Search

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a vertebral corner that demonstrates an active corner inflammatory lesion (CIL) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is more likely to evolve into a de novo syndesmophyte visible on plain radiography than is a vertebral corner that demonstrates no active inflammation on MRI. METHODS: MRI scans and plain radiographs were obtained for 29 patients recruited into randomized placebo-controlled trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFalpha) therapy. MRI was conducted at baseline, 12 or 24 weeks (n = 29), and 2 years (n = 22), while radiography was conducted at baseline and 2 years. A persistent CIL was defined as a CIL that was found on all available scans. A resolved CIL was defined as having completely disappeared on either the second or third scan. A validation cohort consisted of 41 AS patients followed up prospectively. Anonymized MRIs were assessed independently by 3 readers who were blinded with regard to radiographic findings. RESULTS: New syndesmophytes developed significantly more frequently in vertebral corners with inflammation (20%) than in those without inflammation (5.1%) seen on baseline MRI (P

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of adalimumab versus placebo in reducing spinal and sacroiliac (SI) joint inflammation, by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients (n = 82) received 40 mg adalimumab or placebo every other week during an initial 24-week double-blind period. MRIs of both the spine and SI joints were obtained at baseline, week 12, and week 52. Spinal and SI joint inflammation were measured using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI index. RESULTS: The spine SPARCC score in placebo-treated patients increased by a mean of 9.4% from baseline, compared with a mean decrease of 53.6% in adalimumab-treated patients (P < 0.001); the SI joint SPARCC score decreased by a mean of 12.7% from baseline in placebo-treated patients and by 52.9% in adalimumab-treated patients (P = 0.017). The response in adalimumab-treated patients was maintained at week 52. Placebo-treated patients were switched to open-label adalimumab treatment at week 24 and experienced similar reductions in spinal and SI joint inflammation by week 52. Similar large reductions in the spine and SI joint SPARCC scores were noted, even in patients who failed to meet the ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (International Working Group) criteria (nonresponders) at 12 weeks. In adalimumab-treated patients, a reduced C-reactive protein concentration at week 12 was significantly associated with improvement in the spine SPARCC score (P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Adalimumab significantly reduced both spinal and SI joint inflammation in patients with active AS after 12 weeks of treatment, and these improvements were maintained for up to 52 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of fluoroscopically guided corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis (OA) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with symptomatic hip OA were randomly allocated to receive placebo (10 mg bipuvicaine, 2 ml saline) (n = 21) or corticosteroid treatment (10 mg bipuvicaine, 40 mg triamcinolone hexacetonide) (n = 31). Patients were followed up for 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the pain improvement response, defined as a 20% decrease in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) pain score (on 5 100-mm visual analog scales [VAS]) (WOMAC20) from baseline to 2 months postinjection. Secondary outcomes were a 50% decrease in the WOMAC pain score (WOMAC50), changes in other WOMAC subscale scores, patient's global assessment of health (on a 100-mm VAS), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life indices. Analyses were based on the intent-to-treat principle. RESULTS: The mean WOMAC pain score fell 49.2% (decreasing from 310.1 mm to 157.4 mm) at 2 months postinjection in patients receiving corticosteroid, compared with a decrease of 2.5% (from 314.3 mm to 306.5 mm) in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The proportion of WOMAC20 responders at 2 months' followup was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group (67.7%) compared with the placebo group (23.8%) (P = 0.004); similar proportions of WOMAC50 responders were observed between groups (61.3% in the corticosteroid group versus 14.3% in the placebo group; P = 0.001). Response differences were maintained at 3 months' followup (58.1% responders in the corticosteroid group versus 9.5% responders in the placebo group; P = 0.004). Significant differences in the WOMAC stiffness and physical function scores (P < 0.0001), patient's global health scores (P = 0.005), and SF-36 physical component scores (P = 0.04) were observed, with patients in the corticosteroid group showing greater improvements. There were no differences in the frequency of adverse events between groups. CONCLUSION: This placebo-controlled trial confirms that corticosteroid injection can be an effective treatment of pain in hip OA, with benefits lasting up to 3 months in many cases. Future studies should address questions related to the benefits of repeated steroid injection and the effects of this treatment on disease modification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Most vertebral compression fractures are not recognized or treated. We conducted a controlled trial in older patients with vertebral fractures incidentally reported on chest radiographs, comparing usual care with osteoporosis interventions directed at physicians (opinion-leader-endorsed evidence summaries and reminders) or physicians+patients (adding activation with leaflets and telephone counseling). Methods: Patients aged >60 years who were discharged home from emergency departments and who had vertebral fractures reported but were not treated for osteoporosis were allocated to usual care (control) or physician intervention using alternate-week time series. After 3 months, untreated controls were re-allocated to physician+patient intervention. Allocation was concealed, outcomes ascertainment blinded, and analyses intent-to-treat. Primary outcome was starting osteoporosis treatment within 3 months. Results: There were 1315 consecutive patients screened, and 240 allocated to control (n=123) or physician intervention (n=117). Groups were similar at baseline (average age 74 years, 45% female, 58% previous fractures). Compared with controls, physician interventions significantly (all P <.001) increased osteoporosis treatment (20 [17%] vs 2 [2%]), bone mineral density testing (51 [44%] vs 5 [4%]), and bone mineral density testing or treatment (57 [49%] vs 7 [6%]). Three months after controls were re-allocated to physician+patient interventions, 22% had started treatment and 