1. Profiling Bispebjerg Acute Cohort: Database Formation, Acute Contact Characteristics of a Metropolitan Hospital, and Comparisons to Urban and Rural Hospitals in Denmark
- Author
-
Gregersen R, Fox Maule C, Husum Bak-Jensen H, Linneberg A, Nielsen OW, Thomsen SF, Meyhoff CS, Dalhoff K, Krogsgaard M, Palm H, Christensen H, Porsbjerg C, Antonsen K, Rungby J, Haugaard SB, Petersen J, and Nielsen FE
- Subjects
emergency medicine acute care urban-rural disparities registry-based research danish national registers epidemiology ,Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 - Abstract
Rasmus Gregersen,1,2 Cathrine Fox Maule,3 Henriette Husum Bak-Jensen,2 Allan Linneberg,3,4 Olav Wendelboe Nielsen,4,5 Simon Francis Thomsen,6 Christian S Meyhoff,2,4,7 Kim Dalhoff,4,8 Michael Krogsgaard,4,9 Henrik Palm,4,9 Hanne Christensen,4,10 Celeste Porsbjerg,4,11 Kristian Antonsen,12 Jørgen Rungby,2,4,13 Steen B Haugaard,2,4,13 Janne Petersen,3,14 Finn E Nielsen1,2 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Copenhagen Center for Translational Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 6Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 7Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 8Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 9Department of Orthopedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 10Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 11Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 12Executive Board, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 13Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; 14Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkCorrespondence: Rasmus Gregersen, Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, NV, 2400, Denmark, Email rasmus.gregersen@regionh.dkPurpose: To present a metropolitan cohort, Bispebjerg acute cohort (BAC), and compare patient characteristics and outcomes with patients from urban and rural hospitals in Denmark.Patients and Methods: We linked data from seven Danish nationwide registries and included all acute contacts to non-psychiatric hospitals in the years 2016– 2018. Acute hospital contacts to Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital constituted BAC, representing a solely metropolitan/urban catchment area. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared to the rest of Denmark in an urban cohort (UrC) and a rural cohort (RuC), stratified by visit and hospitalization contact types.Results: We identified 4,063,420 acute hospital contacts in Denmark and BAC constituted 8.4% (n=343,200) of them. BAC had a higher proportion of visits (65.1%) compared with UrC (52.1%) and RuC (45.3%). Patients in BAC more often lived alone (visits: BAC: 34.8%, UrC: 30.6%, RuC: 29.2%; hospitalizations: BAC: 50.8%, UrC: 36.7%, RuC: 37.2%) and had temporary CPR number (visits: BAC: 4.4%, UrC: 1.9%, RuC: 1.6%; hospitalizations: BAC: 1.5%, UrC: 0.9%, RuC: 0.8%). Visit patients in BAC were younger (BAC: 36, UrC: 42, RuC: 45 years, median), more often students (BAC: 18.0%, UrC: 14.0%, RuC: 12.5%), and had more contacts due to infectious diseases (BAC: 19.8%, UrC: 14.1%, RuC: 6.2%) but less due to injuries (BAC: 40.0%, UrC: 43.8%, RuC: 60.7%). Hospitalized patients in BAC had higher median age (BAC: 64, UrC: 61, RuC: 64 years) and fewer were in employment than in UrC (BAC: 26.1%, UrC: 32.1%, RuC: 28.1%). BAC Hospitalizations had a lower death rate within 30 days than in RuC (BAC: 3.0% [2.9– 3.1%], UrC: 3.1% [3.0– 3.1%], RuC: 3.4% [3.3– 3.4%]), but a higher readmission-rate (BAC: 20.5% [20.3– 20.8%], UrC: 17.3% [17.2– 17.4%], RuC: 17.5% [17.5– 17.6%]).Conclusion: Significant differences between BAC, urban, and rural cohorts may be explained by differences in healthcare structure and sociodemographics of the catchment areas.Keywords: emergency medicine, acute care, urban-rural disparities, registry-based research, Danish national registers, epidemiology
- Published
- 2022