Search

Background: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Unwanted pro-arrhythmic effects are a common reason for drugs failing to gain regulatory approval; these properties can be detected by assessing the effect of the drug on the QT interval.Objective: This study was performed, in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance, to assess whether rivaroxaban prolongs the QT interval.Study Design: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, four-way crossover study.Setting: The study was conducted at a clinical pharmacology research unit.Subjects: Healthy male and female subjects (n = 54) aged > or =50 years were enrolled and remained in the study unit for 3 days for each treatment. Of these, 50 patients were eligible for the QT analysis.Intervention: Subjects received single oral doses of rivaroxaban 45 mg or 15 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), or placebo.Outcome Measures: Multiple ECGs were taken at frequent intervals after drug administration, and the QT interval was measured manually under blinded conditions at a central laboratory. The Fridericia correction formula (QTcF) was used to correct the QT interval for heart rate. The primary outcome was the effect of rivaroxaban or moxifloxacin on the placebo-subtracted QTcF 3 hours after administration. The frequency of outlying QTcF values and the tolerability of the treatments were also assessed.Results: All treatments were well tolerated and had no effect on heart rate. Moxifloxacin established the required assay sensitivity; placebo-subtracted QTcF 3 hours after moxifloxacin administration was prolonged by 9.77 ms (95% CI 7.39, 12.15). Placebo-subtracted QTcF values 3 hours after rivaroxaban administration were -0.91 ms (95% CI -3.33, 1.52) and -1.83 ms (95% CI -4.19, 0.54) with rivaroxaban 45 mg and 15 mg, respectively. QTcF was not prolonged with rivaroxaban at any time, and the frequency of outlying results with rivaroxaban and placebo was similar.Conclusion: This thorough QT study, which was performed in accordance with ICH E14 guidelines, shows that rivaroxaban does not prolong the QTc interval. Therefore, the potential of rivaroxaban for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, including chronic cardiovascular disorders, can be investigated in appropriate clinical studies without the need for intensive monitoring of the QTc interval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticoagulants are often dose adjusted, or their use restricted, in patients with extremes of body weight. Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is a novel, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development. This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy male and female subjects to assess the effect of extreme body weight (120 kg), and gender, on the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban 10 mg, compared with subjects of normal weight (70-80 kg). Rivaroxaban was well tolerated. C(max) of rivaroxaban was unaffected in subjects >120 kg but was increased by 24% in subjects weighing

Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor in advanced clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This was a randomized, 2-way crossover study in healthy male subjects, with an aspirin run-in period, to examine whether aspirin influences the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban. All treatments were well tolerated; drug-related adverse events were mild and transient. Aspirin did not alter the effects of rivaroxaban on Factor Xa activity or clotting tests. Platelet aggregation and bleeding time were not affected by rivaroxaban, and rivaroxaban did not influence the effects of aspirin on these parameters to a clinically relevant extent. Aspirin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban, including the fraction unbound. This study suggests that there is no clinically relevant interaction between rivaroxaban and aspirin and that the 2 drugs could be administered concomitantly at the doses used in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the influence of food and administration of an antacid (aluminum-magnesium hydroxide) or ranitidine on the absorption of BAY 59-7939 (rivaroxaban), 4 randomized studies were performed in healthy male subjects. In 2 food interaction studies, subjects received BAY 59-7939, either as two 5-mg tablets (fasted and fed), four 5-mg tablets (fasted), or one 20-mg tablet (fasted and fed). In 2 drug interaction studies, BAY 59-7939 (six 5-mg tablets) was given alone or with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily, preceded by a 3-day pretreatment phase) or antacid (10 mL). Plasma samples were obtained to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of BAY 59-7939. In the presence of food, time to maximum concentration (t(max)) was delayed by 1.25 hours; maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the curve (AUC) were increased, with reduced interindividual variability at higher doses of BAY 59-7939. Compared with baseline, BAY 59-7939 resulted in a relative increase in maximum prothrombin time (PT) prolongation of 44% (10 mg) and 53% (20 mg) in the fasted state, compared with 53% and 83% after food. Time to maximum PT prolongation was delayed by 0.5 to 1.5 hours after food, with no relevant influence of food type. No significant difference in C(max) and AUC was observed with coadministration of BAY 59-7939 and ranitidine or antacid. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the effect of concomitant administration of dairy products on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of moxifloxacin. Design: This was a single-centre, randomised, controlled, nonblinded, 2-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Participants: 12 healthy men (aged 25 to 46 years) were enrolled in the study. Methods: The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin were investigated after single doses of moxifloxacin 400mg administered orally either under fasting conditions or immediately after 250g of yoghurt that was to be consumed within 15 minutes. There was a 1-week interval between the study periods. Results: Administration of moxifloxacin after yoghurt had no effect on the extent of absorption, as estimated by the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity [AUC; geometric means 31.8 versus 33.9 mg/L · h after test and reference, respectively; estimated true treatment ratio 94%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 90 to 98%]. The rate of absorption was slightly decreased, with a slight reduction in maximum plasma concentration (C; geometric means 2.44 versus 2.87 mg/L; estimated true treatment ratio 85%, 90% CI 74 to 98%) and a prolonged time to reach C (t; median 2.75 versus 0.88 hours). The treatments were well tolerated in these healthy individuals. Conclusions: The effects of yoghurt on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin are considered not clinically relevant. Hence, no special recommendations for administration are required when moxifloxacin is given together with dairy products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the effect of concomitant iron administration on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of moxifloxacin. Design: This was a single-centre, nonblinded, randomised, 2-way crossover study in healthy male volunteers. Participants: 12 healthy males (age 19 to 41 years) were enrolled in the study. Methods: The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin were investigated after single oral doses of moxifloxacin 400mg given either alone or together with ferrous sulfate (Eryfer 100 equivalent to 100mg of Fe) administered concomitantly and again after 24 hours. There was a 1-week washout phase between the treatments. The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin were characterised over the 72 hours after drug administration. Results: The treatments were well tolerated. The concomitant administration of Eryfer reduced the bioavailability of moxifloxacin [geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve 20.7 versus 34.0 mg/L · h; relative bioavailability 61%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 54 to 69%] and slowed down the absorption rate (median time to maximum concentration 2.79 versus 1.0 hours), with a reduction in the mean maximum concentration (C) [geometric mean C 1.17 and 2.86 mg/L; estimated true ratio of C 41%, 90% CI 34 to 49%]. Conclusions: Concomitant ingestion of iron supplements significantly reduces the bioavailability of moxifloxacin. This is compatible with a reduction in solubilisation due to chelation with polyvalent cations, a common finding for quinolones. Because of the long half-life of moxifloxacin, staggered administration of moxifloxacin and potential cationic interactants should be considered to avoid a loss of therapeutic efficacy caused by subtherapeutic plasma concentrations of the quinolone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin after single and repeated doses. Design and setting: This series comprised 3 separate placebo-controlled studies, 2 studies with a randomised crossover design (up to 400 mg/day) and 1 study with a group comparison design (600mg once daily). Patients and participants: Healthy male volunteers were included in these studies. Methods: Participants received 5-day treatment courses of moxifloxacin 100mg (n = 8) or 200mg (n = 8) twice daily or 400mg once daily (n = 7), or a 10-day treatment course of moxifloxacin 600mg once daily (n = 7). Pharmacokinetics were characterised after the first dose (24-hour profile) and the last dose (96-hour profile), with additional trough and peak measurements during the courses. Results: All treatments were well tolerated. No clinically relevant changes in the standard laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG were observed. Minimum plasma concentrations required to inhibit 90% of susceptible micro-organisms (e.g. 0.125 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae) were attained rapidly and exceeded until the end of treatment. Repeated doses of 100 and 200mg twice daily and 400mg once daily resulted in stable trough and peak concentrations within 3 days of the first dose. The concentrations at steady state were moderately higher (approximately 30% for 400mg once daily) than after the first dose. Steady-state peak concentrations were between 0.9 mg/L (100mg twice daily) and 5.7 mg/L (600mg once daily). The terminal elimination half-life was 14 to 15 hours, supporting once daily administration of the drug. Accumulation ratios ranged between 87% for the lowest dosage and 111% after repeated doses of 600mg once daily, indicating the absence of clinically relevant accumulation due to non-linear pharmacokinetics. Across the studies, the average exposure after single and repeated doses was proportional to the dose administered. Conclusions: These studies indicate that, based on the safety profile and the pharmacokinetic behaviour of moxifloxacin, a dosage regimen of 400mg given once daily should be effective and well tolerated for the treatment of various infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of theophylline and moxifloxacin after single and repeated doses of either compound administered alone or concomitantly with the other. Design: This was a randomised, multiple-dose, period-balanced, 3-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Participants: 12 nonsmoking healthy volunteers, 21 to 30 years of age were included in this study. Methods: The investigational medications, all given orally, were as follows: treatment A, moxifloxacin 200mg alone; treatment B, theophylline 400mg alone; treatment C, theophylline 400mg plus moxifloxacin 200mg. Each drug or combination was given twice daily on days 2 to 4 of the 5-day study period and as single morning doses on days 1 and 5. The study periods were separated by 1-week washout intervals. The plasma and urinary pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and theophylline were characterised after the