Search

Purpose: To report on 10 years of high-risk service screening with annual MRI in the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC)., Methods: A cohort of 4,573 high-risk, previously unaffected women (954 BRCA1 carriers, 598 BRCA2 carriers, 3021 BRCA1/2 non-carriers) participating in the GC-HBOC surveillance program was prospectively followed. Screening outcomes for 14,142 screening rounds with MRI between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed and stratified by risk group, type of screening round, and age., Results: A total of 221 primary breast cancers (185 invasive, 36 in situ) were diagnosed within 12 months of an annual screening round with MRI. Of all cancers, 84.5% (174/206, 15 unknown) were stage 0 or I. In BRCA1 carriers, 16.9% (10/59, 5 unknown) of all incident cancers (screen-detected and interval cancers combined) and in BRCA2 carriers 12.5% (3/24, 4 unknown) were stage IIA or higher, compared to only 4.8% (2/42, 2 unknown) in high-risk BRCA1/2 non-carriers. Program sensitivity was 89.6% (95% CI 84.9-93.0) with no significant differences in sensitivity between risk groups or by age. Specificity was significantly lower in the first screening round (84.6%, 95% CI 83.6-85.7) than in subsequent screening rounds (91.1%, 95% CI 90.6-91.7), p < 0.001. Cancer detection rates (CDRs) and as a result positive predictive values were strongly dependent on type of screening round, risk group and patient age. CDRs ranged from 43.5‰ (95% CI 29.8-62.9) for the first screening round in BRCA2 carriers to 2.9‰ (95% CI 1.3-6.3) for subsequent screening rounds in high-risk non-carriers in the age group 30 to 39 years., Conclusions: High-risk screening with MRI was successfully implemented in the GC-HBOC with high sensitivity and specificity. Risk prediction and inclusion criteria in high-risk non-carriers need to be adjusted to improve CDRs and thus screening efficacy in these patients.

In a prospective clinical study the relevance of i.v. cholangiography and ultrasonography for preoperative diagnosis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy was assessed. Imaging of the common bile duct was realized successfully via i.v. cholangiography in 96.3% of all patients. Compared with ERCP, i.v. cholangiography diagnosis proved correct in 91.6% of all cases with pathological depiction of the common bile duct. Ultrasonography offered a sensitivity of 97.8% for assessing the common bile duct diameter. However, the distinction between intraductal concrements and artifacts caused by air superposition may be difficult. I.v. cholangiography is the most sensitive and easy to realize diagnostic technique to identify concrements in the common bile duct. The results of this study indicate that a combined strategy of i.v. cholangiography and ultrasonography may replace ERCP for preoperative diagnosis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, if there is a sufficient depiction of the common bile duct and without concrements in it.