Search

BACKGROUND: Cellulite is a well-known concern for many women; however, treatment can prove challenging because of the complexities of cellulite etiology, the various factors contributing to its appearance, and the multitude of therapies and procedures available. OBJECTIVE: To discuss current cellulite treatment options and effective clinical management. METHODS: A roundtable meeting was convened to discuss and share views on current cellulite treatment options, new technologies, and clinical management. The participants' views helped guide a narrative review on this topic. RESULTS: Advanced interventions for cellulite treatment—such as physical and acoustic subcision, radiofrequency, and injectable biostimulators—are gradually being established, with accumulating evidence showing efficacy, patient satisfaction, and potentially long-lasting outcomes. Cellulite severity rating scales are necessary for assessing treatment outcomes, but these can be complex to use in clinical practice, and the majority do not include patient or clinician perspectives. CONCLUSION: With the advent of new treatments and technologies, cosmetic surgeons and dermatologists will need to tailor their approach to each patient's needs and manage patient expectations because multimodal methods are likely to be required to address the various factors underlying cellulite appearance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Sculptra injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA-SCA) treatment in correcting cheek wrinkles compared with a no-treatment control., Methods: Male/female immune-competent adults (aged >21 years) with moderate/severe cheek wrinkles, graded using the Galderma Cheek Wrinkle Scale (GCWS) at rest, were randomized 2:1 to receive PLLA-SCA injections (150 mg; 8 mL reconstitution in sterile water for injection) + 1 mL lidocaine hydrochloride (2%), administered immediately after reconstitution, or no treatment (control). Up to 3 additional treatments were allowed at monthly intervals, and follow-up was at months 7, 9, and 12. The primary endpoint was 1-grade or greater improvement in GCWS at rest for both cheeks at month 12., Results: GCWS at rest responder rate was significantly higher with PLLA-SCA treatment versus the no-treatment control at months 7 (66.2% versus 38.6%; P=0.0043), 9 (70.6% versus 31.1%; P<0.0001), and 12 (71.6% versus 26.1%; P<0.0001). Treating investigators reported improvements in skin radiance (>95%), tighter appearance (>88%), and jawline contour (>85%). PLLA-SCA recipients reported high satisfaction levels regarding improvements in skin radiance (90% or greater), sagging (84% or greater), and firmness (91% or greater) as well as natural-looking results (85% or greater) and a desire for repeat treatment (84% or greater). Treatment-related adverse events were mostly mild in severity with no serious events related to PLLA-SCA injections., Conclusion: Injectable PLLA-SCA treatments were well tolerated and significantly reduced the severity of moderate/severe cheek lines and wrinkles, while improving skin quality. Effectiveness was durable over the 12-month study period with high subject-reported satisfaction, natural-looking appearance, and enthusiasm for repeat treatments., Clinicaltrials: gov registry number: NCT04124692J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1297-1305.        doi:10.36849/JDD.7729.