Search

HLA typing; Donor-specific antibodies; Kidney transplantation Tipificación de HLA; Anticuerpos específicos del donante; Trasplante de riñón Tipificació de HLA; Anticossos específics del donant; Trasplantament de ronyó Complete and high-resolution (HR) HLA typing improves the accurate assessment of donor–recipient compatibility and pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA). However, the value of this information to identify de novo immune-mediated graft events and its impact on outcomes has not been assessed. In 241 donor/recipient kidney transplant pairs, DNA samples were re-evaluated for six-locus (A/B/C/DRB1/DQB1+A1/DPB1) HR HLA typing. De novo anti-HLA antibodies were assessed using solid-phase assays, and dnDSA were classified either (1) as per current clinical practice according to three-locus (A/B/DRB1) low-resolution (LR) typing, estimating donor HLA-C/DQ typing with frequency tables, or (2) according to complete six-locus HR typing. The impact on graft outcomes was compared between groups. According to LR HLA typing, 36 (15%) patients developed dnDSA (LR_dnDSA+). Twenty-nine out of 36 (80%) were confirmed to have dnDSA by HR typing (LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA+), whereas 7 (20%) did not (LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA−). Out of 49 LR_dnDSA specificities, 34 (69%) were confirmed by HR typing whereas 15 (31%) LR specificities were not confirmed. LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA+ patients were at higher risk of ABMR as compared to dnDSA− and LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA− (logRank < 0.001), and higher risk of death-censored graft loss (logRank = 0.001). Both LR_dnDSA+ (HR: 3.51, 95% CI = 1.25–9.85) and LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA+ (HR: 4.09, 95% CI = 1.45–11.54), but not LR_dnDSA+/HR_dnDSA− independently predicted graft loss. The implementation of HR HLA typing improves the characterization of biologically relevant de novo anti-HLA DSA and discriminates patients with poorer graft outcomes. This work was supported by the Biomarker-Driven Immunosuppression Minimization (BIO-DRIM) Consortium (EU FP7-health, grant agreement number 305147; FP7/2012-2017) and by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (grant numbers ICI14/00242, PI16/01321, and PI19/01710), co-funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), a way to build Europe. Also, this work was partly supported by the SLT002/16/00183 grant, from the Department of Health of the Generalitat de Catalunya by the call “Acció instrumental de programes de recerca orientats en l’àmbit de la recerca i la innovació en salut”.

Frank Friedersdorff,1,2,* Beatriz Banuelos-Marco,1,2,* Marie-Therese Koch,1,3 Nils Lachmann,1,4 Anna Bichmann,5,6 Kurt Miller,1,2 Ricardo Gonzalez,1,2 Dominik Müller,1,3 Anja Lingnau1,2 1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2Berlin Institute of Health, Clinic of Urology and Paediatric Urology, Berlin, Germany; 3Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Nephrology and Metabolic Disorders, Berlin, Germany; 4Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Berlin, Germany; 5Charité – Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 6Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Frank FriedersdorffCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, GermanyTel +4930450615219Email frank.friedersdorff@charite.dePurpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors impacting recipient sensitization rates and paediatric renal transplant patient outcomes.Patients and Methods: For this purpose, a retrospective analysis of 143 paediatric renal transplants was carried out. This included the evaluation of patient’s and donor’s demographic data, HLA mismatches, immunosuppressive therapy, rejection episodes, panel reactive antibody (PRA) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).Results: The mean patient age at the point of transplant receival was 11.5 years with a mean follow up time of 9.33± 5.05 years. It was noted that graft survival rates for donors over 59 years had the worst outcome. HLA match did not show statistically significant influence on graft outcome. Graft survival for more than one biopsy-proven rejection was also significantly shorter (p=0.008). PRA were found in 28% of the recipient’s post-transplantation and showed association with lower graft survival rates (p< 0.001). In the present study, 22.7% (5/22) of the patients with EBV infections presented a PTLD.Conclusion: In conclusion, good graft survival with reduced sensitization for future transplantations and minimize the risk of PTLD, can be ensured through a balance between donor age, HLA match and condition of the recipient should be sought. Furthermore, paediatric patients should preferably receive organs from donors between the age of 10 and 59. EBV infection could be a relevant factor for developing PTLD.Keywords: paediatric transplantation, immunological risk factors, graft survival, immunosuppression, kidney transplant, donor statistic

