Search

BackgroundSerum calprotectin (SC) is an emerging biomarker in the measurement of inflammation. It can be determined by different techniques, such as enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or chemiluminescence (CLIA). However, there are no studies comparing whether there is a correlation between the two diagnostic methods in paediatric rheumatologic diseases.Objectives(i) To assess whether there are differences between serum calprotectin (SC) levels determined by EIA (Bühlmann) method and CLIA (QUANTA Flash) in pediatric age patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD). (ii) To evaluate which clinical and analytical variables are associated with an increase of SC in each method.MethodsAnalytical cross-sectional study that included patients from a pediatric rheumatology specialized unit between 02/2017 and 05/2021. We included 41 patients with SARD who had at least one SC analysis determined by EIA in their routine controls (144 serum) and afterwards had SC determined again, this time using the CLIA method.The collected variables were sex, age, remission according to clinical judgment, swollen joint count according to physical examination (PE Count) and ultrasound (US Count), Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score according to physical examination (PE JADAS-27) and ultrasound (US JADAS-27), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).As for the statistical analysis, intraclass correlation (ICC) and paired samples t-test were performed to compare the two methods. Univariate linear regression was performed to study the association between EIA, CLIA and both clinical and analytical variables.ResultsWe included 41 patients, 50.1% were women with a mean age (± SD) of 13.1 (± 3.8) years. The details of their descriptive characteristics were: mean SC (EIA) of 3.1 (±1.8) µg/ml, mean SC (CLIA) of 2.5 (±1.6) µg/ml, mean CRP of 2.6 (± 6.5) mg/l, mean ESR of 10.1 (± 11) mm/h, and mean PE JADAS-27 of 2.8 (± 8). Most frequent diagnosis was oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) (24.4%), followed by enthesitis-related (ERA) JIA (12.2%) and polyarticular JIA (12.2%), familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) (9.8%), psoriatic JIA (4.9%), systemic JIA (4.9%) and syndrome of periodic fever, aphtous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and cervical adenitis (PFAPA) (4.9%), vasculitis (4.8%), and undifferentiated JIA (2.4%). Clinical diagnosis was unspecific in 9.8% of the patients. In our sample, 66.7% were in clinical remission at the discretion of the specialist.A statistically significant Pearson’s CCI of 0.77 (95%CI 0.70-0.83; p=0.00) was observed as a single measure between EIA and CLIA and with an average of 0.87 (95%CI=0.82-0.91; p=0.000). Figure 1 shows the dispersion of this correlation.On the other hand, we observed a statistically significant difference in the mean between both methods of 0.58 (95%CI=0.40-0.77; p=0.000), observing a greater difference in SC (EIA) > 4 µg/ml.A significant association was observed between EIA and clinical remission, joint count, JADAS and CRP; and also between CLIA and clinical remission, JADAS and CRP. The analysis performed is shown in Table 1.Table 1.Association between EIA and CLIA with clinical and analytical variables.RemissionPE CountUS CountPE JADASUS JADASbpbpbpbpbpSC(EIA)0.430.0110.140.0270.080.0240.090.0000.060.000SC(CLIA)0.530.000-0.000.9450.310.3200.050.0210.040.015SexGenderESRCRPbpbpbpbpSC(EIA)0.000.9970.050.2070.000.4870.050.027SC(CLIA)-0.240.3620.010.7950.020.1050.080.000b, regression coefficient; p, statistical significance.ConclusionThere is a good correlation between EIA and CLIA methods to determine SC in pediatric patients with SARD. Significant differences were observed between both methods above the value of 4 µg/ml. This fact could be explained by methodological differences, since CLIA discriminates better at higher values than EIA.An association was observed between both methods and variables of remission or disease activity.Disclosure of InterestsNone declared

