1. Radiosurgery versus radiation therapy for long term local control rate of craniopharyngioma: a meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Yoo HJ, Ham CH, Roh H, Jo HJ, Kwon WK, Yoon W, Kim JH, Kwon TH, and Byun J
- Subjects
- Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Treatment Outcome, Craniopharyngioma radiotherapy, Craniopharyngioma surgery, Radiosurgery methods, Pituitary Neoplasms radiotherapy, Pituitary Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Introduction: Craniopharyngiomas are challenging benign tumors arising from Rathke's pouch remnants, often requiring multidisciplinary management due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. This meta-analysis systematically compares conventional radiation therapy (RT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (RS) in treating residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas., Method: A comprehensive literature search identified 44 studies, including 46 reports, meeting inclusion criteria such as progression-free survival (PFS) and post-radiotherapy complications. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines., Results: The pooled 5-year PFS favored RT (0.843; 95% CI: 0.767-0.898) over RS (0.680; 95% CI: 0.631-0.727), as did 10-year PFS (RT: 0.813; 95% CI: 0.683-0.888; RS: 0.553; 95% CI: 0.470-0.634). RT demonstrated mitigating tumor recurrence risks. Visual and hormonal complication rates between the modalities were comparable (visual: ~4%; hormonal: ~6%)., Conclusion: RT consistently achieved superior long-term PFS compared to RS, reaffirming its role as the standard for adjuvant therapy in craniopharyngiomas. This analysis highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies balancing efficacy and safety, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical declaration: This study is a meta-analysis and did not involve direct interaction with human participants or collection of identifiable personal data. Therefore, the requirement for informed consent was waived. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this study. , (© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF