Search

Aims: Arterial hypertension (aHTN) plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The risk of heart failure increases with therapy‐resistant arterial hypertension (trHTN), defined as inadequate blood pressure (BP) control ≥140/90 mmHg despite taking ≥3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. This study investigates the effects of the BP lowering baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on cardiac function and morphology in patients with trHTN with and without HFpEF. Methods: Sixty‐four consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with trHTN and received BAT implantation between 2012 and 2016 were prospectively observed. Office BP, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data were collected before and after BAT implantation. Results: Mean patients' age was 59.1 years, 46.9% were male, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 33.2 kg/m2. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 38.8%, atrial fibrillation was 12.2%, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥3 was 40.8%. Twenty‐eight patients had trHTN with HFpEF, and 21 patients had trHTN without HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF were significantly older (64.7 vs. 51.6 years, P < 0.0001), had a lower BMI (30.0 vs. 37.2 kg/m2, P < 0.0001), and suffered more often from CKD‐stage ≥3 (64 vs. 20%, P = 0.0032). After BAT implantation, mean office BP dropped in patients with and without HFpEF (from 169 ± 5/86 ± 4 to 143 ± 4/77 ± 3 mmHg [P = 0.0019 for systolic BP and 0.0403 for diastolic BP] and from 170 ± 5/95 ± 4 to 149 ± 6/88 ± 5 mmHg [P = 0.0019 for systolic BP and 0.0763 for diastolic BP]), while a significant reduction of the intake of calcium‐antagonists, α2‐agonists and direct vasodilators, as well as a decrease in average dosage of ACE‐inhibitors and α2‐agonists could be seen. Within the study population, a decrease in heart rate from 74 ± 2 to 67 ± 2 min−1 (P = 0.0062) and lengthening of QRS‐time from 96 ± 3 to 106 ± 4 ms (P = 0.0027) and QTc‐duration from 422 ± 5 to 432 ± 5 ms (P = 0.0184) were detectable. The PQ duration was virtually unchanged. In patients without HF, no significant changes of echocardiographic parameters could be seen. In patients with HFpEF, posterior wall diameter decreased significantly from 14.0 ± 0.5 to 12.7 ± 0.3 mm (P = 0.0125), left ventricular mass (LVM) declined from 278.1 ± 15.8 to 243.9 ± 13.4 g (P = 0.0203), and e′ lateral increased from 8.2 ± 0.4 to 9.0 ± 0.4 cm/s (P = 0.0471). Conclusions: BAT reduced systolic and diastolic BP and was associated with morphological and functional improvement of HFpEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Cardiorenal syndrome is a common condition in clinical practice in which renal venous congestion (VC) plays an important role. Intrarenal Doppler ultrasound (IRD) is a non-invasive method to assess and quantify renal VC. The current study aims to investigate the effects of SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy on IRD parameters of renal VC. Methods This prospective observational study included patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or heart failure (HF) with reduced and preserved ejection fraction who had an indication for standard of care SGLT2i therapy. IRD, assessing venous impedance index (VII), and intrarenal venous flow pattern (IRVF) analysis were performed within the interlobar vessels of the right kidney before and 6 months after initiation of SGLT2i therapy. Results A number of 64 patients with CKD and a cardiorenal risk profile were included (mean eGFR 42.9 ml/min/1.73 m2; 56% with HF, and 38% with type 2 diabetes mellitus). 17 patients exhibited signs of VC in the IRD. VII was significantly correlated with levels of NT-proBNP, female gender, NYHA class, and was significantly negative correlated with body mass index. After 6 months, a notable decrease in the mean VII of the right interlobar veins by 0.13 (P < .01) was observed. Stratification according to IRVF pattern showed a significant shift towards reduced renal VC pattern after 6 months (P = .03). Conclusions In this study, SGLT2i therapy resulted in a reduction in renal VC as assessed by IRD. These findings underscore the potential haemodynamic benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in cardiorenal syndrome and warrant further investigation into their clinical implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Previous randomized controlled trials demonstrated a protective effect of renin angiotensin system blocking agents for the development of type-2 diabetes in patients with pre-diabetes. However, there are no real-world data available to illustrate the relevance for clinical practice. Methods Open, prospective, parallel group study comparing patients with an ACE inhibitor versus a diuretic based treatment. The principal aim was to document the first manifestation of type-2 diabetes in either group. Results A total of 2,011 patients were enrolled (mean age 69.1 ± 10.3 years; 51.6% female). 1,507 patients were available for the per-protocol analysis (1,029 ramipril, 478 diuretic group). New-onset diabetes was less frequent in the ramipril than in the diuretic group over 4 years. Differences were statistically different at a median duration of 3 years (24.4% vs 29.5%; p < 0.05). Both treatments were equally effective in reducing BP (14.7 ± 18.0/8.5 ± 8.2 mmHg and 12.7 ± 18.1/7.0 ± 8.3 mmHg) at the 4 year follow-up (p < 0.001 vs. baseline; p = n.s. between groups). In 38.6% and 39.7% of patients BP was below 130/80 mmHg (median time-to-target 3 months). There was a significant reduction of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in favour of ramipril (p = 0.033). No significant differences were found for a change in HbA1c as well as for fasting blood glucose levels during follow-up. The rate of adverse events was higher in diuretic treated patients (SAE 15.4 vs. 12.4%; p < 0.05; AE 26.6 vs. 25.6%; p = n.s). Conclusions Ramipril treatment is preferable over diuretic based treatment regimens for the treatment of hypertension in pre-diabetic patients, because new-onset diabetes is delayed.

Abstract Background Recent clinical trials reported conflicting results on the reduction of new-onset diabetes using RAS blocking agents. Therefore the role of these agents in preventing diabetes is still not well defined. Ramipril is an ACE inhibitor (ACEi), that has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in high risk patients and post-hoc analyses of the HOPE trial have provided evidence for its beneficial action in the prevention of diabetes. Methods The ADaPT investigation ("ACE inhibitor-based versus diuretic-based antihypertensive primary treatment in patients with pre-diabetes") is a 4-year open, prospective, parallel group phase IV study. It compares an antihypertensive treatment regimen based on ramipril versus a treatment based on diuretics or betablockers. The primary evaluation criterion is the first manifestation of type 2 diabetes. The study is conducted in primary care to allow the broadest possible application of its results. The present article provides an outline of the rationale, the design and baseline characteristics of AdaPT and compares these to previous studies including ASCOT-BLPA, VALUE and DREAM. Results Until March 2006 a total of 2,015 patients in 150 general practices (general physicians and internists) throughout Germany were enrolled. The average age of patients enrolled was 67.1 ± 10.3 years, with 47% being male and a BMI of 29.9 ± 5.0 kg/m2. Dyslipidemia was present in 56.5%. 37.8% reported a family history of diabetes, 57.8% were previously diagnosed with hypertension (usually long standing). The HbA1c value at baseline was 5.6 %. Compared to the DREAM study patients were older, had more frequently hypertension and patients with cardiovascular disease were not excluded. Conclusion Comparing the ADaPT design and baseline data to previous randomized controlled trial it can be acknowledged that AdaPT included patients with a high risk for diabetes development. Results are expected to be available in 2010. Data will be highly valuable for clinical practice due to the observational study design.