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory autoimmune disease of unknown etiology. Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a first-line biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) which inhibits Interleukin 6 (IL-6) pathway through blockade of its receptor. At present, there is a lack of evidence to recommend the treatment of one bDMARD over another.(1) Seeking for genetic biomarkers to predict response to treatment could be key towards a personalized treatment strategy in rheumatology.(2)Objectives:We aimed to evaluate whether functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IL6R gene could predict response and/or toxicity to TZC in Caucasian patients diagnosed with RA.Methods:Retrospective analytical preliminar study of a cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) who received treatment with TCZ within the last 10 years. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data were collected. DNA was extracted from EDTA blood samples. Three SNPs in the IL-6 receptor gene (rs12083537, rs2228145, rs4329505) were genotyped by real-time PCR with TaqMan probes. The associations between polymorphisms and clinicopathological features were evaluated using parametric tests. Efficacy was assessed as the difference of DAS-28 CRP at 6 months. The toxicities recorded were hepatotoxicity, infections, hypersensibility, gastrointestinal, hematological and dyslipidemia.Results:The 31 DNA samples from patients included were mainly female (83.9%) and had a mean age at diagnosis of 46.8 years. The mean duration of treatment was 51.3 months and, previously to initiate TCZ, they received a mean of 2,6 csDMARD and 1,7 bDMARD.The more frequent adverse effects were hypertransaminasemia (22.6%) and neutropenia (32.3%). Most relevant epidemiologic and clinical data is shown in Table 1.Table 1.Clinical characteristics. RA=Rheumatoid Arthritis. CCP= anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptides. RF=Rheumatoid factor. csDMARDs= conventional synthetic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. bDMARD= biological Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. BMI=Body Mass Index. Sc=subcutaneous. Ev=endovenous. DAS28= Disease Activity Score in 28 jointsSex (n=31), n (% women/men) 26/5 (83,9%/16,1%)Age at diagnosis (n=31), years +- SD 46,8+- 12,8Erosive RA (n=31), n(%) 14 (45,2%)Anti-CCP positive (n=31), n(%)UI+- SD 23 (74,2%)259,7 +- 137,3RF positive (n=31), n (%)UI+-SD 21 (67,7%)189,4+- 114Previous csDMARD (n=31), n°+-SD2,6 +-1,3Previous bDMARD (n=31), n°+- SD1,7 +- 1,4BMI (n=29), mean +- SD29,3+- 5,1Duration of treatment (n=31), months +-SD51,3 +- 36,3-Active treatment (n=12)-80,9+- 18,3-Finished treatment (n=19)-32,6+- 32,2Route of administration (n=31), n (%) sc/ev 11/20 (35,5/64,5)Basal DAS28 (n=30), mean+- SD5,3 +- 1,1DAS28 reduction at 6 months (n=28), mean+-SD2,9 +-1,1The univariate analyses showed that the rs2228145 variant was statistically associated with differences in DAS28 reduction at 6 months (p=0.042). Regarding efficacy, we also found a trend with the SNP rs4329505 (p=0.173), which could achieve statistical significance with the projected inclusion of more patients. No associations were found regarding adverse effects.Conclusion:The rs2228145 polymorphisms in the IL6R gene may be considered as a pharmacogenetic biomarker of TCZ response in RA patients. More studies are required in order to investigate the clinical use of pharmacogenetic biomarkers in rheumatic diseases.References:[1]Smolen, Josef S., Robert B., et al. 2020. “EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Synthetic and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 2019 Update.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79 (6): 685–99.[2]Tarnowski, Maciej, Agnieszka Paradowska-Gorycka, et al. 2016. “The Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on Patient Responses to Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy.” Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 12 (1): 41–55.