Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between self-reported hearing handicap and life-space mobility utilizing the Life-Space Questionnaire (LSQ). Life-space mobility reflects how an individual moves through their daily physical and social environment, and the role of hearing loss in life-space mobility is not fully understood. We hypothesized that those with higher self-reported hearing handicap would be more likely to demonstrate restricted life-space mobility. Method: A total of 189 older adults ( M age = 75.76 years, SD = 5.81) completed a mail-in survey packet including the LSQ and Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE). Participants were categorized into one of three groups (“no/none,” “mild/moderate,” or “severe” hearing handicap) according to HHIE total score. LSQ responses were dichotomized to either “nonrestricted/typical” or “restricted” life-space mobility groups. Logistic regression models were performed to analyze life-space mobility differences among the groups. Results: Logistic regression results demonstrated no statistically significant association between hearing handicap and LSQ. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that there is no association between self-reported hearing handicap and life-space mobility as evaluated using a mail-in version of the LSQ. This counters other studies that have demonstrated that life space is associated with chronic illness, cognitive functioning, and social and health integration.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to examine the factors associated with long-term outcomes of postconcussive disruptive dizziness in Veterans of the post-9/11 wars. Method: For this observational cohort study, the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory–Vestibular subscale (NSI-V) score was used as an outcome measure for dizziness in 987 post-9/11 Veterans who indicated disruptive dizziness at an initial Veterans Health Administration Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation (CTBIE). An NSI-V change score was calculated as the difference in the scores obtained at the initial CTBIE and on a subsequent survey. Differences in the NSI-V change scores were examined for demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidities, and vestibular and balance function variables, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to explore associations among the variables and the NSI-V change score. Results: The majority of Veterans (61%) demonstrated a decrease in the NSI-V score, suggesting less dizziness on the survey compared with the CTBIE; 16% showed no change; and 22% had a higher score. Significant differences in the NSI-V change score were observed for traumatic brain injury (TBI) status, diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), headache and insomnia, and vestibular function. Multivariate regressions revealed significant associations between the NSI-V change score and the initial CTBIE NSI-V score, education level, race/ethnicity, TBI status, diagnoses of PTSD or hearing loss, and vestibular function. Conclusions: Postconcussive dizziness can continue for years following an injury. Factors associated with poor prognosis include TBI, diagnoses of PTSD or hearing loss, abnormal vestibular function, increased age, identification as a Black Veteran, and high school education level.

Objectives Falls are considered a significant public health issue and falls risk increases with age. There are many age-related physiologic changes that occur that increase postural instability and the risk for falls (i.e., age-related sensory declines in vision, vestibular, somatosensation, age-related orthopedic changes, and polypharmacy). Hearing loss has been shown to be an independent risk factor for falls. The primary objective of this study was to determine if hearing aid use modified (reduced) the association between self-reported hearing status and falls or falls-related injury. We hypothesized that hearing aid use would reduce the impact of hearing loss on the odds of falling and falls-related injury. If hearing aid users have reduced odds of falling compared with nonhearing aid users, then that would have an important implications for falls prevention healthcare. Design Data were drawn from the 2004-2016 surveys of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). A generalized estimating equation approach was used to fit logistic regression models to determine whether or not hearing aid use modifies the odds of falling and falls injury associated with self-reported hearing status. Results A total of 17,923 individuals were grouped based on a self-reported history of falls. Self-reported hearing status was significantly associated with odds of falling and with falls-related injury when controlling for demographic factors and important health characteristics. Hearing aid use was included as an interaction in the fully-adjusted models and the results showed that there was no difference in the association between hearing aid users and nonusers for either falls or falls-related injury. Conclusions The results of the present study show that when examining self-reported hearing status in a longitudinal sample, hearing aid use does not impact the association between self-reported hearing status and the odds of falls or falls-related injury.

