Search

Plain Language Summary Title: What Psychiatrists Should Know About Prescribed Safer Opioid Supply., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Postoperative head and neck cancer patients are at increased risk for alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Literature has shown that in this patient population, alcohol withdrawal is associated with an increase in postoperative medical and surgical complications, length of hospitalization, and hospital-related costs. Harm reduction and addiction medicine philosophies can reduce morbidity and mortality, but have not been fully validated in perioperative surgical management for head and neck cancer. This commentary synthesizes key principles of addiction medicine and current strategies that Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery surgeons can consider in their perioperative assessment and management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in their patients., (© 2023 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.)

Background: Injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis (IDU-IE) is a growing epidemic. The objective of this survey was to identify the beliefs and practice patterns of Canadian cardiac surgeons regarding surgical management of IDU-IE., Methods: A 30-question survey was developed by a working group and distributed to all practicing adult cardiac surgeons in Canada. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics., Results: Of 146 surgeons, 94 completed the survey (64%). Half of surgeons (49%) would be less likely to operate on patients with IE if associated with IDU. In the case of prosthetic valve IE owing to continued IDU, 36% were willing to reoperate once and 14% were willing to reoperate twice or more. Most surgeons required commitments from patients before surgery (73%), and most referred patients to addiction services (81%). Some surgeons would offer a Ross procedure (10%) or homograft (8%) for aortic valve IE, and 47% would consider temporary mechanical circulatory support. Whereas only 17% of surgeons worked at an institution with an endocarditis team, 71% agreed that there was a need for one at each institution. Most surgeons supported the development of IDU-IE-specific guidelines (80%)., Conclusions: Practice patterns and surgical management of IDU-IE vary considerably across Canada. Areas of clinical unmet needs include the development of a formal addiction services referral protocol for patients, the development of an interdisciplinary endocarditis team, as well as the creation of IDU-IE clinical practice guidelines., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the era of highly potent illicit opioids, such as fentanyl and carfentanil, injectable opioid agonist treatment (iOAT) is an effective treatment for those with severe and treatment-refractory opioid use disorder. Untreated opioid use disorder in pregnancy can lead to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. There are currently limited reports on the use of iOAT in pregnant women. The in-patient setting may provide an opportunity to pregnant women for stabilization with iOAT where first line therapies have been ineffective., Case Summary: We report a case of a pregnant individual who engaged in daily intravenous fentanyl who was admitted to the hospital at 29 weeks gestation for stabilization with iOAT, methadone, and slow-release oral morphine. Before admission, she endured 6 opioid overdoses in her pregnancy and continued to use illicit intravenous opioids in the community despite high dose methadone combined with slow-release oral morphine. Her withdrawal symptoms and cravings were ameliorated with hydromorphone 90 mg IM/IV BID, methadone 135 mg daily, and morphine sulfate sustained release 600 mg daily. With this regimen, she was able to reduce her intravenous fentanyl use to a single episode during her hospitalization. She completed her pregnancy in hospital, delivering a full-term live infant after receiving comprehensive prenatal care., Discussion: This case report highlights iOAT as an option during pregnancy and describes the in-patient setting as appropriate to retain high-risk patients in care. This approach may benefit those who are refractory to standard opioid agonist treatment, the numbers of whom may be rising as tolerance to the illicit supply increases., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 American Society of Addiction Medicine.)

Background: Prerequisite opioid withdrawal symptoms prior to buprenorphine induction are unacceptable to many patients. We assessed whether transdermal buprenorphine minimized withdrawal while bridging to sublingual therapy among hospital inpatients., Methods: Retrospective chart review of (n = 23) inpatients with opioid use disorder or opioid dependence due to chronic pain., Results: Of 23 inpatients, 65% transitioned without symptoms, while 35% experienced mild withdrawal. Ninety-six percent completed planned hospitalizations, with 83% engaged in treatment 4 weeks post-discharge., Discussion and Conclusions: Bridging to sublingual therapy with transdermal buprenorphine patches was feasible without withdrawal symptoms., Scientific Significance: This strategy may facilitate buprenorphine therapy in hospital inpatients. (Am J Addict 2019;00:1-4)., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry.)

