Search

Epidemiological studies identifying biological markers of disease state are valuable, but can be time-consuming, expensive, and require extensive intuition and expertise. Furthermore, not all hypothesized markers will be borne out in a study, suggesting that high-quality initial hypotheses are crucial. In this chapter, we describe a high-throughput pipeline to produce a ranked list of high-quality hypothesized biomarkers for diseases. We review an example use of this approach to generate a large number of candidate disease biomarker hypotheses derived from machine learning models, filter and rank them according to their potential novelty using text mining, and corroborate the most promising hypotheses with further statistical modeling. The example use of the pipeline uses a large electronic health record dataset and the PubMed corpus, to find several promising hypothesized laboratory tests with previously undocumented correlations to particular diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Proteins perform their functions by interacting with other proteins. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) is critical for understanding the functions of individual proteins, the mechanisms of biological processes, and the disease mechanisms. High-throughput experiments accumulated a huge number of PPIs in PubMed articles, and their extraction is possible only through automated approaches. The standard text-mining protocol includes four major tasks, namely, recognizing protein mentions, normalizing protein names and aliases to unique identifiers such as gene symbol, extracting PPIs, and visualizing the PPI network using Cytoscape or other visualization tools. Each task is challenging and has been revised over several years to improve the performance. We present a protocol based on our hybrid approaches and show the possibility of presenting each task as an independent web-based tool, NAGGNER for protein name recognition, ProNormz for protein name normalization, PPInterFinder for PPI extraction, and HPIminer for PPI network visualization. The protocol is specific to human but can be generalized to other organisms. We include KinderMiner, our most recent text-mining tool that predicts PPIs by retrieving significant co-occurring protein pairs. The algorithm is simple, easy to implement, and generalizable to other biological challenges.

Epidemiological studies identifying biological markers of disease state are valuable, but can be time-consuming, expensive, and require extensive intuition and expertise. Furthermore, not all hypothesized markers will be borne out in a study, suggesting that higher quality initial hypotheses are crucial. In this work, we propose a high-throughput pipeline to produce a ranked list of high-quality hypothesized marker laboratory tests for diagnoses. Our pipeline generates a large number of candidate lab-diagnosis hypotheses derived from machine learning models, filters and ranks them according to their potential novelty using text mining, and corroborate final hypotheses with logistic regression analysis. We test our approach on a large electronic health record dataset and the PubMed corpus, and find several promising candidate hypotheses.

We present a simple text mining method that is easy to implement, requires minimal data collection and preparation, and is easy to use for proposing ranked associations between a list of target terms and a key phrase. We call this method KinderMiner, and apply it to two biomedical applications. The first application is to identify relevant transcription factors for cell reprogramming, and the second is to identify potential drugs for investigation in drug repositioning. We compare the results from our algorithm to existing data and state-of-the-art algorithms, demonstrating compelling results for both application areas. While we apply the algorithm here for biomedical applications, we argue that the method is generalizable to any available corpus of sufficient size.

Clinical studies model the average treatment effect (ATE), but apply this population-level effect to future individuals. Due to recent developments of machine learning algorithms with useful statistical guarantees, we argue instead for modeling the individualized treatment effect (ITE), which has better applicability to new patients. We compare ATE-estimation using randomized and observational analysis methods against ITE-estimation using machine learning, and describe how the ITE theoretically generalizes to new population distributions, whereas the ATE may not. On a synthetic data set of statin use and myocardial infarction (MI), we show that a learned ITE model improves true ITE estimation and outperforms the ATE. We additionally argue that ITE models should be learned with a consistent, nonparametric algorithm from unweighted examples and show experiments in favor of our argument using our synthetic data model and a real data set of D-penicillamine use for primary biliary cirrhosis.

While the use of machine learning methods in clinical decision support has great potential for improving patient care, acquiring standardized, complete, and sufficient training data presents a major challenge for methods relying exclusively on machine learning techniques. Domain experts possess knowledge that can address these challenges and guide model development. We present Advice-Based-Learning (ABLe), a framework for incorporating expert clinical knowledge into machine learning models, and show results for an example task: estimating the probability of malignancy following a non-definitive breast core needle biopsy. By applying ABLe to this task, we demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in specificity (24.0% with p=0.004) without missing a single malignancy.

When mammography reveals a suspicious finding, a core needle biopsy is usually recommended. In 5% to 15% of these cases, the biopsy diagnosis is non-definitive and a more invasive surgical excisional biopsy is recommended to confirm a diagnosis. The majority of these cases will ultimately be proven benign. The use of excisional biopsy for diagnosis negatively impacts patient quality of life and increases costs to the healthcare system. In this work, we employ a multi-relational machine learning approach to predict when a patient with a non-definitive core needle biopsy diagnosis need not undergo an excisional biopsy procedure because the risk of malignancy is low.