Search

Telephone genetic counseling (TGC) is accepted as standard clinical care for people seeking hereditary cancer risk assessment. TGC has been shown to be non-inferior to in-person genetic counseling, but trials have been conducted with a predominantly highly educated, non-Hispanic White population. This article describes the process of culturally adapting a TGC protocol and visual aid booklet for Spanish-preferring Latina breast cancer survivors at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. The adaptation process included two phases. Phase 1 involved a review of the literature and recommendations from an expert team including community partners. Phase 2 included interviews and a pilot with the target population (n = 14) to collect feedback about the adapted protocol and booklet following steps from the Learner Verification and Revision Framework. We describe the adaptation process and report the main adaptations following the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Interventions (FRAME). Adaptations in Phase 1 were responsive to the target population needs and characteristics (e.g., delivered in Spanish at an appropriate health literacy level, addressing knowledge gaps, targeting cultural values). Phase 2 interviews were crucial to refine details (e.g., selecting words) and to add components to address GCT barriers (e.g., saliva sample video). Cultural adaptations to evidence-based TGC protocols can increase the fit and quality of care for historically underserved populations. As TGC visits become routine in clinical care, it is crucial to consider the needs of diverse communities to adequately promote equity and justice in cancer care.

BackgroundTypical cancer research studies of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the United States do not include country of origin when examining race and ethnic group differences. This population-based, cross-sectional study used an innovative methodology to examine how self-reported racial and ethnic groups, by country of origin, report differential HRQOL experiences after adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics, including socioeconomic status.MethodsRecruited from 4 cancer registries in California, Louisiana, and New Jersey, cancer survivors completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of fatigue, pain interference, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, ability to participate in social roles, and cognitive function. Latent profile analysis clustered survivors in HRQOL clusters based on including all the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System domains.ResultsThe 5366 participants (60% female; 40% male; average age of 59.8 years) included 17% Asian, 18% Black, 21% Hispanic, and 41% White survivors. Survivors were grouped into 4 clusters: high HRQOL (26%), average HRQOL (34%), low HRQOL (29%), and very low HRQOL (11%). Among many differences by race, ethnicity, and country of origin, Caribbean cancer survivors were more likely to be in the very low HRQOL cluster (odds ratio = 2.67, 95% confidence interval = 1.31 to 5.43) compared with non-Hispanic White survivors. Similarly, American Indian and Alaska Native, Cuban, Dominican, and Puerto Rican cancer survivors had relatively high percentages in the very low HRQOL cluster.ConclusionsThis study found statistically significant differences in HRQOL experience by race, ethnicity, and country of origin, even after adjusting for social determinants of health. These findings inform future HRQOL research to include these self-reported factors.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to describe the prevalence and predictors of symptom and function clusters in a diverse cohort of colorectal cancer survivors. METHODS: We used data from a cohort of 909 adult colorectal cancer survivors. Participants were surveyed at a median of 9 months after diagnosis to ascertain the co-occurrence of eight distinct symptom and functional domains. We used factor analysis to identify co-occurring domains and latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroups of survivors with different symptom and function clusters. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to identify risk/protective factors. RESULTS: Factor analysis demonstrated a single underlying factor structure that included all eight health domains with depression and anxiety highly correlated (r = 0.87). The LPA identified three symptom and function clusters, with 30% of survivors in the low health-related quality of life (HRQOL) profile having the highest symptom burden and lowest functioning. In multivariable models, survivors more likely to be in the low HRQOL profile included being non-White, female, those with a history of cardiac or mental health conditions, and chemotherapy recipients. Survivors less likely to be in the low HRQOL profile included those with older age, greater financial well-being, and more spirituality. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of colorectal cancer survivors experienced a cluster of physical and psychosocial symptoms that co-occur with clinically relevant deficits in function. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Improving the identification of risk factors for having the highest symptom and lowest function profile can inform the development of clinical interventions to mitigate their adverse impact on cancer survivors’ HRQOL.

Few studies have examined experiences of stigma and factors associated with symptoms among cervical cancer survivors from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. We investigated survivorship experiences and patient-reported outcomes in the SPADE symptom cluster (sleep disturbance, pain interference, anxiety, depression, and energy/fatigue) among Black, Latina, and Chinese American women diagnosed with cervical cancer.In two phases of research with cervical cancer survivors, we collected qualitative data through individual interviews (N=12; recruited through community referrals) and quantitative data from an observational cohort study (N=91; recruited through 4 national cancer registries). We coded interview transcripts to describe the survivors' experiences. We then evaluated associations between social support, spirituality, and SPADE symptom cluster domains using linear regression models.Qualitative analysis yielded four themes: perceptions of stigma, empowerment, physical and psychological effects, and social support. These concepts revolved around internal and external stigmas, emotional responses, strengthened faith, and different social support types. Quantitative analyses indicated that greater spirituality was associated with lower symptom burden on all five SPADE domains (p0.01). We observed nuanced associations between specific types of social support and SPADE domains.The survivorship experiences of Black, Latina, and Chinese American women with cervical cancer are negatively influenced by perceptions of stigma. Higher scores on spirituality and varied types of social support were significantly associated with fewer symptoms in the SPADE symptom cluster.Results suggest targets for future interventions to reduce symptom burden among women diagnosed with cervical cancer by leveraging spirituality and social support.

Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) patients with cancer treated with stem cell transplant are vulnerable to adverse outcomes, including higher mortality. This study explored their unmet transplant needs, barriers, and facilitators.Eighteen English- or Spanish-speaking H/L patients (M age = 59.2) who had a transplant in the past year were interviewed about their transplant experience and rated their interest in receiving information about transplant topics (0 = not at all to 10 = extremely).Content analysis revealed five main themes: (1) pre-transplant barriers and concerns; (2) complex relationships with medical teams; (3) informational mismatch; (4) impacts on daily life after transplant; and (5) methods of coping. Participants were most interested in information about ways of coping with transplant (M = 9.11, SD = 1.45) and words of hope and encouragement (M = 9.05, SD = 1.80). At just above the scale's midpoint, they were least interested in information about side effects and unintended consequences of transplant (M = 5.61, SD = 3.85).Cultural factors, social determinants, and structural inequalities give rise to unique needs in this growing patient population. Healthcare team members and researchers can better meet the needs of H/L transplant recipients through attention to described considerations, such as financial barriers, communication difficulties, family dynamics, and coping styles.

PURPOSE: Cancer survivors frequently describe wanting to learn from others who have had similar diagnoses or treatments (peer support). We conducted focus groups to investigate hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors’ attitudes and preferences regarding accessing written peer support through a website. Although written peer support does not allow for interpersonal interactions with peers, it could increase transplant recipients’ access to evidence-based benefits of informational and emotional peer support. METHODS: We conducted four videoconference focus groups with 34 adult transplant survivors who were diverse in their medical and sociodemographic characteristics and geographic location. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed. RESULTS: Many participants reported need for information about transplant beyond what they received from their healthcare providers. Needs varied across participants, as did preferences for characteristics and timing of information optimally provided through peer support. Participants were enthusiastic about the value of written peer support but emphasized that it should be delivered in a way that accommodates variation in transplant experiences, underscores its trustworthiness, and pairs it with useful psychoeducational content. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide guidance for making written peer support an accessible, supportive resource for transplant survivors. Future research should evaluate personalized online delivery of written peer support paired with psychoeducational content that enhances its benefits. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Written peer support delivered online could be a useful, valued resource for transplant survivors.