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:Cryoglobulinemia (CG) is a rare phenomenon, which is defined as the persistent presence in serum of abnormal immunoglobulins (Igs) that precipitate in vitro at less than 37°C and dissolve when the temperature rises again. Is related to hematological disorders, infections and autoimmunes diseases.Objectives:To describe the differential clinical features, serological and demographics in a cohort of patients diagnosed with CG.Methods:We describe a retrospective cohort of 252 cryoglobulin (Cg) positive samples, obtained from a database from the immunology laboratory of a tertiary hospital (November 2018-November 2019). We obtained 182 patients with CG, classified according to their etiology into 4 groups: 1)Rheumatic diseases (RD) that includes rheumatoid arthritis, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren´s syndrome and Systemic scleroderma, 2)Hepatotropic viruses (HV) with patients diagnosed with Hepatitis C virus, B virus and both, 3)Hematological diseases (HD) and 4)Essential cryoglobulinemia (CGE). Demographic variables, clinical and serological data were collected. A comparative analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and the multivariate Kruskal-Wallis test, nonparametric variables were compared using a Wilcoxon test. Ten patients, with more than one disease from 4 groups, were excluded from the study.Results:Out of 182 reviewed patients, 172 were included in the study. Mean age at diagnosis was 59.7(±14.0). Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics are described in table 1. Mixed CG was the predominant subtype, in 116 (67.4%) patients. The most prevalent CG-associated diseases were HV infection with 91(53%) patients. CGE mostly presented with cutaneous manifestations (p=0.0001), particularly purpura. In RD group the presence of Raynaud and non-erosive arthritis (p=0.0001) was relevant. Laboratory findings showed that CG titration varies according to the etiology, being HD the one with the highest values with 292.2 (±546.2). There is significant difference in terms of the average of rheumatoid factor (RF) being higher in the group by CGE. On other hand, the group HV presented more consumption of complement, and showed the lowest average p=0.0001, without more severe clinical manifestations.RD (n=47)HV (n=91)HD (n=17)CGE (n=17)Gender,n(%) F42 (89.4)57 (62.6)7 (41.2)11 (64.7)Age at dg, years, (± SD)60.6 (±14)59.6 (±13.1)61.1(±16.6)56.3(±20.8)p=0.8CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICSSkin n (%)18 (38.3)10 (11.0)2 (11.8)9 (52.9)pRaynaud n (%)14 (29.8)1 (5.9)3 (17.6)pPurpura n (%)6 (12.8)9 (9.9)2 (11.8)6 (35.3)p=0.04Acrocyanosis n (%)6 (12.8)1 (5.9)p=0.0033Ulcers n (%)3 (6.4)2 (2.2) -2 (11.8)p=0.19Peripheric Neuro n (%)10 (21.3)9 (9.9)1 (5.9)4 (23.5)p=0.13N-E arthritis n (%)22 (46.8)8 (8.8)1 (5.9)4 (23.5)pGMN n (%)5 (10.6)3 (3.3)1 (5.9)3 (17.6)p=0.11LABORATORYCg (mg/dL) x (± SD)26.7 (±63.2)65.8 (±256.5)292.4 (±546.2)47.59 (±79.1)pIsotype IgG, n (%)G+M 26 (55.3)G+M 72 (79.1)M 8 (47.1)G+M 12 (70.6)β2M (≥1.8 mg/L), n (%)7/40 (17.5%)1/5 (20.0%)3/12 (25.0%)-p= 0.44RCP (mg/L) p 5010.3 (±26.2)3.9 (±3.0)13.4 (±18.3)8.5 (±12.0)p= 0.47ESR (mm/h) p5040.0 (±28.5)20.3 (±20.2)35.4 (±35.1)24.5 (±25.0)p= 0.0003RF + (>20UI/mL), n (%)19/46 (41.3)44/86 (51.2)5/11 (45.5)7/17 (41.2)p= 0.09p5090.6 (±175.9)161.0 (±219.5)94.8 (±135.6)284.5 (±619.3)pC3 ()20 (42.6)47 (51.6)3 (17.6)3 (17.6)p= 0.13x (± SD)90.1 (±28.6)68.5 (±10.8)99.1 (±29.0)114.8 (±12.7)pC4 ()17 (36.2)36 (39.6) -3 (17.6)p= 0.02x (± SD)15.6 (±9.0)7.6 (±3.5)20.4 (±7.4)21.1 (±9.5)pConclusion:In our cohort, not all patients with CG presented clinical manifestations being those associated with CGE and RD those with the highest skin and joint expression. The most prevalent association of CG continues to be the HV and we confirmed the characteristic decrease in C3 and C4 complement levels, together with the positivity for RF.