Search

01 juli 2023, Contains fulltext : 292520.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Certain patients are at greater risk of developing nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD), including those with lung conditions such as bronchiectasis. Testing for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in patients at risk is necessary to identify NTM-PD and start appropriate management. The aim of this survey was to evaluate current testing practices for NTM and identify testing triggers. METHODS: Physicians (n=455) who see at least one patient with NTM-PD in a typical 12-month period and test for NTM as part of practice from Europe, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan participated in a 10-min anonymised survey on NTM testing practices. RESULTS: Bronchiectasis, COPD and use of immunosuppressants were the factors most likely to prompt testing among physicians in this survey (90%, 64% and 64%, respectively), with radiological findings the most common reason leading to considering NTM testing in patients with bronchiectasis and COPD (62% and 74%, respectively). Macrolide monotherapy in patients with bronchiectasis and inhaled corticosteroid use in patients with COPD were not important triggers for testing (15% and 9% of physicians, respectively). Persistent cough and weight loss triggered testing in >75% of physicians. Testing triggers were markedly different for physicians in Japan, with cystic fibrosis prompting testing in fewer physicians compared with other regions. CONCLUSIONS: Testing for NTM is influenced by underlying disease, clinical symptoms or radiological changes, but clinical practice varies considerably. Adherence to guideline recommendations for NTM testing is limited in certain patient subgroups and varies across regions. Clear recommendations on NTM testing are needed.

Item does not contain fulltext, PURPOSE: Real-world data on antibiotic management of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD) is limited for many countries. This study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment practices of NTM-LD in the Netherlands using medication dispensing data. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal real-world study was conducted using IQVIA's Dutch pharmaceutical dispensing database. The data are collected monthly and include approximately 70% of all outpatient prescriptions in the Netherlands. Patients initiated on specific NTM-LD treatment regimens between October 2015 and September 2020 were included. The main areas of investigation were initial treatment regimens, persistence on treatment, treatment switching, treatment compliance in terms of medication possession rate (MPR) and restarts of treatment. RESULTS: The database included 465 unique patients initiated on triple- or dual-drug regimens for the treatment of NTM-LD. Treatment switches were common and occurred approximately 1.6 per quarter throughout the treatment period. The average MPR of patients initiated on triple-drug therapy was 90%. The median time on therapy for these patients was 119 days; after six months and one year, 47% and 20% of the patients, respectively, were still on antibiotic therapy. Of 187 patients initiated on triple-drug therapy, 33 (18%) patients restarted antibiotic therapy after the initial treatment had been stopped. CONCLUSION: When on therapy, patients were compliant with the NTM-LD treatment; however, many patients stopped their therapy prematurely, treatment switches often occurred, and part of patients had to restart their therapy after a longer treatment gap. NTM-LD management should be improved through greater guideline adherence and appropriate involvement of expert centers.

Contains fulltext : 300162.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is widely underdiagnosed, and certain patient groups, such as those with underlying respiratory diseases, are at increased risk of developing the disease. Understanding patients at risk is essential to allow for prompt testing and diagnosis and appropriate management to prevent disease progression. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the risk factors for NTM-PD that should prompt a physician to consider NTM testing and diagnosis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Electronic searches of PubMed and EMBASE were conducted in July 2021 for the period 2011-2021. Inclusion criteria were studies of patients with NTM-PD with associated risk factors. Data were extracted and assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data analysis was conducted using the R-based "meta" package. Only studies that reported association outcomes for cases with NTM-PD compared with control participants (healthy populations or participants without NTM-PD) were considered for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 9,530 searched publications, 99 met the criteria for the study. Of these, 24 formally reported an association between possible risk factors and the presence of NTM-PD against a control population and were included in the meta-analysis. Comorbid respiratory disease was associated with a significant increase in the OR for NTM-PD (bronchiectasis [OR, 21.43; 95% CI, 5.90-77.82], history of TB [OR, 12.69; 95% CI, 2.39-67.26], interstitial lung disease [OR, 6.39; 95% CI, 2.65-15.37], COPD [OR, 6.63; 95% CI, 4.57-9.63], and asthma [OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 2.81-6.14]). Other factors noted to be associated with an increased risk of NTM-PD were the use of inhaled corticosteroids (OR 4.46; 95% CI, 2.13-9.35), solid tumors (OR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.04-20.94) and the presence of pneumonia (OR, 5.54; 95% CI, 2.72-11.26). INTERPRETATION: The greatest risk for NTM-PD is conferred by comorbid respiratory diseases such as bronchiectasis. These findings could help with ide, 01 november 2023

