Search

Oral anticoagulation therapy is essential for preventing stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, poor anticoagulant adherence may hamper medication safety and effective prevention of stroke.GENERAL is a prospective cohort study of AF patients taking rivaroxaban prescribed by general practitioners in Japan. In this study, anticoagulant adherence was calculated as the proportion of days covered (PDC), and patients were retrospectively divided into two groups: good adherence (PDC ≥80 %) and poor adherence (80 %).Of 5680 patients in the GENERAL study, the poor adherence group consisted of 223 patients (3.9 %). Baseline clinical characteristics were almost comparable regarding age (PDC ≥80 % vs.80 %: 73.9 vs. 74.0 years, p = 0.92) and sex (male 64.6 % vs. 66.8 %, p = 0.52). The PDC80 % group more often had various co-morbidities, and had significantly higher CHADSPoor anticoagulant adherence, as measured by PDC80 %, was associated with higher incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding in the GENERAL study.

Contrary to other developed countries, in Japan, recent years have seen increases in cervical cancer incidence and mortality among young people. However, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine program, a key measure for avoiding cervical cancer, has been virtually suspended. Temporal changes in cervical cancer profiles in this unique situation have not been fully investigated epidemiologically. This study aimed to determine the current status and future trends of the incidence and mortality of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions in Japan. Mortality rates of cervical cancer during 1975-2016 and incidence rates of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 during 1975-2013 were examined using vital statistics and population-based cancer registry data in Japan. Bayesian age-period-cohort analyses were performed to analyze temporal changes of the three cervical cancer-related outcomes. We also calculated projections to 2028 for the three outcomes, assuming that HPV vaccination coverage and screening rates in Japan would be maintained at the current level after the resumption of the national vaccination program. The risk of occurrence of the three outcomes showed similar changes by birth cohort, peaking in the mid-1890s-1900s birth cohorts, declining sharply in the 1940s birth cohort, and persistently increasing in the 1950s and later birth cohorts. Projections to 2028 show increases in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the 30-69 age group, with a particular increase in CIN3 incidence in the 25-49 age group, if HPV vaccine programs and screening are not effectively implemented. These findings revealed an increasing cervical disease burden among reproductive age females in Japan.

Appropriate regimens of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) have not yet been established.To compare the total number of thrombotic and/or bleeding events between rivaroxaban monotherapy and combined rivaroxaban and antiplatelet therapy in such patients.This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) open-label, randomized clinical trial. This multicenter analysis was conducted from February 23, 2015, to July 31, 2018. Patients with AF and stable CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting 1 or more years earlier or who had angiographically confirmed CAD not requiring revascularization were enrolled. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2020, to March 26, 2021.Rivaroxaban monotherapy or combined rivaroxaban and antiplatelet therapy.The total incidence of thrombotic, bleeding, and fatal events was compared between the groups. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of subsequent events in the 2 groups, with the status of thrombotic or bleeding events that had occurred by the time of death used as a time-dependent variable.A total of 2215 patients (mean [SD] age, 74 [8.2] years; 1751 men [79.1%]) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The total event rates for the rivaroxaban monotherapy group (1107 [50.0%]) and the combination-therapy group (1108 [50.0%]) were 12.2% (135 of 1107) and 19.2% (213 of 1108), respectively, during a median follow-up of 24.1 (IQR, 17.3-31.5) months. The mortality rate was 3.7% (41 of 1107) in the monotherapy group and 6.6% (73 of 1108) in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of total events compared with combination therapy (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80; P .001). Monotherapy was an independent factor associated with a lower risk of subsequent events compared with combination therapy. The mortality risk after a bleeding event (monotherapy, 75% [6 of 8]; combination therapy, 62.1% [18 of 29]) was higher than that after a thrombotic event (monotherapy, 25% [2 of 8]; combination therapy, 37.9% [11 of 29]).Rivaroxaban monotherapy was associated with lower risks of total thrombotic and/or bleeding events than combination therapy in patients with AF and stable CAD. Tapered antithrombotic therapy with a sole anticoagulant should be considered in these patients.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02642419.

Objectives The aim of this AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial subgroup analysis was to examine rivaroxaban monotherapy benefits and their relation to the time between stenting and enrollment among patients after coronary stenting. Background Of 2,215 patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease in the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy (combination therapy) in terms of efficacy and superior for safety endpoints. However, thrombotic risk after antiplatelet therapy cessation remained a concern among 1,444 patients who had undergone coronary stenting >1 year before enrollment. Methods The benefits of rivaroxaban monotherapy in coronary stenting subgroups were assessed for efficacy (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death of any cause), safety (major bleeding defined according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria), ischemic endpoints, net adverse clinical event, and time between stenting and enrollment. Results Efficacy and safety endpoints for monotherapy were superior to combination therapy, with HRs of 0.70 for efficacy (95% CI: 0.50-0.98; P = 0.036) and 0.55 for safety (95% CI: 0.33-0.92; P = 0.019). For ischemic endpoints, the HR was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.58-1.15; P = 0.240). The HR became smaller with longer time between stenting and enrollment (efficacy, P for interaction = 0.158; safety, P = 0.097). Conclusions In patients with atrial fibrillation after coronary stenting, the benefits of rivaroxaban monotherapy for efficacy and safety endpoints were consistent with those in the whole AFIRE trial population. The benefits became apparent with longer time between stenting and enrollment. (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Study [AFIRE]; UMIN000016612 , NCT02642419 )

Objectives Hyperuricaemia is recognized as an independent risk marker for cardiovascular and renal diseases. However, uric acid is a powerful free-radical scavenger, and the optimal level of serum uric acid (SUA) determining outcomes is unknown. This study explored whether interventional treatments for excessive SUA reduction were harmful and what constituted the optimal lowering of SUA levels for the prevention of events in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of a randomized trial (Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy [FREED]) in which 1070 older patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia were enrolled and allocated to febuxostat (n = 537) or non-febuxostat treatment group (n = 533). We assessed the relationship between the endpoint (withdrawal or study completion) SUA levels and clinical outcomes. Primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cerebral and cardiorenovascular events. Results In the febuxostat group, patients achieving SUA levels ≤4 mg/dl (hazard ratio: 2.01 [95% CI: 1.05, 3.87]), >4 to ≤5 mg/dl (2.12 [1.07, 4.20], >6 to ≤7 mg/dl (2.42 [1.05, 5.60]), and >7 mg/dl (4.73 [2.13, 10.5]) had significantly higher risks for a primary composite event than those achieving SUA levels >5 to ≤6 mg/dl (P = 0.003 [log-rank test]). This J-shaped relationship applied to patients with renal impairment (P = 0.007 [Gray’s test]) and was not significant in the non-febuxostat treatment group (P = 0.212 [log-rank test]). Conclusion Optimal SUA level by febuxostat treatment is 5–6 mg/dl for reducing all-cause mortality, cerebral, cardiovascular and renal events. Excessive SUA reduction may be harmful in older hyperuricaemic populations. Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01984749

ObjectivePatients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) can be treated with multiple antithrombotic therapies including antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies; however, this has the potential to increase bleeding risk. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin in patients also receiving anticoagulant therapy.MethodsWe evaluated patients from the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischaemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial who received rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent; the choice of antiplatelet agent was left to the physician’s discretion. The primary efficacy and safety end points, consistent with those of the AFIRE trial, were compared between P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin groups. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularisation or death from any cause. The primary safety end point was major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria.ResultsA total of 1075 patients were included (P2Y12 inhibitor group, n=297; aspirin group, n=778). Approximately 60% of patients were administered proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and there was no significant difference in PPI use in the groups. There were no significant differences in the primary end points between the groups (efficacy: HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.94; p=0.178; safety: HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.47; p=0.456).ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with AF and stable CAD taking rivaroxaban with P2Y12 inhibitors or aspirin in the chronic phase.Trial registration numberUMIN000016612; NCT02642419.