Introduction: Approximately 25% of women in the United States experience a symptomatic pelvic floor disorder such as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, anal incontinence, and sexual dysfunction. Aspects associated with breast cancer treatment such a chemotherapy, oophorectomy/ovarian suppression, and endocrine therapy may predispose women to pelvic floor disorders. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders among breast cancer survivors has been cited at 18%, but unpublished cross-sectional data suggests the prevalence may be much higher. In this study, 8.5% - 11.5% of participants experienced prolapse symptoms, 56.2% experienced anal incontinence symptoms, and 43.3% - 51.2% experience urinary incontinence symptoms. While pelvic floor dysfunction is associated with lower quality of life, it is unknown if breast cancer survivors with pelvic floor disorders experience decreased quality of life. The primary aim of this study was to assess if breast cancer survivors with pelvic floor disorders experience lower quality of life. Methods: Women 18 years or older who were previously treated for breast cancer and who were enrolled in a cancer research registry were invited to complete the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory 20 (PFDI-20), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the Short Form 12. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the research registry. A participant was considered eligible for the study if she had enrolled in the cancer registry and completed all core questions (i.e. demographics, cancer diagnosis, cancer treatment, endocrine therapy, medical/surgical history, and risk factors). As per standard PFDI-20 reporting, presence of a symptom was defined as answering a 1, 2, 3, or 4 to a question, while presence of a bothersome symptom was defined as answering a 2, 3, or 4. A score of 26 or less on the FSFI was considered indicative of sexual dysfunction. Results: A total of 634 women were considered eligible for enrollment in the study. 445 were able to be contacted, and 410 women agreed to participate in the study. Of those, 303 returned the PFDI-20 questionnaire and FSFI questionnaire, and 264 returned the SF-12 for response rates of 74% and 64%, respectively. Overall, higher scores on the PFDI-20 was associated with lower scores on both the physical and mental components of the SF-12 (Rho = -0.298, p = Conclusion: Among a subset of breast cancer survivors, pelvic disorders including pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, and anal incontinence exist, and these disorders are associated with decreased mental wellbeing. All pelvic floor disorders except pelvic organ prolapse were associated with decreased physical wellbeing. None of the domains of female sexual dysfunction were associated with decreased physical or mental wellbeing among breast cancer survivors. A subset of breast cancer survivors experiences bothersome pelvic floor disorders and thus screening for these disorders can increase referrals to appropriate treatment and complement survivorship care to enhance overall quality of life. Citation Format: Jon F Pennycuff, Felice Yang, Tania Lobo, Caroline Jackman, Colleen McGuire, Ami Chitalia, Kristi Graves. Pelvic floor disorders and quality of life among breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-26.

Purpose Older cancer survivors (≥ 65 years at diagnosis) are at high-risk for multimorbidity (2 + comorbid conditions). However, few studies have utilized a generalizable sample of older cancer survivors to understand how individual comorbid conditions, as opposed to total comorbidity burden, are associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We examined associations between HRQOL outcomes (pain, fatigue, physical function), individual comorbidities (cardiovascular disease [CVD], lung disease, diabetes, arthritis) and total comorbidity (cancer-only, cancer + 1 condition, cancer + 2 or more conditions). Methods Utilizing a population-based sample of 2019 older cancer survivors, we tested associations between comorbid conditions and the HRQOL outcomes using generalized linear models. HRQOL domains were assessed using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures. Comorbidity was assessed via self-report. Results Cancer survivors with lung disease reported significantly worse physical functioning (β = − 4.96, p

This paper presents a process evaluation of a culturally targeted narrative video about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) for Latina women at risk for HBOC. Spanish-speaking Latina women at risk for HBOC participated in a single arm study (n = 40). Participants watched the video developed by the authors and responded to surveys. We used mixed methods to assess theoretical constructs that are hypothesized mediators of narrative interventions (i.e., transportation or engagement, identification with characters, emotions) and implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability). Descriptive statistics summarized theoretical constructs and implementation outcomes. We conducted Mann–Whitney U tests to assess the differences in theoretical and implementation outcomes between participants who were affected versus. unaffected and participants with different levels of education and health literacy. We used the consensual qualitative research framework to analyze qualitative data. Participants’ mean age was 47.1 years (SD = 9.48). Most participants were high school graduates or less (62.5%). Acceptability of the video was extremely high (Md = 10.0, IQR = 0.2, scale 1–10). Most (82.5%) suggested video dissemination be through social media. Participants were highly engaged (Md = 5.7, IQR = 1.5, scale 1–7), strongly identified with the main character (Md = 8.7, IQR = 2.6, scale 1–10), and reported experiencing mostly positive emotions (Md = 9.5, IQR = 2.8, scale 1–10). Participants with low health literacy and affected participants reported a significantly higher identification with the main character (p

ObjectivePsychosocial interventions can reduce cancer-related fatigue effectively. However, it is still unclear if intervention effects differ across subgroups of patients. These meta-analyses aimed at evaluating moderator effects of (a) sociodemographic characteristics, (b) clinical characteristics, (c) baseline levels of fatigue and other symptoms, and (d) intervention-related characteristics on the effect of psychosocial interventions on cancer-related fatigue in patients with non-metastatic breast and prostate cancer.MethodsData were retrieved from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) consortium. Potential moderators were studied with meta-analyses of pooled individual patient data from 14 randomized controlled trials through linear mixed-effects models with interaction tests. The analyses were conducted separately in patients with breast (n = 1091) and prostate cancer (n = 1008).ResultsStatistically significant, small overall effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue were found (breast cancer: β = -0.19 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) = -0.30; -0.08]; prostate cancer: β = -0.11 [95%CI = -0.21; -0.00]). In both patient groups, intervention effects did not differ significantly by sociodemographic or clinical characteristics, nor by baseline levels of fatigue or pain. For intervention-related moderators (only tested among women with breast cancer), statistically significant larger effects were found for cognitive behavioral therapy as intervention strategy (β = -0.27 [95%CI = -0.40; -0.15]), fatigue-specific interventions (β = -0.48 [95%CI = -0.79; -0.18]), and interventions that only targeted patients with clinically relevant fatigue (β = -0.85 [95%CI = -1.40; -0.30]).ConclusionsOur findings did not provide evidence that any selected demographic or clinical characteristic, or baseline levels of fatigue or pain, moderated effects of psychosocial interventions on fatigue. A specific focus on decreasing fatigue seems beneficial for patients with breast cancer with clinically relevant fatigue.

Introduction: Obesity is associated with a 41% increase in all-cause mortality in breast cancer survivors. The majority of patients treated for breast cancer at our center are obese and most patients are racial and ethnic minority women living in low-income neighborhoods. Numerous barriers exist for weight management and physical activity interventions in this patient population. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a lifestyle intervention in 30 obese breast cancer survivors using shared medical appointments and community partnerships. Methods: 30 patients with stage I-III breast cancer with a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 treated in the preceding 5 years were enrolled through medical oncology and breast surgery clinics. All participants were given a Fitbit® to monitor physical activity and a $25 grocery gift card for a shopping trip with a nutritionist. Participants were expected to attend at least 10 group shared medical appointments (SMA) offered weekly on-site. SMA included nutrition education, cooking instruction, exercise classes or survivorship lectures. We collected participant feedback on SMA. Initial study end points were feasibility of intervention delivery measured by number of SMA appointments and physical activity (steps) measured by Fitbit®. The study was divided in three phases. Phase I/II: patients were required to have baseline evaluations, attend 10 SMA, share Fitbit® information, and complete validated eating and health questionnaires (REAP-S and SF-36, respectively) at scheduled time intervals. In phase III, we provided participants with a binder with information on low-cost fitness and nutrition options in patient’s neighborhoods and awarded prizes for high-performing participants. Results: We enrolled 30/30 participants in less than 6 months from opening; 80% were African-American. Three enrolled subjects did not complete more than one SMA. Participants attended an average of 10.2 SMA; attendance ranged from 5-10 participants per session. 63% (n=19) of participants attended the required 10 or more of the required SMA sessions (average compliance with clinic appointments is 50-60%). Participants had an average of -0.18 kg weight loss; 43% (n=13) lost weight and 40% (n=12) gained weight during the intervention (5 participants lost to follow-up or did not have weight changes during intervention). The range of weight loss was 0.1 to 7 kg and weight gain 0.2 to 6.2 kg. Twenty-four participants had consistent Fitbit® steps recorded; 19 increased their average of daily steps and 7 decreased from baseline, however, the steps varied significantly week to week. At baseline, average daily steps was 3,977 (range 200 to 18,432; SD = 4,236 steps) and 5,526 (range 728 to 14,006; SD = 2437 steps) post- intervention. The number of participants who increased steps (n=19) was significantly greater than the number of participants who decreased steps (n=7; p=0.014). The total cost of the intervention was $150 per patient. Challenges to study implementation included collection of Fitbit® data at consistent intervals and the available times for offering SMA; these times precluded enrollment and compliance for patients who work during the day. Conclusions: Our pilot study of a low-cost lifestyle intervention program appears to be feasible and beneficial for obese patients in a largely underserved community. SMA contributed to compliance and had positive feedback; patients expressed high levels of interest and engagement in the intervention. After the intervention participants were motivated to continue with lifestyle modifications and formed a Facebook® page to maintain connections. In the future, the goal is to incorporate this program as part of our survivorship care and expand it to other malignancies and potentially to other sites. Citation Format: Ilana Schlam, Princess Alintah, Christopher Gallagher, Marc Boisvert, Ami Chitalia, Shruti Tiwari, Patrick Martone, Chiranjeev Dash, Kristi Graves, Asma Dilawari. A lifestyle intervention program for obese breast cancer survivors using shared appointments, technology, and community partners in an underserved area [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-07.

