4 results on '"Léna G. Dietrich"'
Search Results
2. Health Care Professionals’ Interest in Vaccination Training in Switzerland: A Quantitative Survey
- Author
-
Pia Lucas Ramanathan, Nadja Baldesberger, Léna G. Dietrich, Camilla Speranza, Alyssa Lüthy, Andrea Buhl, Martina Gisin, Roswitha Koch, Dunja Nicca, L. Suzanne Suggs, Benedikt M. Huber, Michael J. Deml, and Philip E. Tarr
- Subjects
vaccine hesitancy ,communication ,healthcare professional ,vaccine knowledge ,medical training ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Objectives: Health care professionals (HCPs) play an important role for patients’ vaccination decisions. To counsel patients/clients appropriately, HCPs need current factual knowledge about vaccines and strong communication skills.Methods: We conducted an online survey with physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and midwives in Switzerland (01.11.2020–31.03.2021). We evaluated: 1) interest in vaccination knowledge and counseling training; 2) vaccination recommendation practices; 3) experience with vaccination counseling/administration; 4) comfort level in addressing vaccine hesitancy (VH); 5) perspectives on patient/client VH, delays, and refusals.Results: In total, 1,933 practicing HCPs responded (496 physicians, 226 pharmacists, 607 nurses, 604 midwives). 43% physicians, 31% pharmacists, 15% nurses, and 23% midwives felt comfortable counseling VH patients/clients. 96% physicians, 98% pharmacists, 85% nurses, and 91% midwives were interested in additional vaccination-related training. All professionals mentioned safety, efficacy, and side effects as topics of most interest for additional training.Conclusion: Results demonstrate a high interest among HCPs for additional vaccination-related training. In addition to factual information about vaccination, such training will likely benefit from a communication component, given the low rates of comfort reported by HCPs when counseling VH patients/clients.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Quality of Life and Working Conditions of Hand Surgeons—A National Survey
- Author
-
Léna G. Dietrich, Esther Vögelin, Michael J. Deml, Torsten Pastor, Boyko Gueorguiev, and Tatjana Pastor
- Subjects
hand surgeons ,quality of life ,Swiss ,Switzerland ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Background and Objectives: Providing high-quality care for patients in hand surgery is an everyday endeavor. However, the quality of life (QoL) and working conditions of hand surgeons ensuring these high-quality services need to be investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the QoL and working conditions of Swiss hand surgeons. Materials and Methods: A national survey with Swiss hand surgeons was conducted. Standardized questionnaires were completed anonymously online. Core topics included working conditions, QoL, satisfaction with the profession, and aspects of private life. Results: A total of 250 hand surgeons were invited to participate, of which 110 (44.0%) completed the questionnaire. Among all participants, 43.6% stated that they are on call 4–7 days per month, versus 8.2% never being on call. Overall, 84.0% of the residents, 50.0% of the senior physicians, 27.6% of the physicians in leading positions, and 40.6% of the senior consultants/practice owners, as well as 55.1% of the female and 44.3% of the male respondents, felt stressed by their job, even during holidays and leisure time. Out of all participants, 85.4% felt that work affects private relationships negatively. Despite the reported stress, 89.1% would choose hand surgery as a profession again. Less on-call duty (29.1%) and better pay (26.4%) are the most prioritized factors for attractiveness of a position at a hospital. Conclusions: The QoL of Swiss hand surgeons is negatively affected by their workload and working hours. Residents, senior physicians and female surgeons suffer significantly more often from depression, burnout or chronic fatigue in comparison to leading positions, senior consultants/practice owners and male surgeons. Better pay or less on-call duty would make the work more attractive in acute care hospitals.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Healthcare professional and professional stakeholders' perspectives on vaccine mandates in switzerland: a mixed-methods study
- Author
-
Léna G. Dietrich, Alyssa Lüthy, Pia Lucas Ramanathan, Nadja Baldesberger, Andrea Buhl, Lisa Schmid Thurneysen, Lisa C. Hug, L. Suzanne Suggs, Camilla Speranza, Benedikt M. Huber, Philip E. Tarr, and Michael J. Deml
- Subjects
COVID-19 Vaccines ,General Veterinary ,General Immunology and Microbiology ,Health Personnel ,Vaccination ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,COVID-19 ,Vaccine mandates ,MMR ,Influenza ,Infectious Diseases ,Influenza Vaccines ,Healthcare professionals ,Influenza, Human ,Vaccine policy ,Humans ,Patient Compliance ,Molecular Medicine ,ddc:301 ,Covid-19 ,Switzerland - Abstract
There currently are no mandatory vaccines in Switzerland. However, Swiss federal legislation allows for vaccination mandates in settings where the risk of transmission to vulnerable groups is high, such as healthcare professionals (HCPs) working with vulnerable patients. Since HCPs are trusted information sources, a priority population for COVID-19 vaccination, and potentially subjected to mandates, we investigated HCP perspectives on mandates.A national online survey was administered to HCPs (October 2020-March 2021), including vaccine mandates questions concerning patients (measles) and HCPs (influenza). We qualitatively investigated HCP mandate perspectives through: (1) 34 interviews with HCPs, HCP professional society representatives, and health authorities; (2) a focus group discussion (FGD) with complementary medicine (CM) and biomedical physicians, and Swiss Federal Vaccination Commission members.1933 participants (496 physicians, 226 pharmacists, 607 nurses, 604 midwives) responded to the survey. Quantitative results show all professional groups preferred shared parent-HCP measles vaccine decisions (65%, 54%, 50%, 48%, respectively; p for trend 0.001). Midwives (87%) and nurses (70%) preferred individual influenza vaccination decisions for HCPs, while physicians (49%) and pharmacists (44%) preferred shared employee-employer decisions (p for trend 0.001). Physicians (p .001) and pharmacists (p .01) with CM training favored individual influenza vaccination decisions. Qualitative results show general HCP opposition to vaccine mandates, mainly because participants argued how other approaches, such as HCP training and better information, could encourage uptake. Arguments against COVID-19 mandates included insufficiently documented long-term safety/efficacy data. From participants' perspectives, mandated vaccination should be used as a last resort. Some participants expressed fear that with mandates, notably for influenza and COVID-19, some HCPs might leave their jobs. HCPs were unsure what vaccine mandates would concretely look like in practice, particularly regarding sanctions for non-compliance and enforcement.In Switzerland, HCPs generally were opposed to vaccination mandates. Clarity and guidance are needed from health authorities to better inform discussions around vaccine mandates.
- Published
- 2022
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.