65% had bone mineral density testing or treatment (P <.001 vs controls). Physician+patient interventions increased bone mineral density testing or treatment an additional 16% compared with physician interventions (P=.01). Conclusions: An opinion-leader-based intervention targeting physicians substantially improved rates of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment in patients with incidental vertebral fractures, compared with usual care. Even better osteoporosis management was achieved by adding patient activation to physician interventions [NCT00388908]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aims to establish expert consensus recommendations for clinical information on imaging requests in suspected/known axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), focusing on enhancing diagnostic clarity and patient care through guidelines., Materials and Methods: A specialised task force was formed, comprising 7 radiologists, 11 rheumatologists from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) and a patient representative. Using the Delphi method, two rounds of surveys were conducted among ASAS members. These surveys aimed to identify critical elements for imaging referrals and to refine these elements for practical application. The task force deliberated on the survey outcomes and proposed a set of recommendations, which were then presented to the ASAS community for a decisive vote., Results: The collaborative effort resulted in a set of six detailed recommendations for clinicians involved in requesting imaging for patients with suspected or known axSpA. These recommendations cover crucial areas, including clinical features indicative of axSpA, clinical features, mechanical factors, past imaging data, potential contraindications for specific imaging modalities or contrast media and detailed reasons for the examination, including differential diagnoses. Garnering support from 73% of voting ASAS members, these recommendations represent a consensus on optimising imaging request protocols in axSpA., Conclusion: The ASAS recommendations offer comprehensive guidance for rheumatologists in requesting imaging for axSpA, aiming to standardise requesting practices. By improving the precision and relevance of imaging requests, these guidelines should enhance the clinical impact of radiology reports, facilitate accurate diagnosis and consequently improve the management of patients with axSpA., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TD: speakers bureau: Canon MS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB; consultant: Lilly; grant/research support: Canon MS. CG: speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim. VN-C: has received speakers fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; consultant of AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma; grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis. IE: speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis. HH: speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Janssen, Roche, Sobi and Pfizer, consultant of Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, MSD, AbbVie, Novartis and Sobi. PMM: honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript, and is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University College London Hospitals (UCLH), Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). WM: speaking: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB grants: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. HM-O: research grants from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, honoraria/speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB. MØ: speaker fees: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. XB: consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB; grant/research support: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis and UCB. MRu: speaker fees from and/or advisor for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB. KGH: speaker fees from Novartis, MSD and Pfizer. Consulting for AbbVie and Calyx. Co-founder of BerlinFlame. SJP: speaking fees from MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, UCB, Novartis; consulting fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, UCB, Novartis and research support from AbbVie, MSD and Novartis. MRe: ISS grant; ASAS consultant. RGWL: consultant: Calyx, CARE Arthritis, Image Analysis Group. UW: speaker fees: Novartis, Eli Lilly. AGJ: none for this article. MdH: speaker fees from UBC. FAS: speaker fees: Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Background: The Psoriatic Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (PsAMRIS) and MRI Whole-Body Scoring System for Inflammation in Peripheral Joints and Entheses in Inflammatory Arthritis (MRI-WIPE) have not been used together to assess treatment of psoriatic arthritis in a clinical trial. We aimed to assess the effect of apremilast treatment on inflammation, with outcomes measured by PsAMRIS and MRI-WIPE., Methods: MOSAIC was a phase 4, multicentre, single-arm, open-label study conducted at 29 sites across ten countries (Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA). Adults aged 18 years or older with a documented diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis for a duration of 3 months to 5 years self-enrolled and were included if they met the classification criteria for active psoriatic arthritis at screening. Patients were required to have at least three swollen and three tender joints with hand involvement and at least one active enthesitis site according to the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada enthesitis index or the Leeds enthesitis index. Patients were excluded if they had previous treatment with a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or previous treatment with more than two conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. After a 5-day titration period, patients received apremilast 30 mg orally twice per day. Concomitant stable methotrexate up to 25 mg per week was permitted. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 24 in a composite inflammation score of bone marrow oedema, synovitis, and tenosynovitis in the hand as assessed by PsAMRIS. The full analysis set and safety population included all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of apremilast. This completed study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03783026)., Findings: Between Feb 6, 2019, and May 11, 2022, 123 patients were enrolled in the MOSAIC study. Of these 123 patients, 122 (99%) were treated with apremilast and included in the full analysis set and safety population. 67 (55%) of 122 patients were female, 55 (45%) were male, and 116 (95%) were White. 