects. Other specialties were included in the WGs where relevant. In addition, one trainee or PhD fellow was invited in each WG. All six WGs revised the research questions if necessary, did a literature search, created evidence tables where feasible, and drafted supporting text to each research question and statement. The text and statement proposals from each WG were arranged as one document by the first and last authors before online voting by all authors in two rounds. For the second voting ESCP national representatives were also invited. More than90% agreement was considered a consensus. The final phrasing of the statements with