Safak Gül-Klein,1 Henriette Hegermann,1 Robert Röhle,2– 4 Moritz Schmelzle,1 Frank Tacke,5 Wenzel Schöning,1 Robert Öllinger,1 Tomasz Dziodzio,1 Patrick Maier,1 Julius M Plewe,1 David Horst,6 Igor Maximilian Sauer,2 Johann Pratschke,1 Nils Lachmann,7 Dennis Eurich1 1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; 2Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany; 3Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Coordinating Center for Clinical Studies, Berlin, Germany; 4Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany; 5Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; 6Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Pathology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 7Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, HLA Laboratory, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, GermanyCorrespondence: Safak Gül-KleinDepartment of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, 13353, GermanyTel +49 30 450 652 195Fax +49 30 450 552 900Email safak.guel@charite.deBackground: Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against donor human leukocyte antigen after liver transplantation, which are associated with histological changes, have been widely studied with respect to their sustained impact on transplant function. However, their long-term impact after liver transplantation remains unclear.Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis from June 2016 to July 2017 that included all patients who presented themselves for scheduled follow-up after receiving a liver transplantation between September 1989 and December 2016. In addition to a liver protocol biopsy, patients were screened for human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLAab) and donor-specific antibodies. Subsequently, the association between human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, histologic and clinical features, and immunosuppression was analyzed.Results: Analysis for human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was performed for 291 and 271 patients. A significant association between higher inflammation grades and the presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies was detected, while fibrosis stages remained unaffected. These results were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression for inflammation showing a significant increase for presence of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies (OR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.67– 12.6; p=0.0035). Furthermore, the use of everolimus in combination with tacrolimus was significantly associated with the status of negative human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies. Viral etiology for liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher steatosis grades of the graft were significantly associated with a lower rate of human leukocyte antigen antibodies. The impact of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen was associated with higher levels of laboratory parameters, such as transaminases and bilirubin.Conclusion: Donor-specific antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigen are associated with histological and biochemical graft inflammation after liver transplantation, while fibrosis seems to be unaffected. Future studies should validate these findings for longer observation periods and specific subgroups.Keywords: human leukocyte antigen antibodies, donor-specific antibodies, liver biopsy, liver transplantation

The trace element selenium (Se) is taken up from the diet and is metabolized mainly by hepatocytes. Selenoprotein P (SELENOP) constitutes the liver-derived Se transporter. Biosynthesis of extracellular glutathione peroxidase (GPx3) in kidney depends on SELENOP-mediated Se supply. We hypothesized that peri-operative Se status may serve as a useful prognostic marker for the outcome in patients undergoing liver transplantation due to hepatocellular carcinoma. Serum samples from liver cancer patients were routinely collected before and after transplantation. Concentrations of serum SELENOP and total Se as well as GPx3 activity were determined by standardized tests and related to survival, etiology of cirrhosis/carcinoma, preoperative neutrophiles, lymphocytes, thyrotropin (TSH) and Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. A total of 221 serum samples from 79 transplanted patients were available for analysis. The Se and SELENOP concentrations were on average below the reference ranges of healthy subjects. Patients with ethanol toxicity-dependent etiology showed particularly low SELENOP and Se concentrations and GPx3 activity. Longitudinal analysis indicated declining Se concentrations in non-survivors. We conclude that severe liver disease necessitating organ replacement is characterized by a pronounced Se deficit before, during and after transplantation. A recovering Se status after surgery is associated with positive prognosis, and an adjuvant Se supplementation may, thus, support convalescence.

Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSA) are controversially discussed in the context of liver transplantation (LT). We investigated the relationship between the presence of DSA and the outcome after LT. All the LTs performed at our center between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015 were examined. Recipients &lt, 18 years, living donor-, combined, high-urgency-, and re-transplantations were excluded. Out of 510 LTs, 113 DSA-positive cases were propensity score-matched with DSA-negative cases based on the components of the Balance of Risk score. One-, three-, and five-year survival after LT were 74.3% in DSA-positive vs. 84.8% (p = 0.053) in DSA-negative recipients, 71.8% vs. 71.5% (p = 0.821), and 69.3% vs. 64.9% (p = 0.818), respectively. Rejection therapy was more often applied to DSA-positive recipients (n = 77 (68.1%) vs. 37 (32.7%) in the control group, p &lt, 0.001). At one year after LT, 9.7% of DSA-positive patients died due to sepsis compared to 1.8% in the DSA-negative group (p = 0.046). The remaining causes of death were comparable in both groups (cardiovascular 6.2% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.692, hepatic 3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.788, malignancy 3.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.788). DSA seem to have an indirect effect on the outcome of adult LTs, impacting decision-making in post-transplant immunosuppression and rejection therapies and ultimately increasing mortality due to infectious complications.

The collection of lymphatic fluids (lymphoceles) is a frequent adverse event following renal transplantation. A variety of surgical and medical factors has been linked to this entity, but reliable data on risk factors and long-term outcomes are lacking. This retrospective single-center study included 867 adult transplant recipients who received a kidney transplantation from 2006 to 2015. We evaluated for patient and graft survival, rejection episodes, or detectable donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in patients with identified lymphoceles in comparison to controls. We identified 305/867 (35.2%) patients with lymphocele formation, of whom 72/867 (8.3%) needed intervention. Multivariate analysis identified rejection episode as an independent risk factor (OR 1.61, CI 95% 1.17&ndash, 2.21, p = 0.003) for lymphocele formation, while delayed graft function was independently associated with symptomatic lymphoceles (OR 1.9, CI 95% 1.16&ndash, 3.12, p = 0.011). Interestingly, there was no difference in detectable dnDSA between groups with a similar graft and patient survival in all groups after 10 years. Lymphoceles frequently occur after transplantation and were found to be independently associated with rejection episodes, while symptomatic lymphoceles were associated with delayed graft function in our cohort. As both are inflammatory processes, they might play a causative role in the formation of lymphoceles. However, development or intervention of lymphoceles did not lead to impaired graft survival in the long-term.