Search

Introduction and Hypothesis: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) is a functional reconstructive surgery used to treat pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in middle-aged women. Although LSC is widely used, its implementation is hindered by perceived technical difficulties and surgical learning curves. Surgeons require adequate experience with LSC prior to performing the procedure on patients to improve their quality of life. This study is aimed at demonstrating the effectiveness of the ovine model (OM) for training and research in LSC, while also comparing anatomical differences between ovine and human models during the procedure., Methods: The animal model and training were provided by the Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre. Urologists and gynecologists with experience in LSC participated in a course and their findings were recorded and documented., Results: Differences in patient positioning, trocar placement, and reperitonealization were identified between the ovine and human models. Hysterectomy is always performed in the ovine model, whereas it is not mandatory in humans. There are also differences in the dissection of the levator ani muscle and attachment point of the posterior mesh to the uterus between the two models. Despite differences in some areas, the ovine pelvic structure and vagina are similar in size to those of humans., Conclusions: The ovine model is a valuable tool for surgeons in their learning curve for LSC, allowing for safe and effective practice prior to performing the procedure on patients. The use of the OM can help to improve the quality of life for women affected by pelvic organ prolapse., (© 2023. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically affected the Female and Functional Urology (FFU) practice, leading to massive waiting lists, while patients' quality of life remains severely impaired. The aim of the present study is to develop consensual recommendations to guide clinicians on the management of FFU patients. The present paper focuses on female LUTS., Methods: The authors used the Delphi methodology to develop a robust survey questionnaire, covering the principal topics in FFU, based on literature review and expert opinions. Regarding female LUTS, a 98-question survey was distributed among FFU specialists to obtain optimized recommendations, under the auspicious of the International Continence Society (TURNOVER, ICS project). A quantitative analysis of the data was performed, categorizing the mean value from 0-10. Consensus achievement was defined as attaining ≥ 70% agreement., Results: 98 ICS members completed the F-LUTS survey. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of female LUTS are summarized. Video-consultation should be used for initial assessment, sending questionnaires and bladder diaries in advance to the patient to be filled out before the consultation. However, face-to-face visits are mandatory if POP or continuous incontinence are suspected, and prior to any surgical procedure, regardless of the health alert. Moreover, prescribing medications such as anticholinergics or β 3 agonists in a telemedicine setting is not considered a safe practice. Follow-up teleconsultations can be used to assess the efficacy and treatment-related adverse events.Urodynamic testing should be only performed if consequences on F-LUTS treatment are expected. The study should be postponed until the pandemic local behaviour flattens.Invasive procedures should be postponed during a high alert. In case surgery is scheduled, outpatient clinics and local anaesthesia should be prioritized. Every patient should be screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection before invasive tests or procedures, following local authorities' guidance., Conclusions: During a pandemic, telemedicine offers a novel way of communication, maintaining medical care while preventing viral transmission. Non-urgent procedures should be postponed until the pandemic curve flattens. Ambulatory procedures under regional or local anaesthesia should be prioritized, aiming to reduce bed occupancy and risk of transmission., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Luis Lopez-Fando reports administrative support was provided by International Continence Society. Luis Lopez-Fando and Salvador Arlandis are Editorial Board Members of the Continence Journal., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Introduction and Hypothesis: "Dropped p abd at void" occurs when p abd decreases below the previous resting pressure during voiding time. We sought clinical factors associated with this phenomenon and evaluated whether its correction modifies the urodynamic diagnosis., Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of non-neurological consecutive symptomatic women. The following definitions were used: "dropped p abd at void": decrease in p abd at Q max ≥ 5 cmH 2 O; bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) (p detQmax ≥ 25 cmH 2 O + Q max ≤ 12 ml/s and female BOO index (p detQmax - 2.2*Q max ) > 18; "low detrusor contraction strength": PIP1 (p detQmax + Q max ) < 30. In patients with "dropped p abd at void", p detQmax was corrected., Results: A total of 360 women were analyzed. Ninety-five percent of the women had a variation in p abd at Q max between -13 and 53 cmH 2 O. "Dropped p abd at void" was found in 100 women (27.8%). History of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery was significantly higher (p = 0.016) and symptoms of mixed urinary incontinence were significantly lower (p = 0.030) in patients with "dropped p abd at void". On multivariate analysis only the history of SUI surgery maintained its significance (OR = 1.787 [95% CI: 1.058, 3.017], p = 0.030). When correcting p detQmax in women with "dropped p abd at void", 2 or 5 patients lost BOO diagnosis (depending on how it was diagnosed) and 7 patients gained a "low detrusor contraction strength" diagnosis., Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of women had "dropped p abd at void", which was associated with a history of SUI surgery. Correction of p detQmax would lead to a 2.5% to 3.33% diagnostic modification., (© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.)