Introduction By 2030, Hispanic survivors will likely constitute 20% of the survivor population (4 million people). Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanic cancer survivors experience worse health-related quality of life (HRQOL) across multiple domains including worse physical, psychological, and social wellbeing. Few studies have examined predictors of HRQOL in a population-based sample of Hispanic cancer survivors. We examined demographic, acculturation, and cancer clinical factors associated with HRQOL in early cancer survivorship. Methodology Utilizing data from the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study, which recruited cancer patients from 4 SEER cancer registries between 2010 and 2013, we conducted a secondary analysis of Hispanic survivors who responded to the baseline survey (administered ~9 months after diagnosis; n=908). We examined sample characteristics of the sample, including English language comfort, country of birth, and years in the US. We measured HRQOL outcomes (physical and mental health summary measures, pain interference, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function) using PROMIS® measures validated in English and Spanish. We dichotomized PROMIS scores for clinically relevant symptoms in a cancer population. We conducted linear and logistic regressions examining HRQOL associated with covariates including demographic and cancer characteristics, spirituality, and acculturation factors. Preliminary Results Survivors had a mean age of 60 years, 58% were foreign born, 61% were female, 56% married, 68% had early-stage cancer, 31% had breast cancer, and 23% had prostate cancer. Some survivors reported preferring communicating in English (57%) and those who immigrated to the US had a mean of 30 years in the US. Preliminary results show that this population may be experiencing worse physical and mental health (mean = 43.68 and 47.11; lower scores mean worse health), anxiety, fatigue, and pain (52.7, 53.4, 55.2; high scores mean worse anxiety, fatigue, pain) than national averages (score of 50). Multivariable results are forthcoming. Conclusions In a large and diverse sample of Hispanic cancer survivors, we found survivors report worse quality of life across multiple domains compared to the general population’s self-reported HRQOL. Few interventions have been developed to improve HRQOL for diverse groups of Hispanic cancer survivors. Elucidating factors that affect outcomes can help clarify how to structure interventions to reduce HRQOL disparities in this understudied group of cancer survivors. Citation Format: Manami Bhattacharya, Kristi D. Graves, Roxanne Jensen. Examining the health-related quality of life of U.S. Hispanic cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr A035.

Disparities in genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) uptake persist between Latinas and Non-Hispanic Whites. This study utilized a mental model approach to interview 20 Latinas (10 affected, 10 unaffected) at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Participants were asked about their knowledge and perceptions of GCRA, HBOC, risk, benefits, motivators, barriers, challenges, and experiences with GCRA. Using the Consensual Qualitative Analysis Framework, two authors independently coded the interviews and applied the final codes upon consensus. Additionally, interviews were coded to identify whether participants spontaneously brought up certain topics without a prompt. Findings identified multiple barriers and facilitators to GCRA uptake in this population, including patient level psychosocial/cultural factors (e.g., limited knowledge, worry about relatives' risk) and healthcare system factors (e.g., receiving no referrals). There were notable differences in awareness and knowledge between affected and unaffected women (e.g., genetic testing awareness), as well as knowledge gaps that were evident in both groups (e.g., age of diagnosis as a risk factor). To reduce disparities in GCRA uptake, interventions should address identified facilitators and barriers. Differences in knowledge and awareness between affected and unaffected women support the development of targeted interventions that address specific knowledge gaps. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03075540) by Alejandra Hurtado de Mendoza, Ph.D.

PROBLEM: Medical school can be a socially isolating experience, particularly for students underrepresented in medicine. Social isolation and perceptions of not belonging can negatively impact students’ academic performance and well-being. Therefore, interventions are needed to support students and these efforts should be appealing, brief, and low-burden. INTERVENTION: Guided by evidence-based approaches, we developed the Build & Belong intervention for medical students as a brief peer-to-peer approach that consisted of four components. First, M3 and M4 students wrote reflections on belonging in medical school. Second, M3 and M4 students video recorded messages for M1 and M2 students using their written reflections. Third, M1 and M2 students watched and discussed the videos in small groups. Fourth, the M1 and M2 students wrote letters to future students. Our intervention differs from previous student belonging interventions in the peer delivery of messages. CONTEXT: The Build & Belong intervention aimed to improve medical students’ social belongingness. Using a longitudinal observational study design, the intervention was piloted at a medical school in the Mid-Atlantic United States in 2017–2018. Students completed surveys before and after the intervention. Paired samples tests (t-tests and Wilcoxon) assessed pre- to post-intervention changes in social isolation, social connectedness, and social assurance. IMPACT: Among 63 medical students, with 25.9% from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine, we assessed follow-up outcomes in 38 students. Social isolation scores significantly decreased from baseline (M = 54.8, SD = 7.06) to follow-up (M = 51.3, SD = 6.67; p < .001). Social isolation changes were evident regardless of sex, although males reported a greater reduction (M Δ = −5.32, p < .001) than females (M Δ = −2.79, p = .014). Black/African American students had the largest reduction in social isolation (M Δ = −7.24, p = .010). Social assurance and connectedness scores did not change significantly between baseline and follow-up. Medical students appeared to resonate with messages delivered by more experienced peers (M3s and M4s), particularly messages that normalized feelings of not belonging and strategies to reduce those feelings. LESSONS LEARNED: The Build & Belong intervention appears to reduce social isolation scores among medical students. This pilot test of the Build & Belong intervention provides initial evidence of the effectiveness of a brief, low-cost intervention. Build & Belong may provide a scalable strategy to reduce medical students’ social isolation. Our peer-based approach is distinct from administrator-led strategies; peers were seen as trusted and reliable sources of information about belonging and ways to overcome the challenges experienced during medical school.