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:Patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) have a higher burden of infectious diseases compared to the general population. This could be explained by the disturbances in their immune system response, comorbidities and immunosuppressive treatment.Vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent infections.Objectives:To describe a cohort of patients with AIIRD referred to the infectious disease´s unit according to the vaccination protocol.Methods:Restrospective and descriptive study of a cohort of 286 patients with AIIRD who were evaluated in the rheumatology service of a tertiary hospital in Barcelona and referred to the infectious disease´s unit according to the vaccination protocol among 1 year,between January 1rst December 31st, 2019. The vaccination protocol included serologies of human immunodeficiency virus,hepatitis A,B and C, varicella zoster,tuberculosis,measles,mumps and rubella virus.The recommended vaccines were H.influenzae b,S.pneumonia,influenza,hepatitis A and B(immunity absence),meningococcus c,tetanus – diphtheria (low antigenic load),poliomyelitis and human papillomavirus (not vaccinated).The patients included were diagnosed with a rheumatologic condition under immunosuppressive therapy. Demographic variables,diagnosis,treatment,vaccines administered,infections and adverse effects were collected.Results:Of 286 patients reviewed the mean age was 61, 4 (±14.4) years. The characteristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1. Most of the patients used csDMARDs 149 (52.1%), 77(26.9%) patients used combined treatment. Measles and rubella are part of the triple virus vaccines included in the systematic Spanish vaccination schedule, in our cohort 20 (7%) patients had negative serologies for measles and 26 (9%) for rubella. 57 (20%) patients had latent TB with positive Quantiferon.Forty-one (14.3%) were vaccinated before receiving immunosuppressive treatment. The less administered vaccine was influenza with 44.9% (vaccination rate in Spain in healthy population, in 2019-2020 was 51.2%).No serious adverse effects were reported in relation to the vaccination. The infectious complications during the follow-up period were bronchopneumonia in a patient with RA treated with certolizumab (1), herpes zoster infection in RA on adalimumab(1), recurrent otitis in RA on adalimumab(1), mycobacterium avium infection in RA on etanercept(1), TB reactivation in RA with GCs and csDMARDs(1) and Papilloma virus infection in SpA on ustekinumab (1).Table 1.CHARACTERISTICS OF COHORT OF PATIENTSSex n % (women/men)193/93 (67,5/32,5)Age, years ± DE61.4 ± 14.4Diagnoses AIIRD, n (%)Rheumatoid arthritis n (%)164 (57.3)Systemic lupus erythematosus n (%)6 (2.1)Sjögren´s syndrome n (%)9 (3.1)Systemic sclerosis n (%)1 (0.35)Inflammatory myopathie n (%)5 (1.7)Vasculitis n (%)36 (12.6)Polymyalgia rheumatica n (%)4 (1.4)Spondyloarthropathy n (%)46 (16.1)Others n (%)15 (5.2)Treatment AIIRDGCs n (%)116 (40.7)csDMARDs n (%)149 (52.1)bDMARDs n (%)80 (27.8)tsDMARDs n (%)7 (2.4)Others1 n (%)12 (4.2)GCs + csDMARDs n (%)59 (21)GCs + bDMARDs n (%)14 (4.9)GCs + csDMARDs + bDMARDs n (%)4 (1.4)VaccinesPCV 13 n (%)283 (99)PPSV23 n (%)265 (93)HiB n (%)265 (93)NM n (%)247 (86.7)Influenza n (%)128 (44.9)HBV n (%)121 (42.3)Vaccination before IS n (%)41 (14.3)Vaccination with IS n (%)244 (85.3)Other: Behcet,Adult Stills,Relapsing polychondritis,IGg4 related disease,SarcoidosisOthers1: Mycophenolic acid,cyclosporine and tacrolimusConclusion:In our cohort, the vaccination protocol proved to be a good tool to improve the vaccination rate of rheumatological patients, despite this, the vaccination of Hepatitis B and specially of influenza, continues to have a lower prevalence to general population.The vaccines were effective since none of the preventable infections occurred during follow up, despite the use of an immunosuppressant. Vaccination showed a good safety profile, without reported serious adverse effects or worsening of the underlying disease.