PurposeFalls are considered a significant public health issue, and hearing loss has been shown to be an independent risk factor for falls. The primary objective of this study was to determine if hearing aid use modified (reduced) the association. We hypothesized that routine hearing aid use would reduce the impact of hearing loss on the odds of falling. If hearing aid users have reduced odds of falling, then that would have an important impact on falls prevention health care.MethodData from 8,091 individuals 40 years of age and older who completed National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 1999–2004 were used. NHANES comprises a series of cross-sectional studies, each of which is representative of the total civilian noninstitutionalized population of children and adults in the United States, enabling unbiased national estimates of health that can be independently reproduced. Self-reported hearing, hearing aid status, falls history, and comorbidities were extracted and analyzed using regression modeling.ResultsThe 8,091 individuals were grouped based on a self-reported history of falls in the last year. Self-reported hearing loss was significantly associated with odds of falling. Categorizing individuals based on routine hearing aid use was included as an interaction term in the fully adjusted models and was not significant, suggesting no difference in falls based on hearing aid status.ConclusionsThe unique results of the current study show that when examining self-reported hearing in a nationally representative sample, hearing aid use does not appear to mitigate or modify the association between self-reported hearing and falls. Future research designs are highlighted to address limitations identified using NHANES data for this research and focus on the use of experimental designs to further understand the association between hearing loss and falls, including whether hearing loss may be a modifiable risk factor for falls.Supplemental Materialhttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14642784

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis and low bone density (LBD) may be associated with higher risk of hearing loss, but findings are inconsistent and longitudinal data are scarce. Bisphosphonates may influence risk, but the relation has not been studied in humans. We longitudinally investigated associations of osteoporosis and LBD, bisphosphonate use, vertebral fracture (VF), hip fracture (HF), and risk of self-reported moderate or worse hearing loss. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study SETTING: The Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) (1982-2016) and Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II) (1995-2017). PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 60,821 NHS women, aged 36-61 years at baseline, and 83,078 NHS II women, aged 31-48 years at baseline (total n=143,899). MEASUREMENTS: Information on osteoporosis, LBD, bisphosphonate use, VF, HF and hearing status was obtained from validated biennial questionnaires. In a subcohort (n=3749), objective hearing thresholds were obtained by audiometry. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine independent associations between osteoporosis (NHS), osteoporosis/LBD (NHS II), and risk of hearing loss. RESULTS: The multivariable-adjusted relative risk (MVRR, 95% CI) of moderate or worse hearing loss was higher among women with osteoporosis or LBD in both cohorts. In NHS, compared with women without osteoporosis, the MVRR was 1.14 (1.09,1.19) among women with osteoporosis; in NHS II, the MVRR was 1.30 (1.21,1.40) among women with osteoporosis/LBD. The magnitude of the elevated risk was similar among women who did and did not use bisphosphonates. VF was associated with higher risk [NHS:1.31 (1.16,1.49); NHS II:1.39 (1.13,1.71)], but HF was not [NHS:1.00 (0.86,1.16);NHS II:1.15 (0.75,1.74)]. Among participants with audiometric measurements, compared with women without osteoporosis/LBD, the mean multivariable-adjusted hearing thresholds were higher (i.e. worse) among those with osteoporosis/LBD who used bisphosphonates. CONCLUSION: Osteoporosis and low bone density may be important contributors to aging-related hearing loss. Among women with osteoporosis, the risk of hearing loss was not influenced by bisphosphonate use.