BACKGROUND Latinos remain disproportionately underrepresented in clinical trials, comprising only 2%-3% of research participants. In order to address health disparities, it is critically important to increase enrollment of Latino smokers in smoking cessation trials. There is limited research examining effective recruitment strategies for this population. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of direct versus mass and high- versus low-effort recruitment strategies on recruitment and retention of Latino smokers to a randomized smoking cessation trial. We also examine how the type of recruitment might have influenced the characteristics of enrolled participants. METHODS Latino smokers were enrolled into Decídetexto from 4 states—New Jersey, Kansas, Missouri, and New York. Participants were recruited from August 2018 until March 2021. Mass recruitment strategies included English and Spanish advertisements to the Latino community via flyers, Facebook ads, newspapers, television, radio, church bulletins, and our Decídetexto website. Direct, high-effort strategies included referrals from clinics or community-based organizations with whom we partnered, in-person community outreach, and patient registry calls. Direct, low-effort strategies included texting or emailing pre-existing lists of patients who smoked. A team of trained bilingual (English and Spanish) recruiters from 9 different Spanish-speaking countries of origin conducted recruitment, assessed eligibility, and enrolled participants into the trial. RESULTS Of 1112 individuals who were screened, 895 (80.5%) met eligibility criteria, and 457 (457/895, 51.1%) enrolled in the trial. Within the pool of screened individuals, those recruited by low-effort recruitment strategies (both mass and direct) were significantly more likely to be eligible (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.01-2.76 and OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98-2.96, respectively) and enrolled in the trial (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.81-3.73 and OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.03-4.51, respectively) compared with those enrolled by direct, high-effort strategies. Among participants enrolled, the retention rates at 3 months and 6 months among participants recruited via low-effort strategies (both mass and direct) were similar to participants recruited via direct, high-effort methods. Compared with enrolled participants recruited via direct (high- and low-effort) strategies, participants recruited via mass strategies were less likely to have health insurance (44.0% vs 71.2% and 71.7%, respectively; PPP=.007), more likely to primarily speak Spanish (89.3% vs 65.8% and 66.3%, respectively), and more likely to be at high risk for alcohol abuse (5.8 mean score vs 3.8 mean score and 3.9 mean score, respectively; P CONCLUSIONS Although most participants were recruited via direct, high-effort strategies, direct low-effort recruitment strategies yielded a screening pool more likely to be eligible for the trial. Mass recruitment strategies were associated with fewer acculturated enrollees with lower access to health services—groups who might benefit a great deal from the intervention. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03586596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03586596 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106188

There is an underrepresentation of Latinos in smoking cessation clinical trials. This study describes the feasibility and effectiveness of recruiting Latino smokers in the U.S. from an emergency department (ED) patient registry into a randomized smoking cessation clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from the Hackensack University Medical Center ED. Potential participants were contacted from a patient registry. The primary outcome was whether the participant responded to a call or text. Secondary outcomes included the best day of the week, week of the month, and time of day to obtain a response. Of the 1680 potential participants, 1132 were called (67.5%), while 548 (32.5%) were texted. For calls, response rate was higher compared to text (26.4% vs 6.4%, p &lt, 0.001). More participants were interested in the study when contacted by calls compared to text (11.4% vs. 1.8%) and more participants were enrolled in the study when contacted by calls compared to text (1.1% vs. 0.2%). Regression models showed that ethnicity, age, time of day, and week of the month were not significantly associated with response rates. Recruitment of Latinos from an ED patient registry into a smoking cessation clinical trial is feasible using call and text, although enrollment may be low.

There is an underrepresentation of Latinos in smoking cessation clinical trials. This study describes the feasibility and effectiveness of recruiting Latino smokers in the U.S. from an emergency department (ED) patient registry into a randomized smoking cessation clinical trial. Recruitment occurred from the Hackensack University Medical Center ED. Potential participants were contacted from a patient registry. The primary outcome was whether the participant responded to a call or text. Secondary outcomes included the best day of the week, week of the month, and time of day to obtain a response. Of the 1680 potential participants, 1132 were called (67.5%), while 548 (32.5%) were texted. For calls, response rate was higher compared to text (26.4% vs 6.4%; p < 0.001). More participants were interested in the study when contacted by calls compared to text (11.4% vs. 1.8%) and more participants were enrolled in the study when contacted by calls compared to text (1.1% vs. 0.2%). Regression models showed that ethnicity, age, time of day, and week of the month were not significantly associated with response rates. Recruitment of Latinos from an ED patient registry into a smoking cessation clinical trial is feasible using call and text, although enrollment may be low.

Cancer health disparities remain a significant problem in the USA, compounded by lack of access to care, language barriers and systemic biases in health care. These disparities are particularly evident in areas such as genetics/genomics. For example, Latinas at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have extremely low rates of genetic counseling/testing. Long-standing barriers and inequities in access to services such as genetic counseling and testing require innovative solutions. One solution can involve training community outreach and education professionals (CORE-Ps) to bridge the gap between underserved communities and genetic specialists. We sought to develop and pilot test a training program for English-Spanish bilingual CORE-Ps to reduce disparities in access to and uptake of genetic services among Latino populations. Guided by Adult Learning Theory and with input from multiple stakeholders, we developed ÁRBOLES Familiares (Family Trees), an in-person and online training program for bilingual CORE-Ps to facilitate identification, referral, and navigation of Latinas to genetic counseling/testing. We conducted a pilot test of 24 CORE-Ps recruited from across the United States and assessed knowledge, genetic literacy, and self-efficacy at baseline and follow-up. At follow-up, participants in the pilot with complete baseline and follow-up data (N = 15) demonstrated significant improvements in HBOC knowledge, genetic literacy, self-efficacy and reports of fewer barriers to identify/navigate Latinas (ps.05). Qualitative assessment identified ways to improve the training curriculum. Pilot results suggest ÁRBOLES is a promising approach for training CORE-Ps to identify and refer high-risk Latinas to genetic services. Next steps involve further refinement of ÁRBOLES, development of an online toolkit, and adaptation for virtual delivery.Latinas at high risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have low rates of genetic counseling and testing. Latinas may not have ready access to services like genetic counseling and testing, which need special solutions. One solution can involve training community health workers to bridge the gap between Latinas and genetic specialists. We developed an online and in person training program (ÁRBOLES Familiares or Family Trees) for English-Spanish bilingual community health workers that teaches them how to help Latinas get access to genetic services. We tested this program with a small group of community health workers. After the program, their HBOC knowledge, genetic literacy, and confidence to help Latinas get access to genetic services had improved. Trainees also made suggestions to improve the program, which will be used to help future trainees expand their knowledge and skills to work with Latinas at risk of HBOC.

PURPOSE: Social support is associated with breast cancer survivors’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). More nuanced information is needed regarding aspects of social support associated with different HRQoL domains among diverse populations. We assessed the association between emotional/informational and tangible support and five HRQoL domains and evaluated race as an effect modifier. METHODS: African American and White women (n = 545) diagnosed with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer completed a survey that assessed sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. We assessed bivariate relationships between emotional/informational and tangible support along with overall HRQoL and each HRQoL domain. We tested interactions between race and emotional/informational and tangible social support using linear regression. RESULTS: The sample included African American (29%) and White (71%) breast cancer survivors. Emotional/informational social support had a statistically significant positive association with emotional well-being (β = .08, p = 0.005), social well-being (β = 0.36, p < 0.001), functional well-being (β = .22, p < .001), breast cancer concerns (β = .16, p = 0.002), and overall HRQoL (β = .83, p < .001). Similarly, tangible social support had a statistically significant positive association with emotional well-being (β = .14, p = 0.004), social well-being (β = .51, p < .001), functional well-being (β = .39, p < .001), and overall HRQoL (β = 1.27, p < .001). The interactions between race and social support were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results underscore the importance of the different social support types among breast cancer survivors, regardless of survivors’ race. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Population-based interventions can be standardized and disseminated to provide guidance on how to increase emotional/information and tangible support for all breast cancer survivors by caregivers, health providers, and communities.