Background In the AFIRE trial, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy with rivaroxaban and an antiplatelet agent for thromboembolic events or death, and superior for major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease. Little is known about impacts of stroke and bleeding risks on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy. Methods In this subanalysis of the AFIRE trial, we assessed the risk of stroke and bleeding by the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause. The primary safety end point was major bleeding defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Results Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced the primary efficacy and safety end points with no evidence of differential effects by stroke risk (CHADS2, p for interaction = 0.727 for efficacy, 0.395 for safety; CHA2DS2-VASc, p for interaction = 0.740 for efficacy, 0.265 for safety) or bleeding risk (HAS-BLED, p for interaction = 0.581 for efficacy, 0.225 for safety). There was also no evidence of statistical heterogeneity across patient risk categories for other end points; stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, MI, MI or unstable angina, death from any cause, any bleeding, or net adverse clinical events. Conclusions The advantages of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of combination therapy with respect to all prespecified end points, including thromboembolism, bleeding, and mortality were similar across patients with AF and stable coronary artery disease, irrespective of their risk for stroke and bleeding. Clinical Trial Registration UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.

Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy (rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy) in efficacy but superior in safety in the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial. Among 2,215 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD), 1,378 had baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥50 mL/min and received 10 (underdose) or 15 mg/d (standard-dose) rivaroxaban. We aimed to assess the effects of rivaroxaban underdose on clinical outcomes. We assessed efficacy endpoint (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, and death from any cause) and major bleeding in the subgroup of patients with preserved renal function in the AFIRE trial. Age ≥75 years, female sex, lower CrCl, heart failure, and percutaneous coronary intervention history were associated with the underdose prescription. The underdose group had a similar incidence of the efficacy endpoint (3.62 vs. 3.51% per patient-year; In patients with AF, stable CAD, and preserved renal function, rivaroxaban underdose was associated with similar rates of thrombotic events but a lower incidence of hemorrhagic events than the standard dose. AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/), number UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02642419.

ObjectiveAntithrombotic therapy is essential for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) because of the high risk of thrombosis, whereas a combination of antiplatelets and anticoagulants is associated with a high risk of bleeding. We sought to develop and validate a machine-learning-based model to predict future adverse events.MethodsData from 2215 patients with AF and stable CAD enrolled in the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischaemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease trial were randomly assigned to the development and validation cohorts. Using the random survival forest (RSF) and Cox regression models, risk scores were developed for net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke or major bleeding.ResultsUsing variables selected by the Boruta algorithm, RSF and Cox models demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration in the validation cohort. Using the variables weighted by HR (age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, alcohol consumption, creatinine clearance, heart failure, diabetes, antiplatelet use and AF type), an integer-based risk score for NACE was developed and classified patients into three risk groups: low (0–4 points), intermediate (5–8) and high (≥9). In both cohorts, the integer-based risk score performed well, with acceptable discrimination (area under the curve 0.70 and 0.66, respectively) and calibration (p>0.40 for both). Decision curve analysis showed the superior net benefits of the risk score.ConclusionsThis risk score can predict the risk of NACE in patients with AF and stable CAD.Trial registration numbersUMIN000016612,NCT02642419.

Aim: Coronary plaque regression is weak in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We evaluated whether dual lipid-lowering therapy (DLLT) with ezetimibe and atorvastatin attenuates coronary plaques in ACS patients with DM. Methods: The prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS (Plaque Regression with Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor or Synthesis Inhibitor Evaluated by Intravascular Ultrasound) trial assigned 246 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to DLLT or atorvastatin monotherapy and evaluated IVUS-derived changes in percent atheroma volume (ΔPAV), at baseline and 9–12-month follow-up, in 126 ACS cases, including 25 DM patients. The atorvastatin dose was up-titrated to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 70 mg/dL. Results: In DM patients, the monotherapy group (n = 13) and the DLLT group (n = 12) showed a similar prevalence of coronary risks and baseline lipid profiles. During the study, the change in LDL-C level was similar between DM and non-DM patients. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients showed weaker regression of ΔPAV by DLLT than those who underwent monotherapy (DM: −2.77 ± 3.47% vs. −0.77 ± 2.51%, P = 0.11; non-DM: −2.01 ± 3.36% vs. −0.08 ± 2.66%, P = 0.008). The change in LDL-C level was not correlated with ΔPAV in non-DM patients, but there was significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients (r = 0.52, P = 0.008). Conclusions: ACS patients with DM showed weaker coronary plaque regression than their counterparts. A significant correlation between the change in LDL-C level and ΔPAV in DM patients suggested that more intensive lipid-lowering therapy is required in ACS patients with DM.

