Search

Background: DNA methylation biomarkers are one of the most promising tools for the diagnosis and differentiation of adenocarcinomas of the liver, which are among the most common malignancies worldwide. Their differentiation is important because of the different prognoses and treatment options. This study aimed to validate previously identified DNA methylation biomarkers that successfully differentiate between liver adenocarcinomas, including the two most common primary liver cancers, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), as well as two common metastatic liver cancers, colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma liver metastases (PCLM), and translate them to the methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) and digital PCR (dPCR) platforms. Methods: Our study included a cohort of 149 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples, including 19 CRLMs, 10 PCLMs, 15 HCCs, 15 CCAs, 15 colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs), 15 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and their paired normal tissue samples. The methylation status of the samples was experimentally determined by MS-HRM and methylation-specific dPCR. Previously determined methylation threshold were adjusted according to dPCR data and applied to the same DNA methylation array datasets (provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)) used to originally identify the biomarkers for the included cancer types and additional CRLM projects. The sensitivities, specificities and diagnostic accuracies of the panels for individual cancer types were calculated. Results: In the dPCR experiment, the DNA methylation panels identified HCC, CCA, CRC, PDAC, CRLM and PCLM with sensitivities of 100%, 66.7%, 100%, 86.7%, 94.7% and 80%, respectively. The panels differentiate between HCC, CCA, CRLM, PCLM and healthy liver tissue with specificities of 100%, 100%, 97.1% and 94.9% and with diagnostic accuracies of 100%, 94%, 97% and 93%, respectively. Reevaluation of the same bioinformatic data with new additional CRLM projects demonstrated that the lower dPCR methylation threshold still effectively differentiates between the included cancer types. The bioinformatic data achieved sensitivities for HCC, CCA, CRC, PDAC, CRLM and PCLM of 88%, 64%, 97.4%, 75.5%, 80% and 84.6%, respectively. Specificities between HCC, CCA, CRLM, PCLM and healthy liver tissue were 98%, 93%, 86.6% and 98.2% and the diagnostic accuracies were 94%, 91%, 86% and 98%, respectively. Moreover, we confirmed that the methylation of the investigated promoters is preserved from primary CRC and PDAC to their liver metastases. Conclusions: The cancer-specific methylation biomarker panels exhibit high sensitivities, specificities and diagnostic accuracies and enable differentiation between primary and metastatic adenocarcinomas of the liver using methylation-specific dPCR. High concordance was achieved between MS-HRM, dPCR and bioinformatic data, demonstrating the successful translation of bioinformatically identified methylation biomarkers from the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (HM450) and lllumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip (EPIC) platforms to the simpler MS-HRM and dPCR platforms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), parenchyma-preserving liver resections are gaining prominence with the potential to offer improved perioperative outcomes without compromising oncological safety. The surgeon learning curve remains challenging, and simulation plays a key role in surgical training. Existing simulation models can be limited by suboptimal fidelity and high cost. We describe a novel, reproducible, high-fidelity, low-cost liver metastases model using porcine livers from adult Landrace pigs, with porcine perinephric fat used to simulate subcapsular metastases. This model was then utilised in a training session for surgical trainees performing robotic parenchyma-preserving surgery (PPS) under the guidance of expert robotic surgeons, with feedback being recorded. Trainees rated the model highly on its fidelity to human liver simulation (median score 9), tissue handling (median score 8), and overall usefulness (median score 9). Tissue handling was felt to simulate in vivo liver resection closely, while suggestions for improvement included adding simulated blood flow. This is a novel, low-cost, high-fidelity simulation model of liver metastases with high acceptability to surgical trainees, which could be readily adopted by other training centres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To study outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) in patients also treated for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently metastasizes to the liver and peritoneum and is associated with a poor prognosis. In selected patients, a benefit in overall survival (OS) was shown for both peritoneal metastases (PM-CRC) offered CRS-HIPEC, and CLM treated with surgical resection. However, the presence of CLM was considered a relative contraindication to CRS-HIPEC, causing a paucity of outcome data in this patient group. Methods: Patients with PM-CRC having CRS-HIPEC at a single national center between 2007 and 2023, with additional intervention for CLM, were included (previous curative treatment for extraperitoneal and extrahepatic metastases was allowed). Three groups were defined: CLM before CRS-HIPEC (pre-CRS-HIPEC), CLM resected simultaneously with CRS-HIPEC (sim-CRS-HIPEC), and CLM after CRS-HIPEC (post-CRS-HIPEC), aiming to retrospectively analyze outcomes. Results: Fifty-seven patients were included and classified as: pre-CRS-HIPEC (n = 11), sim-CRS-HIPEC (n = 29), and post-CRS-HIPEC (n = 17). Median Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was 8; 13 patients had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), and no 90-day mortality. Median OS was 48 months after CRS-HIPEC. PCI was a predictor of OS (hazard ratio: 1.11, P < 0.001). We observed no difference in short or long-term outcomes between intervention groups. Discussion: This study demonstrated that patients with CLM having CRS-HIPEC had comparable OS to reports on CRS-HIPEC only, likely explained by a low PCI. Simultaneous CLM resection did not increase the risk of severe complications. Conclusions: In this national cohort, CRS-HIPEC and CLM intervention offers long-term survival, suggesting that this treatment may be offered to selected patients with PM-CRC and CLM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of resection of pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Overall, 60 patients who underwent resection of PM from CRC between 2015 and 2021 at two institutions were reviewed. The primary outcome were overall survival (OS) and early recurrence after PM resection. The association between OS and right-sided colon cancer (RCC) was investigated. Early recurrence after PM resection was defined as recurrence within one year. Results: The 5-year OS after CRC resection was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 67.5–92.4) and after PM resection was 69.4% (95% CI 47.5–83.6). In total, 25 patients had recurrence after PM resection (16 within 1 year and 9 after 1 year). In multivariable analysis for OS, RCC (hazard ratio [HR] 4.370, 95% CI 1.020–18.73; p = 0.047) and early recurrence after resection of PM (HR 17.23, 95% CI 2.685–110.6; p = 0.003) were risk factors for poor OS. In multivariable analysis for early recurrence after PM resection, higher value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (> 5.0 mg/dL) before PM resection was a risk factor for early recurrence (HR 3.275, 95% CI 1.092–9.821; p = 0.034). Conclusion: The RCC and early recurrence after PM resection were poor prognosis factors of OS. Higher value of CEA before PM resection was an independent risk factor for early recurrence after resection of PM. Comparitive study between surgery and nonsurgery is necessary in patients with higher CEA values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The liver is a frequent location of metastatic disease in various malignant tumor entities. Computed tomography (CT) is the most frequently employed modality for initial diagnosis. However, liver metastases may only be delineated vaguely on CT. Calculating radiomics features in feature maps can unravel textures not visible to the human eye on a standard CT reconstruction (SCTR). This study aimed to investigate the comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics feature maps and SCTR for liver metastases. Materials and methods: Forty-seven patients with hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Whole-liver maps of original radiomics features were generated. A representative feature was selected for each feature class based on the visualization of example lesions from five patients. These maps and the conventional CT image data were viewed and evaluated by four readers in terms of liver parenchyma, number of lesions, visual contrast of lesions and diagnostic confidence. T-tests and chi²-tests were performed with a significance cut off of p<0.05 to compare the feature maps with SCRT, and the data were visualized as boxplots. Results: Regarding the number of lesions detected, SCTR showed superior performance compared to radiomics maps. However, the feature map for firstorder RootMeanSquared was ranked superior in terms of very high visual contrast in 57.4% of cases, compared to 41.0% in standard reconstructions (p < 0.001). All other radiomics maps ranked significantly lower in visual contrast when compared to SCTR. For diagnostic confidence, firstorder RootMeanSquared reached very high ratings in 47.9% of cases, compared to 62.8% for SCTR (p < 0.001). The conventional CT images showed superior results in all categories for the other features investigated. Conclusion: The application of firstorder RootMeanSquared feature maps may help visualize faintly demarcated liver lesions by increasing visual contrast. However, reading of SCTR remains necessary for diagnostic confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The present study demonstrated that a humanized anti-CEA antibody conjugated to a near-infrared dye accurately co-localized with luciferase expressing colorectal cancer liver metastases in an orthotopic mouse model. The present study validates the metastatic tumor targeting specificity of the anti-CEA antibody. Background: The present study aimed to validate the accuracy of a tumor-specific antibody to target liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Methods: A humanized anti-CEA antibody conjugated to a fluorescent dye (M5A-IR800) was tested for targeting human colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs) expressing luciferase in an orthotopic mouse model. Orthotopic mouse models of CRLMs were established by implanting fragments of a