To describe the impact of vestibular dysfunction on gross motor development in children with hearing loss.MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science (Clarivate), and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (EBSCO).A systematic review was reported in concordance with the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). Articles on children with hearing loss who underwent at least 1 instrumented measure of vestibular function and had gross motor milestones assessed were included. The Downs and Black checklist was used to assess risk of bias and methodological quality.Eleven articles were included in the systematic review. Three articles stratified quantitative results of gross motor milestone acquisition by severity of vestibular impairment. Over half of studies were case series published within the last 5 years. This systematic review showed that children with hearing loss and severe, bilateral vestibular dysfunction demonstrate delayed gross motor milestones. However, it was difficult to draw conclusions on whether milder forms of vestibular dysfunction significantly affect gross motor milestone acquisition in children with hearing loss. The reason is that most studies were of low to moderate quality, used different assessment methods, and contained results that were descriptive in nature.This emerging area would benefit from future research, such as higher-quality studies to assess vestibular function and gross motor milestones. This would allow for better characterization of the impacts of vestibular impairment, especially milder forms, in children with hearing loss.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of cochlear implantation on the functional integrity of the horizontal semicircular canal using multiple methodologies, and to discuss and highlight the limitations of using isolated vestibular tests to assess vestibular function in surgical ears. Methods Ten cochlear implant patients were consented to undergo a preoperative and 3‐month postoperative vestibular assessment. The horizontal semicircular canal (SCC) was assessed using three different vestibular test measures that assess function using different stimuli and at different frequencies ranges: caloric testing, sinusoidal harmonic acceleration testing in the rotary chair, and video head impulse testing in the plane of the horizontal SCC. Data was analyzed using different methods: descriptive, statistical, and by an examination of individual case studies. Results Each analysis method yielded a different interpretation. Statistical analysis showed no significant group mean differences between baseline pre‐op vestibular test results and 3‐month post‐op vestibular test results. Descriptive analysis showed 30% of individuals presented with postoperative abnormal vestibular testing findings. A case study examination showed that only one patient presented with a post‐op decrease in vestibular function in the implanted ear. Conclusions There are several limitations of conventional vestibular testing in postsurgical cochlear implant patients. A test‐battery approach, including case history, and test interpretation made on a case‐by‐case basis is needed to determine whether the patient has undergone vestibular damage, is at risk for falling, or in need of further management. Level of Evidence 2b individual cohort study., The effects of cochlear implantation on vestibular function are not fully understood as methodologies across studies vary greatly and results between studies are often in disagreement. We assessed the functional integrity of the horizontal semicircular canal pre‐ and post‐cochlear implantation using different test methods and analyzing the data from different approaches. Each analysis method yielded a different interpretation, leading us to conclude that a test‐battery approach and interpretation made on a case‐by‐case basis is needed to determine whether the patient has undergone vestibular damage, is at risk for falling, or in need of further management.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the test–retest reliability and the minimum detectable change (MDC) scores of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ). Method: A total of 77 older adults who were experienced hearing aid users were administered the LSEQ in pen–paper format on two separate occasions. They were provided the first copy of the LSEQ in the clinic to take home to complete. Those participants who completed and returned the first copy of the questionnaire were then mailed a second copy of the LSEQ to complete and return approximately 2 weeks later. The mean subscale and total scale scores from the two administrations were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) to determine test–retest reliability of the measure. The MDC scores, or the minimum difference between scores to demonstrate a real change in self-efficacy levels, were also calculated for each subscale and the total scale. Results: The ICCs ranged from 0.786 to 0.920 for the subscale and total scale scores. The MDC scores for the subscale and total scale ranged from 14.3% to 19.1%. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the LSEQ has moderate to excellent test–retest reliability. The MDC scores demonstrate that the LSEQ has the potential to detect true changes in listening self-efficacy in older patients with hearing loss who use hearing aids. The LSEQ may aid clinicians in understanding listening self-efficacy in their patients and how their self-efficacy levels change with amplification.