Purpose: Inflammation plays an important role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis, leading to poor clinical outcomes. Hyperuricemia is associated with the activation of the Nod-like receptor protein 3 inflammasome. Here, we investigated whether inhibition of inflammation using febuxostat lowered the risk of cardiovascular events. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of the randomized trial, Febuxostat for Cerebral and CaRdiorenovascular Events PrEvEntion StuDy (FREED). In total, 1,067 patients (736 men and 331 women) were included in the analysis. We compared the serial changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels between febuxostat and non-febuxostat groups and assessed the correlation between the changes in uric acid (UA) and hs-CRP levels after febuxostat treatment. We also determined whether febuxostat could reduce a hard endpoint, defined as a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Results: Serum UA levels in the febuxostat group were significantly lower than those in the non-febuxostat group after randomization (p> 0.2 mg/dL or those administered 40 mg of febuxostat, the drug did not reduce hs-CRP levels or decrease the hard endpoint. Conclusion: Febuxostat reduced the UA levels but did not affect the CRP levels, and therefore may fail to decrease cardiovascular outcomes after treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT01984749).https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01984749

To evaluate whether combinatorial use of abatacept (ABT) and tacrolimus (Tac) increases the risk of adverse events compared to their individual use in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of RA patients using the Japanese multicenter database and analyzed the data of RA patients registered from April 2010 to March 2019 by comparing three treatment groups who received Tac, ABT, or a combination of both. We included patients who had initiated treatment with ABT or Tac and excluded patients who used tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, and Jak inhibitors in the first year of our study. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events such as infections that required hospitalization, newly diagnosed malignancy, or death from any cause after initiation of ABT or Tac. Of the 27,032 RA patients in the registry, 2009 patients were included. The Tac, ABT, and combination groups consisted of 1328, 563, and 118 patients, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 149 (13.4%), 62 (13.5%), and 14 (13.9%) patients of the Tac, ABT, and combination groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse events between groups was not significantly different (p = 0.638). A Cox regression analysis which was adjusted for potential confounders such as age, disease activity, and concomitant use of prednisolone revealed no significant differences between groups. The combinatorial use of ABT and Tac, or ABT alone does not increase the risk of adverse events when compared to the use of Tac alone in RA patients in Japan. Key Points • This study included Japanese rheumatoid arthritis data and found that there was no significant risk when patients were treated with a combination of Tac and ABT or each drug alone.

To test our hypothesis that the magnitude of reduction in hsCRP achieved by antihypertensive medications may predict the benefit for cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive individuals, we performed subanalysis of the ATTEMPT-CVD study. The hypertensive participants enrolled in the ATTMEPT-CVD study were categorized into two groups according to whether achieved reduction in hsCRP levels at 6 months after initiation of antihypertensive medications from baseline was equal to or greater than 40% (responder group) or less than 40% (non-responder group). Baseline characteristics and blood pressure during follow-up period were similar between the groups. For women, the incidence of cardiovascular events was significantly less in responder group than non-responder group (P This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01075698.

New/worsening cognitive and physical impairments following critical care pose significant problems. Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can improve physical function after cardiac intensive care (CIC). This observational study aimed to evaluate cognitive function in patients participating in multidisciplinary CR and to identify correlates of impaired cognitive function after CIC. We analyzed 111 consecutive patients admitted to our comprehensive care ward at least 7 days after CIC and assessed factors associated with cognitive function using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Patients were stratified into two groups based on the median FIM-Cognitive scores: impaired (n = 56) and preserved cognition (n = 55) groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified age [odds ratio (OR) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.13; p = 0.042], Mini-Nutrition Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF; OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56–0.95; p = 0.017), and FIM-Physical scores (OR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.90–0.99; p = 0.012) as significant and independent factors associated with impaired cognition. The median length of hospital stay was 28 (interquartile range: 18, 43) days. The FIM-Cognitive and FIM-Physical scores significantly increased from admission to discharge [32.0 (27.0, 35.0) vs. 34.0 (29.0, 35.0) points; p

