Chris Sibley-Allen, Massimiliano Cariati, Ashutosh Kothari, Kunal Vyas, Tibor Kovacs, Fiona Nimmo, Michael Douek, Sarah E Pinder, Amit Pawa, David Tuch, Sarah Allen, Maarten Grootendorst, Hisham Hamed, Gary Cook, Arnie Purushotham, and A. J. Britten
S S53 Introduction: Oncoplastic techniques are increasingly used in breast conserving surgery for better aesthetic outcome following breast cancer treatment without compromising oncological principles. This modified periareolar mammaplasty (MPM) gives excellent access for wide local excision, avoids scar on the breast mound and also gives a pleasing aesthetic outcome. We have critically evaluated our technique including oncological and aesthetic outcomes over a 14-month period. Methods: Details of patientswho underwentMPMbetweenOct 2013 and Dec 2014 were retrieved from our prospectively collected breast cancer operations database. Patient’s operative details including thedurationof operation, specimenweight, histopathology data, adjuvant therapy details and follow-up visits were updated. Medical photography was reviewed for all patients. Results: 25 women underwent MPM. The median age was 60 yrs (range 37e82). The median specimen weight was 34g (range 17e76). Along with breast cancer surgery, most of them had axillary staging according to standard practice. Two patients had re-excision of margins and one patient underwent completion skin sparing mastectomy for involved margins. Postoperative recovery and wound healing were uneventful except one patient had infection of axillary wound. 23 patients underwent radiotherapy to the breast remnant. Medical photography shows excellent aesthetic outcomes. Conclusion: MPM is a type of therapeutic mammaplasty which is easy to learn and reproduce, and a useful adjunct to oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.131 P094. Clinical feasibility of Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging (CLI) for intraoperative assessment of tumour excision margins and sentinel lymph node metastases in breast-conserving surgery Maarten Ruben Grootendorst, Ashutosh Kothari, Massimiliano Cariati, Hisham Hamed, Michael Douek, Tibor Kovacs, Gary Cook, Sarah Allen, Chris Sibley-Allen, Alan Britten, Amit Pawa, Fiona Nimmo, Kunal Vyas, David Tuch, Sarah Pinder, Arnie Purushotham, on behalf of the Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging Study Group 1 Department of Research Oncology, King’s College London, London, UK Department of Breast Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 3 PET Imaging Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Department of Nuclear Medicine, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Medical Physics Department, St George’s Hospital, London, UK Anaesthetic Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Day Surgery Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 8 Sagentia, Cambridge, UK Lightpoint Medical Ltd., Rickmansworth, UK Introduction: Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging (CLI) is a molecular imaging technique that detects light emitted by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals. This first-in-woman study evaluates F-FDG CLI for intraoperative assessment of tumour margins and sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases with a view to reducing re-excision rates. Methods: To date 8 of 30 patients have been recruited (REC reference 14/WM/0050). Patients received 5 MBq/kg F-FDG 1e2 hours prior to surgery. Tc dose was increased to 150 MBq to facilitate SLN detection against the gamma-probe background signal (cross-talk) from F-FDG. The cross-talk was evaluated in a separate lead-in study of n 1⁄4 20 patients. Tumour specimens and SLNs were imaged with a CLI imager (Lightpoint Medical Ltd, UK) intraoperatively immediately after excision. Normalised decay-corrected radiance (ph/s/cm/str/MBq) was calculated for each ROI. Radiation doses to all staff were measured. Results: Elevated radiance was identified in the primary tumour (26.7 ROI SD 3.2), and the only metastatic (8mm) SLN (42.1 ROI SD 9.1) compared with negative SLNs (16.2 SD 12.5). The mean F-FDG cross-talk in the lead-in study was 348 cps and 357 cps in left and right axilla, respectively. SLN detection was successful in all patients undergoing CLI despite substantial F-FDG cross-talk. Table Staff radiation doses Staff Average dose per Maximum procedure (mSv) dose (mSv) Surgeon 28.6 64 Anaesthetist 8.6 15 Anaesthetist assistant 6.4 11 Scrub nurse 1.8 5 Recovery nurse 6.6 17 Conclusions: Intraoperative F-FDG CLI is a feasible and low risk procedure. Despite significant cross-talk, SLN biopsy can be performed successfully using 150 MBq Tc and blue dye. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.132 P095. Chemotherapy trends in early breast cancer in the under 55s in 2014 Caroline Strachan, Rajiv Dave, Sue Hartup, Nisha Sharma, Tom Hughes, Kieran Horgan The Leeds Breast Unit, St James University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly employed for early breast cancer in younger women with the potential benefit over adjuvant treatment (ACT) of conserving the breast and monitoring response. With wider ranging indications for NACT, is the use of ACT in the under 55s diminishing? Methodology: Clinico-pathological characteristics of patients under 55 undergoing chemotherapy in our unit over the last year were analysed, to review selection criteria for ACT in this age group. Results: 195 patients under 55 were diagnosed with breast cancers in 2014. 37 under 55 received NACT. 122 Patients under 55 consulted an oncologist for consideration of ACT and 54 patients (60%) received it. 68 patients did not receive ACT, due to personal choice or “adjuvantonline” / oncologist opinion not being persuasive. ACT in the 54 patients was preceded by breast conserving surgery (BCT) in 28 patients, and by mastectomies (Mx) in 26. Of the 26 who had Mx, 12 were considered obligate mastectomy candidates regardless of potential NACT response. 11 chose to have Mx, with 8 of those 11 being offered NACT. In 3 patients, Mx was performed for widespread DCIS and chemotherapy was not anticipated pre-operatively. Of the 28 patients who underwent BCT, NACT was not discussed as they were already conservable and MDT saw no benefit. Conclusions: The majority of younger women with early breast cancer treated with chemotherapy still receive it as an adjuvant treatment. 52% of women receiving adjuvant therapy do so as they are considered conservable without discussing primary systemic therapy, whereas 22%were deemed not conservable evenwithNACT.Adjuvant administration therefore remains the mainstay of systemic chemotherapy in this cohort of women. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.133