Search

Endoscopic transmural drainage/debridement of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON) has been performed using double-pigtail plastic (DP), fully covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs), or the novel lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent (LAMS). Our aim was to perform a retrospective cohort study to compare the clinical outcomes and adverse events of EUS-guided drainage/debridement of WON with DP stents, FCSEMSs, and LAMSs.Consecutive patients in 2 centers with WON managed by EUS-guided debridement were divided into 3 groups: (1) those who underwent debridement using DP stents, (2) debridement using FCSEMSs, (3) debridement using LAMSs. Technical success (ability to access and drain a WON by placement of transmural stents), early adverse events, number of procedures performed per patient to achieve WON resolution, and long-term success (complete resolution of the WON without need for further reintervention at 6 months after treatment) were evaluated.From 2010 to 2015, 313 patients (23.3% female; mean age, 53 years) underwent WON debridement, including 106 who were drained using DP stents, 121 using FCSEMSs, and 86 using LAMSs. The 3 groups were matched for age, cause of the pancreatitis, WON size, and location. The cause of the patients' pancreatitis was gallstones (40.6%), alcohol (30.7%), idiopathic (13.1%), and other causes (15.6%). The mean cyst size was 102 mm (range, 20-510 mm). The mean number of endoscopy sessions was 2.5 (range, 1-13). The technical success rate of stent placement was 99%. Early adverse events were noted in 27 of 313 (8.6%) patients (perforation in 6, bleeding in 8, suprainfection in 9, other in 7). Successful endoscopic therapy was noted in 277 of 313 (89.6%) patients. When comparing the 3 groups, there was no difference in the technical success (P = .37). Early adverse events were significantly lower in the FCSEMS group compared with the DP and LAMS groups (1.6%, 7.5%, and 9.3%; P .01). At 6-month follow-up, the rate of complete resolution of WON was lower with DP stents compared with FCSEMSs and LAMSs (81% vs 95% vs 90%; P = .001). The mean number of procedures required for WON resolution was significantly lower in the LAMS group compared with the FCSEMS and DP groups (2.2 vs 3 vs 3.6, respectively; P = .04). On multivariable analysis, DP stents remain the sole negative predictor for successful resolution of WON (odds ratio [OR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.53; P = .002) after adjusting for age, sex, and WON size. Although there was no significant difference between FCSEMSs and LAMSs for WON resolution, the LAMS was more likely to have early adverse events (OR, 6.6; P = .02).EUS-guided drainage/debridement of WON using FCSEMSs and LAMSs is superior to DP stents in terms of overall treatment efficacy. The number of procedures required for WON resolution was significantly lower with LAMSs compared with FCSEMSs and DP stents.

Background Cirrhosis has been shown in small studies to be a predictor of suboptimal bowel preparation at screening colonoscopy. It has yet to be established whether patients with chronic liver disease in the absence of cirrhosis experience equally poor colon cleansing. Intestinal dysmotility related to cirrhosis might impair bowel preparation in this population more than those with chronic liver disease without cirrhosis. Objective This study compared the quality of bowel preparation in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with chronic liver disease and determined whether this influenced polyp detection rate. Methods A retrospective study of patients with chronic liver disease, both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic, who underwent screening colonoscopy was performed. Patient characteristics, concomitant medication use, adequacy of bowel preparation, and the total number and types of polyps found were compared between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic groups. Results 330 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria; 36% (n = 120) were cirrhotic. Cirrhotic patients had significantly worse bowel preparation scores compared with non-cirrhotics (mean 3.4 ± 1.1 vs. 3.7 ± 0.9, P = 0.003). Worse bowel preparation scores in cirrhotics vs. non-cirrhotics persisted despite controlling for age, sex, and concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM) (P = 0.0027). Among the cirrhotics, 48% had the lowest preparation scores compared with 30% of non-cirrhotics. No difference in polyp detection rate was found between cirrhotics and non-cirrhotics. Severity of cirrhosis as assessed by the MELD score did not predict worse bowel preparation. Conclusions Cirrhotics have significantly worse bowel preparation scores compared to non-cirrhotics with chronic liver disease. No correlation between MELD score and bowel preparation score was observed in the cirrhotic cohort.