AIMS The prediction of future heart failure (HF) in stable outpatients is often difficult for general practitioners and cardiologists. Recently, the H2 FPEF score (0-9 points) has been proposed for the discrimination of HF with preserved ejection fraction from non-cardiac causes of dyspnoea. The six clinical and echocardiographic variables that constitute the H2 FPEF score include the following: (i) obesity (H); (ii) the use of ≥2 antihypertensive drugs (H); (iii) atrial fibrillation (F); (iv) pulmonary hypertension (P); (v) an age > 60 years (E); and (vi) E/e' > 9 (F). We performed an external validation study that investigated whether the H2 FPEF score could predict future HF-related events in stable outpatients with cardiovascular risk factor(s) in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS In this prospective cohort study, after exclusion of 195 from 551 consecutive, stable Japanese outpatients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor who were enrolled between September 2010 and July 2013, the remaining 356 outpatients (171 men, 185 women, mean age 73.2 years) were eligible for the analysis. We calculated the H2 FPEF score (0-9 points), and followed up the patients for an average of 517 days. In all of the 356 patients, the mean H2 FPEF score was 3.1 ± 1.8, and 15 developed HF-related events during the follow-up period, including cardiovascular death (n = 2) and hospitalization for HF decompensation (n = 13). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the H2 FPEF score was an independent predictor of future HF-related events (P < 0.001 for all three models). Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed a significantly higher probability of HF-related events in the outpatients with a high H2 FPEF score (P < 0.001). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the H2 FPEF score was significantly associated with the occurrence of future HF-related events (P < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio of a H2 FPEF score of 7 points to predict HF-related events were 47%, 96%, and 11.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The H2 FPEF score could provide useful information for future HF-related events in stable outpatients with cardiovascular risk factor(s) in Japan.

Background Among patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, those with histories of atherothrombotic disease are at high‐risk for future ischemic events. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and histories of atherothrombotic disease. Methods and Results This was a post hoc subanalysis of the AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial. Patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease were recruited and randomized to receive the rivaroxaban monotherapy or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet drug. For the purpose of this sub‐study, participants were divided into 2 subgroups, including the atherothrombosis group (those with histories of myocardial infarction, stroke, and/or peripheral artery disease; n=1052, 47.5%) and non‐atherothrombosis group (n=1163, 52.5%). The efficacy end point included cardiovascular events or all‐cause death, while the safety end point was major bleeding. Net adverse events consisted of all‐cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding. In the atherothrombosis group, rivaroxaban monotherapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of net adverse events when compared with combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.34–0.74; P P =0.044) and safety (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19–0.71; P =0.003) end points. By contrast, there were no differences between treatment outcomes for the non‐atherothrombosis group. Conclusions Rivaroxaban monotherapy significantly reduced net adverse events as compared with combination therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, and prior atherothrombotic disease. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02642419.

Background: Early bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with increased risk of death and myocardial infarction; however, the association between bleeding and subsequent major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) remains unclear in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. We thus aimed to investigate this association. Methods: The AFIRE trial (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) was a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan. This post hoc analysis included 2215 patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease treated with rivaroxaban or rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent. MACCE was defined as a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause. The association of bleeding with subsequent MACCE risk was investigated using time-adjusted Cox multivariate analysis after adjusting for baseline characteristics and time from bleeding. Bleeding events were classified according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Results: Among the 2215 patients, 386 (17.4%) had bleeding during follow-up, of whom 63 (16.3%) also experienced MACCE; MACCE incidence was higher in patients with bleeding than in those without (8.38% versus 4.20% per patient-year; hazard ratio, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.49–2.70]; P Conclusions: In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease, major bleeding was strongly associated with subsequent MACCE. Thus, it is important to prevent major bleeding to avoid cardiovascular events and death. Registration: URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ; Unique identifier: UMIN000016612. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02642419. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Exposure to ambient air pollution increases mortality and is a leading contributor to the global disease burden [1]. Epidemiological studies have elucidated a relationship between out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) and air pollutants, especially particulate matter (diameter ≤2.5 μm; PM2.5) [2, 3]. The causes of OHCA are broadly categorised as cardiac and non-cardiac [4]. A 10 µg·m−3 increase in PM2.5 exposure yielded a 1.6% increase in the incidence of cardiac origin OHCA [3, 5]. However, few studies on OHCAs of non-cardiac origin, including intrinsic respiratory diseases (COPD/pneumonia/asthma) are available. We examined the association between short-term exposure to PM2.5 and bystander-witnessed respiratory origin OHCAs, including eventual prognosis. We also investigated differences between PM2.5 exposure-related cardiac and respiratory origin OHCAs., Particulate matter is a potential risk factor for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) of respiratory origin. The percent increase in incidence of OHCA of respiratory origin is equivalent to that of PM2.5 exposure-related OHCAs of cardiac origin. http://bit.ly/3tDXym0

