Search

Winnie Yeo,1 Nicole TY Ngai,1 Christopher CH Yip,1 Frankie KF Mo,1 Victoria A Yeo,1 Jonathan WH Ko,1 Leung V Li,1 Thomas KH Lau,1 Kwai Tung Lai,1 Elizabeth Pang,1 Claudia HW Yip,1 Horatio L Yeo,1 Carol Chi Hei Kwok,2 Stephanie WY Ko,1 Alex Molassiotis3 1Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Clinical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongCorrespondence: Winnie Yeo, Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, People’s Republic of China, Email winnieyeo@cuhk.edu.hkPurpose: Although risk factors related to chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) have been identified in previous studies, only a few studies have evaluated the risk factors associated with contemporary antiemetic prophylaxis, including olanzapine/aprepitant- or NEPA-containing regimens. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with CINV development in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.Methods: Data from 304 patients enrolled in 3 previously reported prospective antiemetic studies were included. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to predict risk factors associated with CINV occurrence. Additionally, the likelihood of treatment failure in relation to the number of risk factors in individual patients was evaluated.Results: Multivariate analysis of the entire study group revealed that obesity status (defined as body mass index/= 25.0 kg/m2) and the use of olanzapine/aprepitant- or NEPA-containing anti-emetic regimens were associated with a high likelihood, while a history of motion sickness was associated with a lower likelihood, complete response (CR), and “no nausea” in the overall phase. A history of vomiting during pregnancy was also associated with a lower likelihood of an overall CR. Patients with an increasing number of risk factors had a higher likelihood of treatment failure and shorter time to first vomiting. Those who did not achieve CR and “no nausea” in the first cycle were less likely to achieve these parameters in the subsequent cycle of chemotherapy.Conclusion: The present study confirmed previously reported risk factors for CINV in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Further optimization of CINV control is required for patients with identifiable risk factors; olanzapine/aprepitant- or NEPA- containing prophylaxis are the preferred contemporary anti-emetics regimens for Chinese breast cancer patients undergoing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy.Keywords: cytotoxic, nausea and vomiting, olanzapine, aprepitant, NEPA

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was initially used for locally advanced or inoperable breast cancers. Its extension to early disease has facilitated breast-conserving surgery (BCS). This study investigated the use of NAC in patients registered with the Hong Kong Breast Cancer Registry (HKBCR); it also assessed NAC effectiveness according to rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and BCS., Methods: Records were retrieved from the HKBCR regarding 13 435 women who had been diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during the period of 2006 to 2017, including 1084 patients who received NAC., Results: The proportion of patients treated with NAC nearly doubled from 5.6% in 2006-2011 to 10.3% in 2012-2017. The increase was most pronounced among patients with stage II or III disease. In terms of biological subtype, substantial increases in the receipt of NAC were evident among patients with triple-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (non-luminal) tumours. The best rates of pCR were observed in patients with HER2-positive (non-luminal) [46.0%] tumours, followed by patients with luminal B (HER2-positive) [29.4%] and triple-negative (29.3%) tumours. After NAC, the rate of BCS was 53.9% in patients with clinical stage IIA disease, compared with 38.2% in patients with pathological stage IIA disease who did not receive NAC., Conclusion: The use of NAC in Hong Kong increased from 2006 to 2017. The findings regarding rates of pCR and BCS indicate that NAC is an effective treatment; it should be considered in patients with stage ≥II disease, as well as patients with HER2- positive (non-luminal) or triple-negative breast cancers., Competing Interests: All authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Introduction: This post-hoc analysis retrospectively assessed data from two recent studies of antiemetic regimens for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The primary objective was to compare olanzapine-based versus netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA)-based regimens in terms of controlling CINV during cycle 1 of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy; secondary objectives were to assess quality of life (QOL) and emesis outcomes over four cycles of AC., Methods: This study included 120 Chinese patients with early-stage breast cancer who were receiving AC; 60 patients received the olanzapine-based antiemetic regimen, whereas 60 patients received the NEPA-based antiemetic regimen. The olanzapine-based regimen comprised aprepitant, ondansetron, dexamethasone, and olanzapine; the NEPA-based regimen comprised NEPA and dexamethasone. Patient outcomes were compared in terms of emesis control and QOL., Results: During cycle 1 of AC, the olanzapine group exhibited a higher rate of 'no use of rescue therapy' in the acute phase (olanzapine vs NEPA: 96.7% vs 85.0%, P=0.0225). No parameters differed between groups in the delayed phase. The olanzapine group had significantly higher rates of 'no use of rescue therapy' (91.7% vs 76.7%, P=0.0244) and 'no significant nausea' (91.7% vs 78.3%, P=0.0408) in the overall phase. There were no differences in QOL between groups. Multiple cycle assessment revealed that the NEPA group had higher rates of total control in the acute phase (cycles 2 and 4) and the overall phase (cycles 3 and 4)., Conclusion: These results do not conclusively support the superiority of either regimen for patients with breast cancer who are receiving AC., Competing Interests: W Yeo has been involved in the Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) Network in Asia and has provided lectures on CINV at events organised by Mundipharma International Limited, which supported the design of the NEPA study10 analysed in this post-hoc analysis but had no role in the present comparative analysis, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Introduction: This study was performed to examine the effects of primary granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis on neutropenic toxicity, chemotherapy delivery, and hospitalisation among Chinese patients with breast cancer in Hong Kong., Methods: This retrospective study included patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy from November 2007 to October 2013 at Princess Margaret Hospital. Data were collected regarding the usage of G-CSF prophylaxis; incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, non-neutropenic fever, and infection; hospital admissions, and chemotherapy dose delivery. Patients who began to receive G-CSF prophylaxis during the first cycle of chemotherapy and continued such prophylaxis in subsequent cycles were regarded as the primary G-CSF prophylaxis group., Results: In total, 231 female Chinese patients with breast cancer were included in the analysis. Overall, 193 (83.5%) patients received primary G-CSF prophylaxis. The demographics and tumour characteristics were comparable between patients with and without primary G-CSF prophylaxis. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis significantly reduced febrile neutropenia incidence from 31.6% to 14.5% (relative risk=0.45, 95% confidence interval=0.25-0.81). Primary G-CSF prophylaxis also significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia from 57.9% to 24.7% (relative risk=0.43, 95% confidence interval=0.30-0.62) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia-related hospital admission from 31.6% to 12.4% (P=0.025). Finally, it enabled more patients to receive adequate chemotherapy dose delivery., Conclusion: Primary G-CSF prophylaxis effectively reduced the incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, while enabling adequate chemotherapy dose delivery and reducing hospital admissions among Chinese patients with breast cancer who received adjuvant docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide chemotherapy., Competing Interests: As the Editor-in-Chief and adviser of the journal, respectively, MCS Wong and SLA Tse were not involved in the peer review process. Other authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

