Search

This study analyzes the normative definition of the guarantees of political rights of citizens. A dialectical methodology of knowledge of law is used, and law is interpreted as an attribute of social management of society. A legal norm is understood as a process of necessity, the elements of which are the hypothesis, disposition and sanction of the norm in their organic connection. It is shown that the political rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen are established by the disposition of the legal norm, and their guarantees are determined by the sanction of the legal norm. The public legal character of political rights conditions their guarantee by legal acts of the court of administrative justice, as a type of justice. The study concludes that improving the normative definition of the guarantees of political rights is an urgent task for the management and legal regulation of political relations in modern society.

The aim of this study was a holistic analysis of aspects of expanding the interaction between the state and civil society on the example of the experience of foreign countries, namely Austria, Belgium, France, Italy, and Poland. The research involves such methods as sociological analysis, systemic and case study methods, structural and comparative methods, as well as the dialectical method. The factors of expanding the  interaction of the judiciary as a representative of the state, which protects the rights and interests of civil society, were identified in accordance with the results of the study. As a result, conclusions were drawn on the need for the judiciary, as a representative of the state, to use methods to expand the interaction between the state and society, in the person of every citizen. The use of those factors in relation to such interaction will further help increase public confidence in the state, which will ensure effective protection of the rights and interests of society., El objetivo de este estudio fue un análisis holístico de los aspectos de la expansión de la interacción entre el Estado y la sociedad civil sobre el ejemplo de la experiencia de varios países a saber: Austria, Bélgica, Francia, Italia y Polonia. La investigación involucra métodos tales como análisis sociológico, métodos sistémicos y de estudio de casos, métodos estructurales y comparativos, así como el método dialéctico. Los factores de ampliación de la interacción del Poder Judicial como representante del Estado, que protege los derechos e intereses de la sociedad civil, fueron identificados de acuerdo con los resultados del estudio. Como resultado, se extrajeron conclusiones sobre la necesidad de que el Poder Judicial, como representante del Estado, utilice métodos para ampliar la interacción entre el Estado y la sociedad, en la persona de cada ciudadano. El uso de esos factores en relación con dicha interacción contribuirá aún más a aumentar la confianza pública en el Estado, lo que garantizará la protección efectiva de los derechos e intereses de la sociedad en general.