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:Currently, there are no biomarkers to predict respiratory worsening in patients with Coronavirus infectious disease, 2019 (COVID- 19) pneumonia.Objectives:We aimed to determine the prognostic value of Krebs von de Lungen-6 circulating serum levels (sKL-6) predicting COVID- 19 evolving trends.Methods:We prospectively analyzed the clinical and laboratory characteristics of 375 COVID- 19 patients with mild lung disease on admission. sKL-6 was obtained in all patients at baseline and compared among patients with respiratory worsening.Results:45.1% of patients developed respiratory worsening during hospitalization. Baseline sKL-6 levels were higher in patients who had respiratory worsening (median [IQR] 303 [209-449] vs. 285.5 [15.8-5724], P=0.068). The best sKL-6 cut-off point was 408 U/mL (area under the curve 0.55; 33% sensitivity, 79% specificity). Independent predictors of respiratory worsening were sKL-6 serum levels, age >51 years, time hospitalized, and dyspnea on admission. Patients with baseline sKL-6 ≥ 408 U/mL had a 39% higher risk of developing respiratory aggravation seven days after admission. In patients with serial determinations, sKL-6 was also higher in those who subsequently worsened (median [IQR] 330 [219-460] vs 290.5 [193-396]; pConclusion:sKL-6 has a low sensibility to predict respiratory worsening in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia. Baseline sKL-6 ≥ 408 U/mL is associated to a higher risk of respiratory worsening. sKL-6 levels are not useful as a screening tool to stratify patients on admission but further research is needed to investigate if serial determinations of sKL-6 may be of prognostic use.References:[1]Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054-62. 5.[2]Tian W, Jiang W, Yao J, Nicholson CJ, Li RH, Sigurslid HH, et al. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020.[3]Wang D, Li R, Wang J, Jiang Q, Gao C, Yang J, et al. Correlation analysis between disease severity and clinical and biochemical characteristics of 143 cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):519.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Background:Lyme disease (LD) is a multisystemic animal-borne disease caused by spirochetes of theBorrelia burgdorferi s.lcomplex and transmitted by ticks of the speciesIxodes ricinus. In Spain, most cases occur in rural areas of the north-east region with a peak of maximum incidence between spring and early autumn. The diagnosis is based on a history of potential exposure to ticks, the recognition of characteristic clinical manifestations and serological testing.Objectives:To assess the suitability of serological study for the diagnosis of LD in an urban area.Methods:Retrospective observational study that included all LD serology tests made between April 2017 and September 2019 at a tertiary hospital in Barcelona covering a population of 450,000 people. Demographic data and the medical department that requested the serology test were collected along with serology test results. The medical records of patients with positive serology were consulted to identify which patients were finally diagnosed with LD along with their clinical manifestations, treatment and outcome.Results:A total of 574 serological tests were included and 78 (13.59%) of them were positive. Only 1.04% (6) of all serological tests belonged to patients finally diagnosed with LD. The department that made most requests was Neurology (37.3%) followed by Infectious Diseases (21%), Internal Medicine (14.5%), Emergency Medicine (4.7%), Dermatology (4.5%), Critical Care Medicine (2.3%) and Rheumatology (2.1%). 50% of the diagnosed patients were women with a mean age of 57.7±7.7DE years. In 50% of diagnosed cases, patients remembered a tick bite during activities in the mountain or rural areas. The most common clinical manifestations were erythema migrans (67%), non-inflammatory arthralgias (50%), fatigue and malaise (67%), together with one case of meningoencephalitis and one of knee monoarthritis. All diagnosed patients received antibiotic treatment with ceftriaxone (33%) or doxycycline (66%). Only one patient presented post-Lyme syndrome.The serological test for LD in our center had a total individual cost of 15.75 eur, so the cost of the 574 requests was 9,040.5 eur. 7,812 eur corresponded to negative results and 1,134 eur to false positive results.Conclusion:Our study indicates the overuse of diagnostic testing for LD with implications for patient care and cost-effective health management. In the absence of a history of potential exposure to infected vector ticks or characteristic clinical manifestations, unnecessary microbiological tests should not be performed.Disclosure of Interests:David Lobo Prat: None declared, Luís Sainz Comas: None declared, Virginia Pomar: None declared, Ana Milena Millán Arciniegas: None declared, HyeSang Park: None declared, Andrea García-Guillén: None declared, Sicylle Jeria: None declared, Ana Laiz: None declared, Berta Magallares: None declared, Ivan Castellví Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Kern Pharma, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Actelion, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Patricia Moya: None declared, Cesar Díaz-Torné: None declared, Susana P. Fernandez-Sanchez: None declared, Hector Corominas: None declared

