Search

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy fails to achieve durable responses in over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients in the third or later line setting. After CAR-T failure, survival outcomes are heterogeneous and a prognostic model in this patient population is lacking. A training cohort of 216 patients with progressive disease (PD) after CAR-T from 12 Spanish centers was used to develop the Post-CAR Prognostic Index (PC-PI); primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from CAR-T progression. Validation was performed in an external cohort from three different European centers (n = 204). The prognostic score incorporated five variables, assessed at time of PD to CAR-T: ECOG (> 0), hemoglobin ( 1) and time from CAR-T to PD (

Abstract Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu‐cel) is an autologous CD19 CAR T‐cell product, approved for relapsed/refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In ZUMA‐2, brexu‐cel demonstrated impressive responses in patients failing ≥2 lines, including a bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with an overall and complete response rate of 93% and 67%, respectively. Here, we report our real‐world intention‐to‐treat (ITT) outcomes for brexu‐cel in consecutive, prospectively approved patients, from 12 institutions in the United Kingdom between February 2021 and June 2023, with a focus on feasibility, efficacy, and tolerability. Of 119 approved, 104 underwent leukapheresis and 83 received a brexu‐cel infusion. Progressive disease (PD) and/or manufacturing (MF) were the most common reasons for failure to reach harvest and/or infusion. For infused patients, best overall and complete response rates were 87% and 81%, respectively. At a median follow‐up of 13.3 months, median progression‐free survival (PFS) for infused patients was 21 months (10.1–NA) with a 6‐ and 12‐month PFS of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71–89) and 62% (95% CI, 49–73), respectively. ≥Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 12% and 22%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, inferior PFS was associated with male sex, bulky disease, ECOG PS > 1 and previous MF. Cumulative incidence of non‐relapse mortality (NRM) was 6%, 15%, and 25% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and mostly attributable to infection. Outcomes for infused patients in the UK are comparable to ZUMA‐2 and other real‐world reports. However, ITT analysis highlights a significant dropout due to PD and/or MF. NRM events warrant further attention.

Abstract Over 60% of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL) patients who receive chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells will experience disease progression. There is no standard next line of therapy and information in this setting is scarce and heterogeneous. We analyzed 387 R/R LBCL patients who progressed after CAR T cells from July 2018 until March 2022 in Spain and the United Kingdom. Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months, with significant differences according to the interval between infusion and progression (6 months [not reached]). After progression, 237 (61%) patients received treatment. Focusing on the first subsequent therapy, overall (complete) response rates were 67% (38%) for polatuzumab–bendamustine–rituximab (POLA), 51% (36%) for bispecific antibodies (BsAb), 45% (35%) for radiotherapy (RT), 33% (26%) for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 25% (0%) for lenalidomide (LENA), and 25% (14%) for chemotherapy (CT). In terms of survival, 12‐month progression‐free survival and OS was 36.2% and 51.0% for POLA, 32.0% and 50.1% for BsAb, 30.8% and 37.5% for RT, 29.9% and 27.8% for ICI, 7.3% and 20.8% for LENA, and 6.1% and 18.3% for CT. Thirty‐two (14%) patients received an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant with median OS not reached after a median follow‐up of 15.1 months. In conclusion, patients with R/R LBCL who progress within the first 2 months after CAR T‐cell therapy have dismal outcomes. Novel targeted agents, such as polatuzumab and BsAbs, can achieve prolonged survival after CAR T‐cell therapy failure.

Not available.

Abstract Infection has emerged as the chief cause of non‐relapse mortality (NRM) post CD19‐targeting chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy (CAR‐T) therapy. Even though up to 50% of patients may remain infection‐free, many suffer multiple severe, life‐threatening, or fatal infectious events. The primary aim of this study was to explore severe and life‐threatening infections post licensed CAR‐T therapy in large B‐cell lymphoma, with a focus on the role of disease burden and disease sites in assessing individual risk. We sought to understand the cohort of patients who experience ≥2 infections and those at the highest risk of infectious NRM. Our analysis identifies a higher disease burden after bridging therapy as associated with infection events. Those developing ≥2 infections emerged as a uniquely high‐risk cohort, particularly if the second (or beyond) infection occurred during an episode of immune effector cell‐associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) or while on steroids and/or anakinra for ICANS. Herein, we also describe the first reported cases of “CAR‐T cold sepsis,” a phenomenon characterized by the lack of an appreciable systemic inflammatory response at the time of detection of infection. We propose a risk‐based strategy to encourage heightened clinician awareness of cold sepsis, with a view to reducing NRM.