Background and Aims Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) remains challenging. EUS with FNA is limited by sampling error and nondiagnostic cytology. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) performed during EUS can be used to improve diagnostic yield via FNA by providing in vivo histology of PCLs. However, the interobserver agreement (IOA) of nCLE of PCLs has yet to be studied. Methods Fifteen deidentified nCLE video clips of PCLs were sent to 6 interventional endoscopists at 5 institutions. Six variables were assessed for IOA: presence or absence of (1) vessels, (2) villi, (3) dark clumps, (4) reticular pattern, (5) acinar cells pattern, and (6) debris. PCL interpretation was categorized as mucinous, serous, pseudocyst, malignant, or indeterminate and final diagnosis as benign, malignant, or indeterminate. Results IOA ranged from "poor" to "fair." The K statistics were –.04 (SE = .05) for vessels, .16 (SE = .07) for villi, .22 (SE = .06) for dark clumps, .13 (SE = .06) for reticular pattern, .14 (SE = .06) for acinar cells pattern, .06 (SE = .06) for debris, .15 (SE = .03) for interpretation, .13 (SE = .05) for final diagnosis, and .19 (SE = .05) for image quality. The final diagnosis was malignant (10), benign (13), and indeterminate (2). The mean accuracy of the observers was 46%, with the lowest being 20% and highest being 67%. Conclusions The IOA and accuracy for PCL diagnosis were low. The results of this study support the need to identify and validate imaging criteria to determine whether nCLE has diagnostic value for pancreatic pathology. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02166086.)

Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a frequent complication of pancreatitis. It is important to classify PFCs to guide management. The revised Atlanta criteria classifies PFCs as acute or chronic, with chronic fluid collections subdivided into pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Establishing adequate nutritional support is an essential step in the management of PFCs. Early attempts at oral feeding can be trialed in patients with mild pancreatitis. Enteral feeding should be implemented in patients with moderate to severe pancreatitis. Jejunal feeding remains the preferred route of enteral nutrition. Symptomatic PFCs require drainage; options include surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic approaches. With the advent of newer and more advanced endoscopic tools and expertise, and an associated reduction in health care costs, minimally invasive endoscopic drainage has become the preferable approach. An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided approach using a seldinger technique is the preferred endoscopic approach. Both plastic stents and metal stents are efficacious and safe; however, metal stents may offer an advantage, especially in infected pseudocysts and in WOPN. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy is often required in WOPN. Lumen apposing metal stents that allow for direct endoscopic necrosectomy and debridement through the stent lumen are preferred in these patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography with pancreatic duct (PD) exploration should be performed concurrent to PFC drainage. PD disruption is associated with an increased severity of pancreatitis, an increased risk of recurrent attacks of pancreatitis and long-term complications, and a decreased rate of PFC resolution after drainage. Any pancreatic ductal disruption should be bridged with endoscopic stenting.

Introduction Lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been used increasingly for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFC). We present an international, multicenter study evaluating the safety and efficacy of LAMS in PFCs. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing LAMS placement for PFC at 12 international centers were included ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01522573). Demographics, clinical history, and procedural details were recorded. Technical success was defined as successful LAMS deployment. Clinical success was defined as PFC resolution at three-month follow-up. Results 192 patients were included (140 males (72.9%), mean-age 53.8 years), with mean follow-up of 4.2 months ± 3.8. Mean PFC size was 11.9 cm (range 2–25). The median number of endoscopic interventions was 2 (range 1–14). Etiologies for PFC were gallstone (n = 82, 42.7%), alcohol (n = 50, 26%), idiopathic (n = 26, 13.5%), and other (n = 34, 17.7%). Technical success was achieved in 189 patients (98.4%). Clinical success was observed in 125 of 135 patients (92.6%). Adverse events included bleeding (n = 11, 5.7), infection (n = 2, 1%), and perforation (n = 2, 1%). Three or more endoscopy sessions were a positive predictor for PFC resolution and the only significant predictor for AEs. Conclusion LAMS has a high technical and clinical success rate with a low rate of AEs. PFC drainage via LAMS provides a minimally invasive, safe, and efficacious procedure for PFC resolution.

Background ERCP is challenging in patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Using EUS to gain access to the excluded stomach and subsequently performing transcutaneous ERCP was described recently. Objective We describe our initial experience with an internal EUS-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) procedure by using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). Design Single-center case series. Setting Tertiary center with expertise in EUS-guided procedures. Patients Five patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass underwent EDGE via a LAMS. Interventions A linear echoendoscope was used to access the excluded stomach. A LAMS was deployed over a wire to create a gastrogastric or jejunogastric fistula. A duodenoscope was then passed through the LAMS and conventional ERCP was performed. Main Outcome Measurements Technical and clinical success rates as well as adverse events. Results EUS-guided creation of a gastrogastric or jejunogastric fistula via placement of a LAMS was successful in all cases (100%). The ability to perform ERCP through the fashioned fistula during the index procedure was successful in 3 of 5 cases (60%). Two LAMS dislodgments requiring restenting were observed. No major adverse events were observed. No weight regain occurred. The median procedure time was 68.0 minutes. Limitations Small sample, single-institution experience. Conclusion The internal EDGE procedure may offer a cost-effective, minimally invasive option for a common problem in a growing patient demographic. Further refinement of the technique is required to minimize adverse events. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01522573.)