first (morning of day 1) and eighth (morning of day 5) doses. Results: At steady state, the plasma pharmacokinetics of theophylline for treatments B and C proved equivalent in terms of maximum concentration (C) and bodyweight- and dose-normalised C [estimated true ratio 96%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 87 to 105%] and also in terms of area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC) and normalised AUC (ratio 95%, 90% CI 85 to 107%); the median times to C (t) were also similar (5.0 and 6.0 hours for treatments B and C, respectively). The plasma pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin for treatments A and C were equivalent with respect to C (estimated true ratio 109%, 90% CI 97 to 123%) and AUC (ratio 104%, 90% CI 100 to 108%); the median t values were also similar (0.5 and 1.0 hour for treatments A and C, respectively). The treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: Moxifloxacin - in contrast to some older quinolones - does not interact pharmacokinetically with theophylline, confirming preclinical results on the absence of cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individuals with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis are at elevated risk for thromboembolic events. Factor (F) XI, which is in the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, is emerging as an attractive target for new anticoagulants that may be safer than existing agents. Osocimab-an inhibitory FXIa antibody-is a potential treatment option for such patients. We conducted a phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in which 704 participants (448 male, 256 female) with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis were randomized to receive lower- or higher-dose osocimab or placebo. In total, 686 participants (436 male, 250 female) received treatment for ≤18 months (planned minimal treatment period of 6 months). The co-primary outcomes were clinically relevant bleeding (a composite of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) and a composite of the incidence of moderate, severe or serious adverse events. Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 16/232 (6.9%) and 11/224 (4.9%) participants who received lower- and higher-dose osocimab, respectively, and in 18/230 participants (7.8%) who received a placebo. For the composite adverse event endpoint, incidences were 51%, 47% and 43% in the lower-dose osocimab, higher-dose osocimab and placebo groups, respectively. These results suggest that osocimab is associated with a low risk of bleeding and is generally well tolerated in this population; findings that require confirmation in larger trials. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04523220 ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Absolute bioavailability (F) and the impact of gastric pH, tablet formulation, and food on the pharmacokinetics and safety of asundexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor, was assessed in healthy White men aged 18-45 years in 4 studies. For F, fasted participants received 50 μg of [ 13 C 7 , 15 N]-labeled asundexian intravenously 2 hours after 25 mg of asundexian orally. Tablet formulation (50-mg immediate release [IR], and different amorphous solid dispersion [ASD] IR 25-mg and 50-mg ASD IR tablets) and food effects were explored in 2 studies. Formulation was compared using 50-mg IR versus 25-mg ASD IR and 25-mg ASD IR versus 50-mg ASD IR (fasted); food effect using 25-mg ASD IR and 50-mg ASD IR. Gastric pH modulation was assessed using omeprazole or antacid coadministration with asundexian in the fasted state. Pharmacokinetic parameters included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC; and AUC/dose [D]) and maximum observed concentration (C max and C max /D) data were evaluable for 59 participants. F was 103.9%. Relative bioavailability with 25-mg ASD IR and 50-mg ASD IR tablets, respectively, was marginally affected by formulation (AUC/D ratios, 94.3% and 95.1%; C max /D ratios, 95.5% and 88.7%), food (AUC[/D] ratios, 91.1% and 96.9%; C max [/D] ratios: 78.3% and 95.1%), and gastric pH (omeprazole, no effect; antacid, AUC ratio, 89.9% and C max ratio, 83.7%). No serious adverse events or deaths occurred; most adverse events were mild or moderate. In summary, oral asundexian was well tolerated and demonstrated complete bioavailability irrespective of tablet formulation, food, or gastric pH., (© 2022 Bayer AG. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Anticoagulant treatment of pediatric cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been prospectively evaluated. Management of anticoagulation for cancer-associated VTE is often challenged by drug interactions and treatment interruptions. A total of 56 of the 500 children (11.2%) with VTE who participated in the recent EINSTEIN-Jr randomized study had cancer (hematologic malignancy, 64.3%, solid malignant tumor, 35.7%). Children were allocated to either therapeutic-dose bodyweight-adjusted oral rivaroxaban (n=40) or standard anticoagulation with heparins, with or without vitamin K antagonists (n=16) and received a median of 30 concomitant medications. Based on sparse blood sampling at steady-state, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of rivaroxaban were derived using population PK modeling. During the 3 months of treatment, no recurrent VTE or major bleeding occurred (95% confidence interval, 0.0%-6.4%), and 3-month repeat imaging showed complete or partial vein recanalization in 20 and 24 of 52 evaluable children (38.5% and 46.2%, respectively). Anticoagulant treatment was interrupted 70 times in 26 (46.4%) children because of thrombocytopenia, invasive procedures, or adverse events, for a mean individual period of 5.8 days. Anticoagulant therapy was resumed in therapeutic doses and was not associated with thrombotic or bleeding complications. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range and similar to those observed in children with VTE who did not have cancer-associated VTE. Rivaroxaban and standard anticoagulants appeared safe and efficacious and were associated with reduced clot burden in most children with cancer-associated VTE, including those who had anticoagulant treatment interruptions. Rivaroxaban exposures were within the adult exposure range despite significant polypharmacy use. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02234843., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Rivaroxaban is approved in various regions for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children aged between 0 and 18 years and was recently investigated for thromboprophylaxis in children aged between 2 and 8 years (with body weights <30 kg) with congenital heart disease who had undergone the Fontan procedure. In the absence of clinical data, rivaroxaban doses for thromboprophylaxis in post-Fontan children aged 9 years and older or ≥30 kg were derived by a bridging approach that used physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models based on pharmacokinetic (PK) data from 588 pediatric patients and from adult patients who received 10 mg once daily for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgeries as a reference. Both models showed a tendency toward underestimating rivaroxaban exposure in post-Fontan patients aged between 2 and 5 years but accurately described rivaroxaban PK in post-Fontan patients aged between 5 and 8 years. Under the assumption that hepatic function is not impaired in post-Fontan patients, PBPK and popPK simulations indicated that half of the rivaroxaban doses for the same body weight given to pediatric patients treated for acute VTE would yield in pediatric post-Fontan patients exposures similar to the exposure observed in adult patients receiving 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily for thromboprophylaxis. Simulation-derived doses (7.5 mg rivaroxaban once daily for body weights 30-<50 kg and 10 mg once daily for body weights ≥50 kg) were therefore included in the recent US label of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in children aged 2 years and older with congenital heart disease who have undergone the Fontan procedure., (© 2022 Bayer AG. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Aim: To evaluate BAY 2433334, an oral activated factor XI (FXIa) inhibitor, in volunteers., Methods: Phase 1 study of healthy men at a German centre. Part A: randomized, single-blind, multiple dose-escalation study of BAY 2433334 (25/50/100 mg once daily [OD]) vs. placebo. Part B: similar design to Part A; evaluated BAY 2433334 25 mg twice daily. Part C: nonrandomized, open-label study; evaluated potential interactions between BAY 2433334 (25/75 mg OD) and midazolam (7.5 mg), a CYP3A4 index substrate. Primary variables: treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; Parts A and B); area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration of midazolam and α-hydroxymidazolam (Part C)., Study Period: 18 days plus follow-up visit., Results: Parts A and B: 36 participants randomized to BAY 2433334; 12 to placebo. Part C: 48 participants assigned to BAY 2433334 plus midazolam. BAY 2433334 was well tolerated in all study parts. AUC and maximum plasma concentration of BAY 2433334 in plasma appeared dose proportional over 25-100 mg OD, with low-to-moderate variability in pharmacokinetic parameters. Multiple dosing caused minor-to-moderate accumulation and a mean terminal half-life (15.8-17.8 h) supporting once-daily dosing. Dose-dependent FXIa activity inhibition and activated partial thromboplastin time prolongation were observed. BAY 2433334 appeared to have a minor effect on AUC for midazolam (ratio [90% confidence interval]: 1.1736 [1.0963-1.2564]) and α-hydroxymidazolam (0.9864 [0.9169-1.0612]) only for BAY 2433334 75 mg OD on day 10., Conclusion: Multiple dosing of BAY 2433334 in healthy volunteers was well tolerated, with a predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile and no clinically relevant CYP3A4 induction or inhibition., (© 2022 Bayer AG. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Thrombosis remains an important complication for children with single-ventricle physiology following the Fontan procedure, and effective thromboprophylaxis is an important unmet medical need. To obviate conventional dose-finding studies and expedite clinical development, a rivaroxaban dose regimen for this indication was determined using a model-informed drug development approach. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic rivaroxaban model was used to predict a pediatric dosing regimen that would produce drug exposures similar to that of 10 mg once daily in adults. This regimen was used in an open-label, multicenter phase III study, which investigated the use of rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis in post-Fontan patients 2 to 8 years of age. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of rivaroxaban was assessed in part A (n = 12) and in part B (n = 64) of the UNIVERSE study. The safety and efficacy in the rivaroxaban group were compared to those in the acetylsalicylic acid group for 12 months. Pharmacodynamic end points were assessed in both parts of the study. Rivaroxaban exposures achieved in parts A and B were similar to the adult reference exposures. Prothrombin time also showed similarity to the adult reference. Exposure-response analysis did not identify a quantitative relationship between rivaroxaban exposures and efficacy/safety outcomes within the observed exposure ranges. A body weight-based dose regimen selected by physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was shown in the UNIVERSE study to be appropriate for thromboprophylaxis in the post-Fontan pediatric population. Model-based dose selection can support pediatric drug development and bridge adult dose data to pediatrics, thereby obviating the need for dose-finding studies in pediatric programs., (© 2021 Janssen Research and Development LLC. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)