Search

Parkinson's disease (PD) is an unparalleled example of a neurodegenerative disorder that can be effectively managed leading to sustained symptom control and quality of life. The cooperation of neurologists with general practitioners, gastroenterologists, and geriatricians is of increasing importance for an optimized management of PD. New diagnostic criteria for PD and for atypical Parkinsonism, which should be considered in the differential diagnostics, include non-motor symptoms and aim to diagnose these disorders as early as possible. Recent research has shown that there are highly complex and clinically relevant interactions with PD at all levels of the gastrointestinal tract, which have been increasingly better understood and have direct clinical relevance. Novel dopaminergic treatment approaches focus on circumvention of the impaired gastrointestinal tract of PD patients. The management of geriatric PD patients and PD dementia requires specific clinical knowledge. Worldwide, PD has emerged as a model disease for the development of network structures for the treatment of chronic neurological diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS-GMS) recommendations for training in Geriatric Medicine were published in 1993. The practice of Geriatric Medicine has developed considerably since then and it has therefore become necessary to update these recommendations., Methods: under the auspices of the UEMS-GMS, the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) and the European Academy of Medicine of Ageing (EAMA), a group of experts, representing all member states of the respective bodies developed a new framework for education and training of specialists in Geriatric Medicine using a modified Delphi technique. Thirty-two expert panel members from 30 different countries participated in the process comprising three Delphi rounds for consensus. The process was led by five facilitators., Results: the final recommendations include four different domains: 'General Considerations' on the structure and aim of the syllabus as well as quality indicators for training (6 sub-items), 'Knowledge in patient care' (36 sub-items), 'Additional Skills and Attitude required for a Geriatrician' (9 sub-items) and a domain on 'Assessment of postgraduate education: which items are important for the transnational comparison process' (1 item)., Conclusion: the current publication describes the development of the new recommendations endorsed by UEMS-GMS, EuGMS and EAMA as minimum training requirements to become a geriatrician at specialist level in EU member states., (© The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.)

This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-relevant benefit in dermatocosmetic treatment, i.e., skin care, of aged skin. Based on an open item collection with 33 elderly persons, items on patient-relevant treatment goals were collected. An expert panel selected 20 items to be most relevant and feasible for the questionnaire named Patient Benefit Index for Aged Skin (PBI-AS). The instrument, which assesses goal importance and achievement, was tested in a cognitive debriefing and validated in a longitudinal study (n = 80) along with the Dry Skin Area and Severity Index (DASI) and the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) as convergent validation criteria. The cognitive debriefing showed the good practicability and feasibility of the instrument. Significant correlation with change in DASI (r = -0.527; p < 0.001) supports convergent validity of the PBI-AS. By contrast, correlation with DLQI was poor, indicating the different constructs. The PBI-AS is a valid and feasible tool for the patient-centered assessment of dermatocosmetic treatment benefit in aged skin.

Background: The pH of the stratum corneum (SC) in the elderly is elevated and linked to impaired SC function. Therefore, this paper addresses the question of whether acidic skin care generates positive clinical, biophysical, and microbiological effects in aged skin., Methods: This study was performed to assess skin care effects in nursing home residents (aged 80-97 years). Visual, biophysical, and microbiological methods were used. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups and treated over 7 weeks with skin care products adjusted to a pH of 4.0 (group A) or a pH of 6.0 (group B)., Results: Compared to baseline, SC integrity improved significantly in group A (p = 0.007), whereas there was no change in group B (p = 0.672). SC recovery 24 h after perturbation increased significantly in group A (p = 0.004) compared to baseline. The SC recovery in group B was not significant compared to baseline (p = 0.327)., Conclusion: Long-term treatment with pH 4.0 skin care results in a significant improvement in epidermal barrier function compared to identical products with a pH of 6.0. In addition, effects on skin dryness and resident flora were demonstrated, but without significant differences, between the 2 groups. Based on these results, we recommend adjustment of skin care products for the elderly to a pH of 4.0 to maintain the health of aged skin. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

For the care of the elderly, specific geriatric care facilities in hospitals and specialized rehabilitation centers have been established in the last 20 years throughout Germany. In addition, trauma surgery departments in hospitals and clinics also provide comprehensive care for trauma patients. The present requirements catalog was developed with the aim to ensure the standardization and quality assurance of these care facilities. Thus, the structural basics and, in particular, the structured cooperation between geriatrics and trauma surgery are described and defined in terms of structure, process, and outcome quality. The Bundesverband Geriatrie, the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geriatrie, and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gerontologie und Geriatrie offer documentation for external and internal use and evaluation of the structures and processes for certification of geriatric trauma centers. Prerequisite for certification is to meet the technical requirements defined in the requirements catalogue or documents derived from it, and proof of a quality management system according to ISO 9001.

