7 results on '"L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez"'
Search Results
2. Jahrestagung der Deutschen, Österreichischen und Schweizerischen Gesellschaften für Hämatologie und Medizinische Onkologie, Wien, 28. September - 2. Oktober 2018: Abstracts
- Author
-
W. Reichmann, Rudolf M. Huber, S-W. Kim, Egbert F. Smit, David Kerstein, Holmskov K. Hansen, E. Kim, D-W. Kim, Natasha B. Leighl, Howard West, H. Groen, M-J. Ahn, L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez, Karen L. Reckamp, Marcello Tiseo, Corey J. Langer, Maximilian Hochmair, Scott N. Gettinger, and D.R. Camidge
- Subjects
Oncology ,030213 general clinical medicine ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Brigatinib ,Crizotinib ,business.industry ,Hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Refractory ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Published
- 2018
3. CANOPY-2: A phase III, placebo-controlled study of canakinumab with or without docetaxel in patients (pts) with NSCLC previously treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy (Ctx)
- Author
-
L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez, J. H. Kang, Yasushi Goto, Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou, J.C.-H. Yang, Hiroyasu Kaneda, D. Lim, Bijoyesh Mookerjee, C.-H. Chiu, I. Malet, Martin Reck, Kenneth J. O'Byrne, Z. Zewen, Sang We Kim, W. Su, and Byoung Chul Cho
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Locally advanced ,Stock options ,Hematology ,Champions Oncology ,Disease control ,Canakinumab ,Oncology ,Docetaxel ,Family medicine ,medicine ,In patient ,business ,Previously treated ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor combined with platinum-based Ctx is standard therapy for eligible pts without a targetable mutation, stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Currently, there is no data to guide treatment following progression on sequential/concomitant use of platinum-based Ctx and PD-1 inhibitors. Activation of inflammation and elevated baseline c-reactive protein (CRP) levels are associated with a lower response to immunotherapies. Canakinumab is a high-affinity anti-IL-1β monoclonal antibody that showed a significant reduction in the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lung cancer in myocardial infarction pts with increased CRP levels (CANTOS study). Trial design CANOPY-2 (NCT03626545) is a multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of docetaxel ± canakinumab in pts with squamous/non-squamous, stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. This study includes a safety run-in part (part 1 – open-label) to confirm recommended phase 3 regimen (RP3R) to be used in the randomized phase 3 part (part 2 – double-blind, placebo-controlled). Key inclusion criteria: adult pts pretreated with one prior platinum-based Ctx and one prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease, either together/sequentially and then progressed; ECOG PS 0-1. In part 1, ∼9 pts will be enrolled to have at least 6 evaluable pts and ∼226 pts will be randomized (1:1, stratified by the number of prior lines of therapy and histology) in part 2 to docetaxel ± canakinumab. Primary objectives: to confirm RP3R of canakinumab + docetaxel, as determined by the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity in the first 42 days of administration (part 1) and overall survival (part 2). Secondary objectives: overall response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival by investigator (RECIST v1.1), safety, PK, immunogenicity of canakinumab, and patient-reported outcomes. Part 1 is completed and part 2 is ongoing after confirming canakinumab 300 mg Q3W as RP3R. Clinical trial identification ACZ885V2301/NCT03626545. Legal entity responsible for the study Novartis. Funding Novartis. Disclosure D. Lim: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, Boerhinger-Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): MSD, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim. Y. Goto: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Shionogi Pharma, Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly, Chugai, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Glaxo Smith Kline; Research grant / Funding (self): AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Novartis, Kyorin. B.C. Cho: Honoraria (self): Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Ono, Yuhan, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Takeda, MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST, Champions Oncology, Janssen, Yuhan, Ono, Dizal Pharma, MSD; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TheraCanVac Inc; Licensing / Royalties: Champions Oncology. H. Kaneda: Honoraria (self): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis. J-H. Kang: Honoraria (self): Roche, AZ, Merck ; Advisory / Consultancy: AZ, MSD, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (self): AZ, Yuhan, CKD, Astellas. S-W. Kim: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim. C-H. Chiu: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche. J.C-H. Yang: Honoraria (self): Novartis, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Roche/Genentech, personal fees from Chugai, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from BMS, persona; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Roche/Genentech, personal fees from Astellas, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Pfizer. W-C. Su: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BI, BMS. K. Obyrne: Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis. V. Papadimitrakopoulou: Advisory / Consultancy: Nektar Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Arrys Therapeutics, Merck, LOXO Oncology, Araxes Pharma, F Hoffman-La Roche, Janssen Research Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, AbbVie, TRM Oncology, Tesaro, Exelixis, Gritsto; Honoraria (self): F Hoffman-La Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck, AstraZeneca, F Hoffman-La Roche, Nektar Therapeutics, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Checkmate, Incyte (to institution). M. Reck: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Honoraria (self): AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Officer / Board of Directors: IASLC BOD, Member of Scientific Committee. I. Malet: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis; Full / Part-time employment: Novartis. B. Mookerjee: Full / Part-time employment: Novartis; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis, Glaxo Smith Kine, Incyte, AstraZeneca. Z. Zewen: Full / Part-time employment: Novartis; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis. L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Janssen, Celgene; Honoraria (self): Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Amgen, Merck, Sanofi, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Janssen, PharmaMar, Celgene.
- Published
- 2019
4. Brigatinib in crizotinib-refractory ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): efficacy updates and exploratory analysis of target lesion response by baseline brain lesion status in the ALTA Trial
- Author
-
M. Tiseo, M-J. Ahn, Corey J. Langer, E. Kim, Scott N. Gettinger, Natasha B. Leighl, Egbert F. Smit, Dai Woo Kim, Karin Holmskov Hansen, David Kerstein, L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez, D.R. Camidge, Howard West, Karen L. Reckamp, Rudolf M. Huber, W. Reichmann, S-W. Kim, Maximilian Hochmair, H. Groen, Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS), and Damage and Repair in Cancer Development and Cancer Treatment (DARE)
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Target lesion ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Crizotinib ,Brigatinib ,business.industry ,non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ,Exploratory analysis ,medicine.disease ,Refractory ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Brain lesions ,business ,medicine.drug - Published
- 2019
5. Brigatinib (BRG) in Crizotinib (CRZ)-Refractory ALK+ Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): efficacy and safety results from ALTA, a pivotal randomized phase 2 Trial
- Author
-
Natasha B. Leighl, Howard West, M-J. Ahn, Frank G. Haluska, D.R. Camidge, W. Reichmann, L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez, Corey J. Langer, Egbert F. Smit, H. Groen, Scott N. Gettinger, Karen L. Reckamp, Dai Woo Kim, K. Holmskov Hansen, M. Tiseo, David Kerstein, Rudolf M. Huber, S-W. Kim, and Maximilian Hochmair
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pathology ,Brigatinib ,Crizotinib ,business.industry ,non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ,Phases of clinical research ,Hematology ,medicine.disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,030104 developmental biology ,0302 clinical medicine ,Refractory ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,business ,medicine.drug - Published
- 2016
6. Randomized phase II trial of cisplatin/gemcitabine with or without LY293111, a multiple eicosonaid pathway modulator, in patients with chemotherapy naïve advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma
- Author
-
Y. W. Oh, Pasi A. Jänne, J. von Pawel, Nathan Enas, M. Gottfried, Leslie Brail, M. N. Reaume, A. Sykes, T. Kaukel, and L. Paz-Ares Rodriguez
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Lung ,business.industry ,Peroxisome ,medicine.disease ,In vitro ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,Eicosanoid ,Immunology ,Carcinoma ,medicine ,Cancer research ,In patient ,Non small cell ,business ,Chemotherapy naive - Abstract
