Search

Background Transitional care protocols are effective at reducing readmission for medical patients, yet no evidence-based protocols exist for surgical patients. A transitional care protocol was adapted to meet the needs of patients discharged to home after major abdominal surgery. Approach The Coordinated-Transitional Care (C-TraC) protocol, initially designed for medical patients, was used as the initial framework for the development of a surgery-specific protocol (sC-TraC). Adaptation was accomplished using a modification of the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) model, which has four phases: (1) preconditions, (2) preimplementation, (3) implementation, and (4) maintenance and evolution. A random sample of five patients each month was selected to complete a phone survey regarding patient satisfaction. Preimplementation planning allowed for integration with current systems, avoided duplication of processes, and defined goals for the protocol. The adapted protocol specifically addressed surgical issues such as nutrition, fever, ostomy output, dehydration, drain character/output, and wound appearance. After protocol launch, the rapid iterative adaptation process led to changes in phone call timing, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and discharge instructions. Outcomes Survey responders reported 100% overall satisfaction with the transitional care program. Key Insights The adaptable nature of sC-TraC may allow for low-resource hospitals, such as rural or inner-city medical centers, to use the methodology provided in this study for implementation of local phone-based transitional care protocols. In addition, as the C-TraC program has begun to disseminate nationally across US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and rural health settings, sC-TraC may be implemented using the existing transitional care infrastructure in place at these hospitals.

Background Poor-quality transitions of care from hospital to home contribute to high rates of readmission after complex abdominal surgery. The Coordinated Transitional Care (C-TraC) program improved readmission rates in medical patients, but evidence-based surgical transitional care protocols are lacking. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted surgical C-TraC protocol. Study Design The intervention includes in-person enrollment of patients. Follow-up protocolized phone calls by specially trained surgical C-TraC nurses addressed medication management, clinic appointments, operation-specific concerns, and identification of red-flag symptoms. Enrollment criteria included pancreatectomy, gastrectomy, operative small bowel obstruction or perforation, ostomy, discharge with a drain, in-hospital complication, and clinician discretion. Engaged patients participated in the first phone call, which was within 48 to 72 hours of discharge and continued every 3 to 4 days. Patients completed the program once they and surgical C-TraC nurse agreed that no additional follow-up was needed or the patient was readmitted. Results Two hundred and twelve patients were enrolled, October 2015 through April 2016, with a mean age of 56 years (range 19 to 89 years); 33% of patients were 65 years or older. Surgery sites included colon (46%), small bowel (16%), pancreas (12%), multivisceral (9%), liver (4.5%), retroperitoneum/soft tissue (4.5%), gastric (4%), biliary (2%), and appendix (1.5%). Refusal rate was 1% and engagement was 95%. At initial call, 47% of patients had at least 1 medication discrepancy (range 0 to 6). Mean number of calls from provider to patient was 3.2 (range 0 to 20, median 3). Conclusions A phone-based transitional care protocol for surgical patients is feasible, with

Obtaining physician commitment to and continued involvement in quality assessment activities can be difficult. Some physicians view quality assessment as a bureaucratic morass that fails to improve patient care. However, by combining quality assessment and clinical research, insight into practice patterns can be obtained and physicians might be more likely to express interest in quality assessment issues. We reviewed medical records of patients at our hospital on peritoneal dialysis (PD) to determine the rate of free air found in normal PD patients. This was compared to PD patients with known gastrointestinal perforation; free intra-abdominal air has been described as a sign of gastrointestinal perforation. Documentation of free air and its significance in radiology reports were noted. Fifty-nine of 59 (100%) cases had available radiology reports. Documentation of free air was present in only 5 of 23 (22%) cases, and its significance was noted in the same 5 of 23 (22%). These results were communicated within the hospital, and a subsequent improvement in free-air detection, documentation, and reporting--both oral and written--was noted by the clinical service. The documentation of radiological findings is a frequently used monitor in radiology quality assessment. Our study identified a clinical and documentation problem, quantified the deficiency, and took steps toward improvement while simultaneously performing clinical research. We conclude that quality assessment and clinical research can coexist and serve to improve clinical practice while encouraging physician involvement in quality assessment programs.

Objective Pneumoperitoneum diagnosed by plain radiography is often a sign of gastrointestinal perforation and is unusual (0.17%) in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). These patients are prone to bacterial peritonitis, which can have overlapping clinical findings with perforated viscus. Because CT is often used to screen symptomatic CAPD patients, the reliability of pneumoperitoneum as a diagnostic sign is examined. Materials and Methods Records of 433 CAPD patients were examined; of these, 56 patients had had CT while on CAPD (rupture, 6; nonrupture, 50). Plain radiography and CT were examined for free air and fluid. Patients were classified according to the amount of free air detected. Results Patients with ruptured viscus had pneumoperitoneum in 5 of 6 cases by CT and 4 of 6 by plain radiography. Excluding free air, ruptured viscus could only be diagnosed in 1 of the 6 patients by CT. Patients without rupture had pneumoperitoneum in 15 of 50 cases by CT and 2 of 46 by plain radiography. No instance of pneumoperitoneum was discovered on plain radiography and not CT. Conclusion Pneumoperitoneum was found by CT in 30% of nonrupture CAPD patients, therefore, CT appeared to be more sensitive than plain radiography for its detection. The presence, quantity, and distribution of free air are not helpful in separating perforations from nonperforations. The lack of pneumoperitoneum on CT was found to be a useful but not absolute diagnostic sign to exclude gastrointestinal rupture.