Search

We have compared two IgM-specific cytomegalovirus (CMV) antibody assays, an immunofluorescence assay (IFA-M) and an enzyme-linked antigen immunoassay (ELA-M), with an assay for CMV total antibody (ELISA) and viral culture for the detection of active CMV infection in renal transplant recipients. Of 75 patients (49 ELISA negative pretransplant, 26 ELISA positive), CMV-specific IgM was detected in 35 (27 ELISA negative pretransplant, 8 ELISA positive) using the IFA-M assay and in 25 (16 ELISA negative pretransplant, 9 ELISA positive) using the ELA-M test. Of the 25 patients identified as positive by ELA-M, 21 had positive viral cultures post-transplant, two seronegative patients had evidence of infection indicated by post-transplant seroconversion, and two patients were seropositive pretransplant but remained viral culture negative throughout the follow-up period. ELA-M and CMV total antibody ELISA detected primary infection in renal transplant recipients equally well, but ELA-M was found to be superior to ELISA and IFA-M for detecting reinfection and reactivation infections.

Blood donors reactive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who showed atypical patterns of viral core protein reactivity on Western blot were monitored for several months. Characterization of their antibodies was performed by 1) use of recombinant HIV proteins; 2) determination of cross-reactivity to HTLV-I, HTLV-II, and HTLV-IV: 3) assessment of immune status; and 4) identification of potentially interfering autoantibodies. Nineteen of 20 donors maintained the same HIV antibody reactivity throughout the follow-up period; the other donor became fully antibody-positive. Eighteen of 20 donors' sera showed clear reactivity with HIV recombinant core proteins. Ten of 19 donor samples demonstrated cross-reactivity to HTLV-IV; 3 of these 10 also cross-reacted with HTLV-I. The immune status of all donors was normal, although the medical histories and HLA antibody screens suggested possible autoimmune reactivity in 9 of 18 donors. During follow-up interviews, three donors reported possible risk factors for HIV infection that had not been acknowledged at the time of blood donation. We conclude that exclusion of donors with these atypical serologic test results is warranted while further studies to determine significance are being conducted.

Five hundred blood donors were evaluated for cytomegalovirus (CMV) viruria, antibody to CMV early antigens (EA-ab), CMV seropositivity by two screening assays, and CMV-specific immunoglobulin M by two methods. Three donors were viruric, EA-ab positive, and seropositive; two viruric donors were immunoglobulin M positive.