Search

To describe first author gender differences and characteristics in 1) Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) Annual Meeting abstracts and 2) resulting manuscript publications.We performed cross-sectional evaluation of SAEM abstracts from 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020, compiling and reviewing a random sample of 100 abstracts for each year (total n = 700 abstracts). We documented abstract characteristics, including first author gender, and used the 2020 SAEM scoring rubric. We then searched PubMed to identify manuscript publications resulting from abstracts from 1990 to 2015 (n = 600). Finally, among abstracts that resulted in manuscript publication, we identified first and last author gender on both the abstracts and the resulting publication.Overall, 29% (202/695; n = 5 missing gender) of abstracts had female first authors. Female first authors increased over time (e.g., 17% in 1990 to 35% in 2020). Abstract quality scores were similar (both median [interquartile range] of 11 ([9-12]). Overall, 42% (n = 254/600) of abstracts resulted in a manuscript publication, 39% (n = 65/202) with female and 44% (n = 189/493) with male first authors (p = 0.26). The median time (IQR) from abstract to manuscript publication was longer for abstracts with female first authors vs. those with male first authors (2 [1-3] years and 1 [1, 2] years, p0.02); 77% and 78% of publications resulting from abstracts with female and male first authors, respectively, had the same first author. Female first author abstracts more often converted to a male first author manuscript publication (18%, n = 12/65) compared to male first author abstracts converting to female first author publications (7%, n = 14/189).A minority of SAEM abstracts, and manuscript publications resulting from them, had female first authors. Abstracts with female first authors took longer to achieve manuscript publication, and almost a fifth of female first author abstracts resulted in male first author manuscript publication.

Since its founding in 1989, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) has accepted thousands of abstracts for presentation at its annual meeting. We reviewed abstracts to characterize temporal changes in study design, abstract topics, quality scores, and proportion of abstracts published as manuscripts.In this serial cross-sectional study, we compiled accepted SAEM abstracts at 5-year intervals (1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020) and then randomly selected 100 abstracts from each year for review by two investigators. We documented each abstract's study design, sample size, and whether it was a single-center or multicenter study. We assigned each abstract to the most appropriate topic category. Applying SAEM's abstract scoring system from 2020, we calculated the mean overall quality score per year. Finally, we searched PubMed to determine if abstracts from 1990-2015 meetings were published as manuscripts.The number of accepted abstracts increased from 180 in 1990 to 879 in 2020 (+388%). The most common study design changed from laboratory study in 1990 (22%) to cohort study in 2020 (44%; p 0.001). The median study sample size increased over time, from 105 (interquartile range [IQR] 25-389) in 1990 to 544 (IQR 102-2067) in 2020 (p 0.001). Multicenter studies have become more common (19% in 1990 vs. 40% in 2020; p = 0.001). The most common topic categories also changed from cardiology/pulmonary/airway (40%) and orthopedic/trauma/burn (17%) in 1990 to health services research/health policy/operations (25%) and cardiology/pulmonary/airway (22%) in 2020. There was a 20% increase in overall quality scores (p 0.001). Between 37% and 49% of the abstracts reviewed from each year were later published as manuscripts, with no significant change over time (p = 0.33).Over the past 30 years, there have been significant changes to the study designs, topics, and quality scores of SAEM meeting abstracts. However, conversion of abstracts to published manuscripts remains a challenge.

The care of severely burned patients comes with unique requirements for specialized burn centers. The American Burn Association sets guidelines for burn centers and provides a voluntary program to verify their quality of care. However, not all burn centers are verified, and it is unclear which nonverified centers have met requirements set by their state health departments. To compile a complete database of all U.S. emergency departments in facilities with confirmed burn centers, we investigated state requirements to supplement data from the American Burn Association verification process. In 2020, only 13 states set requirements for burn centers; 3 states explicitly required American Burn Association verification, 4 used modified American Burn Association criteria, and 6 used alternate criteria. Only two states had separate requirements for pediatric burn centers. Based on adherence to state and American Burn Association criteria, we identified 90 confirmed burn centers in 2020, 85 of which had emergency departments. Of these 85, 45 (53%) were only verified, 17 (20%) were only state-confirmed, and 23 (27%) were both. Emergency departments in a confirmed burn center were more likely—than those without—to have higher adult and pediatric visit volumes, be academic, be a stroke or trauma (adult or pediatric) center, have a dedicated pediatric area, and have a pediatric emergency care coordinator. We compiled the first unified burn center database that incorporates state and American Burn Association lists. This database can be utilized in future health services research and is available to the public through a smartphone application.