Background: The aim of this study is to address the paucity of epidemiological data regarding the characteristics, treatment patterns and survival outcomes of Chinese glioblastoma patients., Methods: This was a population-level study of Hong Kong adult ( > 18 years) Chinese patients with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed glioblastoma between 2006 and 2019. The age standardized incidence rate (ASIR), patient-, tumor- treatment-related characteristics, overall survival (OS) as well as its predictors were determined., Results: One thousand and ten patients with a median follow-up of 10.0 months were reviewed. The ASIR of glioblastoma was 1.0 per 100 000 population with no significant change during the study period. The mean age was 57 + 14 years. The median OS was 10.6 months (IQR: 5.2-18.4). Independent predictors for survival were: Karnofsky performance score > 80 (adjusted OR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.6-0.9), IDH-1 mutant (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9) or MGMT methylated (aOR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.8) glioblastomas, gross total resection (aOR: 0.8; 95% CI: 0.5-0.8) and temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (aOR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.3-0.6). Despite the significant increased administration of temozolomide chemoradiotherapy from 39% (127/326) of patients in 2006-2010 to 63% (227/356) in 2015-2019 ( P -value < .001), median OS did not improve (2006-2010: 10.3 months vs 2015-2019: 11.8 months) (OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 0.9-1.3)., Conclusions: The incidence of glioblastoma in the Chinese general population is low. We charted the development of neuro-oncological care of glioblastoma patients in Hong Kong during the temozolomide era. Although there was an increased adoption of temozolomide chemoradiotherapy, a corresponding improvement in survival was not observed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: There is limited work on the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) on quality of life (QoL) in adriamycin-cyclophosphamide (AC)-treated patients with breast cancer. The objectives of the study were the following: (a) to confirm if symptoms of CINV led to lower QoL during AC; (b) to evaluate the pattern of changes in patients' QoL during multiple cycles of AC; and (c) to assess if the QoL in an earlier cycle affected the QoL in subsequent cycles of AC., Materials and Methods: This is a secondary pooled data analysis that included 303 Chinese patients with breast cancer who received 1,177 cycles of adjuvant AC in three prospective antiemetic studies. QoL data were based on Functional Living Index-emesis (FLIE) scored over three to four AC cycles. CINV symptoms assessed included "no significant nausea" (NSN), "significant nausea" (SN), "no vomiting" (NoV), "vomiting" (V), and complete response (CR)., Results: Across all AC cycles, the mean scores for the FLIE nausea domain for patients who experienced NSN versus SN were 10.92 versus 53.92, respectively (p < .0001), with lower scores indicating better QoL; the mean scores for the FLIE vomiting domain for patients who experienced NoV versus V were 1.44 versus 19.11, respectively (p < .0001), with similar results across subsequent cycles. Analysis of the effect of the QoL in cycle 1 on the QoL of subsequent cycles revealed the following: for the nausea domain, among patients who had cycle 1 FLIE scores ≥ versus < the mean, the corresponding scores in cycle 2 were 6.87 versus 36.71 (p < .0001); whereas those for cycle 3 were 7.07 versus 36.87 (p < .0001); and those for cycle 4 were 5.92 versus 21.48 (p < .0001). Similar findings were observed for the vomiting domain. Netupitant + palonosetron- or aprepitant/olanzapine-based antiemetics had significantly better QoL outcomes., Conclusion: CINV had a significant impact on the QoL of patients with breast cancer treated with AC over multiple cycles., Implications for Practice: In this post-hoc analysis of three prospective studies on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), quality of life (QoL) using contemporary antiemetic regimens in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) was evaluated. During the first and subsequent AC cycles, QoL was significantly better for patients who did not experience vomiting or significant nausea. QoL in an earlier cycle affected the QoL in subsequent AC cycles. Furthermore, recent regimens involving olanzapine/aprepitant or netupitant-palonosetron were associated with a positive impact in QoL. Antiemetic guideline-consistent practice and higher clinician awareness of the impact of CINV on QoL can further mitigate the negative effects of CINV on QoL., (© 2021 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)