Search

Various sensory perceptions drive the quality and typicality of wines, with the volatile profile playing a fundamental role in the characteristics of odor, aroma and consequently flavor, which combines the smell (odor and aroma), taste, and trigeminal sensations. Efforts have been made in both the field of instrumental and sensory analysis to understand the relationship of volatile compounds with sensory attributes in omics approaches. Gas chromatography (monodimensional and two-dimensional (heartcutting and comprehensive)) associated with mass spectrometry (GC/MS, GC-GC/MS and GCxGC/MS) and chemometric tools have contributed to foodomics analyses, specifically those linked to metabolomics/volatilomics. These tools, along with the elucidation of sensory properties (sensomics), lead to advanced results in the field of flavoromics. They also help to define the best practices in both vineyard management and winemaking that enable the production of high-quality wines. The objective of this review is to report the challenges of determining the volatile profile of wines, pointing out the ways that can be followed in successful identification and quantification of volatile compounds. The state of the art of sensory evaluation methods is also addressed, providing information that helps in choosing the most appropriate sensory method to be conducted with chromatographic analysis to achieve more in-depth results in the field of flavoromics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Juliane Elisa Welke reports financial support was provided by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. Juliane Elisa Welke reports financial support was provided by Foundation for Research Support of Rio Grande do Sul State. Aline Telles Biasoto Marques reports financial support was provided by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. Karolina Cardoso Hernandes, Laura Oliveira Lago, Rafaela Diogo Silveira reports financial support was provided by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The combination of QuEChERS-LC-QTOFMS and matrix-matched calibration (MMC) to simultaneously determinate legislated and emerging mycotoxins in malt and beer was evaluated for the first time. The method performance was satisfactory displaying suitable linearity (R 2 >0.99) and recovery (71-102%). The lowest values (in μg kg -1 ) of LOD (0.01) and LOQ (0.05) were found for enniatins, while the highest LOD (15) and LOQ (50) were reported for fumonisin B1. Precision and sensitivity (RSD <10%) were in accordance with the different guidelines of method validation. MMC was important to avoid inaccurate quantification of all mycotoxins due to signal enhancement or suppression. Another advantage was the enhanced throughput, requiring 1.2 min of analysis per analyte. The detection of legislated (aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol, fumonisin B1, zearalanone, T-2 and HT-2 toxin) and emerging mycotoxins (enniatins, beauvericin, moniliformin and sterigmatocystin) allowed verifying compliance with legislation and generating data to support the establishment of limits for emerging mycotoxins., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The validated method based on the use of headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with the comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection (GC×GC/TOFMS) proved to be appropriate for this first simultaneous quantitative determination of six toxic compounds (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, ethyl carbamate, furan, furfural and acrolein) found in wines. Acetaldehyde and acrolein coeluted with other wine compounds, which indicated that difficulties could arise if only one-dimensional gas chromatography was used for the determination of these compounds. The advancement of the ripeness degree and increasing the grape maceration time seems to result in higher concentrations of toxic compounds. The exposure to furan, acrolein and ethyl carbamate through wine consumption may pose risks to consumer health, since calculated MOE values were lower than 10,000., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)