Until recently, the belief that adequate pain management was not achievable while patients remained on buprenorphine was the impetus for the perioperative discontinuation of buprenorphine. We aimed to use an expert consensus Delphi-based survey technique to 1) specify the need for perioperative guidelines in this context and 2) offer a set of recommendations for the perioperative management of these patients. The major recommendation of this practice advisory is to continue buprenorphine therapy in the perioperative period. It is rarely appropriate to reduce the buprenorphine dose irrespective of indication or formulation. If analgesia is inadequate after optimisation of adjunct analgesic therapies, we recommend initiating a full mu agonist while continuing buprenorphine at some dose. The panel believes that before operation, physicians must distinguish between buprenorphine use for chronic pain (weaning/conversion from long-term high-dose opioids) and opioid use disorder (OUD) as the primary indication for buprenorphine therapy. Patients should ideally be discharged on buprenorphine, although not necessarily at their preoperative dose. Depending on analgesic requirements, they may be discharged on a full mu agonist. Overall, long-term buprenorphine treatment retention and harm reduction must be considered during the perioperative period when OUD is a primary diagnosis. The authors recognise that inter-patient variability will require some individualisation of clinical practice advisories. Clinical practice advisories are largely based on lower classes of evidence (level 4, level 5). Further research is required in order to implement meaningful changes in practitioner behaviour for this patient group., (Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The ongoing opioid epidemic has necessitated increasing prescriptions of buprenorphine, which is an evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder, and also shown to reduce harms associated with unsafe opioid administration. A systematic review of perioperative management strategies for patients taking buprenorphine concluded that there was little guidance for managing buprenorphine perioperatively. The aim of this project is to develop consensus guidelines on the optimal perioperative management strategies for this group of patients. In this paper, we present the design for a modified Delphi technique that will be used to gain consensus among patients and multidisciplinary experts in addiction, pain, community and perioperative medicine., Methods and Analysis: A national panel of experts identified by perioperative, pain and/or addiction systematic review authorship established an international profile in perioperative, pain and/or addiction research, community clinical excellence and by peer referral. A steering group will develop the first round with a list of indications to be rated by the panel of national experts, patients and allied healthcare professionals. In round 1, the expert panel will rate the appropriateness of each individual item and provide additional suggestions for revisions, additions or deletions. The definition of consensus will be set a priori . Consensus will be gauged for both appropriateness and inappropriateness of treatment strategies. Where an agreement is not reached and items are suggested for addition/deletion/modification, round 2 will take place over teleconference in order to obtain consensus., Ethics and Dissemination: Institutional research ethics board provided a waiver for this modified Delphi protocol. We plan on developing a national guideline for the management of patients taking buprenorphine in the perioperative period that will be generalisable across three sets of preoperative diagnoses including opioid use disorder and/or co-occurring pain disorders. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To use the best available evidence and principles of shared, informed decision making to develop a clinical practice guideline for a simplified approach to managing opioid use disorder (OUD) in primary care., Methods: Eleven health care and allied health professionals representing various practice settings, professions, and locations created a list of key questions relevant to the management of OUD in primary care. These questions related to the treatment setting, diagnosis, treatment, and management of comorbidities in OUD. The questions were researched by a team with expertise in evidence evaluation using a series of systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. The Guideline Committee used the systematic reviews to create recommendations., Recommendations: Recommendations outline the role of primary care in treating patients with OUD, as well as pharmacologic and psychotherapy treatments and various prescribing practices (eg, urine drug testing and contracts). Specific recommendations could not be made for management of comorbidities in patients with OUD owing to limited evidence., Conclusion: The recommendations will help simplify the complex management of patients with OUD in primary care. They will aid clinicians and patients in making informed decisions regarding their care., (Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.)

Background: An increasing number of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are treated with opioid agonist-antagonists such as buprenorphine/naloxone. Perioperative management of patients on buprenorphine/naloxone is inconsistent and remains a controversial topic with mismanagement posing a significant risk to the long-term health of these patients., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search involving Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, Cochrane Central, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, Web of Science (Clarivate), Scopus (Elsevier), CINAHL (EbscoHosst), and PubMed (NLM)., Results: Eighteen studies were included in the final sample, including one controlled study and four observational studies . Neither the controlled study nor the observational studies assessed addiction treatment retention, harm reduction, or long-term mortality rates as primary or secondary outcomes. Of the observational studies, authors showed equivalent peri- and postoperative pain control among buprenorphine continued patients. All but one authors described adequate analgesia among the case reports in which buprenorphine ≤ 16 mg sublingually (SL) daily was continued during the perioperative period. Long-term harm reduction was not reported with only three case reports including any long-term abstinence or relapse rates., Conclusions: The current understanding of the risks and benefits of continuing or stopping buprenorphine perioperatively is limited by a lack of high-quality evidence. Observational studies and case reports indicate no evidence against continuing buprenorphine perioperatively, especially when the dose is < 16 mg SL daily. In patients with significant potential for relapse, such as those with a recent history of OUD, the discontinuation of buprenorphine should have a strong rationale supported by patient and surgical preferences. Future studies require standardized reporting of median doses, details on the route of delivery, dosing schedules and any dosing changes, and rates of addiction relapse, including long-term morbidity and mortality where possible.

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this article is to provide a brief overview of the medical and surgical management of infective endocarditis secondary to IDU, with a focus on the underlying substance use disorder., Recent Findings: Patients with infective endocarditis secondary to IDU are often young with unique comorbidities including mental illness, chronic hepatitis C, HIV infection, which are often compounded by limited social and familial supports. The focus of management has been treatment of endocarditis using IV antibiotics alongside surgery. Surgical outcomes compare favorably with those of infective endocarditis in the general population but long-term outcomes of IDUs are significantly worse. This is primarily due to the high rate of recidivism of drug use and the risk of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. Contemporary management of addiction utilizes an integrative approach, combining both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic strategies while remaining patient-centered. Given the complexity of care required, we advocate for a multidisciplinary team-based approach including psychiatry, infectious disease, cardiology, cardiac surgery and social services., Summary: Infective endocarditis secondary to IDU remains a medical and surgical challenge with dismal outcomes. Here we offer practical suggestions on the multidisciplinary management of this challenging and high-risk patient cohort.

Neuronal intranuclear rodlets (INRs; rodlets of Roncoroni) have been known to neuroanatomists since the turn of the century. However, the functional and/or pathological significance of these structures has remained enigmatic. We recently demonstrated that these structures are immunoreactive for class III beta tubulin and for glucocorticoid receptor. Moreover, they are markedly reduced in the temporal cortex of patients with Alzheimer's disease relative to age-matched controls and those with dementia with Lewy bodies, thereby implicating these structures in neurodegenerative disease pathogenesis. The present report represents an experimental pilot study to investigate the possible involvement of INRs in Parkinson's disease (PD). Specifically, we demonstrate significantly increased INRs in dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area in mice treated with the selective catecholaminergic neurotoxin MPTP, relative to saline-treated controls. We have hypothesized that INRs represent an intranuclear sequestrum of monomeric beta-tubulin and that their alteration in neurodegeneration may reflect disrupted or abnormal microtubule dynamics. We propose that the increased formation of INRs is related to the demonstrated ability of MPTP to cause microtubule disruption. Because tubulin has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of human PD, it is possible that the results of this study will have important implications for this most common neurodegenerative movement disorder.