80 (66%) of 122 patients completed 48 weeks of treatment. The least squares mean change from baseline to week 24 in the composite inflammation score of bone marrow oedema, synovitis, and tenosynovitis as assessed by PsAMRIS was -2·32 (95% CI -4·73 to 0·09). 95 (78%) of 122 patients had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. Six (5%) patients had a severe treatment-emergent adverse event and six (5%) patients had a serious treatment-emergent adverse event. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were considered to be related to apremilast., Interpretation: Apremilast improved inflammation in joints and entheses on assessment of MRI measures in the hand and the whole body. Our findings encourage the use of MRI, including whole-body MRI, as an objective outcome measure in trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis., Funding: Amgen., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MØ has received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis; and has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB. MB has received research grants from AbbVie, Celgene, and Novartis; has received speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Image Analysis Group, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and owns stock in Image Analysis Group. WPM has received consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; has received grant and research support from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and is chief medical officer of CARE Arthritis. RGL has received consulting fees from Calyx, CARE Arthritis, and Image Analysis Group. MRB has received research grants from Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. OK is employed by and owns stock in Image Analysis Group. GV has received grant and research support from Mallinckrodt and Novartis; has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Esaote, Exagen, Genentech, Gilead, Global Health Living, Horizon, Image Analysis Group, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB; and is on the speakers' bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Centocor, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Horizon, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Radius, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB. JR, SC, YK, CD, ZZ, and HA are employed by and own stock in Amgen. PJM has received grant and research support and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, and UCB; has received consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, and GSK; and is on the speakers' bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: Radiographic assessment of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria is key in the classification of axial spondyloarthritis but has moderate interreader agreement. We aimed to investigate the improvements of the reliability in scoring SIJ radiographs after applying an online real-time iterative calibration (RETIC) module, in addition to a slideshow and video alone., Methods: Nineteen readers, randomized to 2 groups (A or B), completed 3 calibration steps: (1) review of manuscripts, (2) review of slideshow and video with group A completing RETIC, and (3) re-review of slideshow and video with group B completing RETIC. The RETIC module gave instant feedback on readers' gradings and continued until predefined reliability (κ) targets for mNY positivity/negativity were met. Each step was followed by scoring different batches of 25 radiographs (exercises I to III). Agreement (κ) with an expert radiologist was assessed for mNY positivity/negativity and individual lesions. Improvements by training strategies were tested by linear mixed models., Results: In exercises I, II, and III, mNY κ were 0.61, 0.76, and 0.84, respectively, in group A; and 0.70, 0.68, and 0.86, respectively, in group B (ie, increasing, mainly after RETIC completion). Improvements were observed for grading both mNY positivity/negativity and individual pathologies, both in experienced and, particularly, inexperienced readers. Completion of the RETIC module in addition to the slideshow and video caused a significant κ increase of 0.17 (95% CI 0.07-0.27; P = 0.002) for mNY-positive and mNY-negative grading, whereas completion of the slideshow and video alone did not (κ = 0.00, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.10; P = 0.99)., Conclusion: Agreement on scoring radiographs according to the mNY criteria significantly improved when adding an online RETIC module, but not by slideshow and video alone.

Background: A temporal relationship between vedolizumab and new-onset spondyloarthritis (SpA) has been suggested., Aims: We evaluated the relationship between vedolizumab initiation and development of new-onset SpA in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through serial clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Methods: A single-centre prospective observational study of 24 patients with IBD. Patients were eligible if they had active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease (CD), were initiating vedolizumab, had no prior history of arthritis or SpA and were suitable for serial MRI. A rheumatologist performed clinical evaluation prior to the first dose and 8 and 24 weeks. Axial MRI was evaluated by a blinded central reader and performed at baseline 8 and 24 weeks., Results: Nine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor-naïve patients (4 male; mean age 53.2 years; 6 UC; 3 CD) and eight TNF inhibitor-experienced patients (7 male; mean age 48 years; 3 UC; 5 CD) completed all assessments. No patients developed new features of axial arthritis or features of peripheral SpA (inflammatory oligoarthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, or psoriasis (nail, body, or scalp)). Both groups demonstrated a good intestinal response., Conclusion: Vedolizumab initiation did not induce new features of axial or peripheral SpA after 24 weeks of treatment in TNF inhibitor-experienced or TNF inhibitor-naive patients with IBD., (© 2024 The Author(s). United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Teacher stress is at an all-time high. The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for teachers, which resulted in a record number of teachers intending to leave the classroom citing stress as a contributing factor. Understanding teachers' positive and negative psychological experiences, or well-being, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic will inform teacher wellness interventions intended to keep teachers in the classroom. Two hundred forty-six teachers from a suburban school district participated in a survey of well-being indicators, including affect, perceived stress, teaching self-efficacy, and preventive coping. A latent profile analysis identified four patterns of well-being: strained, resilient, lower teaching self-efficacy, and lower emotional well-being. While many teachers were resilient during the crisis, approximately