7024 Background: The eicosanoid pathway is altered in NSCLC. Pharmacological activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) have been shown to inhibit lung tumors in vitro. LY293111 inhibits the eicosanoid pathway, is a PPARγ agonist and modulates adipophilin and adiponectin expression levels in vitro. LY293111 is well tolerated and can be administered with cisplatin/gemcitabine. A randomized phase II study in NSCLC was undertaken. Methods: Pts with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized to two doses of LY293111 (200 mg BID (Arm A) or 600 mg BID (Arm B) or placebo (Arm C) alone for 7 days followed by concurrent cisplatin (75 mg/m2;d1) and gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2;d1,8) q21 days. Treatment was continued until disease progression or toxicity. Primary endpoint was PFS with 75% power to detect 33% improvement compared to placebo (5 months). Calculated sample size was 65 pts/arm (195 total) with a one sided type I error of 0.2. Changes in adipophilin mRNA expression and adiponectin serum levels were assessed at baseline and day 7. Results: Between 09/03 and 07/04, 201 pts were randomized and 195 treated. Demographics (all pts): M:F (65%:35%); median age 61 (range 27–87); stage IIIB/IV (15%:85%); ECOG PS (0:36%;1:64%). Demographics were well balanced between the 3 arms. Most common CTC grade 3/4 toxicities were nausea (8%), vomiting (7%), fatigue (6%) and diarrhea (6%) with only diarrhea related to dose of LY293111 (p=0.03). Response rates (CR+PR) were similar in all 3 arms (A:20%; B:27%; C:21%). There was no significant difference in median PFS (95% CI) between the arms (A: 4.6 months (3.2–5.0); B:6.0 months (4.6–7.2); C:6.0 months (5.2–7.0)). Median survival (95% CI) was similar in all 3 arms (A: 7.3 months (6.2–9.4); B:7.9 months (7.2–9.7); C: 9.0 months (7.7–12.5). Median change in serum adiponectin levels at d7 were significantly higher in arm B vs. placebo (p < 0.05). Adipophilin expression at d7 was increased in a dose dependent manner (p=NS) in arms A and B vs. placebo. Conclusions: LY293111 in combination with cisplatin/gemcitabine did not increase median PFS compared to placebo in pts with NSCLC. Pharmacodynamic modulation was observed but did not impact efficacy. [Table: see text]
- Published
- 2006
7. Efficacy and Safety of the Biosimilar ABP 215 Compared with Bevacizumab in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (MAPLE): A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase III Study.
- Author
-
Thatcher N, Goldschmidt JH, Thomas M, Schenker M, Pan Z, Paz-Ares Rodriguez L, Breder V, Ostoros G, and Hanes V
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Bevacizumab administration & dosage, Bevacizumab pharmacokinetics, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals administration & dosage, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals pharmacokinetics, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Staging, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Purpose: This phase III study compared clinical efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 215 with bevacizumab reference product (RP) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to ABP 215 or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every three weeks for 6 cycles. All patients received carboplatin and paclitaxel every three weeks for ≥4 and ≤6 cycles. The primary efficacy endpoint was risk ratio of objective response rate (ORR); clinical equivalence was confirmed if the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of the risk ratio was within the margin of 0.67 to 1.5. Secondary endpoints included risk difference of ORR, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS); pharmacokinetics, adverse events (AEs), and incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were monitored., Results: A total of 820 patients were screened; 642 were randomized to ABP 215 ( n = 328) and bevacizumab ( n = 314). Overall, 128 (39.0%) and 131 (41.7%) patients in the ABP 215 and bevacizumab groups, respectively, had objective responses [ORR risk ratio: 0.93 (90% CI, 0.80-1.09)]. In the ABP 215 and bevacizumab group, 308 (95.1%) and 289 (93.5%) patients, respectively, had at least 1 AE; 13 (4.0%) and 11 (3.6%) experienced a fatal AE. Anti-VEGF toxicity was low and comparable between treatment groups. At week 19, median trough serum drug concentration was 132 μg/mL (ABP 215 group) and 129 μg/mL (bevacizumab group). No patient tested positive for neutralizing antibodies., Conclusions: ABP 215 is similar to bevacizumab RP with respect to clinical efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics. The totality of evidence supports clinical equivalence of ABP 215 and bevacizumab., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.