There are limited data from randomized trials evaluating the use of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease.In a multicenter, open-label trial conducted in Japan, we randomly assigned 2236 patients with atrial fibrillation who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) more than 1 year earlier or who had angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease not requiring revascularization to receive monotherapy with rivaroxaban (a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant) or combination therapy with rivaroxaban plus a single antiplatelet agent. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, or death from any cause; this end point was analyzed for noninferiority with a noninferiority margin of 1.46. The primary safety end point was major bleeding, according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; this end point was analyzed for superiority.The trial was stopped early because of increased mortality in the combination-therapy group. Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for the primary efficacy end point, with event rates of 4.14% and 5.75% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P0.001 for noninferiority). Rivaroxaban monotherapy was superior to combination therapy for the primary safety end point, with event rates of 1.62% and 2.76% per patient-year, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.89; P = 0.01 for superiority).As antithrombotic therapy, rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy for efficacy and superior for safety in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. (Funded by the Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation; AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000016612; and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02642419.).

Aims To compare the occurrence of cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events in patients with hyperuricaemia treated with febuxostat and those treated with conventional therapy with lifestyle modification. Methods and results This multicentre, prospective, randomized open-label, blinded endpoint study was done in 141 hospitals in Japan. A total of 1070 patients were included in the intention-to-treat population. Elderly patients with hyperuricaemia (serum uric acid >7.0 to ≤9.0 mg/dL) at risk for cerebral, cardiovascular, or renal disease, defined by the presence of hypertension, Type 2 diabetes, renal disease, or history of cerebral or cardiovascular disease, were randomized to febuxostat and non-febuxostat groups and were observed for 36 months. Cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events and all deaths were defined as the primary composite event. The serum uric acid level at endpoint (withdrawal or completion of the study) in the febuxostat (n = 537) and non-febuxostat groups (n = 533) was 4.50 ± 1.52 and 6.76 ± 1.45 mg/dL, respectively (P Conclusion Febuxostat lowers uric acid and delays the progression of renal dysfunction. Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01984749).

AIM Whether young cervical cancer patients have poorer prognosis compared to older ones has remained controversial over the past half century. The last three decades have seen a rise in morbidity and mortality among young Japanese women with cervical cancer. This reflects the fact that the importance of prevention has not been fully recognized due to limited clinical studies. We examined the relationship between age and prognosis in cervical cancer. METHODS We retrospectively examined medical records of consecutive patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB and IIB cervical cancer at a hospital in Japan. Patients were divided into two age groups: less than or equal to 39 years (adolescent and young adult [AYA] group) and greater than or equal to 40 years (older adult group). We compared prognosis and clinical factors associated with prognosis between AYA and older adult patients. RESULTS Data from 182 patients (AYA n = 71; older adults n = 111) treated between 2004 and 2011 were analyzed. The proportion of loss to follow-up was 6.0%. Significant differences were observed in stage and lymph node metastasis between the two groups at baseline. However, despite the older adult group having a higher proportion of advanced cancer patients, the overall survival rate of stage IIB patients in the AYA group at the 3-year follow-up was significantly lower (AYA 53.6%, older adults 86.3%, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical factors revealed that AYA patients had a 3.7-3.9 times greater mortality risk compared to older adults. CONCLUSION AYA patients with stage IB and IIB cervical cancer may have a prognostic disadvantage.