Background During, shortly after, and sometimes for years after hematopoietic stem cell transplant, a large proportion of hematological cancer patients undergoing transplant report significant physical and psychological symptoms and reduced health-related quality of life. To address these survivorship problems, we developed a low-burden, brief psychological intervention called expressive helping that includes two theory- and evidence-based components designed to work together synergistically: emotionally expressive writing and peer support writing. Building on evidence from a prior randomized control trial showing reductions in physical symptoms and distress in long-term transplant survivors with persistent survivorship problems, the Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease (WISE) trial will evaluate the efficacy of expressive helping when used during transplant and in the early post-transplant period, when symptoms peak, and when intervention could prevent development of persistent symptoms. Methods WISE is a multi-site, two-arm randomized controlled efficacy trial. Adult hematological cancer patients scheduled for a hematopoietic stem cell transplant will complete baseline measures and then, after hospitalization but prior to transplant, they will be randomized to complete either expressive helping or a time and attention “neutral writing” task. Both expressive helping and neutral writing involve four brief writing sessions, beginning immediately after randomization and ending approximately 4 weeks after hospital discharge. Measures of symptom burden (primary outcome), distress, health-related quality of life, and fatigue (secondary outcomes) will be administered in seven assessments coinciding with medically relevant time points from baseline and to a year post-intervention. Discussion The steady and continuing increase in use of stem cell transplantation has created growing need for efficacious, accessible interventions to reduce the short- and long-term negative physical and psychosocial effects of this challenging but potentially life-saving treatment. Expressive helping is a psychological intervention that was designed to fill this gap. It has been shown to be efficacious in long-term transplant survivors but could have even greater impact if it is capable of reducing symptoms during and soon after transplant. The WISE study will evaluate these benefits in a rigorous randomized controlled trial. Trial registration Clinicaltrial.govNCT03800758. Registered January 11, 2019

Cascade testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer is an important public health priority. Increasing attention has been paid to the relevance of testing for men within BRCA1/2-positive families given that such testing may provide important information about their cancer risks, particularly for prostate cancer, and risks to their offspring. However, men are much less likely to seek genetic counseling and testing than their at-risk female relatives. To facilitate access to pre-test information and testing, we developed a web-based intervention (WI) for men that we are evaluating in a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). This paper describes three phases of research in the development of the WI: (1) formative (qualitative) research among men from BRCA1/2 families to assess needs and preferences for education; (2) a detailed description of the organization, format, and content of the WI; and (3) usability testing. We discuss the aims and hypotheses of the pilot RCT in which the WI is being compared with an enhanced usual care condition among at-risk men. We expect that the WI described here will foster informed decisions and lead to increased use of BRCA1/2 counseling and testing, potentially yielding improved cancer control outcomes for this understudied group, and for their at-risk relatives.

Background Latinos remain disproportionately underrepresented in clinical trials, comprising only 2%-3% of research participants. In order to address health disparities, it is critically important to increase enrollment of Latino smokers in smoking cessation trials. There is limited research examining effective recruitment strategies for this population. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of direct versus mass and high- versus low-effort recruitment strategies on recruitment and retention of Latino smokers to a randomized smoking cessation trial. We also examine how the type of recruitment might have influenced the characteristics of enrolled participants. Methods Latino smokers were enrolled into Decídetexto from 4 states—New Jersey, Kansas, Missouri, and New York. Participants were recruited from August 2018 until March 2021. Mass recruitment strategies included English and Spanish advertisements to the Latino community via flyers, Facebook ads, newspapers, television, radio, church bulletins, and our Decídetexto website. Direct, high-effort strategies included referrals from clinics or community-based organizations with whom we partnered, in-person community outreach, and patient registry calls. Direct, low-effort strategies included texting or emailing pre-existing lists of patients who smoked. A team of trained bilingual (English and Spanish) recruiters from 9 different Spanish-speaking countries of origin conducted recruitment, assessed eligibility, and enrolled participants into the trial. Results Of 1112 individuals who were screened, 895 (80.5%) met eligibility criteria, and 457 (457/895, 51.1%) enrolled in the trial. Within the pool of screened individuals, those recruited by low-effort recruitment strategies (both mass and direct) were significantly more likely to be eligible (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.01-2.76 and OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98-2.96, respectively) and enrolled in the trial (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.81-3.73 and OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.03-4.51, respectively) compared with those enrolled by direct, high-effort strategies. Among participants enrolled, the retention rates at 3 months and 6 months among participants recruited via low-effort strategies (both mass and direct) were similar to participants recruited via direct, high-effort methods. Compared with enrolled participants recruited via direct (high- and low-effort) strategies, participants recruited via mass strategies were less likely to have health insurance (44.0% vs 71.2% and 71.7%, respectively; P Conclusions Although most participants were recruited via direct, high-effort strategies, direct low-effort recruitment strategies yielded a screening pool more likely to be eligible for the trial. Mass recruitment strategies were associated with fewer acculturated enrollees with lower access to health services—groups who might benefit a great deal from the intervention. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03586596; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03586596 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106188

Despite considerable evidence that psychosocial interventions can effectively relieve distress in patients with cancer, many individuals who could benefit from these interventions do not receive them. A proposed solution to this problem is the establishment of programs in oncology settings that routinely screen for distress and refer patients for appropriate psychosocial care. This commentary addresses a review by Ehlers et al. that describes policies and procedures related to distress screening, summarizes prior research on this topic, and identifies key areas for future research. Among their major conclusions is the need for research to fill the gap in knowledge about how best to implement new distress screening programs as well as optimize the use and efficiency of existing programs. This commentary focuses on how the types of study methods, designs, and outcomes that are commonplace in implementation science to facilitate the integration of research into practice can be applied to distress screening programs. Priorities identified include designing and conducting pragmatic clinical trials, evaluating multilevel interventions, and using hybrid designs to simultaneously evaluate clinical effectiveness and barriers and facilitators of implementation. Use of these approaches holds considerable potential for developing an evidence base that can promote more widespread adoption of effective distress screening programs and inform further development of standards and policies related to the psychosocial care of patients with cancer.

We evaluated changes in patient-reported outcomes and cognitive function from pre- to 3-6 months post-treatment among 42 newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma undergoing transplant with complete data using PROMIS-29. There were statistically significant improvements in physical (

There are well-established disparities in cancer incidence and outcomes by race/ethnicity that result from the interplay between structural, socioeconomic, socio-environmental, behavioural and biological factors. However, large research studies designed to investigate factors contributing to cancer aetiology and progression have mainly focused on populations of European origin. The limitations in clinicopathological and genetic data, as well as the reduced availability of biospecimens from diverse populations, contribute to the knowledge gap and have the potential to widen cancer health disparities. In this review, we summarise reported disparities and associated factors in the United States of America (USA) for the most common cancers (breast, prostate, lung and colon), and for a subset of other cancers that highlight the complexity of disparities (gastric, liver, pancreas and leukaemia). We focus on populations commonly identified and referred to as racial/ethnic minorities in the USA—African Americans/Blacks, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asians, Native Hawaiians/other Pacific Islanders and Hispanics/Latinos. We conclude that even though substantial progress has been made in understanding the factors underlying cancer health disparities, marked inequities persist. Additional efforts are needed to include participants from diverse populations in the research of cancer aetiology, biology and treatment. Furthermore, to eliminate cancer health disparities, it will be necessary to facilitate access to, and utilisation of, health services to all individuals, and to address structural inequities, including racism, that disproportionally affect racial/ethnic minorities in the USA. Fil: Zavala, Valentina A.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Bracci, Paige M.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Carethers, John M.. University of Michigan; Estados Unidos Fil: Carvajal Carmona, Luis. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos Fil: Coggins, Nicole B.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos Fil: Cruz Correa, Marcia R.. Universidad de Puerto Rico; Puerto Rico Fil: Davis, Melissa. No especifíca; Fil: de Smith, Adam J.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Dutil, Julie. Ponce Research Institute; Puerto Rico Fil: Figueiredo, Jane C.. Cedars Sinai Medical Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Fox, Rena. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Graves, Kristi D.. University Of Georgetown; Estados Unidos Fil: Gomez, Scarlett Lin. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Llera, Andrea Sabina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires. Fundación Instituto Leloir. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Neuhausen, Susan L.. No especifíca; Fil: Newman, Lisa. No especifíca; Fil: Nguyen, Tung. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Palmer, Julie R.. National Institutes of Health; Estados Unidos Fil: Palmer, Nynikka R.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Pérez Stable, Eliseo J.. National Institutes of Health; Estados Unidos Fil: Piawah, Sorbarikor. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Rodriquez, Erik J.. National Institutes of Health; Estados Unidos Fil: Sanabria Salas, María Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; Colombia Fil: Schmit, Stephanie L.. University of Southern California; Estados Unidos Fil: Serrano Gomez, Silvia J.. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; Colombia Fil: Stern, Mariana Carla. University of Southern California; Estados Unidos Fil: Weitzel, Jeffrey. No especifíca; Fil: Yang, Jun J.. St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital; Estados Unidos Fil: Zabaleta, Jovanny. No especifíca; Fil: Ziv, Elad. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Fejerman, Laura. University of California; Estados Unidos