luciferase-expressing human colorectal cancer cell line, LS174T, in the liver of nude mice. Mice received 50 µg M5A-IR800 72 h prior to imaging. To test co-localization, bioluminescence imaging was performed using D-luciferin, which was given via intraperitoneal injection just prior to imaging. Results: Tumors were able to be visualized non-invasively through the skin with the luciferase–luciferin signal. Intra-abdominal imaging showed accurate labeling of CRLMs with M5A-IR800, which co-localized with the luciferase–luciferin signal. Conclusions: The present results validate the accuracy of a tumor-specific anti-CEA antibody in targeting liver metastases of colorectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To develop and validate a deep learning radiomics (DLR) model based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to identify the primary source of liver metastases. In total, 657 liver metastatic lesions, including breast cancer (BC), lung cancer (LC), colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), and pancreatic cancer (PC), from 428 patients were collected at three clinical centers from January 2018 to October 2023 series. The lesions were randomly assigned to the training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. An additional 112 lesions from 61 patients at another clinical center served as an external test set. A DLR model based on contrast-enhanced CT of the liver was developed to distinguish the five pathological types of liver metastases. Stepwise classification was performed to improve the classification efficiency of the model. Lesions were first classified as digestive tract cancer (DTC) and non-digestive tract cancer (non-DTC). DTCs were divided into CRC, GC, and PC and non-DTCs were divided into LC and BC. To verify the feasibility of the DLR model, we trained classical machine learning (ML) models as comparison models. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy (ACC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The classification model constructed by the DLR algorithm showed excellent performance in the classification task compared to ML models. Among the five categories task, highest ACC and average AUC were achieved at 0.563 and 0.796 in the validation set, respectively. In the DTC and non-DTC and the LC and BC classification tasks, AUC was achieved at 0.907 and 0.809 and ACC was achieved at 0.843 and 0.772, respectively. In the CRC, GC, and PC classification task, ACC and average AUC were the highest, at 0.714 and 0.811, respectively. The DLR model is an effective method for identifying the primary source of liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A large pooled analysis of liver oligometastases, classified accordingly to the ESTRO/EORTC recommendations, treated by stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and Radiosurgery (SRS) was carried out. The clinical and dosimetric data of patients who underwent SBRT/SRS for liver metastases were analysed in terms of efficacy and toxicity profile. In particular, the Local Control (LC), the Distant Metastases Free Survival (DMFS), the Disease-Free Survival (DFS), the Overall Survival (OS), and the Next Systemic Therapy Free Survival (NEST-FS) rates were analysed. 113 patients (M/F: 49/64), accounting for a total of 150 hepatic lesions (March 2006–February 2023) in two Italian radiotherapy Institutions were evaluated. Median age was 67 years old (36–92) and 48 (42.5%) patients had at least one comorbidity. The majority of the lesions were induced (30.7%) or repeated oligoprogressive (12.7%) metastases. 98 lesions were treated with more than one daily fraction (mainly 50 Gy in 5 fractions), while 52 were radiosurgery treatments (mainly 32 Gy). The treatment response at 3–4 months was evaluable in 147 lesions: complete response was 32.0%, partial response 17.0%, and stable disease 32.0%. Actuarial LC, DMFS, DFS, OS, and NEST-FS at 1 year were 75.8%, 37.7%, 34.9%, 78.7%, and 59.4% respectively; while actuarial LC, DMFS, DFS, OS, and NEST-FS at 2 years were 52.1%, 24.9%, 21.9%, 51.3%, and 36.8%, respectively. The achievement of complete response, synchronous oligometastases, and no treatment interruptions correlated with a more favorable outcomes. As per the toxicity profile, we registered only two acute and one late toxicity cases higher than grade 2. Stereotactic treatment for liver metastases seems to be a safe and promising option in terms of local control. The best results in term of outcomes have been obtained in patients with complete response, synchronous oligometastases, favorable histology, and no treatment interruptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have limited treatment options following standard-of-care therapy. VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated clinical activity in mCRC in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly in patients without liver metastases. The TKI zanzalintinib (XL092) targets VEGFR, MET and TAM kinases, proteins that are involved in tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis and immunosuppression. Zanzalintinib has immunomodulatory properties that may enhance response to ICIs. Presented is the design of STELLAR-303, a global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluating zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab versus regorafenib in patients with non-MSI-H mCRC who progressed during/after or are refractory/intolerant to standard-of-care therapy. The primary end point is overall survival in patients without liver metastases. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT05425940 (ClinicalTrials.gov) Plain Language Summary Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is cancer of the colon or rectum that has spread to other parts of the body, most often to the liver, lungs and abdomen. People with mCRC that has worsened after initial treatment have limited options. Zanzalintinib is a novel oral investigational drug that can slow or stop cancer growth. It works by blocking certain proteins that play important roles in the development, growth and spread of cancer. Zanzalintinib may also help improve the effectiveness of another class of cancer drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which work by activating the patient's immune system to fight cancer. Here, we describe the design of STELLAR-303, an ongoing study that is comparing the effects of combining zanzalintinib and an ICI drug called atezolizumab with an approved treatment for mCRC called regorafenib. About 900 participants with mCRC will be enrolled in the study worldwide. To be included in the study, participants must have mCRC that worsened after previous therapies and must not have a high level of microsatellite instability, which is a specific feature of some mCRCs. Participants will be randomly given one of the two treatments. The main goal of the study is to evaluate zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab compared with regorafenib by measuring the length of time participants are alive after starting treatment, specifically in patients with mCRC that has not spread to the liver. Additionally, the study will look at the side effects with each treatment. The study is currently seeking participants. Tweetable Abstract STELLAR-303 is a randomized phase III study evaluating the novel TKI zanzalintinib plus the ICI atezolizumab in patients with previously treated non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. Patient enrollment is ongoing globally. Article highlights Background & rationale Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options following progression on standard of care therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and mismatch repair-deficient mCRC. However, efficacy of these treatments is limited in non-MSI-H or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) disease. Agents targeting the VEGF pathway in combination with ICIs have been evaluated in non-MSI-H mCRC and have demonstrated encouraging clinical activity. Studies have shown that mCRC patients without liver metastases may derive greater benefit from TKI-ICI combinations than those with liver metastases. Zanzalintinib (XL092) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets MET, VEGFR and the TAM kinases. Inhibition of these kinases may suppress tumor growth and proliferation and promote an immunopermissive tumor microenvironment, which may enhance response to ICIs such as atezolizumab. Zanzalintinib has shown anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with ICIs in the preclinical setting and has demonstrated immunomodulatory effects, increasing pro-inflammatory immune cells and decreasing immunosuppressive cells. STELLAR-303 study design STELLAR-303 (NCT05425940) is a global, open-label, randomized, phase III study. Approximately 874 patients with non-MSI-H mCRC (with and without liver metastases) who have progressed during/after or are intolerant to standard of care therapies will be randomized 1:1 to oral zanzalintinib plus intravenous atezolizumab or to oral regorafenib. Eligibility criteria Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years and have histologically/cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum that is non-MSI-H and pMMR; MSI/MMR status will be documented and determined by tissue-based analysis. A prespecified number of patients with/without liver metastases will be enrolled. Patients must have received standard of care therapy for mCRC and radiographically progressed or be refractory or intolerant to these therapies; progression during treatment or within 4 months of the most recent therapy is required. Patients who received prior zanzalintinib, regorafenib, trifluridine-tipiracil, or PD-L1/PD-1 targeting ICIs are ineligible. End points The primary end point is overall survival (OS) in patients without liver metastases. Secondary end points are OS in all randomized patients (assessed with hierarchical testing); progression-free survival, objective response rate and duration of response per RECIST v1.1 by investigator in patients without liver metastases and in all randomized patients; and safety. Status The study is actively enrolling patients in the USA, Europe and Asia-Pacific regions. Conclusion STELLAR-303 will assess the efficacy and safety of zanzalintinib plus atezolizumab in patients with previously treated non-MSI-H mCRC, a population with unmet need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of first‐line regimens based on programmed cell death (or ligand) [PD‐(L)1] blockade in extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) patients with or without liver metastases (LM), and to identify optimal treatment strategies. Methods: Network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemo‐immunotherapy (CIT) and chemotherapy (CT) in ES‐SCLC patients stratified by LM. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Seven RCTs involving 3658 ES‐SCLC patients (1243 with LM, 2415 without LM) were analyzed. For patients with LM, the combination therapies of anti‐PD‐1 + CT (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54%–0.82%; p < 0.001) and anti‐PD‐L1 + CT + anti‐angiogenesis (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71%–0.99%; p = 0.042) demonstrated superior efficacy in prolonging OS compared to CT alone. The anti‐PD‐1 + CT regimen had the highest cumulative probability of 91.6% for extending OS in patients with LM. For patients without LM, all CIT regimens resulted in improved OS compared to CT alone, with the regimen of anti‐angiogenesis + anti‐PD‐L1 + CT ranking first and having the highest cumulative probability of 95.5% for prolonging OS. Conclusions: CIT is effective for ES‐SCLC patients regardless of LM status. For patients with LM, PD‐1 blockade combined with CT is the best option. For patients without LM, the most beneficial regimen is the combination of anti‐angiogenesis, PD‐L1 blockade, and CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although survival outcomes for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NETLM) are improved with liver-direct therapies (LDT), including hepatic debulking and nonsurgical trans-arterial embolization, the benefit is less established in the setting of concurrent extrahepatic disease (EHD). We performed a population-based study to characterize the rates of LDT being performed for NETLM with EHD patients and whether LDT is associated with survival outcomes. Methods: Patients with NETLM and EHD were identified using the California Cancer Registry database merged with data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development between 2000 and 2012. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes were analyzed for these patients with and without LDT. Results: 327 NETLM patients with EHD were identified. EHD sites included lung, peritoneum, bone, and brain. A total of 71 (22%) of these patients underwent LDT. Compared to NETLM with EHD patients who did not undergo LDT, patients who received LDT had longer median overall survival (27 vs. 16 months, p = 0.006). Within the LDT group, 23 patients underwent liver resection. Liver resection was associated with longer median overall survival compared to nonsurgical LDT (138 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: LDT candidacy should be determined for patients on a case-by-case basis, but the presence of EHD should not preclude LDT with appropriate patient selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review: This article aims to illustrate the current state of investigations and management of liver metastases in patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are rising in incidence globally and have become the second most prevalent gastrointestinal malignancy in UK and USA. Frequently, patients have metastatic disease at time of presentation. The liver is the most common site of metastases for gastro-enteropancreatic NETs. Characterisation of liver metastases with imaging is important to ensure disease is not under-staged. Recent Findings: Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography are now becoming standard of care for imaging liver metastases. There is an increasing armamentarium of therapies available for management of NETs and loco-regional therapy for liver metastases. The data supporting surgical and loco-regional therapy is reviewed with focus on role of liver transplantation. Summary: It is important to use appropriate imaging and classification of NET liver metastases. It is key that decisions regarding approach to treatment is undertaken in a multidisciplinary team and that individualised approaches are considered for management of patients with metastatic NETs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and Fluorine-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for diagnosing suspected liver metastases in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: The meta-analysis using the bivariate model included studies on patients with newly diagnosed CRC only and excluded patients with non-CRC liver metastases, known liver metastases, patients treated with chemotherapy and local treatments, e.g. hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation. We used QUADAS-2 to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Results: We included 32 studies, 6 studies evaluated the accuracy of CEUS (n = 937 participants), 26 studies evaluated CECT (n = 2,582), 8 studies evaluated MRI (n = 564) and 6 studies evaluated FDG-PET/CT (n = 813). Sensitivity: FDG-PET/CT 94.4% [95% CI: 90.7–98.1%], MRI 92.9% [95% CI: 88.8–97.0%], CEUS 86.1% [95% CI: 78.0–94.3%] and CECT 84.6% [95% CI: 79.3–89.9%]. Specificity FDG-PET/CT 97.9% [95% CI: 95.9–99.9%], CEUS 96.1% [95% CI: 93.6–98.6%], MRI 94.4% [95% CI: 90.5–98.3%], and CECT 94.3% [95% CI: 91.8–96.8%]. Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT had significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than CECT, and significantly higher sensitivity than CEUS. MRI had a significantly higher sensitivity than CEUS, but a lower non-significant specificity. CECT had the lowest sensitivity and specificity. PROSPERO registration details: CRD42017055015 and CRD42017082996. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cancer-related mortality cause. More than a third of CRC patients develop liver metastases during the course of the disease, contributing to poor prognosis. Thermal ablation techniques are currently recommended as a local curative option for selected small liver metastases. Thermal ablation (TA) includes a wide variety of different modalities, like radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA) and cryoablation (CRA). This comprehensive review outlines the role of image-guided ablation in the treatment of colorectal liver metastatic (CLM) disease. Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer-related mortality, with liver metastases occurring in over a third of patients, and is correlated with poor prognosis. Despite surgical resection being the primary treatment option, only about 20% of patients qualify for surgery. Current guidelines recommend thermal ablation either alone or combined with surgery to treat limited hepatic metastases, provided that all visible disease can be effectively eradicated. Several ablation modalities, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, cryoablation, irreversible electroporation and histotripsy, are part of the percutaneous ablation armamentarium. Thermal ablation, including radiofrequency, microwave ablation and cryoablation, can offer local tumor control rates comparable to limited resection for selected tumors that can be ablated with margins. This review aims to encapsulate the current clinical evidence regarding the efficacy and oncologic outcomes after percutaneous ablation for the treatment of colorectal liver metastatic disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes resection of liver metastases (LM), however, no validated biomarker identifies patients most likely to benefit from this procedure. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of the most relevant molecular alterations in cancer-related genes of CRC (i.e., RAS, BRAF, SMAD4, PIK3CA) as prognostic markers of survival and disease recurrence in patients with mCRC surgically treated by LM resection. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies reporting data regarding survival and/or recurrence in patients that underwent complete liver resection for CRC LM, stratified according to RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 mutational status. Hazard ratios (HRs) from multivariate analyses were pooled in the meta-analysis and various adjustment strategies for confounding factors were combined. The search was conducted in numerous databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO host), and WHO Global Index Medicus, through March 18th, 2022. Meta-analyses, editorials, letters to the editor, case reports, studies on other primary cancers, studies with primary metastatic sites other than the liver, studies lacking specific oncological outcome variables or genetic data, non-English language studies, and studies omitting residual disease data from liver metastasectomy were excluded. The remaining 47 studies were summarized in a descriptive table which outlines the key characteristics of each study and final results were graphically presented. Results: RAS mutation status was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.54-1.84) and recurrence free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.61). A negative association was also found for BRAF regarding OS (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 2.15-3.24) and RFS (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.32-2.73) and SMAD4 regarding OS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.56-2.38) and RFS (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.31-2.91). For PIK3CA only three studies were eligible and no significant association with either OS or RFS could be highlighted. Conclusion: RAS, BRAF, and SMAD4 are negatively associated with OS and RFS in patients undergoing curative liver metastasectomy from colorectal cancer. No conclusion can be drawn for PIK3CA due to the limited literature availability. These data support the integration of RAS, BRAF, and SMAD4 mutational status in the surgical decision-making for colorectal liver metastasis. Nevertheless, we have to consider several limitations, the major ones being the pooling of results from studies that evaluated patient outcomes as either disease-free survival (DFS) or RFS; the inclusion of patients with minimal residual disease and unconsidered potential confounding factors, such as variability in resectability definitions, chemotherapy use, and a potential interaction between biological markers and pre- and post-resection pharmacological treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved remarkable success in clinical research and practice. Notably, liver metastasis is not sensitive to ICIs. Liver locoregional therapies can cause irreversible damage to tumor cells and release tumor antigens, thereby providing a rationale for immunotherapy treatments in liver metastasis. The combination therapy of ICIs with locoregional therapies is a promising option for patients with liver metastasis. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that combining ICIs with locoregional therapies produces a significantly synergistic anti-tumor effect. However, the current evidence for the efficacy of ICIs combined with locoregional therapies remains insufficient. Therefore, we review the literature on the mechanisms of locoregional therapies in treating liver metastasis and the clinical research progress of their combination with ICIs.

