Search

Motoko Tachihara,1 Kayoko Tsujino,2 Takeaki Ishihara,3 Hidetoshi Hayashi,4 Yuki Sato,5 Takayasu Kurata,6 Shunichi Sugawara,7 Isamu Okamoto,8 Shunsuke Teraoka,9 Koichi Azuma,10 Haruko Daga,11 Masafumi Yamaguchi,12 Takeshi Kodaira,13 Miyako Satouchi,14 Mototsugu Shimokawa,15 Nobuyuki Yamamoto,9 Kazuhiko Nakagawa4 On behalf of members of the West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG)1Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe City, Japan; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi City, Japan; 3Division of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe City, Japan; 4Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University, Osakasayama City, Japan; 5Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe City, Japan; 6Department of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata City, Japan; 7Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai City, Japan; 8Research Institute for Diseases of the Chest, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka City, Japan; 9Internal Medicine III, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan; 10Division of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka City, Japan; 11Department of Medical Oncology, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan; 12Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka City, Japan; 13Departments of Radiation Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya City, Aichi, Japan; 14Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi City, Japan; 15Department of Biostatistics, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine Yamaguchi, Ube City, JapanCorrespondence: Motoko TachiharaDivision of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, 650-0017, JapanTel +81-78-382-5660Fax +81-78-382-5661Email mt0318@med.kobe-u.ac.jpAbstract: Durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand-1) administration after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) has improved the survival of patients with unresectable, locally advanced (LA) stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some patients are unable to complete cCRT and cannot receive immunotherapy due to poor performance status based on adverse events after cCRT. Immunotherapy plays an important role in anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced NSCLC and is replacing chemotherapy. In addition, radiotherapy and immunotherapy have been reported to have a synergistic effect. This Phase II, multicenter study (DOLPHIN, WJOG11619L, JapicCTI-194840) is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus concurrent curative radiation therapy for PD-L1-positive unresectable LA-NSCLC without chemotherapy. Unresectable LA stage III NSCLC patients aged 20 years or older with a World Health Organization/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 and PD-L1 positivity are enrolled. The patients will receive curative radiation therapy (60 Gy) plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (q2w) for up to 12 months until there is evidence of disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is the 12-month progression-free survival rate as assessed by an independent central review. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, treatment completion rate, and safety. Recruitment began in September 2019.Keywords: clinical study, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, immunotherapy, programmed cell death ligand-1, durvalumab, radiation

Toru Kurata, Sachio Fushida, Jun Kinoshita, Katsunobu Oyama, Takahisa Yamaguchi, Mitsuyoshi Okazaki, Tomoharu Miyashita, Hidehiro Tajima, Itasu Ninomiya, Tetsuo Ohta Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan Background: Characterized by aggressive proliferation, extensive stromal fibrosis, and resulting drug resistance, peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer remains associated with poor prognosis. Interaction between cancer and stromal cells accelerates tumor progression via epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is one of the major causes of tissue fibrosis, and human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) play important roles as cancer stroma in peritoneal dissemination. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) has a pivotal function in the progression of EMT, and Smad proteins play an important role in the TGF-β signaling pathway. Eribulin mesylate (eribulin), a nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor used for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, inhibits EMT changes in triple-negative breast cancer cells. We examined its ability to inhibit tumor progression and EMT changes resulting from the interaction between gastric cancer cells and HPMCs and to act synergistically with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), a key drug for gastric cancer. Materials and methods: Proliferation of gastric cancer cells and HPMCs isolated from healthy omentum was assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Following gastric cancer cell/HPMC coculture, EMT markers were detected by immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting; invasion assays were performed; and TGF-β and Smad phosphorylation were assessed by Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A mouse fibrotic tumor xenograft model was established using gastric cancer cell/HPMC cocultures. The effect of eribulin and/or 5-FU was tested in each case. Results: Eribulin significantly suppressed gastric cancer cell proliferation and EMT changes in MKN-45 gastric cancer cells and HPMCs induced by their interaction in vitro. Eribulin inhibited EMT at much lower concentrations (≥0.5 nM for MKN-45 and ≥0.1 nM for HPMCs) than its half maximal inhibitory concentrations (2.2 nM for MKN-45 and 8.1 nM for HPMCs), and this resulted, at least partly, from the downregulation of TGF-β/Smad signaling. Eribulin administration of ≥0.1 mg/kg suppressed tumor progression (0.1 mg/kg, p=0.02), and fibrosis was inhibited by lower dose (0.05 mg/kg, p=0.008) in the xenograft model. Furthermore, 0.05 mg/kg administration with 5-FU brought about synergistic antitumor effects (p=0.006). Conclusion: Low-dose eribulin combined with 5-FU might be a promising therapy for peritoneal dissemination in gastric cancer. Keywords: peritoneal dissemination, cancer–stromal interaction, human peritoneal mesothelial cell, TGF-β, Smad, synergism

Maiko Niki, Takashi Yokoi, Takayasu Kurata, Shosaku Nomura First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan Background: Several biomarkers have emerged as potential prognostic and predictive markers for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Successful inhibition of angiogenesis with the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, bevacizumab, has improved the efficacy seen with standard cytotoxic therapy of NSCLC. However, despite such enhanced treatment strategies, the prognosis for patients with advanced NSCLC remains poor. Patients and methods: We assessed potential biomarkers in 161 NSCLC patients and 42 control patients. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods were used to evaluate three biomarkers: platelet-derived microparticle (PDMP), high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). We studied the effects of bevacizumab on the expression of these markers. We also analyzed the relationship of the newly designed risk factor (NDRF) to overall survival and disease-free survival. The NDRF classification of patients was determined from the levels of PDMP, HMGB1, and PAI-1. To determine the individual prognostic power of PDMP, HMGB1, and PAI-1, we evaluated associations between their levels and patient outcomes by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in a derivation cohort. Results: PDMP, HMGB1, and PAI-1 levels were higher in NSCLC patients compared with control patients. Notably, the difference in PDMP levels exhibited the strongest statistical significance (p