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) frequently causes inflammatory strictures (IS). The Paris Classification (PC) for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) identifies four descriptive criteria of IS. We aim to compare the pCLE findings of IS in PSC and non-PSC patients. This is a single-center, retrospective review of all histologically proven IS evaluated with pCLE with at least 6 months of follow-up. All pCLE images were reviewed for each criteria of the PC: (1) vascular congestion, (2) dark granular pattern, (3) increased inter-glandular space, and (4) thickened reticular structures (TRS). The clinical status (PSC vs. non-PSC) was blinded to the reviewer. Univariate, multivariate, and stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted. The primary outcome was the number of PC criteria present in PSC versus non-PSC. A total of 35 patients (13 PSC, 22 non-PSC) were included (mean age 59.1 years, 25.7 % male). Each of the PC criteria was present more frequently in non-PSC patients. The presence of TRS was significantly different (95 vs. 62 %, p = 0.01). All patients had at least two criteria present, but non-PSC patients had a significantly higher frequency of three criteria (95 vs. 38 %, p

The aim of this study was to assess the operating characteristics of using the confocal endomicroscopy miniprobe (pCLE) compared to cholangioscopic targeted biopsies for the detection of malignancy in biliary tract strictures.We conducted a retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures after inconclusive brush cytology. Only those patients with a final pathologic diagnosis or a conclusive12 months follow-up were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who underwent pCLE assessment (pCLE) and those who underwent cholangioscopic targeted biopsies (SB) of biliary strictures. Cholangioscopic biopsies were considered positive for malignancy when adenocarcinoma cells were identified. pCLE was considered positive for malignancy according to the Miami and Paris criteria.A total of 195 patients (median age, 66 years; 54.9% male) were included; 61 underwent C-pCLE and 134 underwent SB. Patient and biliary stricture characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Final diagnoses were cholangiocarcinoma (N.=93), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (N.=6); and benign strictures (N.=96). The overall sensitivity of pCLE and SB for the detection of malignancy were 76.4% and 78.4% respectively (P=0.7). Similarly, there was no difference in the specificity of pCLE and CB for the diagnosis of malignancy (97.7% and 98.5% respectively; P=1). The diagnostic accuracy of pCLE was 83.6% versus 88.8% in SB (P=0.8). However, the specificity to detect a malignancy was higher for CB compared to pCLE (98.5 vs. 86.3%; P=0.04).In patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures, cytology combined with pCLE has a similar sensitivity, and diagnostic accuracy when compared to cholangioscopic biopsies for the diagnosis of malignant strictures. pCLE may be beneficial for in vivo, real-time histopathologic examination of biliary strictures and help in the instantaneous characterization of biliary strictures.

Background & Aims Endoscopic ultrasound–guided transmural drainage and necrosectomy have become the standard treatment for patients with pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have shown success in the management of pancreatic fluid collections. However, there are few data on their specific roles in management of WON. We investigated the efficacy and safety of LAMS in treatment of WON. Methods We performed a retrospective multicenter case series of 124 patients with WON who underwent endoscopic transmural drainage by using LAMS at 17 tertiary care centers from January 2014 through May 2015. Patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound–guided cystogastrostomy or cystoenterostomy with placement of an LAMS into the WON collection. At the discretion of the endoscopist, we performed direct endoscopic necrosectomy, irrigation with hydrogen peroxide, and/or nasocystic drain placement. We performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with pancreatic duct stent placement when indicated. Concomitant therapies included direct endoscopic debridement (n = 78), pancreatic duct stent placement for leak (n = 19), hydrogen peroxide–assisted necrosectomy (n = 38), and nasocystic irrigation (n = 22). We collected data for a median time of 4 months (range, 1–34 months) after the LAMS placement. The primary outcomes were rates of technical success (successful placement of the LAMS), clinical success (resolution of WON, on the basis of image analysis, without need for further intervention via surgery or interventional radiology), and adverse events. Results The median size of the WON was 9.5 cm (range, 4–30 cm). Eight patients had 2 LAMS placed for multiport access, all with technical success (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 107 patients (86.3%) after 3 months of follow-up. Thirteen patients required a percutaneous drain, and 3 required a surgical intervention to manage their WON. The stents remained patent in 94% of patients (117 of 124) and migrated in 5.6% of patients (7 of 124). The median number of endoscopic interventions was 2 (range, 1–9 interventions). Conclusions On the basis of a retrospective analysis of 124 patients, endoscopic therapy of WON by using LAMS is safe and effective. Creation of a large and sustained cystogastrostomy or cystoenterostomy tract is effective in the drainage and treatment of WON.

The evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures is challenging due to the low sensitivity of routine sampling at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Cholangioscopy allows for direct visualization of the biliary mucosa. Confocal laser endomicroscopy is an in vivo imaging technique that provides real-time optical biopsies. Both modalities have the potential to increase diagnostic yields at the time of ERCP. This chapter will focus on the current data available for those two technologies.

Endoscopic-ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage is a therapeutic option for patientswithbiliarypathologyandaltered gastrointestinal anatomy in whom conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has failed [1– 3].We present the case of a patient undergoing EUS-guided choledochojejunostomy with a fully covered, lumen-apposingmetal stent (●" Video 1). A 64-year-oldmanwho had gastric cancer and a Billroth II anastomosis presented with cholangitis and biliary obstruction due to tumor recurrence. Conventional ERCP and single-balloon ERCP were unsuccessful. EUS-guided biliary drainage was performed. The echoendoscope (GFUCT180; Olympus, Central Valley, Pennsylvania, USA) identified the left intrahepatic duct. A 19-gauge needle (ECHO 19 EchoTip; Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA) was used to access the duct. Cholangiography revealed a distal biliary stricture with upstream dilatation but nondilated intrahepatic ducts. Contrast extended to the ampulla but did not pass into the small bowel. Attempts to pass a guidewire (Hydra Jagwire; Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA) into the duct were unsuccessful because of insufficiently dilated left intrahepatic duct radicals. The echoendoscope was advanced to the jejunum adjacent to the opacified extrahepatic bile duct. The duct was accessed with a 19-gauge needle, a wire was advanced, and a dilating balloon (Hurricane RX Biliary Balloon Dilation Catheter; Boston Scientific)was used to create a fistulous tract. A 10-mm lumen-apposing metal stent (Axios; Xlumena, Mountain View, California, USA) was deployed with the proximal end in the extrahepatic bile duct and the distal end in the jejunum (●" Fig.1). A balloon dilator (CRE; Boston Scientific) was used to dilate the stent. Two doublepigtail plastic stents (Advanix; Boston Scientific) were deployed to separate the lumen-apposing metal stent from the oppositewall of the duct (●" Fig.2). The patient’s bilirubin level decreased, and he was discharged from the hospital. At 3and 6-month follow-up, his serum liver chemistries remained normal, and imaging confirmed a stable stent position with resolution of the ductal dilatation. The creation of an EUS-guided choledochojejunostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent for biliary decompression offers a minimally invasive option for patients with altered anatomy who require ERCP.

Background. Accurate diagnosis and clinical management of indeterminate biliary strictures are often a challenge. Tissue confirmation modalities during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) suffer from low sensitivity and poor diagnostic accuracy. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) has been shown to be sensitive for malignant strictures characterization (98%) but lacks specificity (67%) due to inflammatory conditions inducing false positives.Methods. Six pCLE experts validated the Paris Classification, designed for diagnosing inflammatory biliary strictures, using a set of 40 pCLE sequences obtained during the prospective registry (19 inflammatory, 6 benign, and 15 malignant). The 4 criteria used included (1) multiple thin white bands, (2) dark granular pattern with scales, (3) increased space between scales, and (4) thickened reticular structures. Interobserver agreement was further calculated on a separate set of 18 pCLE sequences.Results. Overall accuracy was 82.5% (n=40retrospectively diagnosed) versus 81% (n=89prospectively collected) for the registry, resulting in a sensitivity of 81.2% (versus 98% for the prospective study) and a specificity of 83.3% (versus 67% for the prospective study). The corresponding interobserver agreement for 18 pCLE clips was fair (k=0.37).Conclusion. Specificity of pCLE using the Paris Classification for the characterization of indeterminate bile duct stricture was increased, without impacting the overall accuracy.