Search

Objective This study sought to identify factors that influence emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians' destination decision-making for pediatric patients. We also sought EMS clinicians' opinions on potential systems improvements, such as protocol changes and the use of evidence-based transport guidelines. Methods Thirty-six in-depth phone interviews were conducted using a semi-structured format. We utilized a modified Grounded Theory approach to understand the complicated decision-making processes of EMS personnel. Memo writing was used throughout the data collection and analysis processes in order to identify emerging themes. The research team utilized hierarchical coding of interview transcripts to organize data into sub-categories for final analysis. Results EMS clinicians cited the perceived need for specialty care, the presence of a medical home, a desire for improved continuity of care, and the availability of aeromedical transport as factors that promoted transport to a pediatric specialty center. They voiced that children with emergent stabilization needs should be transported to the closest facility, however, they did not identify any specific medical conditions suitable for transport to non-specialty centers. EMS clinicians recommended improvements in pediatric-specific education, improved clarity of hospitals' pediatric capabilities, and the creation of a pediatric-specific destination decision-making tool. Conclusion This study describes specific factors that influence EMS clinicians' transport destination decision-making for pediatric patients. It also describes potential systems and educational improvements that may increase pediatric transport directly to definitive care. EMS clinicians are in support of specific designations for hospitals' pediatric capabilities and were in favor of the creation of a formal destination decision-making tool.

Background: Patient lifting injuries remain a significant hazard to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers despite preventative and mitigative strategies. Objective: To better characterize the nature of occupational injury involving patient and stretcher handling. Methods: A retrospective review of existing de-identified claims data was performed for the study period of January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2017. Independent reviewers analyzed each claim to determine if the claim was related to lifting or moving a patient. Any discrepancies between the two reviewers were analyzed by a third reviewer. Results: Eighty-two claims were identified as resulting from lifting or maneuvering patients. Fifty-two of these injuries (63.4%) resulted in at least one lost workday (LWD). Strains and sprains accounted for the majority of injuries with 63.4% (n=52) and 18.3% (n=15) respectively. Forty-two (51.2%) of these reports occurred when the provider was moving a patient, not involving a stretcher, while 37.8% (n=31) occurred due to lifting or maneuvering a stretcher with or without a patient. Conclusion: While the overall incidence of lifting injuries was less than reported in other occupational health data series, these injuries continue to occur, and cause significant operational and fiscal impact for EMS systems. This occurrence is despite advances in engineering controls and the organizational embracement of a culture of safety that focuses on risk identification and mitigation. Understanding the types of lifting/moving injuries, circumstances surrounding the injury, and contributing factors will help to maintain a heightened awareness of potential injuries associated with EMS work, and opportunities to reduce them.

Decisions for patient transport by emergency medical services (EMS) are individualized, while established guidelines help direct adult patients to specialty hospitals, no such pediatric equivalents are in wide use. When children are transported to a hospital that cannot provide definitive care, care is delayed and may cause adverse events. Therefore, we created a novel evidence-based decision tool to support EMS destination choice. A multidisciplinary expert panel (EP) of stakeholders reviewed published literature. Four facility capability levels for pediatric care were defined. Using a modified Delphi method, the EP matched specific conditions to a facility pediatric-capability level in a draft tool. The literature review and EP recommendations identified seventeen pediatric medical conditions at risk for secondary transport. In the first voting round, two were rejected, nine met consensus for a specific facility capability level, and six did not reach consensus on the destination facility level. A second round reached consensus on a facility level for the six conditions as well as revision of one previously rejected condition. In the third round, the panel selected a visual display format. Finally, the panel unanimously approved the PDTree. Using a modified Delphi technique, we developed the PDTree EMS destination decision tool by incorporating existing evidence and the expertise of a multidisciplinary panel.

Objective The primary objective of this study is to better understand the preferences of the general public regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education as it relates to both format and the time and place of delivery. Methods Survey data were collected from a convenience sample at large public gatherings in Baltimore, Maryland, between May 23, 2015, and February 11, 2017. The survey was a 23-item single-page instrument administered at fairs and festivals. Results A total of 516 surveys were available for analysis. Twenty-four percent of the total population reported being very confident in performing CPR (scoring 8 to 10 on a Likert scale). Thirty-two percent of respondents who had previously taken a CPR class reported being very confident in performing CPR. A stepwise decline in reported confidence in performing CPR was observed as the time from last CPR class increased. Among all respondents the most favored instruction style was an instructor-led class. Least favorable was a local learning station at an event. The most favored location for instruction were libraries, while community festivals were least favored. Conclusion Respondent preferences regarding the location and style of the training differed little between socioeconomic groups. Instructor-led instruction at local libraries was the most preferred option. CPR education offered at local learning stations during events and at community festivals were least favored among respondents. This study’s findings can be used to more effectively structure CPR outreach and educational programs in an attempt to increase rates of bystander CPR.

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) protocol implementation can be a challenging endeavor given the large and diverse provider workforce. These efforts can be even more challenging given training restrictions, career and volunteer combination EMS agencies, and inconsistent work schedules. In an effort to educate as many providers as possible in a relatively short time, the community of practice educational model was used during a new evidence-based EMS protocol implementation. This model identifies providers who are enthusiastic during initial training as advocates. These advocates then continue to educate their peers going forward. This allows for the initial educational effort to continue to propagate during pilot testing and beyond. During this protocol implementation, a total of 17 educational visits were made to EMS stations and 43 providers were identified as advocates.FrattaKA, FisheJN, AndersJF, SmithTG. Introduction of a new EMS protocol using the communities of practice educational model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(1):108–109.