Hispanic and Latino (HL) cancer survivors are at a critical disadvantage compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients regarding sociodemographic adversities and access to equitable treatment options. By 2030, there will be about four million HL cancer survivors in the U.S., representing nearly 20% of survivors in this country. Hispanics and Latinos are subjected to significant challenges in accessing and receiving equitable care relative to NHWs. Hispanics and Latinos also experience lower rates of health insurance and financial resources, limiting health care options. These disparities often originate from disparate social determinants of health, including lower funding for education and school programs, greater neighborhood stressors and violence, lower access to healthy and affordable food, and greater barriers to community health and exercise opportunities. Even among HL cancer survivors with proper access to health care, they experience disparate treatment options, including low inclusion in clinical trials and/or access to experimental therapies. A solution to these barriers necessitates complex and systemic changes that involve, for example, investing in public health programs, increasing the diversity and cultural awareness of the medical workforce, and promoting research opportunities such as clinical trials that are inclusive of HLs. Only through meaningful reform will equitable cancer care be available for all in the U.S. regardless of racial and/or ethnic background. This article reviews some of the critical social determinants of health and biases relevant to HL cancer survivors and provides recommendations for achieving cancer health equity. Implications for Practice Hispanics and Latinos experience a significant and often disproportionate cancer-related burden compared with non-Hispanic and Latino White individuals and other racial and ethnic groups. Meaningful reform to achieve health equity in oncology should focus on approaches to gaining trust among diverse patients, cultural and community sensitivity and engagement in oncology care and research, diversifying the workforce, and improving inclusion in clinical trial participation. Taken together, these recommendations can lead to exemplary and equitable care for all patients.

Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is a risk management approach with strong evidence of mortality reduction for women with germline mutations in the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). Few studies to date have evaluated uptake of BSO in women from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds who carry BRCA1/2 mutations. The objective of the UPTAKE study was to explore rates and predictors of risk-reducing BSO among Latinas affected and unaffected with breast cancer who had a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation. We recruited 100 Latina women with deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations from community hospitals, academic health systems, community, and advocacy organizations. Women completed interviews in Spanish or English. We obtained copies of genetic test reports for participants who provided signed medical release. After performing threefold cross-validation LASSO for variable selection, we used multiple logistic regression to identify demographic and clinical predictors of BSO. Among 100 participants, 68 had undergone BSO at the time of interview. Of these 68, 35 were US-born (61% of all US-born participants) and 33 were not (77% of the non-US-born participants). Among Latinas with BRCA1/2 mutations, older age (p = 0.004), personal history of breast cancer (p = 0.003), higher income (p = 0.002), and not having a full-time job (p = 0.027) were identified as variables significantly associated with uptake of BSO. Results suggest a high rate of uptake of risk-reducing BSO among a sample of Latinas with BRCA1/2 mutations living in the US. We document factors associated with BSO uptake in a diverse sample of women. Relevant to genetic counseling, our findings identify possible targets for supporting Latinas' decision-making about BSO following receipt of a positive BRCA1/2 test.

Introduction Latinos, the largest minority group in the U.S., experience tobacco-related disparities, including limited access to cessation resources. Evidence supports the efficacy of mobile interventions for smoking cessation, which may be greater among Latinos, the highest users of text messaging. Objectives To describe the methodology of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of Decidetexto, a culturally appropriate mobile smoking cessation intervention versus standard care on smoking abstinence (cotinine-verified 7-day point prevalence abstinence) at Month 6 among Latino smokers. Methods Latino smokers (N = 618) will be randomized to one of two conditions: 1) Decidetexto or 2) standard of care. Decidetexto is a mobile smoking cessation intervention (available in English and Spanish) that incorporates three integrated components: 1) a tablet-based software that collects smoking-related information to develop an individualized quit plan, 2) a 24-week text messaging counseling program with interactive capabilities, and 3) pharmacotherapy support. Decidetexto follows the Social Cognitive Theory as theoretical framework. Standard of care consists of printed smoking cessation materials along with referral to telephone quitline. Participants in both groups are given access to free pharmacotherapy (nicotine patches or gum) by calling study phone number. Promotores de Salud will rely on community-based approaches and clinical settings to recruit smokers into the study. All participants will complete follow-up assessments at Week 12 and Month 6. Discussion If successful, Decidetexto will be ready to be implemented in different community- and clinic-based settings to reduce tobacco-related disparities.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in Latinas and the leading cause of cancer death. Latinas tend to be diagnosed at later stages, receive poorer quality care and have a higher risk of mortality than non-Latina White (NLW) women. Among women with a genetic predisposition to hereditary BC, genetic counseling can be beneficial. Latinas participate in genetic counseling at lower rates than NLW women. The goal of this study was to develop comprehensive, culturally appropriate materials for community health educators (promotores)-led hereditary BC education program for Spanish-speaking Latinas. We developed the curriculum through feedback from 7 focus groups, with a total of 68 participants (35 promotores and 33 community members). We used a mixed-methods approach that relied on quantitative analysis of survey questions and qualitative content analysis of the focus groups transcripts. Pre and post promotores’ training survey responses suggested improvement in the promotores’ cancer-related knowledge. Themes that emerged from the qualitative analyses were (i) barriers to health education and/or care; (ii) importance of educating the Latino community about BC and genetics and (iii) role of the promotores. Future research will further evaluate the impact of the program in promotores’ knowledge and community members’ screening behaviors.

Contains fulltext : 225951.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of coping skills training (CST) on symptoms of depression and anxiety in cancer patients, and investigated moderators of the effects. METHODS: Overall effects and intervention-related moderators were studied in meta-analyses of pooled aggregate data from 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patient-related moderators were examined using linear mixed-effect models with interaction tests on pooled individual patient data (n = 1953) from 15 of the RCTs. RESULTS: CST had a statistically significant but small effect on depression (g = -0.31,95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.40;-0.22) and anxiety (g = -0.32,95%CI = -0.41;-0.24) symptoms. Effects on depression symptoms were significantly larger for interventions delivered face-to-face (p = .003), led by a psychologist (p = .02) and targeted to patients with psychological distress (p = .002). Significantly larger reductions in anxiety symptoms were found in younger patients (p(interaction)

PURPOSE: Despite having a generally favorable prognosis, differentiated thyroid cancer is known to have a significant, long term impact on the quality of life of survivors. We wished to investigate short and long-term effects among thyroid cancer survivors following radioactive iodine therapy. METHODS: We conducted 8 focus groups (N=47) to understand patients’ experiences of short- and long-term effects after radioactive iodine treatment and the impact these treatment-related side effects had on patients’ quality of life. We elicited responses regarding experiences with side effects following radioactive iodine treatment, particularly salivary, lacrimal, and nasal symptoms. We transcribed audiotapes and conducted qualitative analyses to identify codes and themes. RESULTS: We identified eight broad themes from the qualitative analyses. Themes reflecting physical symptoms included dry mouth, salivary gland dysfunction, altered taste, eye symptoms such as tearing or dryness, and epistaxis. Psychosocial themes included lack of knowledge and preparation for treatment, regret of treatment, and distress that thyroid cancer is labeled as a “good cancer.” CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid cancer survivors reported a wide range of radioactive iodine treatment related effects and psychosocial concerns that appear to reduce quality of life. The psychosocial concerns reported by participants underscore the significant unmet information and support needs prior to and following RAI treatment among individuals diagnosed with thyroid cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Future research is needed to help both patients and physicians understand the effect of radioactive iodine on quality of life, and to better assess the benefits versus the risks of radioactive iodine therapy.

Patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) emphasizes the involvement of patients and other interested stakeholders during study design, implementation, and evaluation. We provide an example of PCOR using “research democracy”—a process in which individuals involved in research (e.g., team members, participants, and advisors) have a vote and a voice in the decisions that are made and the procedures that are used to conduct the research. We describe the Nueva Vida Intervention study and the strategies used to strengthen team management and team cohesion and to utilize team diversity as an asset. We collected data on team engagement through informal observations, direct discussions, and survey assessments. Team members overwhelmingly agreed that using research democracy approaches increased mutual trust and an individual’s level of influence during the study. Identified barriers indicated the importance of effective communication and the challenges with recruitment, while the benefits included a heightened sense of collaboration and a better understanding of the research process. Initial results suggest that team engagement and research democracy approaches are advantageous to conducting an efficient and effective study, thereby improving PCOR and ultimately benefiting the patients and their caregivers.

To further inform implementation efforts of a telephone-based physical activity (PA) intervention for breast cancer survivors, we assessed the PA, fatigue, mood, and quality of life of the peer mentors/coaches who delivered the program. The coaches were volunteers with the American Cancer Society’s Reach to Recovery program. The coaches (n = 18) delivered the PA intervention to 76 breast cancer survivors in a randomized controlled trial. Coaches completed assessments of PA (self-report), motivational readiness for PA, and standardized measures of psychosocial variables at the start of coaching and at study exit. At study exit, they also responded to an open-ended question on the benefits that they accrued from the study. We used generalized linear models to analyze the PA data and psychosocial variables. Chi-squared analyses were used for motivational readiness. The written responses to the open-ended question were analyzed to identify themes. Coaches’ PA exceeded national recommendations at study entry and exit with no significant changes over time. Sixty-one percent were in the maintenance stage of motivational readiness, and 61% remained in the same stage at study exit. Psychosocial functioning also remained stable over time. Qualitative data revealed that the coaches’ gains included helping themselves (with four subthemes) and helping others. Intervention delivery had no unintended negative consequences (PA, motivational readiness, and psychosocial functioning) among coaches. They reported gains that were not reflected in standardized psychosocial assessments. These data support further implementation of peer-delivered PA programs to enhance the reach of interventions.

Disparities persist in breast cancer outcomes between Latina survivors and non-Hispanic Whites. Identifying methods to ensure that Latinas participate in and benefit from translational behavioral medicine research is important to reduce disparities. We developed a “Social Network Research Registry” to enhance Latina survivors’ engagement in research and explored the social networks and research/cancer organization participation in this population. We initially recruited 30 Latina breast cancer survivors (“seeds”) from community organizations and identified other survivors through snowball sampling. Guided by Social Network Analysis, we assessed the structural (e.g., size) and functional (e.g., social support) characteristics of the network, willingness to join the registry, prior research participation, involvement in cancer organizations, and interest in different types of research and roles in research. The resulting network size was 98, including 53 women who enrolled in the study and 45 who were listed in the network but did not enroll. All enrolled participants (N = 53) agreed to be part of the registry. We identified 15 participants who occupied strategic positions as hubs and/or bridges. Women who were currently involved in cancer organizations were more likely to have participated in research (70.3% vs. 18.8%); χ(2) (1, 53) = 11.97, p = .001. Most were interested in surveys/interviews (98%), behavioral interventions (96%), and becoming health promoters (79%). The Social Network Research Registry is an acceptable and feasible strategy to engage underrepresented Latina survivors in research. Social network analysis can be useful to identify members who occupy key positions to enhance recruitment and translational efforts.

Introduction: Germline testing for BRCA1/2 genes provides an opportunity to reduce mortality and morbidity by adopting appropriate risk reduction and screening options, in particular with risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO).There is a paucity of data on Latinas and prophylactic measures among BRCA1/2 carriers.Existing studies are limited either by the small number of Latinas, or limited to a specific geographic location.Factors related to decision making have also not been evaluated. Methods: The UPTAKE study is an observational study of Latinas with germline BRCA1/2 mutations.Subjects were recruited nationally and, by telephone interviews, reported uptake of prophylactic surgeries (BSO, bilateral mastectomy in unaffected women, and contralateral mastectomy in carriers with breast cancer (BC)). Women with ovarian cancer were ineligible. All women had to have been informed that they carried a deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation at least 1 year prior to completing the interview. The objectives of this study are: 1)to examine the rate of uptake of prophylactic surgeries; 2)identify acculturation and attitudinal factors related to decisions made and 3)examine relationships between primary language, receipt of genetic counseling (GC) and in which language it was provided and uptake of prophylactic surgeries. We plan to enroll 100 participants. Results: As of 6/11/2017, 86 telephone interviews have been conducted. We anticipate that all 100 interviews will be completed by July 2017. 51.2% (44/86) of participants completed the interview in Spanish. Our population was diverse in terms of country of origin: 50.0% (43/86) were born in the US, 22.1% (19/86) in Mexico, 11.6% (10/86) in Puerto Rico, 4.6% (4/86) in El Salvador, 3.5% (3/86) in Ecuador and 8.1% (7/86) in other countries of Latin America. 30% (26/86) of the participants reported an annual household income inferior to $50.000. Only 26.7% (23/86) of women reported having a graduate degree. Approximately one quarter of participants were unemployed at the time of study participation (26.7%, 23/86). 34.9% (30/86) were unaffected and 62.8% (54/86) were affected with BC. 73.3% (63/86) of participants reported having received formal GC, of which only 28.6% (18/63) was conducted in Spanish. 66.3% (57/86) of women opted to undergo BSO and 58.1% (50/86) underwent prophylactic mastectomy. Being born outside the US and currently working were associated with higher uptake of BSO. Multivariate analysis will be performed once all interviews have been completed. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the largest study that evaluates uptake of prophylactic measures in Latinas known to be BRCA1/2 carriers. Our study included a heterogeneous group of participants in terms of country of origin, income and level of education including English knowledge. It was conducted across various academic and community centers in the country. The uptake of prophylactic surgeries among Latinas with germline BRCA mutations seems to be slightly lower than what has been reported in non-Hispanic whites (71-74%) but higher than in African Americans (32-50%). Results and factors associated with decision making will be updated once the total number of participants is enrolled. Citation Format: Lynce F, Serrano A, Friedman S, Nahleh Z, Dutil J, Campos C, Ricker C, Rodriguez P, Duron Y, Isaacs C, Graves K. UPTAKE study - Uptake of preventive surgeries among Latinas with BRCA1/2 mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-05.

PurposeTelegenetics has become the predominant mode of cancer genetic counseling during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to identify potential patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic genetic counseling.MethodsWe analyzed post-counseling (pre-result disclosure) follow-up data from a randomized noninferiority trial of a telephone genetic counseling versus usual care genetic counseling. Among 669 randomized participants, 600 completed pre-test counseling and 568 completed a 2-week follow-up assessment before receiving test results. In this analysis, we focused on genetic counseling outcomes (knowledge, decisional conflict, and distress). In multivariate models controlling for bivariate predictors of these outcomes, we tested our a priori hypotheses that pre-counseling numeracy, perceived stress, and race/ethnicity would moderate the outcomes of telephone genetic counseling versus usual care.ResultsOnly numeracy significantly moderated associations between mode of genetic counseling and outcomes. Higher numeracy was associated with higher post-counseling knowledge following telephone genetic counseling ( p 0.20).ConclusionAlthough high numeracy was associated with higher levels of knowledge following telegenetic counseling, we did not identify any clinically significant patient-level contraindicators for telegenetic counseling. These results lend further confidence to the broad use of telegenetics.