Background:Cryoglobulinemia (CG) is a rare phenomenon related to haematological disorders, infections and autoimmune diseases. Age and renal involvement are known prognostic markers.Objectives:To describe the differential clinical features and the prognostic factors in a cohort of patients diagnosed with CG non-associated with hepatotropic viruses.Methods:A descriptive, retrospective study of a cohort comprised of 252 cryoglobulin positive samples, obtained from the immunology laboratory database of a tertiary hospital attending 450,000 people over 1 year. 186 patients with CG positive samples were included, 87 of which were not associated with neither hepatitis B nor C virus. Demographic, clinical, serological and pathological data were collected. Nonparametric variables were compared using a Wilcoxon test.Results:Out of 186 reviewed patients, 87 (46.7%) are included in this study. The mean age at CG diagnosis was 60 (± 16) years. Mixed CG was the predominant subtype, detected in 66 (75.9%) patients, 10 of which (11.5%) were associated with glomerulonephritis (GN) with compatible biopsy, 17 (19.5%) with peripheral neuropathy (PN), 29 (33.3%) with non-erosive arthritis and 10 (11.5%) with leukocytoclastic vasculitis confirmed by skin biopsy. The clinical, epidemiological and serological characteristics of the sample are summarized in Table 1.Figure 1.Ing et al’s Nomogram of parsimonious model.Table 1.Clinical, epidemiological and serical characteristics of patients with CGSex, female / male, n (%)65/22 (74.7/25.3)Age at diagnosis, years ± SD60 ± 16CG subtype, n (%)- Type 1, n (%)27 (30)- Mixed, n (%)61 (70)ASSOCIATED DISEASES- pSS, n (%)37 (42,5)- LES, n (%)9 (10,3)- SSc, n (%)7 (8,05)CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS- Skin, n (%)30 (34,5)- Purpura, n (%)14(16)- Ulcers, n (%)5 (5,7)- Acral ischemia, n (%)2 (2,3)- Acrocyanosis by cold, n (%)7 (8)- Raynaud, n (%)19 (21,8)- Peripheric Neuropathy, n (%)17 (19,5)- Non-erosive arthritis, n (%)29 (33,3)- Glomerulonephritis, n (%)10 (11,5)LABORATORY- β2M +(>1.8 mg/L) mean3.9- RCP (mg/L) p503.7- ESR (mm/hour) p5028- RF + (>20 UI/mL) p50124- Anti Ro52 + /Anti Ro60 + n, (%)42 (48.3)- Low C3 n, (%)48 (55.1)- Low C4 n, (%)36 (41.4)In the comparative analysis of patients with CG and Beta 2 microglobulin (β2M), CG and rheumatoid factor (RF), those with high β2M (>1.8 mg / L) presented significantly more GN (p0.016) and PN (p0.013). However, the association of RF with either GN (p0.948) or PN (p0.645) was not significant. Also, high β2M was significantly related to complement consumption of C4 (p: 0.015) but not of C3 (p: 0.063). In the 30 (34.5%) patients with skin manifestations, high β2M showed no statistically significant association. The main systemic autoimmune diseases associated were primary Sjögren’s Syndrome (pSS) 37 (42.5%), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) 9 (10.3%) and Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) 7 (8.05%).Conclusion:A direct association between presence of elevated levels of β2M and the existence of progression to glomerulonephritis and peripheral neuropathy is found in our cohort. No correlation is found between the presence of CG and other serological markers of autoimmunity except low C4. CG with elevated β2M does not associate with greater skin involvement or arthritis.References:[1]A.C. Desbois et al. Cryoglobulinemia: An update in 2019. Joint Bone Spine (2019)[2]Cacoub P, Cryoglobulinemia Vasculitis, The American Journal of Medicine (2015)Disclosure of Interests:None declared