BACKGROUND Direct oral anticoagulants have become a standard therapy for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, little is known about their effectiveness/safety when prescribed by general practitioners to treat high-risk populations such as the elderly, those who are frail or have cognitive dysfunction.Methods and Results:In this multicenter, prospective study, a total of 5,717 NVAF patients (mean age 73.9 years) receiving rivaroxaban were registered by general practitioners, with a maximum 3-year follow up (mean 2.0±0.5 years). The primary endpoint was a composite of stroke and systemic embolism (SE). The annual incidence (per 100 person-years) of stroke/SE was 1.23% and for major bleeding, it was 0.63%. Multivariate analyses identified age ≥75 years (hazard ratio [HR]; 2.67, P

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) can be treated with multiple antithrombotic therapies including antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies; however, this has the potential to increase bleeding risk. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of P2YWe evaluated patients from the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischaemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial who received rivaroxaban plus an antiplatelet agent; the choice of antiplatelet agent was left to the physician's discretion. The primary efficacy and safety end points, consistent with those of the AFIRE trial, were compared between P2YA total of 1075 patients were included (P2YThere were no significant differences in cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with AF and stable CAD taking rivaroxaban with P2YUMIN000016612; NCT02642419.

We previously reported on the FREED study, which found that febuxostat reduced the risk of adverse clinical outcome in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia without gout. We have now investigated outcomes in subgroups of FREED patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD).We performed a post hoc subgroup analysis of 1070 patients randomized to the febuxostat or non-febuxostat group and followed for 36 months.At baseline, 234 patients (21.9%) had a history of CVD, including 86 patients with stroke (36.8%), 90 with coronary artery disease (38.5%), 74 with heart failure (31.6%), and 25 with vascular disease (10.7%). The risk for the primary composite endpoint, i.e., cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events and all deaths, was higher in patients with CVD than in those without CVD (34.2% vs 23.7%; p 0.001). Treatment with febuxostat lowered rates of the primary composite endpoint in patients with CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.601, 95% CI 0.384 to 0.940, p = 0.026), and these effects were consistently observed in subgroups with and without CVD (p = 0.227 for treatment by subgroup interaction). Furthermore, in the subgroup with CVD, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the febuxostat group than in the non-febuxostat group (HR 0.160, 95% CI 0.047 to 0.547, p = 0.004), with a significant subgroup interaction (p = 0.007 for treatment by subgroup interaction).In patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia without gout, febuxostat reduces the risk of the composite of cerebral, cardiovascular, and renal events and death in the secondary prevention setting.