Contains fulltext : 220118.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Patients with bronchiectasis are at increased risk of developing non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung disease (NTM-LD), and published guidelines recommend regular testing for NTM infection in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to survey physicians managing patients with bronchiectasis to understand the perceived risk of NTM to their patients, perceived disease severity and frequency of testing for NTM. METHODS: The study comprised an online survey of hospital-based physicians in the UK, Germany, Italy, France and the Netherlands. The target group were hospital-based physicians who had managed at least 10 adult patients with bronchiectasis over the preceding 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 280 physicians completed the survey. Most (87%) thought their patients to be at particular risk of NTM, although it was perceived as a moderate risk versus other respiratory pathogens. Most perceived NTM-LD to impact patient morbidity (84%), and 61% indicated that NTM-LD significantly impacted mortality. 68% of all respondents did not test for NTM prior to initiating macrolide monotherapy, despite guidelines recommending testing. The perceived risk of and screening for NTM varied among countries. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that physicians understand the risk of NTM-LD and associated morbidity in patients with bronchiectasis; however, a minority do not perceive that NTM-LD significantly affects mortality. Greater awareness of the need to test for NTM infection before initiating macrolide monotherapy for bronchiectasis is essential due to potential emergence of drug-resistant NTM.

Contains fulltext : 208558.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access), INTRODUCTION: In women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requiring pharmacotherapy, insulin was the established first-line treatment. More recently, oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) have gained popularity as a patient-friendly, less expensive and safe alternative. Monotherapy with metformin or glibenclamide (glyburide) is incorporated in several international guidelines. In women who do not reach sufficient glucose control with OGLD monotherapy, usually insulin is added, either with or without continuation of OGLDs. No reliable data from clinical trials, however, are available on the effectiveness of a treatment strategy using all three agents, metformin, glibenclamide and insulin, in a stepwise approach, compared with insulin-only therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes. In this trial, we aim to assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and patient experience of a stepwise combined OGLD treatment protocol, compared with conventional insulin-based therapy for GDM. METHODS: The SUGAR-DIP trial is an open-label, multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Participants are women with GDM who do not reach target glycaemic control with modification of diet, between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation. Participants will be randomised to either treatment with OGLDs, starting with metformin and supplemented as needed with glibenclamide, or randomised to treatment with insulin. In women who do not reach target glycaemic control with combined metformin and glibenclamide, glibenclamide will be substituted with insulin, while continuing metformin. The primary outcome will be the incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight >90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures are maternal diabetes-related endpoints, obstetric complications, neonatal complications and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Com

Introduction In women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requiring pharmacotherapy, insulin was the established first-line treatment. More recently, oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) have gained popularity as a patient-friendly, less expensive and safe alternative. Monotherapy with metformin or glibenclamide (glyburide) is incorporated in several international guidelines. In women who do not reach sufficient glucose control with OGLD monotherapy, usually insulin is added, either with or without continuation of OGLDs. No reliable data from clinical trials, however, are available on the effectiveness of a treatment strategy using all three agents, metformin, glibenclamide and insulin, in a stepwise approach, compared with insulin-only therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes. In this trial, we aim to assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and patient experience of a stepwise combined OGLD treatment protocol, compared with conventional insulin-based therapy for GDM. Methods The SUGAR-DIP trial is an open-label, multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Participants are women with GDM who do not reach target glycaemic control with modification of diet, between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation. Participants will be randomised to either treatment with OGLDs, starting with metformin and supplemented as needed with glibenclamide, or randomised to treatment with insulin. In women who do not reach target glycaemic control with combined metformin and glibenclamide, glibenclamide will be substituted with insulin, while continuing metformin. The primary outcome will be the incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight >90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures are maternal diabetes-related endpoints, obstetric complications, neonatal complications and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Commit