Background: The second decade of this millennium was characterized by a widespread availability of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T)therapies to treat relapsed and refractory lymphomas. As expected, the role and indication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant(allo-HSCT)in the management of lymphoma changed. Currently a not unneglectable proportion of patients will be considered candidate for an allo-HSCT and the debate of which transplant platform should be offered is still active. Objectives:to report the outcome of patients affected with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and transplanted following reduced intensity conditioning at King’s College Hospital, London, between January 2009 and April2021. Methods: Conditioning was with fludarabine 150mg/m2 and melphalan 140mg/m2. The graft was unmanipulated G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood haematopoietic stem cells(PBSC). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of pre-transplant Campath at the total dose of 60 mg in unrelated donors and 30 mg in fully matched sibling donors, and ciclosporin. Results: One year and five years OS were87% and79.9%, respectively and median OS was not reached. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 16%.Incidence of acute GVHD was 48%(only grade I/II); no cases of grade III/IV were diagnosed. Chronic GVHD occurred in 39% of patients. TRM was 12%, with no cases developed within day 100 and 18months after the procedure. Conclusions:The outcomes of heavily pretreated lymphoma patients are favorable with median OS and survival not reached after a median of 49months. In conclusion, even if some lymphoma subgroups can’t be treated (yet) with advanced cellular therapies, this study confirms the role of allo-HSCT as a safe and curative strategy.

We investigated the incidence and outcome of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells-associated Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) ≥grade 3 cytopenia. In the EBMT CAR-T registry, we identified 398 adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma who had been treated with CAR-T-cells with axicel (62%) or tisacel (38%) before August 2021 and had cytopenia status documented for the first 100 days. Most patients had received two or three previous lines of therapy, however, 22.3% had received four or more. Disease status was progressive in 80.4%, stable in 5.0% and partial/complete remission in 14.6%. 25.9% of the patients had received a transplantation before. Median age was 61.4 years (min–max; IQR=18.7–81; (52.9–69.5)).The cumulative incidence of ≥grade 3 cytopenia was 9.0% at 30 days (95% CI (6.5 to 12.1)) and 12.1% at 100 days after CAR T-cell infusion (95% CI (9.1 to 15.5)). The median time from CAR-T infusion to cytopenia onset was 16.5 days (min–max; IQR=1–90; (4–29.8)). Grade 3 and grade 4 CTCAE cytopenia occurred in 15.2% and 84.8%, respectively. In 47.6% there was no resolution.Severe cytopenia had no significant impact on overall survival (OS) (HR 1.13 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.73), p=0.57). However, patients with severe cytopenia had a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.54 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.22), p=0.02) and a higher relapse incidence (HR 1.52 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.23), p=0.03). In those patients who developed severe cytopenia during the first 100 days (n=47), OS, PFS, relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality at 12 months after diagnosis of severe cytopenia were 53.6% (95% CI (40.3 to 71.2)), 20% (95% CI (10.4 to 38.6)), 73.5% (95% CI (55.2 to 85.2)) and 6.5% (95% CI (1.7 to 16.2)), respectively.In multivariate analysis of severe cytopenia risk factors, only year of CAR-T infusion (HR=0.61, 95% CI (0.39 to 0.95), p=0.028) and total number of treatment lines before CAR-T infusion (one or two lines vs three or more, HR=0.41, 95% CI (0.21 to 0.83), p=0.013) had a significant positive association with the incidence of cytopenia. Other factors, such as previous transplantation, disease status at time of CAR-T, patient age and patient sex, had no significant association.Our data provide insight on frequency and clinical relevance of severe cytopenia after CAR T-cell therapy in the European real-world setting.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Landslides are socio-natural hazards. In Colombia, for example, these are the most frequent hazards. The interplay of climate change and the mostly informal growth of cities in high-hazard areas increases the associated risks. Early warning systems (EWSs) are essential for disaster risk reduction, but the monitoring component is often based on expensive sensor systems. This study aims to develop a cost-effective method for low-cost and easy-to-use EWS instrumentalization in landslide-prone areas identified based on data-driven methods. We exemplify this approach in the landslide-prone city of Medellín, Colombia. We introduce a workflow to enable decision-makers to balance financial costs and the potential to protect exposed populations. To achieve this, we first mapped city-level landslide susceptibility using data on hazard levels, landslide inventories, geological and topographic factors using a random-forest model. We then combine the landslide susceptibility map with a population density map to identify highly exposed areas. Subsequently, a cost function is defined to estimate the cost of EWS-monitoring sensors at the selected sites, using lessons learned from a pilot EWS in Bello Oriente, a neighbourhood in Medellín. Our study estimates that EWS monitoring sensors could be installed in several landslide-prone areas in the city of Medellín with a budget ranging from €5 to €41 per person (roughly COP 23,000 to 209,000), improving the resilience over 190,000 exposed individuals, 81% of whom are located in precarious neighbourhoods; thus, they are a social group of very high vulnerability. We provide recommendations for stakeholders on where to proceed with EWS instrumentalization based on five different cost-effective scenarios. Finally, we discuss the limitations, challenges, and opportunities for the successful implementation of an EWS. This approach enables decision-makers to prioritize EWS deployment to protect exposed populations while balancing the financial costs, particularly for those in precarious neighbourhoods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]