Despite the disproportionate underuse of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/2 (BRCA)-associated hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk among Latinas, little is known about the associated barriers and facilitators. We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 20 at-risk Latina women from diverse backgrounds. Eligible women were diagnosed with breast cancer50 years, with or without a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (1 first-degree relative diagnosed50 years). All interviews were conducted in Spanish, audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Two bilingual coders used thematic analyses to identify 7 main themes. Results revealed very low levels of awareness and knowledge about HBOC and BRCA genetic counseling. Interestingly, for most Latinas, competing life demands and cultural concerns (fatalismo and destino) did not strongly influence personal beliefs about genetic counseling. In addition, older women were equally as interested in education, cancer prevention, and BRCA genetic counseling as younger women. These findings suggest that Latinas, regardless of age, increasingly acknowledge and prioritize their own health. Women reported their main motivator to undergo counseling was concern about family members' cancer risks. Main barriers included financial and insurance concerns, and lack of awareness about genetic services. Investigating the beliefs and attitudes of diverse populations of Latinas at risk for HBOC reveals logistical barriers to BRCA genetic counseling uptake within this under-represented community. Efforts are needed to provide at-risk Latina breast cancer survivors' knowledge of and access to genetic counseling and testing based on risk status and Latinas' increasing responsiveness and uptake of these services.

Latina women at risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have lower awareness, knowledge, and use of genetic counseling and testing services (GCT) than non-Latina Whites. Few interventions have been developed to reduce these disparities among at-risk Latinas. This pilot study assessed the impact of a culturally targeted narrative video developed by our team. The study included 40 Latina immigrants living in the United States who were at risk of HBOC, including affected and unaffected women. We assessed pre-post differences in psychosocial outcomes. Participants were 47.35 years old on average (SD = 9.48). Most (70%) were unaffected with cancer, had an annual income of $40,000 or less (65%), an education of High School or less (62.5%), and were uninsured (77.5%). The video significantly enhanced knowledge (p &lt, 0.001), positive attitudes (p &lt, 0.05), anticipatory positive emotions (p &lt, 0.05), and intentions to participate in counseling (p &lt, 0.001). Importantly, the video also significantly reduced negative attitudes (p &lt, 0.05), and attitudinal ambivalence (p &lt, 0.001). The culturally targeted video shows preliminary evidence in improving psychosocial outcomes related to GCT uptake in Latinas at risk for HBOC. This intervention is a promising easily-disseminable strategy to address disparities in GCT utilization.

BACKROUND. Although therapeutic arts are used in the palliative care setting, little has been described about what happens during the artist-patient encounter and how these interactions can complement and integrate into the interdisciplinary model of palliative care. The objective of this study is to describe the artist-patient encounter and how artists can function in the palliative interdisciplinary model of care. METHODS. Authors reviewed 229 reports written by artists about encounters with palliative patients, and performed thematic analysis on 95. RESULTS. Artists describe physical, emotional, and spiritual responses by patients including relaxation, invigoration, and accessing spirituality, some of which were unique to the artist-patient interaction. Artists also described personal reactions including themes of professional fulfillment, kinship and empathy with patient suffering. Themes surrounding the artist-patient bond and trust also emerged. CONCLUSIONS. The artist-patient encounter has an effect on both patients and artists, and can create a therapeutic relationship between them. Artists provide unique perspectives and care paradigms to the palliative team.

458 Background: SES and access to care are factors that may impact patient outcomes. We examined the impact of SES on survival in patients (pts) with GI cancers. Methods: Data obtained from the NCDB were used to examine the association between SES and outcomes of GI cancer pts. Pts were categorized by income and education levels. Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and chi-square tests were used to examine the differences between the groups. Results: A total of 1,409,177 pts diagnosed with GI cancers between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively studied (table). The majority of pts were male (54.3%), and 83.7% were white, 11.5% black, and 4.7% of other races. Of the entire cohort, 31% of pts lived in the highest income areas, whereas 18.3% were in the lowest and 50.6% in middle-income areas; 23% lived in the highest high school graduation rate (>93%) areas, whereas 17.4% lived in the lowest graduation rate (< 79%) areas; and 82.4% resided in metropolitan areas. Pts in the lowest compared to highest income areas were more likely to be black (OR: 6.5, 6.4-6.6), uninsured (2.9, 2.8-3.0), or have Medicaid (4.13, 4.04-4.22), and have a Charlson-Deyo score ≥ 1 (1.35, 1.33-1.36). In the multivariate analysis, cancer type, stage, tumor differentiation, income, education, insurance status, gender, race, Charlson-Deyo score, and type of treatment center were independent predictors for survival. After controlling for other factors, black pts had a 3% increased risk of death (HRadj = 1.03; 1.02-1.03; p < 0.001). Pts from lowest vs highest education areas had a 2% increased risk of death (HRadj = 1.02; 1.01-1.03; p < 0.001). Pts from the lowest income vs highest income areas had a 13% increased risk of death (HRadj = 1.13; 1.12-1.14; p < 0.001). Pts with Medicaid insurance had a 33% (HRadj: 1.33, CI 1.32-1.34, p < 0.001) and uninsured pts had 22% (HRadj: 1.22 (1.20-1.23, p < 0.001) increased risk of death compared to pts with private insurance. Pts from urban or rural areas vs metropolitan areas had a 1% increased risk of death (HRadj = 1.01; 1.00-1.02; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Low SES is associated with worse survival in pts with any GI cancer. Pts with low-income status and Medicaid or no health insurance had the highest risk of mortality. These stark inequities must be addressed with renewed efforts to identify, treat, and better support pts at highest risk for poor outcomes. [Table: see text]

19 Background: SES has been associated with outcomes in cancer patients (pts). We examined associations between SES and survival of pts with colorectal cancers (CRC). Methods: The NCDB was used to examine the association of SES status with clinicopathological features and outcomes of colorectal cancer pts, categorized by the income and education level of their area of residence. Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazard model, and chi-square test were used to examine the differences between groups. Results: A retrospective analysis of 890,867 pts with CRC (right-sided 34.1%, transverse 11.9%, left-sided 46.2%, and rectal 7.8%) diagnosed between 2004 and 2016, was conducted. About half the pts were male (51.4%); 84.3% were white, 11.2% black, and 4.5% of other races. Overall, 30.8% of pts lived in the highest and 18.4% in the lowest income areas. Twenty-three percent lived in areas comprising the highest high school graduation rate areas (>93%), while 17.4% lived in the lowest (< 79%). Compared to pts living in high-income areas, pts living in the lowest income areas were more likely to be black (OR 6.2, 6.1-6.3), present at a younger age (18-30 yrs vs. >70 yrs; OR 1.28, 1.18-1.39), have T3/T4 disease at presentation (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.04), left-sided tumors (OR 1.05, 1.04-1.06), higher Charlson-Deyo score (OR 1.34, 1.33-1.36), and have Medicaid (OR: 3.9, 3.8-4.0) or no health insurance (OR: 2.9, 2.8-3.0). Tumor location and grade, stage, age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, education, insurance status, Charlson-Deyo score, and type of treatment center were independent predictors for survival in the multivariate analysis. Pts living in the lowest income and lowest education areas had a 13% and 4% higher risk of death, respectively, compared to pts in the highest income areas and education areas. Black pts had a 7% increased risk of death. Pts with Medicaid and no insurance coverage had a 44% and 29% increased risk of death, respectively, compared to pts with private insurance. Conclusions: CRC pts living in areas of low income and low education had worse survival. Insurance status and type of treatment center also have a strong impact on survival. Sociodemographic characteristics need to be taken into account and studied further, with the aim of improving outcomes for all pts. [Table: see text]