Search

Compared to HIV and hepatitis C virus, the residual infectious risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) posed by blood products is about 10 times higher. In addition to HBsAg testing, screening for anti-HBc was recommended by the German Advisory Committee Blood in March 2005. Prevalence of anti-HBc in German blood donors was investigated at five test sites located in different geographic regions. In total, 12,000 blood donors were screened for anti-HBc by PRISM HBcore, and a statistically representative number of these were tested with Abbott Murex anti-HBc total, bioMerieux Hepanostika anti-HBc uniform, Bio-Rad Monolisa anti-HBc PLUS and Dade Behring Enzygnost anti-HBc. Anti-HBc repeat reactive samples were tested for anti-HBs, anti-HBe and HBV DNA by individual donation NAT. The mean prevalence of anti-HBc was 1.75% in donors that had not been tested for anti-HBc in the past. The percentage of anti-HBs in anti-HBc repeat reactive donors was 93.7%. Samples that were additionally reactive for anti-HBe were anti-HBc reactive in all tested assays. The sample to cut-off (S/Co) values for anti-HBc were lower (competitive assays) in samples that were also positive for anti-HBe, when compared to samples that were only anti-HBc reactive. Most commercially available anti-HBc assays provide sufficient sensitivity for routine screening purposes, and lacking specificity is no longer a serious issue for most of them. Assay differences were recognized for samples that were anti-HBc only reactive. The overall loss of 1.75% of positive testing donors can be significantly reduced to 0.45% by implementation of re-entry procedures for donors with an anti-HBs titre of over 100 IU/l and negative by sensitive ID-NAT.

Background and Objectives Since voluntary introduction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) minipool nucleic acid amplification technology (NAT) at the German Red Cross, the expected residual risk of a transfusion-associated HBV infection has been estimated to be 1 : 500 000 – about 10 times higher than for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Donors demonstrating chronic positivity for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), negativity for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-negative with a low virus load are a major cause of this increased risk. Materials and Methods Ten-thousand blood donors from our blood-donation centre were screened for anti-HBc using the current PRISM® HBc and the new PRISM® HBcore assay to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of these tests. PRISM® HBc- or PRISM® HBcore-reactive samples were further analysed using seven additional tests for anti-HBc, two tests for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), one test for antibody to hepatitis B envelope antigen (anti-HBe) and three HBV NAT assays. Results From a total of 10 000 donors, nine and 14 samples were reactive only in the PRISM® HBc and the PRISM® HBcore, respectively, whereas 165 samples were reactive in both anti-HBc assays. Further analysis of these 188 anti-HBc-reactive specimens in a total of nine different anti-HBc assays revealed concordant results for 162 (86·2%) specimens. Sample cut-off values for anti-HBc were significantly (P