two-thirds experienced global or isolated areas of strain. Additionally, the Classroom Appraisal of Resources and Demands-Revised, a theory-driven assessment of teachers' workplace appraisal of demands and resources, was associated with teachers' strained and resilient well-being profiles, making it a suitable screening tool for these groups. Layered screening and tailored intervention, based on teachers' well-being patterns, may help minimize teacher attrition during and postcrises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: We aimed to assess: 1. The frequency of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) according to extra-articular presentation and HLA-B27 status; 2. Clinical and imaging features that distinguish axSpA from non-axSpA; 3. The impact of MRI on diagnosis and classification of axSpA., Methods: The Screening in Axial Spondyloarthritis in Psoriasis, Iritis, Colitis, (SASPIC) study enrolled patients in two multicenter cohorts. Consecutive patients with undiagnosed chronic back pain attending dermatology, ophthalmology, and gastroenterology clinics with PsO, AAU, or IBD, were referred to a local rheumatologist with special expertise in axSpA for a structured diagnostic evaluation. The primary outcome was proportion of patients diagnosed with axSpA by final global evaluation., Results: Frequency of axSpA was 46.7%, 61.6%, and 46.8% in SASPIC-1 cases (n=212) and 23.5%, 57.9%, and 23.3% in SASPIC-2 cases (n=151) with PsO, AAU, or IBD, respectively. Among B27 positives, axSpA was diagnosed in 70%, 74.5%, and 66.7% in SASPIC-1, and in 71.4%, 87.8%, and 55.6% in SASPIC-2 in patients with PsO, AAU, or IBD, respectively. All musculoskeletal clinical features were non-discriminatory. MRI was indicative of axSpA in 60-80% of patients and MRI in all patients (SASPIC-2) versus on-demand (SASPIC-1) led to 25% fewer diagnoses of axSpA in HLA B27 negatives with PsO or IBD. Performance of the ASAS classification criteria was greater with routine MRI (SASPIC-2) though sensitivity was lower than previously reported., Conclusions: Optimal management of patients presenting with PsO, AAU, IBD, and undiagnosed chronic back pain should include referral to a rheumatologist. Conducting MRI in all patients enhances diagnostic accuracy., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To develop and validate classification criteria for axial disease in youth with juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA; AxJSpA)., Methods: This international initiative consisted of four phases: 1) Item generation; 2) Item reduction; 3) Criteria development; and 4) Validation of the AxJSpA criteria by an independent team of experts in an internationally representative Validation cohort., Results: These criteria are intended to be used on youth with a physician diagnosis of juvenile SpA and for whom axial disease is suspected. Item generation consisted of a systematic literature review and a free-listing exercise using input from international physicians and collectively resulted in 108 items. After the item reduction exercise and expert panel input, 37 items remained for further consideration. The final AxJSpA criteria domains included: imaging: active inflammation, imaging: structural lesions, pain chronicity, pain pattern, pain location, stiffness, and genetics. The most heavily weighted domains were active inflammation and structural lesions on imaging. Imaging typical of sacroiliitis was deemed necessary, but not sufficient, to classify a youth with AxJSpA. The threshold for classification of AxJSpA was a score of ≥55 (out of 100). When tested in the validation data set, the final criteria had a specificity of 97.5% (95% CI: 91.4-99.7), sensitivity of 64.3% (95% CI: 54.9-73.1) and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86)., Conclusions: The new AxJSpA classification criteria require an entry criterion, physician diagnosis of juvenile SpA, and include seven weighted domains. The AxJSpA classification criteria are validated and designed to identify participants for research studies., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To begin evaluating deep learning (DL)-automated quantification of knee joint effusion-synovitis via the OMERACT filter., Methods: A DL algorithm previously trained on Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) knee MRI automatically quantified effusion volume in MRI of 53 OAI subjects, which were also scored semi-quantitatively via KIMRISS and MOAKS by 2-6 readers., Results: DL-measured knee effusion correlated significantly with experts' assessments (Kendall's tau 0.34-0.43) CONCLUSION: The close correlation of automated DL knee joint effusion quantification to KIMRISS manual semi-quantitative scoring demonstrated its criterion validity. Further assessments of discrimination and truth vs. clinical outcomes are still needed to fully satisfy OMERACT filter requirements., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jacob Jaremko reports financial support was provided by Medical Imaging Consultants (MIC), Edmonton, Canada. Banafshe Felfeliyan reports on a relationship with Alberta Innovates that includes funding grants. Walter P. Maksymowych is Chief Medical Officer CARE Arthritis Limited. Robert G. Lambart has received consulting fees from CARE Arthritis, Image Analysis Group and Calyx. We thank the members of the OMERACT MRI in Arthritis Working Group for their participation and support in this project., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Whereas previous projects attempted to standardize imaging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), few studies have been published about the need for specific details regarding the image acquisition and lesions that may be less familiar to general radiologists. This work reports consensus recommendations developed by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) that aim to standardize the imaging reports in patients suspected of having or with known axSpA. A task force consisting of radiologists and rheumatologists from ASAS and one patient representative formulated two surveys that were completed by ASAS members. The results of these surveys led to the development of 10 recommendations that were endorsed by 73% (43 of 59) of ASAS members. The recommendations are targeted to the radiologist and include best practices for the inclusion of clinical information, technical details, image quality, and imaging findings in radiology reports. These recommendations also emphasize that imaging findings that indicate differential diagnoses and referral suggestions should be included in the concluding section of the radiology report. With these recommendations, ASAS aims to improve the diagnostic process and care for patients suspected of having or with known axSpA., (© RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Gandikota in this issue.)

