Search

Background: There is a paucity of data regarding the consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Our objective was to identify the clinical manifestations and prognostic factors and to assess the impact of treatment schemes on the outcome. Materials and methods: Here we present retrospectively collected data from medical records of patients on MHD hospitalized with COVID-19 infection from 1st June to 30th November 2020. Result: Around 69 patients were admitted with a median age of 51 years. About 81% had hypertension, 41% had diabetes, and 24% had body mass index (BMI) ≥ 23 kg/m2 . Of all who died, 73.33% had dialysis vintage of

The use of remdesivir is not recommended in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection unless potential advantage offset disadvantage due to limited safety data. Our objective was to assess the safety of remdesivir in patients with end-stage renal failure and evaluate the outcome of this vulnerable group.We carried out a retrospective observational study in dialysis-dependent ESRD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection who received a standard 5-day course of remdesivir (powder form) from June 2020 to December 2020. Oxygen requirement, hemogram, inflammatory markers, and liver function tests before and after remdesivir treatment were compared.We found thirty-nine such patients with mean age of patients 58.79 ± 12.13 years. Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiac diseases were present in 58.97, 87.17, and 23.07% of patients, respectively. Mean oxygen saturation on admission was 85.41% (±7.73). There were no events of hepatotoxicity, altered behavior, or infusion reaction. There was statistically significant improvement in total leukocyte count, absolute lymphocyte counts, and C-reactive protein (The use of remdesivir in end-stage kidney disease is safe. Improvement in oxygenation was significant when baseline oxygen requirement was less. It requires prospective controlled trials with larger population to assess its impact on mortality.Shah MK, Parikh M, Prajapati D, Kute VB, Bhende P, Prajapati A

Headache disorders cause significant distress in patients living with epilepsy (PWE) and are underreported. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of various forms of headache in PWE.Two hundred and three PWE were evaluated for the presence and type of headache as per the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 classification criteria. The severity was graded using the Headache Under Response to Treatment (HURT)-3. A subgroup analysis of headache and epilepsy was done. The World Health Organization-5 (WHO-5) questionnaire was used to assess mental well-being. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) questionnaire was used to study the psychiatric comorbidities, which were classified according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV classification.The prevalence of headaches in PWE was 45% [60% females]. Female gender and younger age were significantly associated with migraine (p values of 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). Migraine was the most common type of headache (71%), followed by tension-type headache (TTH) (23%) in PWE. The headache was inter-ictal in 80% of PWE. In PWE with migraine, both juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) and frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) had a 28% prevalence. In PWE with TTH, FLE was more common (43%). The prevalence of migralepsy in PWE was 4% [n = 4; 2 each of occipital lobe epilepsy (OLE) and idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE)]. A psychiatric illness was more than two times more likely in PWE with headache (n = 34; 37%) as compared to PWE without headache (n = 19; 17%). Patients living with epilepsy with headaches and psychiatric comorbidities had significantly lower mental well-being (p = 0.001). Forty five percent of PWE with headaches required acute management, and 35% required prophylactic management for their headache.Headache is frequently ignored in PWE. It can affect their mental health and quality of life. Evaluation and management of headache in PWE is very important.

Introduction: Different variables of Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) show changes to different extent in various pathological states. However, certain physiological factors may affect them too. Aims and objectives: This cross sectional study aimed to evaluate the role of age, gender and BMI upon these variables in the tibial and peroneal nerves. Materials and methods: 51 healthy subjects were chosen according to exclusion and inclusion criteria. Reference limits were derived from the obtained data as Mean±2SD. pResults: No sex-wise correlation was seen with the NCS Parameters of Tibial and Peroneal Nerves, whereas age showed deteriorating correlation (p value