Search

Your search keyword '"LMA-protector™"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Descriptor "LMA-protector™"
3 results on '"LMA-protector™"'

1. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

Author

Jee-Eun Chang, Hyerim Kim, Jung-Man Lee, Seong-Won Min, Dongwook Won, Kwanghoon Jun, and Jin-Young Hwang

Subjects
I-gel, LMA-protector™, Airway sealing, Anesthesiology, RD78.3-87.3
Abstract

Abstract Background In the present study, we compare the LMA-Protector™ and the i-gel™ in terms of adequacy of the airway seal, insertion time, ease and accuracy of insertion, and the incidence of postoperative sore throat. Methods In 110 anesthetized and paralyzed adult patients, the i-gel™ (n = 55) or the LMA-Protector™ (n = 55) was inserted. The primary outcome was airway leak pressure. The secondary outcomes included the first-attempt success rate, insertion time, ease and accuracy of the device insertion, ease of gastric tube placement, blood staining on the device after removal, and incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat. Results The airway leak pressure was higher with the LMA-Protector™ than with the i-gel™ (31 [7] cmH2O vs. 27 [6] cmH2O, respectively; P = 0.016). Insertion time was longer with the LMA-Protector™ than with the i-gel™ (27 [16] sec vs. 19 [16] sec, respectively, P

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

Author

Kwanghoon Jun, Seong Won Min, Jin Young Hwang, Dongwook Won, Jee Eun Chang, Hyerim Kim, and Jung Man Lee

Subjects
Male, Leak, medicine.medical_specialty, Anesthesia, General, Laryngeal Masks, lcsh:RD78.3-87.3, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Insertion time, 030202 anesthesiology, Anesthesiology, Republic of Korea, Intubation, Intratracheal, Sore throat, Humans, Paralysis, Medicine, Prospective Studies, Airway sealing, business.industry, Incidence (epidemiology), I-gel, Pharyngitis, 030208 emergency & critical care medicine, Middle Aged, Blood staining, LMA-protector™, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, lcsh:Anesthesiology, Anesthesia, embryonic structures, Tube placement, Female, medicine.symptom, business, Airway, Research Article
Abstract

Background In the present study, we compare the LMA-Protector™ and the i-gel™ in terms of adequacy of the airway seal, insertion time, ease and accuracy of insertion, and the incidence of postoperative sore throat. Methods In 110 anesthetized and paralyzed adult patients, the i-gel™ (n = 55) or the LMA-Protector™ (n = 55) was inserted. The primary outcome was airway leak pressure. The secondary outcomes included the first-attempt success rate, insertion time, ease and accuracy of the device insertion, ease of gastric tube placement, blood staining on the device after removal, and incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat. Results The airway leak pressure was higher with the LMA-Protector™ than with the i-gel™ (31 [7] cmH2O vs. 27 [6] cmH2O, respectively; P = 0.016). Insertion time was longer with the LMA-Protector™ than with the i-gel™ (27 [16] sec vs. 19 [16] sec, respectively, P

Published
2019

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results