Objective: To assess whether using ultrasound (US) in addition to clinical information versus only clinical information in a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy leads to more clinical remission and to less radiographic progression in RA., Methods: Patients with RA from the 2-year prospective BIODAM cohort were included. Clinical and US data (US7-score) were collected every 3 months and hands and feet radiographs every 6 months. At each visit, it was decided whether patients were treated according to the clinical definition of T2T with DAS44 remission as benchmark (T2T-DAS44). T2T-DAS44 was correctly applied if: (i) DAS44 remission had been achieved or (ii) if not, treatment was intensified. A T2T strategy also considering US data (T2T-DAS44-US) was correctly applied if: (i) both DAS44 and US remission (synovitis-score < 2, Doppler-score = 0) were present; or (ii) if not, treatment was intensified. The effect of T2T-DAS44-US on attaining clinical remission and on change in Sharp-van der Heijde score compared to T2T-DAS44 was analysed., Results: A total of 1016 visits of 128 patients were included. T2T-DAS44 was correctly followed in 24% of visits and T2T-DAS44-US in 41%. DAS44 < 1.6 was achieved in 39% of visits. Compared to T2T-DAS44, using the T2T-DAS44-US strategy resulted in a 41% lower likelihood of DAS44 remission [OR (95% CI): 0.59 (0.40;0.87)] and had no effect on radiographic progression [β(95% CI): 0.11 (- 0.16;0.39)] assessed at various intervals up to 12 months later., Conclusion: Our results do not suggest a benefit of using the US7-score in addition to clinical information as a T2T benchmark compared to clinical information alone. Key Points • Ultrasound has a valuable role in diagnostic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis, but it is unclear whether adding ultrasound to the clinical assessment in a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy leads to more patients achieving remission and reduction in radiographic progression. • Our data from a real-world study demonstrated that adding information from ultrasound to the clinical assessment in a T2T strategy led to a lower rather than a higher likelihood of obtaining clinical remission as compared to using only clinical assessment. • Our data demonstrated that adding ultrasound data to a T2T strategy based only on clinical assessment did not offer additional protection against radiographic progression in patients with RA. • Adding US to a T2T strategy based on clinical assessment led to far more treatment intensifications (with consequences for costs and exposure to adverse events) without yielding a meaningful clinical benefit., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Objective: (1) To compare the capacity to detect sacroiliac joint (SIJ) erosions and baseline-to-week 104 change in erosions between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs in recent-onset axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); and (2) to compare treatment-discriminatory capacities of MRI and radiographic scores for erosion detection in patients receiving etanercept in the Effect of Etanercept on Symptoms and Objective Inflammation in Nonradiographic axSpA (EMBARK) trial vs controls in the DESIR ( Devenir des Spondylarthropathies Indifférenciées Récentes ) cohort., Methods: Anonymized SIJ MRI and radiographs were assessed at patient and joint surface levels. Three readers evaluated MRI; 3 different readers evaluated radiographs. Final scores for comparison of radiographs and MRI for detection of erosions were assigned based on agreement of ≥ 2 of 3 readers' assessments., Results: At baseline, discordance in erosion detection between imaging methods was more frequent for MRI erosions in the absence of radiographic erosions (48/224 [21.4%] patients) than for radiographic erosions in the absence of MRI erosions (14/224 [6.3%] patients; P < 0.001). After 104 weeks, a decrease in erosions was observed on MRI but not radiographs in 49/221 (22.2%) patients, and on radiographs but not MRI in 6/221 (2.7%) patients ( P < 0.001). In the treatment-discriminant capacity analysis, the largest standardized differences between etanercept and control cohorts at week 104 were changes in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI erosion discrete score, changes in erosion average score, and meeting the modified New York criteria on radiographs, with unadjusted/adjusted Hedges G effect sizes of 0.40/0.50, 0.40/0.56, and 0.40/0.43, respectively., Conclusion: In recent-onset axSpA, SIJ erosions and erosion change were observed more frequently on MRI than radiography. The significance of interval improvement of MRI erosions warrants further research. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01258738, NCT01648907]., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To develop a reference image atlas for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (OMERACT MRI-WIPE) of the knee region., Methods: Image examples of each pathology, location and grade, were collected and discussed at web-based, interactive meetings within the OMERACT MRI in Arthritis Working Group. Subsequently, reference images were selected by consensus., Results: Reference images for each grade, pathology and location are depicted, along with definitions, reader rules and recommended MRI-sequences., Conclusion: The atlas guides scoring whole-body MRIs for inflammation in joints and entheses of the knee region according to MRI-WIPE methodology in clinical trials and cohorts., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Mikkel Østergaard has received research grants from Abbvie, BMS, Merck, Novartis and UCB, consultancy fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB and speaker fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB. Walter P Maksymowych is Chief Medical Officer at CARE Arthritis Limited. Helena Marzo-Ortega has received research grants from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB. Philip G Conaghan has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Novartis and Takeda and speaker fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Novartis. Robert GW Lambert has received research grants from Calyx and Care Arthritis, and consultancy fees from Image Analysis Group, Calyx and Care Arthritis. The remaining authors declare no financial interests/personal relationships., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To develop a reference image atlas for scoring the hip/pelvis region according to the OMERACT whole-body MRI scoring system for inflammation in peripheral joints and entheses (MRI-WIPE)., Methods: We collected image examples of each pathology, location and grade, discussed them at web-based, interactive meetings and, finally, selected reference images by consensus., Results: Reference images for each grade and location of osteitis, synovitis and soft tissue inflammation are provided, as are definitions, reader rules and recommended MRI-sequences., Conclusion: A reference image atlas was created to guide scoring whole-body MRIs for arthritis and enthesitis in the hip/pelvis region in spondyloarthritis/psoriatic arthritis clinical trials and cohorts., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests Mikkel Østergaard has received research grants from Abbvie, BMS, Merck, Novartis and UCB, consultancy fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB and speaker fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, and UCB. Robert GW Lambert has received research grants from Calyx and Care Arthritis, and consultancy fees from Image Analysis Group, Calyx and Care Arthritis. Walter P Maksymowych is Chief Medical Officer at CARE Arthritis Limited. Helena Marzo-Ortega has received research grants from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB. Philip G Conaghan