Introduction:Millions of people visit US national parks annually to engage in recreational wilderness activities, which can occasionally result in traumatic injuries that require timely, high-level care. However, no study to date has specifically examined timely access to trauma centers from national parks. This study aimed to examine the accessibility of trauma care from national parks by calculating the travel time by ground and air from each park to its nearest trauma center. Using these calculations, the percentage of parks by census region with timely access to a trauma center was determined.Methods:This was a cross-sectional study analyzing travel times by ground and air transport between national parks and their closest adult advanced trauma center (ATC) in 2018. A list of parks was compiled from the National Parks Service (NPS) website, and the location of trauma centers from the 2018 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA database. Ground and air transport times were calculated using Google Maps and ArcGIS, with medians and interquartile ranges reported by US census region. Percentage of parks by region with timely trauma center access—defined as access within 60 minutes of travel time—were determined based on these calculated travel times.Results:In 2018, 83% of national parks had access to an adult ATC within 60 minutes of air travel, while only 26% had timely access by ground. Trauma center access varied by region, with median travel times highest in the West for both air and ground transport. At a national level, national parks were unequally distributed, with the West housing the most parks of all regions.Conclusion:While most national parks had timely access to a trauma center by air travel, significant gaps in access remain for ground, the extent of which varies greatly by region. To improve the accessibility of trauma center expertise from national parks, the study highlights the potential that increased implementation of trauma telehealth in emergency departments (EDs) may have in bridging these gaps.

Pediatric hospital care is becoming increasingly regionalized, and previous data have suggested that insurance may be associated with transfer. The aims of the study are to describe regionalization of pediatric care and density of the interhospital transfer network and to determine whether these varied by insurance status.Using the New York State ED Database and State Inpatient Database from 2016, we identified all pediatric patients and calculated regionalization indices (RI) and network density, overall and stratified by insurance. Regionalization indices are based on the likelihood of a patient completing care at the initial hospital. Network density is the proportion of actual transfers compared with the number of potential hospital transfer connections. Both were calculated using the standard State ED Database/State Inpatient Database transfer definition and in a sensitivity analysis, excluding the disposition code requirement.We identified 1,595,566 pediatric visits (emergency department [ED] or inpatient) in New York in 2016; 7548 (0.5%) were transferred and 7374 transferred visits had eligible insurance status (Medicaid, private, uninsured). Of the transfers, 24% were from ED to ED with discharge, 28% from ED to ED with admission, 31% from ED to inpatient, 16% from inpatient to inpatient, and 1.2% from inpatient to ED. The overall RI was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.20-0.31). The overall weighted RI was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.12) and was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.13) for Medicaid-insured patients, 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.11) for privately insured patients, and 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.11) for patients without insurance. The overall network density was 0.018 (95% CI, 0.017-0.020). Network density was higher, and transfer rates were lower, for patients with Medicaid insurance as compared with private insurance.We found significant regionalization of pediatric emergency care. Although there was not material variation by insurance in regionalization, there was variation in network density and transfer rates. Additional work is needed to understand factors affecting transfer decisions and how these patterns might vary by state.

Pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) are associated with pediatric readiness of emergency departments (EDs). National organizations have called for PECCs in all EDs. Although the National Pediatric Readiness Program provides a list of suggested tasks for each PECC, little is known about implementation. Our objective was to describe the role of PECCs in EDs.We analyzed data from the 2019 National ED Inventory-USA to identify EDs with PECCs in 8 states (Arkansas, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, Nebraska, New York, Vermont, and Wisconsin). We called each ED that reported having a PECC to administer a standardized survey assessing NRPP tasks, specifically quality improvement (QI), education provision, skill verification, equipment responsibilities, and how many hours the PECC devoted to the role.Of the 201 of 830 EDs (24%) that reported a PECC, 167 (83%) completed the survey, with80% response rate in each state. Of these, 153 EDs (92%) confirmed a PECC, and during the past year, 81% participated in QI initiatives, 93% provided pediatric education, 90% verified staff skills, and 90% were responsible for ensuring medications, equipment, supplies, and resources for children. The median number of hours per week that PECCs devoted to this role was 12 (interquartile range, 5-40). There was wide variation between states (eg, 50% of PECCs in Vermont participating in QI activities, as compared with 100% in Nebraska).Most PECCs report participating in the suggested National Pediatric Readiness Program tasks, although there was variation by state. Future directions for this work include assessing the association between PECC tasks and patient outcomes.