This case-control study assesses exposure to ambient air pollution, presenting cardiac arrest rhythms, initial resuscitation efforts, and patient and onset factors in individuals who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Japan., Key Points Question What is the association of short-term exposure to fine particulate matter (with a diameter of ≤2.5 μm [PM2.5]) with bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of cardiac origin and with the development of initial cardiac arrest rhythm? Findings In this case-control study of 103 189 bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, every 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 levels was associated with a 1.6% increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and with a 1.4% increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests initially presenting with a nonshockable rhythm. Meaning Results of this study support the implementation of measures to reduce PM2.5 exposure for the prevention of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of cardiac origin., Importance Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are a major public health concern and a leading cause of death worldwide. Exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with increases in morbidity and mortality and has been recognized as a leading contributor to global disease burden. Objective To examine the association between short-term exposure to particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 μm or smaller (PM2.5) and the incidence of OHCAs of cardiac origin and with the development of initial cardiac arrest rhythm. Design, Setting, and Participants This case-control study used data from cases registered between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, in the All-Japan Utstein Registry, a prospective, nationwide, population-based database for OHCAs across all 47 Japanese prefectures. These OHCA cases included patients who had bystander-witnessed OHCAs and for whom emergency medical services responders initiated resuscitation before hospital transfer. A case-crossover design was employed for the study analyses. A prefecture-specific, conditional logistic regression model to estimate odds ratios was applied, and a random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain prefecture-specific pooled estimates. All analyses were performed from May 7, 2019, to January 23, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the association of short-term PM2.5 exposure with the incidence of bystander-witnessed OHCAs of cardiac origin. The differences in the distribution of initial cardiac arrest rhythm in OHCAs among those with exposure to PM2.5 were also examined. Results In total, 103 189 OHCAs witnessed by bystanders were included in the final analysis. Among the patients who experienced such OHCAs, the mean (SD) age was 75 (15.5) years, and 62 795 (60.9%) were men. Point estimates of the percentage increase for a 10-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 at lag0-1 (difference in mean PM2.5 concentrations measured on the case day and 1 day before) demonstrated a statistically significantly higher incidence of OHCA across most of the 47 prefectures, without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 20.1%; P = .12). A stratified analysis found an association between PM2.5 exposure and OHCAs (% increase, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.1%-3.1%). An initial shockable rhythm, such as ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (% increase, 0.6; 95% CI, –2.0% to 3.2%), was not associated with PM2.5 exposure. However, an initial nonshockable rhythm, such as pulseless electrical activity and asystole, was associated with PM2.5 exposure (% increase, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.1%-2.7%). Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this study suggest that increased PM2.5 concentration is associated with bystander-witnessed OHCA of cardiac origin that commonly presents with nonshockable rhythm. The results support measures to reduce PM2.5 exposure to prevent OHCAs of cardiac origin.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Because coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of death in CKD patients, cardiovascular risk reduction has been clinically important in CKD. We hypothesized intensive lipid-lowering with statin/ezetimibe attenuated coronary atherosclerotic development even in patients with CKD.In the prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter PRECISE-IVUS trial, 246 patients undergoing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI were randomly assigned to receive atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination or atorvastatin alone (the dosage of atorvastatin was up-titrated to achieve the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 70 mg/dL). Serial volumetric IVUS findings obtained at baseline and 9-12 month follow-up to quantify the coronary plaque response in 202 patients were compared stratified by the presence or absence of CKD.CKD was observed in 52 patients (26%) among 202 enrolled patients. Compared with the non-CKD group, the CKD group was significantly older (71.5 ± 8.6 years vs. 64.4 ± 9.6 years, P 0.001) with similar prevalence of comorbid coronary risk factors and lipid profiles. Similar to the non-CKD group (-1.4 [-2.8 to -0.1]% vs. -0.2 [-1.7 to 1.0]%, P = 0.002), the atorvastatin/ezetimibe combination significantly reduced ∆PAV compared with atorvastatin alone even in the CKD group (-2.6 [-5.6 to -0.4]% vs. -0.9 [-2.4 to 0.2]%, P = 0.04).As with non-CKD, intensive lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin/ezetimibe demonstrated stronger coronary plaque regression effect even in patients with CKD compared with atorvastatin monotherapy.NCT01043380 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Background and aims We aimed to examine the effect of serum sitosterol, a cholesterol absorption marker, on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with dyslipidaemia. Methods This is a sub-analysis of the HIJ-PROPER trial that assesses the effect of aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering treatment with pitavastatin + ezetimibe in 1734 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with dyslipidaemia. Patients were divided into two groups based on sitosterol level at enrolment (cut-off value was 2.2 μg/mL; a median of baseline sitosterol level), and clinical outcomes were examined. Results The mean LDL-C level after 3 years in the low sitosterol group was 84.8 ± 20.1 mg/dL with pitavastatin-monotherapy and 64.6 ± 20.3 mg/dL with pitavastatin + ezetimibe, while corresponding values in the high sitosterol group were 91.0 ± 22.9 mg/dL and 71.1 ± 23.3 mg/dL, respectively. In the high sitosterol group, the Kaplan-Meier event rate for the primary endpoint at 3 years was 26.0% in the pitavastatin + ezetimibe group, as compared with 34.3% in the pitavastatin-monotherapy group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.91; p = 0.006, p-value for interaction = 0.010). However, in the low sitosterol group, there was no significant reduction of the primary endpoint by pitavastatin + ezetimibe therapy. Conclusions Aggressive lipid-lowering treatment with ezetimibe had a positive effect on clinical outcomes in the high sitosterol subset of ACS patients with dyslipidaemia, but not in the low sitosterol subset. This effect was independent of LDL-C reduction and suggests that sitosterol measurement on admission in ACS patients might contribute to a “personalised” lipid-lowering approach.