Abstract Background To retrospectively analyze the risk factors of liver metastases in patients with gastric cancer in a single center, and to establish a Nomogram prediction model to predict the occurrence of liver metastases. Methods A total of 96 patients with gastric cancer who were also diagnosed with liver metastasis (GCLM) and treated in our center from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020 were included. The clinical data of 1095 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed without liver metastases (GC) in our hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 were retrospectively compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. 309 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in another medical center from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018 were introduced as external validation cohorts. Results Based on the training cohort, multivariate analysis revealed that tumor site (OR = 0.55, P = 0.046), N stage (OR = 4.95, P = 0.004), gender (OR = 0.04, P = 0.001), OPNI (OR = 0.95, P = 0.041), CEA (OR = 1.01, P = 0.018), CA724 (OR = 1.01, P = 0.006), CA242 (OR = 1.01, P = 0.006), WBC (OR = 1.13, P = 0.024), Hb (OR = 0.98, P

Abstract Background Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare pathological histotype in ovarian cancer, while the survival rate of advanced OCCC (Stage III-IV) is substantially lower than that of the advanced serous ovarian cancer (OSC), which is the most common histotype. The goal of this study was to identify high-risk OCCC by comparing OSC and OCCC, with investigating potential risk and prognosis markers. Methods Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from 2009 to 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify risk and prognostic factors in high-risk OCCC patients. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Furthermore, Cox analysis was employed to build a nomogram model. The performance evaluation results were displayed using the C-index, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Immunohistochemically approach was used to identify the expression of the novel target (GPC3). Results In the Cox analysis for advanced OCCC, age (45–65 years), tumor numbers (total number of in situ/malignant tumors for patient), T3-stage, bilateral tumors, and liver metastases could be defined as prognostic variables. Nomogram showed good predictive power and clinical practicality. Compared with OSC, liver metastases had a stronger impact on the prognosis of patients with OCCC. T3-stage, positive distant lymph nodes metastases, and lung metastases were risk factors for developing liver metastases. Chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for patient with advanced OCCC, but had no effect on CSS in patients with liver metastases (p = 0.0656), while surgery was significantly related with better CSS in these patients (p

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have achieved remarkable success in clinical research and practice. Notably, liver metastasis is not sensitive to ICIs. Liver locoregional therapies can cause irreversible damage to tumor cells and release tumor antigens, thereby providing a rationale for immunotherapy treatments in liver metastasis. The combination therapy of ICIs with locoregional therapies is a promising option for patients with liver metastasis. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that combining ICIs with locoregional therapies produces a significantly synergistic anti-tumor effect. However, the current evidence for the efficacy of ICIs combined with locoregional therapies remains insufficient. Therefore, we review the literature on the mechanisms of locoregional therapies in treating liver metastasis and the clinical research progress of their combination with ICIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To retrospectively analyze the risk factors of liver metastases in patients with gastric cancer in a single center, and to establish a Nomogram prediction model to predict the occurrence of liver metastases. Methods: A total of 96 patients with gastric cancer who were also diagnosed with liver metastasis (GCLM) and treated in our center from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020 were included. The clinical data of 1095 patients with gastric cancer who were diagnosed without liver metastases (GC) in our hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 were retrospectively compared by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. 309 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in another medical center from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018 were introduced as external validation cohorts. Results: Based on the training cohort, multivariate analysis revealed that tumor site (OR = 0.55, P = 0.046), N stage (OR = 4.95, P = 0.004), gender (OR = 0.04, P = 0.001), OPNI (OR = 0.95, P = 0.041), CEA (OR = 1.01, P = 0.018), CA724 (OR = 1.01, P = 0.006), CA242 (OR = 1.01, P = 0.006), WBC (OR = 1.13, P = 0.024), Hb (OR = 0.98, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for liver metastasis in patients with gastric cancer, and Nomogram was established based on this analysis (C-statistics = 0.911, 95%CI 0.880–0.958), and the C-statistics of the external validation cohorts achieved 0.926. ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the nomogram provided superior diagnostic value than single variety. Conclusions: By innovatively introducing a new tumor location classification method, systemic inflammatory response indicators such as NLR and PLR, and nutritional index OPNI, the risk factors of gastric cancer liver metastasis were determined and a predictive Nomogram model was established, which can provide clinical prediction for patients with gastric cancer liver metastasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) can often have an indolent course despite distant metastatic disease. Additionally, given that metastatic MTC is incurable and systemic therapies have non-negligeable toxicities, localized treatments are often favored in presence of oligo-progressive disease. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (Y90) has emerged as a safe and efficacious treatment for nonresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors, yet data supporting its use in metastatic MTC are limited. We present the case of a patient with hereditary MTC and large bilobar liver metastases who demonstrated tumor response and resolution of their paraneoplastic diarrhea following TARE with Y90 microspheres. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess differences in radiomics derived from semi-automatic segmentation of liver metastases for stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), and progressive disease (PD) based on RECIST1.1 and to assess if radiomics alone at baseline can predict response. Our IRB-approved study included 203 women (mean age 54 ± 11 years) with metastatic liver disease from breast cancer. All patients underwent contrast abdomen-pelvis CT in the portal venous phase at two points: baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up (between 3 and 12 months following treatment). Patients were subcategorized into three subgroups based on RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1): 66 with SD, 69 with PR, and 68 with PD on follow-up CT. The deidentified baseline and follow-up CT images were exported to the radiomics prototype. The prototype enabled semi-automatic segmentation of the target liver lesions for the extraction of first and high order radiomics. Statistical analyses with logistic regression and random forest classifiers were performed to differentiate SD from PD and PR. There was no significant difference between the radiomics on the baseline and follow-up CT images of patients with SD (area under the curve (AUC): 0.3). Random forest classifier differentiated patients with PR with an AUC of 0.845. The most relevant feature was the large dependence emphasis's high and low pass wavelet filter (derived gray level dependence matrix features). Random forest classifier differentiated PD with an AUC of 0.731, with the most relevant feature being the surface-to-volume ratio. There was no difference in radiomics among the three groups at baseline; therefore, a response could not be predicted. Radiomics of liver metastases with semi-automatic segmentation demonstrate differences between SD from PR and PD. Semiautomatic segmentation and radiomics of metastatic liver disease demonstrate differences in SD from the PR and progressive metastatic on the baseline and follow-up CT. Despite substantial variations in the scanners, acquisition, and reconstruction parameters, radiomics had an AUC of 0.84–0.89 for differentiating stable hepatic metastases from decreasing and increasing metastatic disease. • Radiomics correlates with treatment response. • Semi-automatic segmentation is reliable. • Future role for radiomics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the surgeon's ability to accurately predict the margin following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Background: The decision to resect CRLM is based on the surgeon's ability to predict tumor-free resection margins. However, to date, no study has evaluated the accuracy of surgeon margin prediction. Methods: In this