OBJECTIVES: Although emerging evidence suggests that hearing loss is an independent risk factor for falls, it is unclear how hearing loss may impact falls risk in adults with vestibular dysfunction and non-vestibular dizziness. The purpose of this study was to characterize the impact of hearing loss on falls in patients with vestibular dysfunction and non-vestibular dizziness relative to a group of patients without dizziness. In addition, this study aimed to evaluate whether there was an interactive effect between hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction or non-vestibular dizziness on the odds of falling. DESIGN: The authors conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 2,750 adult patients with dizziness evaluated at a tertiary care center vestibular clinic between June 1, 2015 and October 7, 2020. Only patients with available self-reported falls status, as extracted from the electronic medical record, were included. Patients were classified into the following diagnostic groups based on rotary chair testing and videonystagmography: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV, n = 255), Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction (UVH, n = 456), Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction (BVH, n = 38), Central Dysfunction (n = 208), Multiple Diagnoses (n = 109), and Dizzy, Non-Vestibular (n = 1,389). A control group of patients without dizziness (n = 295) was identified by a random sample of audiology patients. Degree of hearing loss was characterized by the 4-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of the better hearing ear. Demographic variables, comorbidities, cognitive impairment status, and falls-associated medications were extracted from the electronic medical record and included as covariates during analysis. Potential associations between PTA and falls status and possible interactions between diagnostic group and PTA were explored using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The BVH and Central Dysfunction groups had the highest rates of self-reported falls at 26.3% and 26.9% respectively. The control group had the lowest rate of self-reported falls at 6.4%. With the exception of the Multiple Diagnoses group, all diagnostic groups had elevated odds of falling compared to the control group, when adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, cognitive impairment status, and falls-associated medications. There was no significant association between degree of hearing loss and falls status (odds ratio [OR] = 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93, 1.11, p = .713) when adjusting for diagnostic group and all other covariates. Furthermore, there were no significant interactions between diagnostic group and degree of hearing loss on the odds of falling. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that hearing loss was not associated with falls in patients with vestibular dysfunction or non-vestibular dizziness, while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and falls-associated medications. There was no significant interactive effect observed between hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction or non-vestibular dizziness on the odds of falling. As previously reported, vestibular dysfunction and non-vestibular dizziness were independently associated with falls relative to a group of patients without dizziness. A population-based study utilizing more robust falls data is needed to explore a potential association between hearing loss and falls in those with vestibular dysfunction.

Purpose: This letter serves to respond to Powell et al.'s (2021) letter to the editor regarding our recent publication, "Preliminary Evidence on the Impact of Hearing Aid Use on Falls Risk in Individuals With Self-Reported Hearing Loss." In our letter, we respond to key concerns and commentary raised by the authors.

We describe preliminary results from the application of time-varying caloric vestibular stimulation (tvCVS) to volunteers during a continuous blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) acquisition, recording baseline, during-tvCVS and post-tvCVS epochs. The modifications necessary to enable the use of this novel device in a 3-Tesla magnetic field are discussed. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used as a model-free method to highlight spatially and temporally coherent brain networks. The ICA results are consistent with tvCVS induction being mediated principally by thermoconvection in the vestibular labyrinth and not by direct thermal effects. The activation of hub networks identified by ICA is consistent with the concept of sensory neuromodulation, which posits that a modulatory signal introduced to a sensory organ is able to traverse the regions innervated (directly and indirectly) by that organ, while being transformed so as to be “matched” to regional neuronal dynamics. The data suggest that regional neurovascular coupling and a systemic cerebral blood flow component account for the BOLD contrast observed. The ability to modulate cerebral hemodynamics is of significant interest. The implications of these initial findings for the use of tvCVS therapeutically are discussed.

Gulf War Illness (GWI) is a chronic condition involving symptoms across multiple body systems. Previous research has implicated the vestibular system as a potential underlying factor in the symptoms experienced by veterans with GWI, due in part to exposure to potentially ototoxic chemicals and events.To characterize the presence of vertigo and dizziness symptoms in a sample of veterans with GWI using validated self-report instruments, accounting for mental health comorbidities.This is a case series, follow-up, prospective interview of clinical veterans; results presented are purely descriptive.Our sample of 50 veterans was a follow-up to a case series of clinical Gulf War veterans evaluated at the War Related Illness and Injury Study Center.Veterans participated in a 70-min phone interview where the following questionnaires were administered: Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS), Patient Health Questionnaire (depression scale), Patient Health Questionnaire (somatization scale), Beck Anxiety Inventory, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist, Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center Traumatic Brain Injury Questionnaire, and GWI (Kansas) Questionnaire. We used descriptive (mean/median, standard deviation, interquartile range, and percentage) statistics to describe our sample and illuminate possible relationships between measures.Our primary finding is a substantial report of vertigo symptoms in our sample, according to the VSS. Ninety percent of participants scored above the VSS threshold (>12), suggesting “severe dizziness.” The most commonly endorsed symptom on the VSS was “headache or pressure in the head.”We conclude that there is significant burden of vertigo symptoms in veterans with GWI, suggesting a need for objective tests of vestibular function in this population. Furthermore, the relationship between symptoms of vertigo and dizziness, vestibular function, and PTSD warrants further exploration using objective measures.

OBJECTIVES Following the loss of vestibular function, some patients functionally improve and are minimally bothered by their loss of peripheral function while others remain more symptomatic and are unable to return to their activities of daily living. To date, the mechanisms for functional improvement remain poorly understood. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between corrective saccades and measures of handicap, dynamic visual acuity, gait, and falls. DESIGN A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who were diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral vestibular hypofunction and who also completed a baseline vestibular rehabilitation evaluation. A total of 82 patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction and 17 patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction were identified. The video head impulse test results for each patient were grouped based on the type of presenting saccades. Specifically, the saccade grouping included the following: (1) covert, (2) overt, or (3) a combination of both types of saccades. RESULTS The results show that covert saccades are associated with better performance on measures of dynamic visual acuity, gait, and balance in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Patients exhibiting overt saccades or combination of both covert and overt saccades were more often found to have an abnormal gait speed and be characterized as being at risk for falls using the Dynamic Gait Index. We observed no differences in physical function for those patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction as a function of saccade grouping. CONCLUSIONS When comparing saccade groups (covert, overt, or combination of both), patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction and covert saccades demonstrated better performance on standard baseline physical therapy measures of dynamic visual acuity and gait and balance. We did not observe any significant associations between saccade group and physical function in patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction; however, additional studies are needed with adequate sample sizes. Our findings may suggest that corrective saccade latency in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction is related to measures of physical function. The extent to which saccade latency has the potential to be a useful target for vestibular rehabilitation is still to be determined and may be promising target to improve functional outcomes.

Background The Mountain Home Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center has been diagnosing and treating veterans with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) for almost 2 decades. The clinic protocol includes a 2-week follow-up visit to determine the treatment outcome of the canalith repositioning treatment (CRT). To date, the characteristics of BPPV and treatment efficacy have not been reported in a cohort of veterans with BPPV. Purpose To determine the prevalence and characteristics of veterans diagnosed with BPPV in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center Audiology Clinic and to examine treatment outcomes. Research Design Retrospective chart review. Study Sample A total of 102 veterans who tested positive for BPPV in the Vestibular Clinic at the Mountain Home VA Medical Center from March 2010 to August 2011. Results In 102 veterans who were diagnosed with BPPV, the posterior semicircular canal was most often involved (75%), motion-provoked vertigo was the most common symptom (84%), and the majority (43%) were diagnosed with BPPV in their sixth decade. The prevalence of BPPV in the Audiology Vestibular Clinic was 15.6%. Forty-one percent of veterans reported a symptom onset within 12 months of treatment for BPPV; however, 36% reported their symptoms began > 36 months prior to treatment. CRT was effective (negative Dix–Hallpike/roll test) in most veterans (86%) following 1 treatment appointment ( M = 1.6), but more than half reported incomplete symptom resolution (residual dizziness) at the follow-up appointment. Eighteen percent of veterans experienced a recurrence ( M = 1.8 years; SD = 1.7 years). Conclusions The characteristics and treatment outcomes of BPPV in our veteran cohort was similar to what has been reported in the general population. Future work should focus on improving the timeliness of evaluation and treatment of BPPV and examining the time course and management of residual dizziness.

Objective To describe the prevalence and impact of vestibular dysfunction and nonspecific dizziness diagnoses and explore their associations with traumatic brain injury (TBI) severity, mechanism, and postconcussive comorbidities among post-9/11 veterans. Setting Administrative medical record data from the US Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs (VA). Participants Post-9/11 veterans with at least 3 years of VA care. Design Cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study. Main measures International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for TBI, vestibular dysfunction, dizziness, and other commonly associated postconcussive conditions; Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory. Results Of the 570 248 post-9/11 veterans in this sample, 0.45% had a diagnosis of vestibular dysfunction and 2.57% had nonspecific dizziness. Those with either condition were more likely to have evidence of TBI (57.11% vs 28.51%) and reported more disruption from neurobehavioral symptoms. Blast and nonblast injuries were associated with greater symptom disruption, particularly in combination. Conclusions There was a consistent, significant association between TBI and vestibular dysfunction or nonspecific dizziness, after controlling for sociodemographic factors, injury mechanism, and comorbid conditions. Given that most deployed post-9/11 veterans report blast and/or nonblast injuries, the need for prompt identification and management of these conditions and symptoms is clear.

Dizziness is a common complaint that can arise from multiple systems in the body. Objective vestibular tests are used to understand the underlying function of the vestibular system and whether or not it may be contributing to the dizziness symptoms experienced by the patient. Even when comprehensive case history is consistent with an otologic etiology, audiometric and vestibular tests are ordered to objectively characterize inner ear function to help further refine the differential diagnoses and aid in guiding treatment options. Few reports in the literature describe audiometric and vestibular results in patients with multiple concurrent otologic etiologies.This case provides a description of audiometric, vestibular, and imaging results in a case of concurrent bilateral superior canal dehiscence, right-sided vestibular schwannoma, and right-sided posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. The patient’s symptoms and laboratory findings are described in detail and, where appropriate, highlight challenges that may arise in interpretation.A case report.The patient presented for evaluation of dizziness, asymmetric hearing loss, and autophony. Comprehensive audiometric evaluation shows asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss and an air-bone gap at 250 Hz in the right ear. Vestibular evaluation shows right caloric asymmetry along with abnormal cervical vestibular– and ocular vestibular–evoked myogenic potentials, with the left ear showing results consistent with the third-window pathology.Comprehensive assessment of symptoms and critical thinking while performing testing are necessary when examining multiple concurrent otologic etiologies in a patient. Knowledge of anticipated test results and physiology may help the audiologist to synthesize results and make appropriate clinical recommendations as part of the multidisciplinary team.

IMPACT: Findings from this study will better characterize the role of hearing loss in falls risk among patients with vestibulopathy and identify groups that are most at risk for falls. OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Vestibular dysfunction and hearing loss are independent risk factors for experiencing falls. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent, if any, to which hearing loss contributes to falls in patients with concomitant vestibular dysfunction presenting to a specialty vestibular clinic. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A retrospective chart review of patients ≥18 years who underwent vestibular evaluation at our institution from June 1, 2015 to October 7, 2020 will be conducted. Patients who underwent vestibular evaluation also received audiologic evaluation and degree of hearing loss will be characterized by the 4-frequency pure-tone average (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of the better hearing ear. Falls status will be determined by the response to the following question administered at clinic-check in, ‘Have you fallen in the last 90 days?’ Demographics, comorbidities, and falls-associated medications will also be collected. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: A total of 3,265 unique patients who underwent vestibular evaluation in the study time period were identified. Patients will be categorized into discrete groups (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, unilateral hypofunction, bilateral hypofunction, central dysfunction, and normal) based on laboratory results. Regression models will be developed to evaluate the potential association between degree of hearing loss and falls in patients with different types of vestibular dysfunction, while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and falls-associated medications. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS: Findings from this study will better characterize the role of hearing loss in falls risk among patients with vestibulopathy and identify groups that are most at risk for falls. This study may potentially indicate the importance of hearing evaluation in the work-up of patients with vestibulopathy.

Background: Vestibular function (specifically, horizontal semicircular canal function) can be assessed across a broad frequency range using several different techniques. The head impulse test is a qualitative test of horizontal semicircular canal function that can be completed at bedside. Recently, a new instrument (video head impulse test [vHIT]) has been developed to provide an objective assessment to the clinical test. Questions persist regarding how this test may be used in the overall vestibular test battery. Purpose: The purpose of this case report is to describe vestibular test results (vHIT, rotational testing, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, and balance and gait performance) in an individual with a 100% unilateral caloric weakness who was asymptomatic for dizziness, vertigo or imbalance. Data Collection and/or Analysis: Comprehensive assessment was completed to evaluate vestibular function. Caloric irrigations, rotary chair testing, vHIT, and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials were completed. Results: A 100% left-sided unilateral caloric weakness was observed in an asymptomatic individual. vHIT produced normal gain with covert saccades. Conclusions: This case demonstrates the clinical usefulness of vHIT as a diagnostic tool and indicator of vestibular compensation and functional status.

The purpose of this article is to review relevant literature on the effect of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and blast injury on the vestibular system. Dizziness and imbalance are common sequelae associated with mTBI, and in some individuals, these symptoms may last for six months or longer. In war-related injuries, mTBI is often associated with blast exposure. The causes of dizziness or imbalance following mTBI and blast injuries have been linked to white matter abnormalities, diffuse axonal injury in the brain, and central and peripheral vestibular system damage. There is some evidence that the otolith organs may be more vulnerable to damage from blast exposure or mTBI than the horizontal semicircular canals. In addition, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is a common vestibular disorder following head injury that is treated effectively with canalith repositioning therapy. Treatment for (non-BPPV) mTBI-related vestibular dysfunction has focused on the use of vestibular rehabilitation (VR) augmented with additional rehabilitation methods and medication. New treatment approaches may be necessary for effective otolith organ pathway recovery in addition to traditional VR for horizontal semicircular canal (vestibulo-ocular reflex) recovery.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of triaging patients with motion-provoked dizziness into a benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) clinic. Method A retrospective chart review was performed of veterans who were tested and treated for BPPV in a triaged BPPV clinic and veterans who were tested and treated for BPPV in a traditional vestibular clinic. Results The BPPV triage clinic had a hit rate of 39%. On average, the triaged BPPV clinic reduced patient wait times by 23 days relative to the wait times for the traditional vestibular clinic while also reducing patient costs. Conclusion Triaging patients with BPPV is one method to improve access to evaluation and treatment and a mechanism for the effective use of clinic time and resources.

Dizziness is one of the most common reasons patients seek medical care, and because there are many causes of dizziness, management of these patients requires an interdisciplinary approach. Peripheral vestibular dysfunction is the most common cause of dizziness/vertigo diagnosed in specialty clinics. The purpose of this article is to present an interdisciplinary approach to the management of patients with vestibular dysfunction with a focus on the unique and overlapping contributions of audiology and physical therapy to vestibular assessment and rehabilitation.

The purpose of this study was to determine reliability of computerized dynamic visual acuity (DVA) testing and to determine reference values for younger and older adults.A primary function of the vestibular system is to maintain gaze stability during head motion. The DVA test quantifies gaze stabilization with the head moving versus stationary. Commercially available computerized systems allow clinicians to incorporate DVA into their assessment; however, information regarding reliability and normative values of these systems is sparse.Forty-six healthy adults, grouped by age, with normal vestibular function were recruited. Each participant completed computerized DVA testing including static visual acuity, minimum perception time, and DVA using the NeuroCom inVision System. Testing was performed by two examiners in the same session and then repeated at a follow-up session 3 to 14 days later. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine inter-rater and test-retest reliability.ICCs for inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.323 to 0.937 and from 0.434 to 0.909 for horizontal and vertical head movements, respectively. ICCs for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.154 to 0.856 and from 0.377 to 0.9062 for horizontal and vertical head movements, respectively. Overall, raw scores (left/right DVA and up/down DVA) were more reliable than DVA loss scores.Reliability of a commercially available DVA system has poor-to-fair reliability for DVA loss scores. The use of a convergence paradigm and not incorporating the forced choice paradigm may contribute to poor reliability.