has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Novartis and Takeda and speaker fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Novartis. The remaining authors declare no financial interests/personal relationships., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) developers have created web-based calibration modules for the SPARCC MRI sacroiliac joint (SIJ) scoring methods. We aimed to test the impact of applying these e-modules on the feasibility and reliability of these methods., Methods: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules contain cases with baseline and follow-up scans and an online scoring interface. Visual real-time feedback regarding concordance/discordance of scoring with expert readers is provided by a colour-coding scheme. Reliability is assessed in real time by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), cases being scored until ICC targets are attained. Participating readers (n=17) from the EuroSpA Imaging project were randomised to one of two reader calibration strategies that each comprised three stages. Baseline and follow-up scans from 25 cases were scored after each stage was completed. Reliability was compared with a SPARCC developer, and the System Usability Scale (SUS) assessed feasibility., Results: The reliability of readers for scoring bone marrow oedema was high after the first stage of calibration, and only minor improvement was noted following the use of the inflammation module. Greater enhancement of reader reliability was evident after the use of the structural module and was most consistently evident for the scoring of erosion (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.42/0.20) to stage 3 (0.50/0.38)) and backfill (ICC status/change: stage 1 (0.51/0.19) to stage 3 (0.69/0.41)). The feasibility of both e-modules was evident by high SUS scores., Conclusion: The SPARCC-SIJ RETIC e-modules are feasible, effective knowledge transfer tools, and their use is recommended before using the SPARCC methods for clinical research and tria., Competing Interests: Competing interests: WM has received honoraria/consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; research grants from AbbVie, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; and educational grants from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. WM is the Chief Medical Officer for CARE ARTHRITIS. MØ has received research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Merck, Novartis and UCB and speaker and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MEDAC, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB. RM received honoraria for lectures or presentations from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Gilead and Pfizer. BM received travel expenditures, honoraria for lectures or presentations from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. MJN has received honoraria for travel expenditures, lectures or presentations from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. MdH received honoraria for presentations from UCB. RM received honoraria for presentations from UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To determine whether systematic calibration enhances scoring proficiency of the OMERACT juvenile idiopathic arthritis MRI-Sacroiliac Joint score (JAMRIS-SIJ) and whether contrast-enhancement enhances its performance., Methods: MRI SIJ scans of 50 cases with juvenile spondyloarthritis were scored by 7 raters after calibration with 3 different knowledge transfer tools., Results: Calibrated readers achieved greater reliability for scoring certain inflammatory and structural lesions. Sensitivity and reliability for scoring inflammatory lesions was greater on fluid-sensitive compared to contrast-enhanced sequences., Conclusion: Systematic calibration should be implemented prior to the use of JAMRIS-SIJ for clinical trials. It is unlikely that contrast-enhanced MRI will improve the performance of this method., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Walter P. Maksymowych is Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Radiography is still used worldwide for the detection of sacroiliitis in juvenile spondyloarthritis (JSpA), despite its low sensitivity and reliability. We aimed to define unequivocal evidence of sacroiliitis on pelvic radiography in skeletally immature youth for use in classification criteria when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is unavailable., Methods: Subjects were a retrospective cohort of juvenile patients with spondyloarthritis with a radiograph and MRI as part of a diagnostic evaluation for axial disease. Six musculoskeletal imaging experts underwent an iterative consensus process to define unequivocal sacroiliitis on radiography in skeletally immature youth. Radiographs were graded using the modified New York (mNY) criteria and the unequivocal sacroiliitis criteria. Interrater agreement was assessed with the Fleiss [Formula: see text] statistic. Specificity, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC), and sensitivity of the 2 measures were tested using 2 MRI reference standards., Results: A total of 112 subjects, with a median age of 14.9 (range 6.7-20.1) years, were included. The Fleiss [Formula: see text] was fair for the mNY criteria (0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.67) and the unequivocal sacroiliitis criteria (0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.69). The unequivocal sacroiliitis criteria achieved > 90% specificity using both MRI reference standards. Sensitivity (59.26 and 57.14 vs 44.83 and 43.33) and AUROC (0.76 and 0.76 vs 0.71 and 0.71) were higher, for both reference standards, for the unequivocal sacroiliitis in youth definition than for the mNY criteria, respectively., Conclusion: In this study, we propose the first consensus-derived definition to our knowledge of unequivocal sacroiliitis by radiography in skeletally immature youth. This definition achieved excellent specificity and had higher AUROC and sensitivity values than the mNY criteria using both MRI reference standards. This definition has applicability to the JSpA axial disease classification imaging criterion when MRI is unavailable., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objective: We aimed to determine quantitative sacroiliac (SI) joint magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cutoffs for active and structural lesions that will be incorporated as imaging domains in classification criteria of axial disease in juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA)., Methods: MRI scans from an international cross-section of juvenile SpA patients were reviewed by 6 musculoskeletal imaging experts blinded to clinical details. Raters globally assessed the presence/absence of lesions typical of axial SpA and performed SI joint quadrant- or joint-based scoring. Sensitivity and specificity of lesion cutoffs were calculated using a rater majority (≥4 of 6 raters) on a global assessment of the presence/absence of active or structural lesions typical of axial SpA with high confidence as the reference standard. Cutoffs were validated in an independent cohort., Results: Imaging from 243 subjects, 61% male, median age 14.9 years, had sequences available for detailed MRI scoring. Optimal cutoffs for defining lesions typical of axial disease in juvenile SpA were: 1) inflammatory lesion: bone marrow edema in ≥3 SI joint quadrants across all SI joint MRI slices (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 96.5%); 2) structural lesions: erosion in ≥3 quadrants or sclerosis or fat lesion in ≥2 SI joint quadrants or backfill or ankylosis in ≥2 joint halves across all SI joint MRI slices (sensitivity 98.6%, specificity 95.5%). Sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoffs in the validation cohort were excellent., Conclusion: We propose data-driven cutoffs for active inflammatory and structural lesions on MRI typical of axial disease in juvenile SpA that have high specificity and sensitivity using central imaging global assessment as the reference standard and excellent reliability., (© 2022 American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To compare MRI and conventional radiography of SI joints for detection of structural lesions typical for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA)., Methods: Adult patients from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) cohort with symptoms suggestive of axSpA and both SI joint MRI and radiographs available for central reading were included. Radiographs were evaluated by three readers according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria grading system. The presence of structural damage on radiographs was defined as fulfilment of the radiographic mNY criterion and, additionally, a lower threshold for sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 unilaterally. MRI scans were assessed for the presence of structural changes indicative of axSpA by seven readers. Diagnostic performance [sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-)] of MRI and radiographs (vs rheumatologist's diagnosis of axSpA) were calculated., Results: Overall, 183 patients were included and 135 (73.7%) were diagnosed with axSpA. Structural lesions indicative of axSpA on MRI had sensitivity 38.5%, specificity 91.7%, PPV 92.9%, NPV 34.6%, LR+ 4.62 and LR- 0.67. Sacroiliitis according to the mNY criteria had sensitivity 54.8%, specificity 70.8%, PPV 84.1%, NPV 35.8%, LR+ 1.88 and LR- 0.64. Radiographic sacroiliitis of at least grade 2 unilaterally had sensitivity 65.2%, specificity 50.0%, PPV 78.6%, NPV 33.8%, LR+ 1.30 and LR- 0.69., Conclusion: Structural lesions of the SI joint detected by MRI demonstrated better diagnostic performance and better interreader reliability compared with conventional radiography., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background MRI is frequently used for early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). However, evaluation is time-consuming and requires profound expertise because noninflammatory degenerative changes can mimic axSpA, and early signs may therefore be missed. Deep neural networks could function as assistance for axSpA detection. Purpose To create a deep neural network to detect MRI changes in sacroiliac joints indicative of axSpA. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included MRI examinations of five cohorts of patients with clinical suspicion of axSpA collected at university and community hospitals between January 2006 and September 2020. Data from four cohorts were used as the training set, and data from one cohort as the external test set. Each MRI examination in the training and test sets was scored by six and seven raters, respectively, for inflammatory changes (bone marrow edema, enthesitis) and structural changes (erosions, sclerosis). A deep learning tool to detect changes indicative of axSpA was developed. First, a neural network to homogenize the images, then a classification network were trained. Performance was evaluated with use of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. P < .05 was considered indicative of statistically significant difference. Results Overall, 593 patients (mean age, 37 years ± 11 [SD]; 302 women) were studied. Inflammatory and structural changes were found in 197 of 477 patients (41%) and 244 of 477 (51%), respectively, in the training set and 25 of 116 patients (22%) and 26 of 116 (22%) in the test set. The AUCs were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.97) for all inflammatory changes, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95) for inflammatory changes fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society definition, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) for structural changes indicative of axSpA. Sensitivity and specificity on the external test set were 22 of 25 patients (88%) and 65 of 91 patients (71%), respectively, for inflammatory changes and 22 of 26 patients (85%) and 70 of 90 patients (78%) for structural changes. Conclusion Deep neural networks can detect inflammatory or structural changes to the sacroiliac joint indicative of axial spondyloarthritis at MRI. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Background: There is limited understanding regarding the inhibition of structural damage in the sacroiliac joint of patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. This study evaluated the effect of the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab versus placebo on structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints as assessed by MRI at week 16 in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis from the COAST-X study., Methods: COAST-X was a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study done at 107 sites in 15 countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with active axial spondyloarthritis without definite radiographic sacroiliitis (non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis), objective signs of inflammation (via MRI or C-reactive protein), and an inadequate response or intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly allocated to placebo or double-blind ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 2 weeks (Q2W), with an 80 mg or 160 mg starting dose. We report a post-hoc analysis of 266 patients with available MRI scans from baseline and week 16. MRI scans were scored using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) sacroiliac joint structural score (SSS) method independently by two masked readers. Treatment comparisons used analysis of covariance based on observed cases. Correlations were evaluated among changes in SPARCC SSS for erosion, fat lesions, and backfill, and between changes in SPARCC SSS and sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and clinical measures. COAST-X was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02757352., Findings: Between Aug 2, 2016, and Jan 29, 2018, 303 patients were enrolled to the COAST-X study. 290 (96%) of 303 participants completed the week 16 visit (95 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, 98 in the ixekizumab Q2W group, and 97 in the placebo group), and MRI scans were available for 266 patients at baseline and week 16 (85 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, 91 in the ixekizumab Q2W group, and 90 in the placebo group). Changes from baseline to week 16 in mean SPARCC SSS for erosion were -0·39 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·003 vs placebo), -0·40 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·002), and 0·16 for placebo; for fat lesions: 0·16 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·013), 0·10 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·067), and -0·04 for placebo; and for backfill: 0·21 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·011), 0·22 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·006), and -0·10 for placebo. Ankylosis did not change. Effects of ixekizumab versus placebo on structural changes were most pronounced in patients with baseline inflammation in the sacroiliac joints. Changes from baseline at week 16 in erosion, fat lesions, and backfill were correlated., Interpretation: Although the clinical relevance is not yet clear, patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis receiving ixekizumab had significant reductions in erosions and increases in fat lesions and backfill in the sacroiliac joints versus placebo at week 16, suggesting an early repair process with ixekizumab treatment., Funding: Eli Lilly and Company., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests WPM is Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis and has acted