Objectives: Describe the technique, indications and the correct interpretation given the findings in different clinical entities, and to serve as a guide for urologists, urology residents and even medical students., Material and Methods: A literature search was performed using Pubmed, Cochrane and Scopus database for articles and guidelines published between January 1970 and June 2020., Results: Videourodynamics is a diagnostic procedure that combines the urodynamic study with simultaneous images of the lower urinary tract to assess the anatomy and function during the different phases of micturition.This study provides important information that can modify therapeutic behavior and therefore clinical outcomes of patients., Conclusion: The role of videourodynamics becomes more relevant nowadays in the assessment of the pathophysiology of voiding dysfunction, being the gold standard for the workup of neurogenic bladder and voiding dysfunction in young people and women and, possibly in persistent/recurrent incontinence in both men and women.

Context: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has changed standard urology practice around the world. The situation is affecting not only uro-oncological patients but also patients with benign and disabling conditions who are suffering delays in medical attention that impact their quality of life., Objective: To propose, based on expert advice and current evidence where available, a strategy to reorganize female and functional urological (FFU) activity (diagnosis and treatment)., Evidence Acquisition: The present document is based on a narrative review of the limited data available in the urological literature on SARS-Cov-2 and the experience of FFU experts from several countries around the world., Evidence Synthesis: In all the treatment schemes proposed in the literature on the COVID-19 pandemic, FFU surgery is not adequately covered and usually grouped into the category that is not urgent or can be delayed, but in a sustained pandemic scenario there are cases that cannot be delayed that should be considered for surgery as a priority. The aim of this document is to provide a detailed management plan for noninvasive and invasive FFU consultations, investigations, and operations. A classification of FFU surgical activity by indication and urgency is proposed, as well as recommendations adopted from the literature for good surgical practice and by surgical approach in FFU in the COVID-19 era., Conclusions: Functional, benign, and pelvic floor conditions have often been considered suitable for delay in challenging times. The long-term implications of this reduction in functional urology clinical activity are currently unknown. This document will help functional urology departments to reorganize their activity to best serve their patients., Patient Summary: Many patients will suffer delays in urology treatment because of COVID-19, with consequent impairment of their physical and psychological health and deterioration of their quality of life. Efforts should be made to minimize the burden for this patient group, without endangering patients and health care workers., (Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, all surgical activity that was not life threatening was cancelled , as well as most face-to-face consultations. Currently the beginning of the de-escalation phases that will led us to a new normal, forces us to establish some degree of priority in the interventions as well as in the medical consultations. Our objective is to establish some recommendation on Functional Urology office visits and surgical interventions that serve as a tool to facilitate decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts in Functional Urology from different autonomous communities of Spain were contacted to design a strategy to reorganize the activity of both, diagnosis and treatment. A modified nominal group technique has been used due to the extraordinary restrictions of assembly and mobility during the COVID pandemic. The first signer (EMC) made the first draft with the measures adopted and the strategy to be followed during the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. The proposal was sent to the rest of the authors, in order to unify criteria and experiences to reach a quick consensus on the relative priority of the different activities, problems and solutions. A final version was approved by all authors May 27, 2020. RESULTS: Tables of recommendation have been prepared for outpatient consultation, surgical and technical interventions, according to de-escalation phases proposed by the Spanish Associations of Surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: The change that COVID-19 Pandemich as involved in our clinical practice force us to seek alternative methods to treat our patients, some of which may already be established. Mean while, a consensusin decision making is necessary. Documents such as the current one, are intended to guide the management of patients with urological functional pathology in exceptional situations. Logically, it should be adapted to material and human availability, and to the idiosyncrasy of each Urology service.