Search

A major challenge in surface hydrology involves predicting streamflow in ungauged catchments with heterogeneous vegetation and spatiotemporally varying evapotranspiration (ET) rates. We present a top‐down approach for quantifying the influence of broad‐scale changes in forest structure on ET and hence streamflow. Across three catchments between 18 and 100 km2 in size and with regenerating Eucalyptus regnans and E. delegatensis forest, we demonstrate how variation in ET can be mapped in space and over time using LiDAR data and commonly available forest inventory data. The model scales plot‐level sapwood area (SA) to the catchment‐level using basal area (BA) and tree stocking density (N) estimates in forest growth models. The SA estimates over a 69 year regeneration period are used in a relationship between SA and vegetation induced streamflow loss (L) to predict annual streamflow (Q) with annual rainfall (P) estimates. Without calibrating P, BA, N, SA, and L to Q data, we predict annual Q with R2 between 0.68 and 0.75 and Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) between 0.44 and 0.48. To remove bias, the model was extended to allow for runoff carry‐over into the following year as well as minor correction to rainfall bias, which produced R2 values between 0.72 and 0.79, and NSE between 0.70 and 0.79. The model under‐predicts streamflow during drought periods as it lacks representation of ecohydrological processes that reduce L with either reduced growth rates or rainfall interception during drought. Refining the relationship between sapwood thickness and forest inventory variables is likely to further improve results.

Optimisation can assist in the management of riverine ecosystems through the exploration of multiple alternative management strategies, and the evaluation of trade-offs between conflicting objectives. In addition, it can facilitate communication and learning about the system. However, the effectiveness of optimisation in aiding decision making for ecological management is currently limited by four major challenges: identification and quantification of ecosystem objectives; representation of ecosystems in predictive simulation models; specification of objectives and management alternatives in an optimisation framework; and evaluation of model results against actual ecological outcomes. This study evaluates previous literature in ecology, optimisation and decision science, and provides a strategy for addressing the challenges identified. It highlights the need for better recognition and analysis of assumptions in optimisation modelling as part of a process that generates and shares knowledge.

One of the fundamental steps in regional rainfall frequency analysis is deciding the method by which rainfall stations are to be grouped together to form regions. This paper compares three methods of forming regions for use in estimating design rainfalls: a fixed region approach where all the available sites are included in a single region, a Region of Influence (ROI) approach based on geographical proximity and a hybrid approach where sites with similar topographic orientations are grouped together.The three region types were implemented in a Bayesian Generalized Least Squares Regression (BGLSR) framework which leads to regionalized regression equations that can be used to predict rainfall L-moments at ungauged sites. A leave-one-out cross validation approach was used to compare the relative accuracy, reliability and uncertainty of the derived rainfall statistics and resulting estimates of the rainfall quantiles. The study used data from two areas of Australia chosen for their highly varied topography and different climatic influences.It was found that all three methods provided good estimates of the L-moment statistics and the rainfall quantiles. The hybrid approach produced the smallest errors in the South-East Queensland region whilst for the Tasmanian region the fixed region approach was best. The results from this study show that although there is a slight benefit in using the proposed hybrid approach for BGLSR, these benefits were minor compared to maximizing the number of stations used to calibrate the BGLSR equations. This conclusion regarding the number of stations could be tested in future work by repeating the analyses in areas with sparser station density. Another test could be to simulate reduced station coverage in the current study areas by leaving stations out of the analyses. Finally it would be interesting to see if similar results are obtained by expanding the study area so that different climatological regimes are assessed.