1. Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review With an Interactive Database.
- Author
-
Ovesen SH, Clausen AH, Kirkegaard H, Løfgren B, Aagaard R, Skaarup SH, Arvig MD, Lorentzen MH, Kristensen AH, Cartuliares MB, Falster C, Tong L, Rabajoli A, Leth R, Desy J, Ma IWY, and Weile J
- Subjects
- Humans, Emergency Medicine methods, Lung Diseases diagnostic imaging, Lung diagnostic imaging, Point-of-Care Systems, Ultrasonography
- Abstract
Background: This scoping review was conducted to provide an overview of the evidence of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) in emergency medicine. By emphasizing clinical topics, time trends, study designs, and the scope of the primary outcomes, a map is provided for physicians and researchers to guide their future initiatives., Research Question: Which study designs and primary outcomes are reported in published studies of LUS in emergency medicine?, Study Design and Methods: We performed a systematic search in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for LUS studies published prior to May 13, 2023. Study characteristics were synthesized quantitatively. The primary outcomes in all papers were categorized into the hierarchical Fryback and Thornbury levels., Results: A total of 4,076 papers were screened and, following selection and handsearching, 406 papers were included. The number of publications doubled from January 2020 to May 2023 (204 to 406 papers). The study designs were primarily observational (n = 375 [92%]), followed by randomized (n = 18 [4%]) and case series (n = 13 [3%]). The primary outcome measure concerned diagnostic accuracy in 319 papers (79%), diagnostic thinking in 32 (8%), therapeutic changes in 4 (1%), and patient outcomes in 14 (3%). No increase in the proportions of randomized controlled trials or the scope of primary outcome measures was observed with time. A freely available interactive database was created to enable readers to search for any given interest (https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/blinded/viz/LUSinEM_240216/INFO)., Interpretation: Observational diagnostic studies have been produced in abundance, leaving a paucity of research exploring clinical utility. Notably, research exploring whether LUS causes changes to clinical decisions is imperative prior to any further research being made into patient benefits., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: S. H. O. reports a relationship with Danish Society for Ultrasound in General Practice that includes travel reimbursement, and a relationship with USabcd that includes speaking and lecture fees. M. D. A. reports relationships with the Danish Society for Ultrasound in General Practice and the Danish Emergency Medical Conference 10 (DEMC10) that include travel reimbursement. J. W. reports a relationship with DEMC10 that includes travel reimbursement. I. W. Y. M. reports a relationship with Research Chair, the John A. Buchanan Chair in General Internal Medicine, University of Calgary that includes funding grants, relationships with the 3rd Vice President of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and with the Governor, Alberta Chapter, American College of Physicians that include board membership, and relationships with American College of Physicians, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Cornell University, University of Alberta, Sonography Canada, the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine, the Canadian Thoracic Society, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, the International Pediatric Nephrology Association, and the Canadian Rheumatology Ultrasound Society that include: speaking and lecture fees. None declared (A. H. C., H. K., B. L., R. A., M. H. L., A. H. K., M. B. C., C. F., L. T., A. R., R. L., J. D.)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF