Search

The objective of this report was to develop a case definition of “distal symmetrical polyneuropathy” to standardize and facilitate clinical research and epidemiological studies. A formalized consensus process was employed to reach agreement after a systematic review and classification of evidence from the literature. The literature indicates that symptoms alone have relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy; signs are better predictors of polyneuropathy than symptoms; and single abnormalities on examination are less sensitive than multiple abnormalities in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy. The combination of neuropathic symptoms, signs, and electrodiagnostic findings provides the most accurate diagnosis of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. A set of case definitions was rank ordered by likelihood of disease. The highest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for clinical trials) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms, multiple signs, and abnormal electrodiagnostic studies. A modest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for field or epidemiological studies) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms and multiple signs when the results of electrodiagnostic studies are not available. A lower likelihood of polyneuropathy occurs when electrodiagnostic studies and signs are discordant. For research purposes, the best approach for defining distal symmetrical polyneuropathy is a set of case definitions rank ordered by estimated likelihood of disease. The inclusion of this formalized case definition in clinical and epidemiological research studies will ensure greater consistency of case selection. Muscle Nerve, 2005

We compared the binding of human antibodies from patients with neuropathy to the myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), to its cross-reactive glycolipid sulfoglucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG), and to sections of peripheral nerve. Titers were correlated with the clinical presentation and results of electrophysiological and pathological studies. Most patients had a predominantly sensory or sensorimotor demyelinating neuropathy and highly elevated antibodies to both MAG and SGPG, but 2 had highly elevated antibodies to MAG alone, and 1 to SGPG alone. Two patients had predominantly motor neuropathy and highly elevated antibodies to SGPG which reacted with MAG by Western blot but not by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. One patient had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and antibodies to SGPG but not to MAG. These studies indicate that the neuropathic syndrome associated with anti-MAG or -SGPG antibodies are more heterogeneous than previously suspected, and that although most of the antibodies react with both MAG and SGPG, some may react with MAG or SGPG alone.

We reviewed the clinical and electrophysiologic features of 36 patients with increased titers of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies. Mildly elevated titers of up to 3,200 were not associated with any particular clinical syndrome or disease. Clinically, 14 of 16 patients with highly elevated titers of 6,400 or higher had progressive weakness with lower motor neuron signs; six had active tendon reflexes and eight had absent reflexes, but none had definite upper motor neuron signs. Electrophysiologic studies showed spontaneous activity in all 14 patients, one or more motor conduction blocks in nine, slowed motor conductions in one, and normal conductions in four patients. None had abnormal sensory conductions. These patients presented with a syndrome that has features of, but is distinct from, both motor neuron disease and demyelinating neuropathy.