Background: Geriatric medicine, as a specialized form of treatment for the elderly, is gaining in importance due to demographic changes. Especially important for geriatric medicine is combining acute care with the need to maintain functionality and participation. This includes prevention of dependency on structured care or chronic disability and handicap by means of rehabilitation., Methods and Materials: Ten years ago, the German DRG system tried to incorporate procedures (e.g., "early rehabilitation in geriatric medicine") in the hospital reimbursement system. OPS 8-550.x, defined by structural quality, days of treatment, and number of therapeutic interventions, triggers 17 different geriatric DRGs, covering most of the fields of medicine. OPS 8-550.x had been revised continuously to give a clear structure to quality aspects of geriatric procedures. However, OPS 8-550.x is based on proven need of in-hospital treatment. In the last 10 years, no such definition has been produced taking aspects of the German hospital system into account as well as aspects of transparency and benefit in everyday work., Results: The German DRG system covers just basic reimbursement aspects of geriatric medicine quite well; however, a practicable and patient-oriented definition of "hospital necessity" is still lacking, but is absolutely essential for proper compensation. A further problem concerning geriatric medicine reimbursement in the DRG system is due to the different structures of providing geriatric in-hospital care throughout Germany.

Multimorbidity is typical for geriatric patients. Problems not identified in time may lead to increased hospitalisation or prolonged hospital stay. Problems of multimorbidity are not covered by most guidelines or clinical pathways. The geriatric assessment supports standard clinical and technical assessment. Geriatric identification screening is basic for general practitioners and in emergency rooms to filter those patients bearing a special risk. Geriatric basic assessment covers most of the problems relevant for people in old age, revealing even problems that had so far been hidden. It permits to structure a comprehensive and holistic therapeutic approach and to evaluate the targets of treatment relevant for independent living and well-being. This results in reduction of morbidity and mortality. Assessment tools focusing on pain, nutrition and frailty should be added to the standardized geriatric basic assessment in Germany.

Elderly and old tumour patients differ very much individually and a broad range of variation is even to be observed in patients of the same age group. But these patients differ from younger patients in many respects: This concerns the process of treatment decision and the expectations of the therapy on the one hand. Relevant differences with regard to younger patients exist also because of the age-related physiological changes and frequent age-typical comorbidities which may increase the toxicity of a therapy and the surgery-associated morbidity and lethality because of a decreased functional reserve capacity., (Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Acceptance of Geriatric Medicine in the academic world in Germany is still problematic. A WHO study on undergraduate training reveals a disastrous situation in Germany compared with other countries altogether and even in the subgroup "Old Population--Weak in Geriatric Education". This is due to the fact that there is little representation in universities and insufficient integration in training curricula. Subsequently research in Geriatric Medicine in Germany still needs to be increased. Academic acceptance is also reflected by positioning in the postgraduate training rules. In contrast to the opinion of specialists in national and international boards Geriatric Medicine is mostly implemented as sub-/supraspecialty with inadequately shortened duration of specialised training and requirements for the start of specialised training that lead to a shortage of Geriatric Specialists. European recommendations on duration and contents are followed only in two regional chambers. These would enable the specialty of Geriatric Medicine either as a lone-standing specialty or within the common trunk Internal Medicine.

As a result of the continuing development in recent medicine, and improvements of emergency services, an increasing number of patients are surviving serious disease and injury. This has increased the need for rehabilitation, starting already during the acute hospital stay. Early identification and rehabilitation may reduce overall costs and help patients to regain independence earlier. Since the eighties specialized early post-acute rehabilitation units have been increasingly implemented in German hospitals. With book 9 of the German Social Code (SGB IX) coming into effect in July 2001, early post-acute rehabilitation care in hospitals became accepted as a social right. However, the specifics of early rehabilitation care have not been defined. There is a lack of generally accepted indication criteria for early rehabilitation services. Similarly, the aims, objectives and methods need to be specified. It was the objective of a group of interested experts from different fields and backgrounds to achieve an interdisciplinary consensus in terms of conceptual definitions and terminology for all early rehabilitation care services in the acute hospital. The development of the definitions and criteria was achieved by using a modified Delphi-technique. By publishing this paper the group is providing information about its activities and results. Examples of typical cases from the various fields of early rehabilitation care were identified and described. Furthermore, the report points out a number of other problems in the area of early rehabilitation care, which have yet to be solved.

Prevention is of importance when the patient is already suffering from a serious disease, e.g., from arterial obstructive disease causing a stroke or an amputation, from a hip fracture or other diseases that might threaten his independence. Prevention covers a wide field of topics. Most importantly, the patient must recover from his acute disease. It is important to avoid complications which are not specific for the disease but are typical for a bedridden old person (decubital ulcer, dehydration etc.). Prevention also means to avoid recurrence of the same disease as well as complications that frequently occur during the clinical course and may influence the outcome (spasticity in stroke patients, muscular calcification following hip replacement).

The intention of a Geriatric Assessment (GA) is a more systematic and exact way to examine a wide range of activities of daily life. This can be achieved by the help of scientifically proved and standardized investigations which complete the medical judgment with objective and comparable results. This type of examination controls the selective observation of the investigator and makes reexamination easier. Moreover, this way of gaining information gives reliable hints about non-apparent or difficult-to-estimate risks of a patient. The methods of GA have to be adapted to different qualities of resources which will be assessed: physical resources should be assessed by standardized ways of observation; the patient's subjective well-being should be examined by standardized interviews. The standardized instruments of measurement are fairly independent from personal qualifications of the investigator.