single-institution prospective study, the operating attending and fellow independently completed a preoperative and postoperative questionnaire describing their expected resection margin in 100 consecutive cases (200 assessments) of CRLM resections. In cases with multiple metastases, the closest margin was assessed as the margin of interest for the primary outcome. Surgeon assessments were compared with the gold-standard histopathologic assessment. Results: After excluding aborted cases, 190 preoperative and 190 postoperative assessments from 95 cases were included in the analysis. The pathologic margin was noted to be wide (=1 cm), 1 mm to 1 cm, narrow (<1 mm), and positive in 28 (29.5%), 55 (57.9%), 5 (5.3%), and 7 (7.4%) cases, respectively. The 88 cases with negative margins were all predicted to be negative. None of the cases with positive margins were predicted to be positive. Ninety-one (48%) preoperative and 104 (55%) postoperative predictions were accurate. The sensitivity of predicting a margin <1 mm was 8.3% preoperatively and 16.7% postoperatively. The positive predictive value for preoperative and postoperative predictions of margin <1 mm was 18.2% and 26.7%, respectively. Conclusions: Surgeons are inaccurate at predicting positive and close surgical margins following resection of CRLM. A predicted close margin should not necessarily preclude resection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Y-90 Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) uses injectable radioactive microspheres to treat inoperable liver metastases. It is poorly understood how the effective local control of small-volume metastatic disease with Y-90 SIRT may improve patient survival. Here, we demonstrate that failure to locally control liver metastases with ytrritum-90 (Y-90) SIRT is associated with worse 1-year overall survival for patients with ≤5 metastases, emphasizing the importance of disease control in those with early metastatic disease. Y-90 Selective Internal Radiotherapy (SIRT) is an ablative therapy used for inoperable liver metastasis. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the impact of local control after SIRT on overall survival (OS) in oligometastatic patients. A retrospective, single-institution study identified oligometastatic patients with ≤5 non-intracranial metastases receiving unilateral or bilateral lobar Y-90 SIRT from 2009 to 2021. The primary endpoint was OS defined from Y-90 SIRT completion to the date of death or last follow-up. Local failure was classified as a progressive disease at the target lesion(s) by RECIST v1.1 criteria starting at 3 months after SIRT. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months, 33 patients were identified who had a total of 79 oligometastatic lesions treated with SIRT, with the majority histology of colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 22). In total, 94% of patients completed the Y-90 lobectomy. Of the 79 individual lesions treated, 22 (27.8%) failed. Thirteen patients received salvage liver-directed therapy following intrahepatic failure; ten received repeat SIRT. Median OS (mOS) was 20.1 months, and 12-month OS was 68.2%. Intralesional failure was associated with worse 1 y OS (52.3% vs. 86.2%, p = 0.004). These results suggest that intralesional failure following Y-90 may be associated with inferior OS, emphasizing the importance of disease control in low-metastatic-burden patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PET/CT using radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) is a promising diagnostic tool in oncology, especially when non-increased and/or physiologically high [18F]FDG uptake (as in liver parenchyma) is observed. We aimed to review the role of PET/CT using radiolabeled FAPIs in primary and/or metastatic liver lesions, and to compare their performances with more "conventional" radiopharmaceuticals. A search algorithm based on the terms "FAPI" AND ("hepatic" OR "liver") was applied, with the last update on 1st January 2024. Out of 177 articles retrieved, 76 studies reporting on the diagnostic application of radiolabeled FAPI PET/CT in at least one patient harboring primary or metastatic liver lesion(s) were fully analyzed. Although there was some heterogeneity in clinical conditions and/or study methodology, PET/CT with radiolabeled FAPIs showed an excellent performance in common primary liver malignancies (hepatocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) and liver metastases (mostly from the gastrointestinal tract and lungs). A higher tumor-to-background ratio for FAPIs than for [18F]FDG was found in primary and metastatic liver lesions, due to lower background activity. Despite limited clinical evidence, radiolabeled FAPIs may be used to assess the suitability and effectiveness of FAPI-derived therapeutic agents such as [177Lu]Lu-FAPI. However, future prospective research on a wider population is needed to confirm the excellent performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The purpose of the study is to construct meaningful nomogram models according to the independent prognostic factor for metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Methods: This study is retrospective and consecutively included 143 patients from January 2013 to June 2021. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the area under the curve (AUC) is utilized to determine the optimal cut‐off value. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis are exploited to identify the correlation of inflammatory biomarkers and clinicopathological features with survival. R software are run to construct nomograms based on independent risk factors to visualize survival. Nomogram model is examined using calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The best cut‐off values of 966.71, 0.257, and 2.54 for the systemic immunological inflammation index (SII), monocyte‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were obtained by ROC analysis. Cox proportional‐hazards model revealed that baseline SII, history of drinking and metastasis sites were independent prognostic indices for survival. We established prognostic nomograms for primary endpoints of this study. The nomograms' predictive potential and clinical efficacy have been evaluated by calibration curves and DCA. Conclusion: We constructed nomograms based on independent prognostic factors, these models have promising applications in clinical practice to assist clinicians in personalizing the management of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thermal ablation is routinely used for solitary colorectal liver metastases (SCLM), but the added value of adjuvant systemic therapy in SCLM remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes for SCLM treated by ablation alone (AB) versus ablation plus systemic therapy (AS). Methods: This multicenter retrospective study using nationwide data from fourteen institutions between October 2010 and May 2023, 369 patients with initial SCLM smaller than 5 cm, no extrahepatic metastases, and colorectal cancer R0 resection treated by thermal ablation were included. The crude analysis was used to analyze eligible cases between the two groups. The propensity score matching to control for potential confounders in each matched group. Subgroup analyses were performed to identify specific survival benefits. Results: 61.2% (226/369) of eligible patients were treated with AS and 38.8% (143/369) with AB. During the median follow-up period of 8.8 years, 1-/3-/5-year DFS/OS rates did not differ between the two groups, when analyzed via propensity score matching (P=0.52/0.08). Subgroup analysis revealed that AS was significantly associated with better OS than AB in patients with plasma CEA >5 ug/l (P=0.036), T (III-IV) category of primary cancer (P=0.034), or clinical risk score (1-2) (P=0.041). In each matched group, the authors did find a significant difference in drug-related adverse events (P<0.001) between AS group (24.1%, 28/116) and AB group (0.0%, 0/116). Conclusions: For patientswith plasma CEA >5 ug/l, T (III-IV) category of primary cancer, or clinical risk score (1-2), thermal ablation plus systemic therapy appeared to be associated with improved overall survival. Thermal ablation was equally effective in disease-free survival for treating SCLM, whether with or without adjuvant systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This review addresses the current landscape of colorectal cancer (CRC) with a focus on liver metastases, the third most common cancer globally. It explores recent findings in treatment strategies, emphasizing the dynamic interplay between surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and local therapies for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Recent Findings: Highlighting the role of advanced imaging, the review underscores the significance of contrast-enhanced MRI in surgical planning for CRLMs. Surgical resection remains a primary choice for resectable cases, with considerations for oncologic scoring systems and tumor biology. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy plays a pivotal role, especially in conversion therapy for initially unresectable CRLMs. The review also explores various local therapies, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy, hepatic arterial infusional chemotherapy, selective internal radiation therapy, and transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable cases. Summary: A comprehensive approach, integrating surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and local therapies, is crucial for managing synchronous CRLMs. Surgical resection and perioperative chemotherapy are key players, guided by considerations of tumor biology and scoring systems. For unresectable cases, local therapies offer viable alternatives, emphasizing the need for tailored treatments. Multidisciplinary collaboration among medical oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists is essential. Ongoing research will refine treatment approaches, while emerging technologies hold promise for further advancements in managing colorectal liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of machine learning and radiomics analysis by computed tomography (CT) in presurgical setting, to predict RAS mutational status in colorectal liver metastases. Methods: Patient selection in a retrospective study was carried out from January 2018 to May 2021 considering the following inclusion criteria: patients subjected to surgical resection for liver metastases; proven pathological liver metastases; patients subjected to enhanced CT examination in the presurgical setting with a good quality of images; and RAS assessment as standard reference. A total of 851 radiomics features were extracted using the PyRadiomics Python package from the Slicer 3D image computing platform after slice-by-slice segmentation on CT portal phase by two expert radiologists of each individual liver metastasis performed first independently by the individual reader and then in consensus. Balancing technique was performed, and inter- and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the between-observer and within-observer reproducibility of features. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis with the calculation of area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (ACC) were assessed for each parameter. Linear and non-logistic regression model (LRM and NLRM) and different machine learning-based classifiers were considered. Moreover, features selection was performed before and after a normalized procedure using two different methods (3-sigma and z-score). Results: Seventy-seven liver metastases in 28 patients with a mean age of 60 years (range 40–80 years) were analyzed. The best predictors, at univariate analysis for both normalized procedures, were original_shape_Maximum2DDiameter and wavelet_HLL_glcm_InverseVariance that reached an accuracy of 80%, an AUC ≥ 0.75, a sensitivity ≥ 80% and a specificity ≥ 70% (p value < < 0.01). However, a multivariate analysis significantly increased the accuracy in RAS prediction when a linear regression model (LRM) was used. The best performance was obtained using a LRM combining linearly 12 robust features after a z-score normalization procedure: AUC of 0.953, accuracy 98%, sensitivity 96%, specificity of 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 96% (p value < < 0.01). No statistically significant increase was obtained considering the tested machine learning both without normalization and with normalization methods. Conclusions: Normalized approach in CT radiomics analysis allows to predict RAS mutational status in colorectal liver metastases patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Radiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of liver metastases. Methods: Patients with up to 5 liver metastases were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study and underwent SBRT. Efficacy outcomes included in-field local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE v.4.0. Results: A total of 52 patients with 105 liver metastases were treated between 2015 and 2018. The most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (72% of cases). Liver metastases were synchronous with the primary tumor diagnosis in 24 patients (46.2%), and 21 patients (40.4%) presented with other extrahepatic oligometastases. All patients underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and respiratory gating, and a minimum biologically effective dose (BED10Gy) of 100 Gy was delivered to all lesions. With a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range: 13.4–30.9 months) since liver SBRT, the median actuarial local progression-free survival (local-PFS) was not reached. The actuarial in-field LC rates were 84.9% and 78.4% at 24 and 48 months, respectively. The median actuarial liver-PFS and distant-PFS were 11 and 10.8 months, respectively. The actuarial median overall survival (OS) was 27.7 months from SBRT and 52.5 months from metastases diagnosis. Patients with lesion diameter ≤ 5 cm had significantly better median liver-PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.018). No acute or late toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed. Conclusions: This prospective multicenter study confirms that liver SBRT is an effective alternative for the treatment of liver metastases, demonstrating high rates of local control and survival while maintaining a low toxicity profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Advances in chemotherapy have increased clinical experience with conversion surgery for inoperable advanced gastric cancer. This report describes three patients with unresectable gastric cancer accompanied by multiple liver metastases. In all three patients, nivolumab resolved the liver metastases and subsequent conversion surgery achieved a pathological complete response. Case presentation: In Case 1, a 68-year-old man with clinical Stage IVB gastric cancer and multiple liver metastases initiated first-line therapy with SOX plus nivolumab. The patient completed 13 cycles; however, only nivolumab was continued for 3 cycles because of adverse events. Distal gastrectomy and partial hepatic resection were performed because of a significant reduction in the size of the liver metastases as observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In Case 2, a 72-year-old man with clinical Stage IVB gastric cancer and multiple liver metastases initiated first-line therapy with SOX. Because of the subsequent emergence of new liver metastases, the patient transitioned to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy. Third-line therapy with nivolumab was initiated because of side effects. MRI revealed necrosis within the liver metastasis, and the patient underwent proximal gastrectomy and partial hepatectomy. In Case 3, a 51-year-old woman with clinical Stage IVB gastric cancer accompanied by multiple metastases of the liver and para-aortic lymph nodes began first-line therapy with SOX plus nivolumab. The patient completed 10 cycles; however, only nivolumab was continued for 5 cycles because of adverse events. Computed tomography showed a significant decrease in the size of the para-aortic lymph nodes, while MRI indicated the presence of a singular liver metastasis. Distal gastrectomy and partial hepatic resection were subsequently performed. In all three cases, MRI revealed the presence of liver metastases; however, pathological examination showed no viable tumor cells. Conclusions: We herein present three cases in which chemotherapy, including nivolumab, elicited a response in patients with multiple unresectable liver metastases, ultimately culminating in R0 resection through conversion surgery. Although MRI showed liver metastases, pathological analysis revealed no cancer, underscoring the beneficial impact of chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neuroendocrine tumors are an indolent, heterogeneous group of tumors that primarily arise from the gastropancreatic tract and lungs. Most patients present with liver metastases at the time of diagnosis, which cause significant morbidity and mortality due to excess hormone secretion, bile duct obstruction, and liver damage. A small percentage of these patients are eligible for potential cure through surgical resection. However, interventional radiology provides liver-directed therapies, such as percutaneous ablation, transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization, for palliative care and potential bridging to debulking and surgical resection of neuroendocrine liver metastases. This article aims to provide a brief overview of these liver-directed therapies focusing on the pre-, intra-, and postprocedural imaging findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Immunotherapy or combined chemoimmunotherapy is currently first-line therapy for patients with metastatic NSCLC without a driver mutation. Despite immunotherapy contributing to improved survival outcomes, the estimated 5-year OS rate for metastatic NSCLC remains poor. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess how patients with different anatomical metastatic sites respond or develop resistance to immunotherapy, combination chemoimmunotherapy, or chemotherapy alone. We confirmed that patients with bone metastases have poorer survival outcomes compared to those without bone metastases. This highlights a group of patients that may benefit from a specific clinical trial evaluation to assess the benefit of additional novel therapeutics or upfront radiotherapy. Patients with advanced NSCLC have heterogenous responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy. In NSCLC, the impact of the distribution of metastatic sites and the response to systemic therapy combinations remain poorly understood. In a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC who received first-line systemic therapy, we sought to assess the association between the site of metastases with patterns of response and progression. Data regarding demographics, tumour characteristics (including site, size, and volume of metastases), treatment, and outcomes were examined at two cancer care centres. The endpoints included organ site-specific response rate, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Two-hundred and eighty-five patients were included in the analysis. In a multivariate analysis, patients with bone metastases had a reduced ORR, PFS, and OS. Primary resistance was also more likely in patients with bone metastases. Patients with bone or liver metastases had a shorter OS when receiving ICIs with or without chemotherapy, but not with chemotherapy alone, suggesting an immunological basis for therapeutic resistance. A directed assessment of the tumour microenvironment in these locations and a deeper understanding of the drivers of organ-specific resistance to immunotherapy are critical to optimise novel combination therapies and sequencing in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare pathological histotype in ovarian cancer, while the survival rate of advanced OCCC (Stage III-IV) is substantially lower than that of the advanced serous ovarian cancer (OSC), which is the most common histotype. The goal of this study was to identify high-risk OCCC by comparing OSC and OCCC, with investigating potential risk and prognosis markers. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer from 2009 to 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify risk and prognostic factors in high-risk OCCC patients. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Furthermore, Cox analysis was employed to build a nomogram model. The performance evaluation results were displayed using the C-index, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Immunohistochemically approach was used to identify the expression of the novel target (GPC3). Results: In the Cox analysis for advanced OCCC, age (45–65 years), tumor numbers (total number of in situ/malignant tumors for patient), T3-stage, bilateral tumors, and liver metastases could be defined as prognostic variables. Nomogram showed good predictive power and clinical practicality. Compared with OSC, liver metastases had a stronger impact on the prognosis of patients with OCCC. T3-stage, positive distant lymph nodes metastases, and lung metastases were risk factors for developing liver metastases. Chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for patient with advanced OCCC, but had no effect on CSS in patients with liver metastases (p = 0.0656), while surgery was significantly related with better CSS in these patients (p < 0.0001) (p = 0.0041). GPC3 expression was detected in all tissue sections, and GPC3 staining was predominantly found in the cytoplasm and membranes. Conclusion: Advanced OCCC and OCCC with liver metastases are two types of high-risk OCCC. The constructed nomogram exhibited a satisfactory survival prediction for patients with advanced OCCC. GPC3 immunohistochemistry is expected to accumulate preclinical evidence to support the inclusion of GPC3 in OCCC targeted therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is controversy in the best management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CLM). This study aimed to compare short-term and survival outcomes of simultaneous resection of CLM and primary colon cancer compared to resection of only colon cancer. This retrospective matched cohort study included patients from the National Cancer Database (2015–2019) with stage IV colon adenocarcinoma and synchronous liver metastases who underwent colectomy. Patients were divided into two groups: colectomy-only (resection of primary colon cancer only) and colectomy-plus (simultaneous resection of primary colon cancer and liver metastases). The groups were matched using the propensity score method. The primary outcome was short-term mortality and readmission. Secondary outcomes were conversion, hospital stay, surgical margins, and overall survival. 4082 (37.6%) of 10,862 patients underwent simultaneous resection of primary colon cancer and liver metastases. After matching, 2038 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the groups in 30-days mortality (3.1% vs 3.8%, p = 0.301), 90-days (6.6% vs 7.7%, p = 0.205) mortality, 30-days unplanned readmission (7.2% vs 5.3%, p = 0.020), or conversion to open surgery (15.5% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.298). Patients in the colectomy plus group had a higher rate of lower incidence of positive surgical margins (13.2% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.001) and longer overall survival (median: 41.5 vs 28.4 months, p < 0.001). Synchronous resection of CLM did not increase the rates of short-term mortality, readmission, conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery, or hospital stay and was associated with a lower incidence of positive surgical margins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transarterial chemoembolisation with irinotecan-loaded drug-eluting beads (DEBIRI TACE) can be considered in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) who progress after all approved standard therapies or in patients unsuitable for systemic therapy. Between September 2010 and March 2020, thirty patients (22 men and 8 women; mean age 66.8 ± 13.2) were included in this retrospective study. DEBIRI TACE was conducted in 43% of patients unsuitable for systemic therapy as a first-line treatment and 57% as salvage therapy after the progression of systemic therapy. All the patients had liver-limited disease. In the case of unilobar disease, two treatments were performed at four-week intervals, and in the case of bilobar disease, four treatments were performed at two-week intervals. All patients were premedicated and monitored after the procedure. Adverse events were graded according to the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) classification system for complications. The median overall survival (OS) from the beginning of DEBIRI TACE in the salvage group was 17.4 months; in the group without prior systemic therapy, it was 21.6 months. The median overall survival of all patients was 17.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.0–24.7 months), and progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI: 0.9–7.4 months). The one-year survival rate after the procedure was 61%, and the two-year rate was 25%. Univariate analysis showed better survival of patients with four or fewer liver metastases (p = 0.002). There were no treatment-related deaths or grade 4 and 5 adverse events. Nonserious adverse events (Grades 1 and 2) were present in 53% of patients, and Grade 3 adverse events were present in 6% of the patients. DEBIRI TACE is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Patients with four or fewer liver metastases correlated with better survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explores the predictive and monitoring capabilities of clinical and multiparametric MR parameters in assessing capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) therapy response in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This retrospective study (n = 44) assessed CAPTEM therapy response in neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) patients. Among 33 monitored patients, as a subgroup of the overall study cohort, pretherapeutic and follow-up MRI data (size, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] values, and signal intensities), along with clinical parameters (chromogranin A [CgA] and Ki-67%), were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) served as the reference. Responders were defined as those with PFS ≥ 6 months. Most patients were male (75%) and had G2 tumors (76%) with a pancreatic origin (84%). Median PFS was 5.7 months; Overall Survival (OS) was 25 months. Non-responders (NR) had higher Ki-67 in primary tumors (16.5 vs. 10%, p = 0.01) and increased hepatic burden (20% vs. 5%, p = 0.007). NR showed elevated CgA post-treatment, while responders (R) exhibited a mild decrease. ADC changes differed significantly between groups, with NR having decreased ADCmin (−23%) and liver-adjusted ADCmean/ADCmean liver (−16%), compared to R's increases of ADCmin (50%) and ADCmean/ADCmean liver (30%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.76) for a single parameter for ∆ ADC mean/liver ADCmean, with a cut-off of < 6.9 (76% sensitivity, 75% specificity). Combining ∆ Size NELM and ∆ ADCmin achieved the best balance (88% sensitivity, 60% specificity) outperforming ∆ Size NELM alone (69% sensitivity, 65% specificity). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated significantly longer PFS for ∆ ADCmean/ADCmean liver < 6.9 (p = 0.024) and ∆ Size NELM > 0% + ∆ ADCmin < −2.9% (p = 0.021). Survival analysis emphasizes the need for adapted response criteria, involving combined evaluation of CgA, ADC values, and tumor size for monitoring CAPTEM response in hepatic metastasized NETs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Radiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) is a minimally invasive therapy with proven efficacy in patients with uveal melanoma (UM) liver metastases. M-PHP is associated with a short hospital admission time and limited systemic side effects. In this study, we assessed quality of life (QoL) in UM patients treated with M-PHP. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-center study including 24 patients treated with M-PHP for UM metastases to the liver. QoL questionnaires were collected at baseline, on day 2/3 after M-PHP, and on day 7 and day 21 after M-PHP, according to study protocol. The results were scored according to EORTC-QLQ C30 global health status (GHS), functional scales, and symptom scales. The difference in scores at baseline and subsequent time points was analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and multiple testing Bonferroni correction. Adverse events (AE) were registered up to 30 days after M-PHP according to CTCAE v5.0. Results: Twenty-four patients (14 males; median age 63.0 years) completed 96 questionnaires. Most scores on all scales declined on day 2/3 after M-PHP. On day 21 after M-PHP, 12 out of 15 scores returned to baseline, including median GHS scores. Three variables were significantly worse on day 21 compared to baseline: fatigue (6–33; p = 0.002), physical functioning (100 vs 86.7; p = 0.003), and role functioning (100 vs 66.7; p = 0.001). Grade 3/4 AEs consisted mainly of hematological complications, such as leukopenia and thrombopenia. Conclusion: M-PHP causes fatigue and a decline in physical and role functioning in the 1st weeks after treatment, but GHS returns to baseline levels within 21 days. Level of Evidence 3: Cohort study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionSurgical resection is gold standard for treatment of liver metastasis, locally ablative techniques including computer tomography (CT)-guided interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (CT-BRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have gained prominence as alternatives, offering comparable outcomes in selected patients. We aim to compare CT-BRT and SBRT - based on dosimetric analysis.Material and methodsPatients who underwent CT-BRT for oligometastatic, ≤4cm liver metastases between 2018 and 2024 were eligible. SBRT plans for Halcyon (SBRTh) and TrueBeam (SBRTtb) were prepared virtually. In the CT-BRT group CTV was equal to PTV, for SBRTh and SBRTtb planning, a 5 mm margin was applied to CTV to create PTV. Dose calculation was carried out with the TG-43 algorithm for CT-BRT and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm for SBRTh and SBRTtb group. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the data. The Wilcoxon pairwise order test was utilized to compare dependent groups.ResultsCT-BRT resulted in a more favorable dose distribution within PTVs for Dmean, D50, and D90, while SBRT showed better results for D98 and V27.5Gy. No significant differences were observed for V25Gy between CT-BRT and SBRTtb, but SBRTh favored over CT-BRT. For OARs, CT-BRT plans showed better values for V5, V10, and V11.6Gy in the uninvolved liver volume. There were no significant differences in dose distribution for the duodenum, bowel, and heart. SBRT modalities performed better in the kidney. CT-BRT had improved dose distribution in the esophagus, great vessels, ribs, skin, spinal cord, and stomach compared to SBRT.ConclusionsCT-BRT could be a viable alternative to SBRT for certain patients with liver malignancies.

BackgroundThe liver is a frequent location of metastatic disease in various malignant tumor entities. Computed tomography (CT) is the most frequently employed modality for initial diagnosis. However, liver metastases may only be delineated vaguely on CT. Calculating radiomics features in feature maps can unravel textures not visible to the human eye on a standard CT reconstruction (SCTR). This study aimed to investigate the comparative diagnostic accuracy of radiomics feature maps and SCTR for liver metastases.Materials and methodsForty-seven patients with hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled. Whole-liver maps of original radiomics features were generated. A representative feature was selected for each feature class based on the visualization of example lesions from five patients. These maps and the conventional CT image data were viewed and evaluated by four readers in terms of liver parenchyma, number of lesions, visual contrast of lesions and diagnostic confidence. T-tests and chi²-tests were performed with a significance cut off of p

Background: The liver and lungs are the most common sites of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Their involvement can take five different clinical scenarios: lung metastases only, liver metastases only, lung metastases before liver metastases, liver metastases before lung metastases and simultaneous lung and liver metastases. Using clinical and morphological data we studied the clonal trajectory of these scenarios. Materials and methods: A total of 465 (CRC) patients with 7952 liver and 6406 lung metastases were evaluated. Metastases clinical route was deciphered from metastases number, timing, and linear/parallel ratio (LPR)- a computerized parameter used for deducing clonal trajectories. LPR of +1 suggest pure linear dissemination and −1 pure parallel. Results: Lung-only metastases: high percentage of metachronous disease with a long lead time and a low LPR suggest parallel dissemination. Liver-only metastases: Rare metachronous disease with a short lead time, and a high LPR suggest linear spread. Lung-before-liver metastases: rare solitary metastasis, a median gap of 21 months between the organs, high lung and low liver LPRs suggest linear progression to the lungs and parallel dissemination to the liver. Liver-before-lung metastases: low liver and high lung LPRs and a median gap of 16.5 months between the organs suggest parallel dissemination to the liver and linear spread from the liver to the lungs. Simultaneous liver and lung metastases: rare solitary metastasis and similar and high LPRs suggest simultaneous linear progression to both organs. Conclusions: CRC metastases have different dissemination trajectories in different clinical scenarios. This information can potentially impact on clinical management.

ABSTRACT Purpose To compare the efficacy of first‐line regimens based on programmed cell death (or ligand) [PD‐(L)1] blockade in extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC) patients with or without liver metastases (LM), and to identify optimal treatment strategies. Methods Network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemo‐immunotherapy (CIT) and chemotherapy (CT) in ES‐SCLC patients stratified by LM. Overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) were evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Seven RCTs involving 3658 ES‐SCLC patients (1243 with LM, 2415 without LM) were analyzed. For patients with LM, the combination therapies of anti‐PD‐1 + CT (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54%–0.82%; p

Purpose: The aim of our study was to compare dosimetric aspects of three radioablation modalities – direct high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and virtually planned stereotactic body radiation therapy performed on CyberKnife (SBRTck) and Elekta Versa HD LINAC (SBRTe) applied in patients with liver metastases. Material and methods: We selected 30 patients with liver metastases, who received liver interstitial HDR-BT and virtually prepared plans for SBRTck and SBRTe. In all the cases, the prescribed dose was a single fraction of 25 Gy. Treatment delivery time, doses delivered to PTV and organs at risk, as well as conformity indices, were calculated and compared. Results: The longest median treatment delivery time was observed in SBRTck in contrast to HDR-BT and SBRTe which were significantly shorter and comparable. HDR-BT plans achieved better coverage of PTV (except for D98%) in contrast to SBRT modalities. Between both SBRT modalities, SBRTck plans resulted in better dose coverage in Dmean, D50%, and D90% values compared to SBRTe without difference in D98%. The SBRTe was the most advantageous considering the PCI and R100%. SBRTck plans achieved the best HI, while R50% value was comparable between SBRTe and SBRTck. The lowest median doses delivered to uninvolved liver volume (V5Gy, V9.1Gy) were achieved with HDR-BT, while the difference between SBRT modalities was insignificant. SBRT plans were better regarding more favourable dose distribution in the duodenum and right kidney, while HDR-BT achieved lower doses in the stomach, heart, great vessels, ribs, skin and spinal cord. There were no significant differences in bowel and biliary tract dose distribution between all selected modalities. Conclusions: HDR-BT resulted in more favourable dose distribution within PTVs and lower doses in organs at risk, which suggests that this treatment modality could be regarded as an alternative to other local ablative therapies in carefully selected patients’ with liver malignancies. Future studies should further address the issue of comparing treatment modalities in different liver locations and clinical scenarios.