as a paid consultant or participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; received research or educational grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and received speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. XB has received honoraria or research grants from, or participated in advisory boards for, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Chugai, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly and Company, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB. RGL has received consulting fees from CARE Arthritis, and Image Analysis Group. RL reports honoraria for consultancy and lectures, and grants to the institution from with AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Gilead, Galapagos, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB; has received research grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and is director of Imaging Rheumatology, which is a registered company under Dutch Law. DS, HC, JL, XL, and MH are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. MØ has received research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Merck, Celgene, and Novartis and speaker or consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Spinal MRI is used to visualise lesions associated with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The ASAS MRI working group (WG) updated and validated the definitions for inflammatory and structural spinal lesions in the context of axSpA., Methods: After review of the existing literature on all possible types of spinal MRI pathologies in axSpA, the group (12 rheumatologists and two radiologists) consented on the required revisions of lesion definitions compared with the existing nomenclature of 2012. In a second step, using 62 MRI scans from the ASAS classification cohort, the proposed definitions were validated in a multireader campaign by global (absent/present) and detailed (inflammation and structural) lesion assessment at the vertebral corner (VC), vertebral endplate, facet joints, transverse processes, lateral and posterior elements. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for analysis., Results: Revisions were made for both inflammatory (bone marrow oedema, BMO) and structural (fat, erosion, bone spur and ankylosis) lesions, including localisation (central vs lateral), extension (VC vs vertebral endplate) and extent (minimum number of slices needed), while new definitions were suggested for the type of lesion based on lesion maturity (VC monomorphic vs dimorphic). The most reliably assessed lesions were VC fat lesion and VC monomorphic BMO (ICC (mean of all 36 reader pairs/overall 9 readers): 0.91/0.92; 0.70/0.67, respectively., Conclusions: The lesion definitions for spinal MRI lesions compatible with SpA were updated by consensus and validated by a group of experienced readers. The lesions with the highest frequency and best reliability were fat and monomorphic inflammatory lesions at the VC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: XB: Consulting fees: Abbvie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Payment or honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Advisory Board: Abbvie, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Leadership role: Editorial Board Member of Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, ASAS President. MØ: Consulting fees: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Payment or honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, BMS, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. RGL: Consulting fees: Calyx, CARE Arthritis Ltd., Image Analysis Ltd. IE: Payment or honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, Novartis. PMM: consulting fees: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. Other financial or non-financial interests: Supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). SJP: Consulting fees: Abbvie, UCB, Novartis (paid to the institution). Payment or honoraria for lectures: MSD, Pfizer, Abbvie, UCB, Novartis (paid to private account and to institution). Support for attending meetings: MSD, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim. Participation to Advisory Committee: Novartis, UCB, Abbvie. MdH: Grants: FWRO/FRSR, Leadership role: EDULAR Advocacy Committee. JS: Consulting fees: AbbVie, Novartis, UCB. Payment or honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, Merck, Novartis. Participate on Advisory Board: Abbvie, DP: Grants: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer. Consulting fees: AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, UCB. Payment or honoraria for lectures: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Medscape, Novartis, Peervoice, Pfizer, and UCB. Participation on Advisory Board: AbbVie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Moonlake, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, and UCB. MR: Consulting fees: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Payment or honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. Support for attending meetings: Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Abbvie. DvdH: Consulting fees: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Cyxone, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. Leadership role: Associate Editor of Annals of Rheumatic Diseases, Editorial Board Member Journal of Rheumatology, Advisory Committee RMD Open. RL: Grants: Research grants from Galapagos, AbbVie, Novartis, UCB (paid to institution). Consulting fees: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB (paid to own company). Payment or honoraria for lectures: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB (paid to own company). Participation on Advisory Board: UCB, AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Jansen, Novartis, Pfizer (paid to own company). Data safety Monitoring Board: UCB (no compensation). Director of Rheumatology Consultancy. Partner of ‘Reumatologie Maatschap Sittard/Heerlen’ (paid to own company). Leadership role: Council Member and EULAR's chair of quality of care. Member of Editorial Board of Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. WPM: Grants: Abbvie, Galapagos, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Consulting fees: Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Payment or honoraria for lectures: Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Leadership role: SPARTAN Board of directors. Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Ltd., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose of Review: Recent technical advances in computed tomography (CT) such as low-dose CT and dual-energy techniques open new applications for this imaging modality in clinical practice and for research purposes. This article will discuss the latest innovations and give a perspective on future developments., Recent Findings: Low-dose CT has increasingly been used for assessing structural changes at the sacroiliac joints and the spine. It has developed into a method with similar or even lower radiation exposure than radiography while outperforming radiography for lesion detection. Despite being incompatible with low-dose scanning, some studies have shown that dual-energy CT can provide additional information that is otherwise only assessable with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, it is unclear whether this additional information is reliable enough and if it would justify the additional radiation exposure, i.e. whether the performance of dual-energy CT is close enough to MRI to replace it in clinical practice. While the role of dual-energy CT in patients with axial spondyloarthritis remains to be established, low-dose CT has developed to an appropriate modality that should replace radiography in many circumstances and might supplement MRI., (© 2022. The Author(s).)