Search

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Purpose: To define an optimal set of b-values for accurate derivation of diffusion MRI parameters in the brain with segmented Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) model., Methods: Simulations of diffusion signals were performed to define an optimal set of b-values targeting different perfusion regimes, by relying on an optimization procedure which minimizes the total relative error on estimated IVIM parameters computed with a segmented fitting procedure. Then, the optimal b-values set was acquired in vivo on healthy subjects and skull base chordoma patients to compare the optimized protocol with a clinical one., Results: The total relative error on simulations decreased of about 40% when adopting the optimal set of 13 b-values (0 10 20 40 50 60 200 300 400 1200 1300 1400 1500 s/mm 2 ), showing significant differences and increased precision on D and f estimates with respect to simulations with a non-optimized b-values set. Similarly, in vivo acquisitions demonstrated a dependency of IVIM parameters on the b-values array, with differences between the optimal set of b-values and a clinical non-optimized acquisition. IVIM parameters were compatible to literature values, with D (0.679/0.701 [0.022/0.008] ·10 -3 mm 2 /s), f (5.49/5.80 [0.70/1.14] %), and D* (8.25/7.67 [0.92/0.83] ·10 -3 mm 2 /s) median [interquartile range] estimates for white matter/gray matter in volunteers and D (0.709/0.715/1.06 [0.035/0.023/0.271] ·10 -3 mm 2 /s), f (7.08/7.84/21.54 [1.20/1.06/6.05] %), and D* (10.85/11.84/2.32 [1.38/2.32/4.94] ·10 -3 mm 2 /s) for white matter/gray matter/Gross Tumor Volume in patients with skull-base chordoma tumor., Conclusions: The definition of an optimal b-values set can improve the estimation of quantitative IVIM parameters. This allows setting up an optimized approach that can be adopted for IVIM studies in the brain., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely used diagnostic technique. Patients wearing orthodontic devices are often requested to remove their appliances before an MRI exam, even when the exam involves anatomical areas far from the head, in order to prevent the heating and detachment of the appliances. The present report aims to evaluate changes in temperature and adhesive forces of molar bands after MRI at two different strength outputs. Sixty stainless steel molar bands were bonded on permanent human upper molars using two different cements: Unitek Multi-Cure Glass Ionomer Band Cement (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) and Transbond Plus Light Cure Band Adhesive (3M Unitek). Appliances were subjected to MRI with two different strengths (1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla). Tubes and band temperature was measured before and after MRI. Subsequently, the shear bond strength (SBS) test was calculated. Data underwent statistical analysis (p < 0.05). After MRI, molar bands exhibited significant heating, even though not clinically relevant, with a temperature increase ranging between 0.48 °C and 1.25 °C (p < 0.05). SBS did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). The present study suggests that, under MRI, the molar bands tested are safe; therefore, their removal could be not recommended for non-head and neck MRI exams. Removal would be necessary just in artifact risk areas.