Trauma center certifications across the United States (U.S.) are not unified. Participation in the national trauma certification program established through the American College of Surgeons (ACS) is not universal, and many states maintain unique trauma certification systems with varying criteria. We investigated degree of similarity between the ACS national trauma certification program and state trauma certifications, then combined these distinct certifications into a unified national trauma center database.We performed a cross-sectional study of all non-specialty, non-federal emergency U.S. departments (EDs) open in 2018 to determine availability and levels of trauma centers. We created a "Standard" definition of trauma levels using ACS criteria as a benchmark. ACS similar trauma levels were then assigned to state levels I-III by comparing trauma receiving protocol, maximum response times, and general surgical coverage; through this process, levels across distinct systems established through different criteria were standardized.In 2018, ACS certifications spanned 47 states and DC; 3 states did not participate in ACS (Mississippi, Pennsylvania, and Washington). A distinct, non-ACS state certification system was present in 47 states and DC; 3 states had no ongoing state certification system in 2018 (Maine, Rhode Island, and Vermont). Among 5,514 US EDs open in 2018, we identified 2,132 associated with adult and pediatric trauma centers (39%) holding certification (ACS, state, or both); 1,083 (51%) were certified levels I-III, and the rest (1,049, 49%) were levels IV-V. Of the 1,083 centers with any level I-III certification, 498 (46%) held ACS certification, and 1,059 (98%) held state certification. Applying ACS-similar criteria to centers with state levels I-III (n=1,059) resulted in a level change for 124 centers (12%). Using our "Standard" definition of a trauma level based on ACS criteria, our unified level I-III database included 959 (89%) adult and pediatric centers, with 24 (3%) ACS-certified only, 461 (48%) state-certified only, and 474 (49%) certified by both.Discrepancies exist between ACS and state trauma certification systems. The differences in level I-III state criteria confirm discrepant standards for a given trauma "level" across the U.S. We combined these certifications into a unified national trauma center database available to researchers and the public.

The aim of this study was to describe our expansion of a Massachusetts grassroots initiative-to increase the appointment of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in emergency departments (EDs)-to all 6 New England states.We conducted annual surveys of all EDs in New England from 2015 to 2020 regarding 2014 to 2019, respectively. Data collection included ED characteristics. The intervention from 2018 to 2019 relied on principles of self-organization and collaboration with local stakeholders including state Emergency Medical Services for Children agencies, American College of Emergency Physician state chapters, and Emergency Nursing Association state chapters to help encourage appointment of at least 1 PECC to every ED. Most ED leadership were contacted in person at regional meetings, by e-mail and/or telephone. We reached out to each individual ED to both educate and encourage action.Survey response rates were greater than 85% in all years. From 2014 to 2016, less than 30% of New England EDs reported a PECC. In 2017, 51% of EDs in New England reported a PECC, whereas in 2019, 91% of New England EDs reported a PECC. All other ED characteristics remained relatively consistent from 2014 to 2019.We successfully expanded a Massachusetts grassroots initiative to appoint PECCs to all of New England. Through individual outreach, and using principles of self-organization and creating collaborations with local stakeholders, we were able to increase the prevalence of PECCs in New England EDs from less than 30% to greater than 90%. This framework also led to the creation of a New England-wide PECC network and has fostered ongoing collaboration and communication throughout the region.

This cross-sectional study identifies US institutions sponsoring residency programs and examines whether Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems membership is associated with institution characteristics.

Study objective There has been increasing attention to screening for health-related social needs. However, little is known about the screening practices of emergency departments (EDs). Within New England, we seek to identify the prevalence of ED screening for health-related social needs, understand the factors associated with screening, and understand how screening patterns for health-related social needs differ from those for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. Methods We analyzed data from the 2018 National Emergency Department Inventory–New England survey, which was administered to all 194 New England EDs during 2019. We used descriptive statistics to compare ED characteristics by screening practices, and multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with screening. Results Among the 166 (86%) responding EDs, 64 (39%) reported screening for at least one health-related social need, 160 (96%) for violence (including intimate partner violence or other violent exposures), 148 (89%) for substance use disorder, and 159 (96%) for mental health needs. EDs reported a wide range of social work resources to address identified needs, with 155 (93%) reporting any social worker availability and 41 (27%) reporting continuous availability. Conclusion New England EDs are screening for health-related social needs at a markedly lower rate than for violence, substance use, and mental health needs. EDs have relatively limited resources available to address health-related social needs. We encourage research on the development of scalable solutions for identifying and addressing health-related social needs in the ED.

Aim: Sepsis is a top contributor to in-hospital mortality and, healthcare expenditures and telehealth have been shown to improve short-term sepsis care in rural hospitals. This study will evaluate the effect of provider-to-provider video telehealth in rural emergency departments (EDs) on healthcare costs and long-term outcomes for sepsis patients. Materials & methods: We will use Medicare administrative claims to compare total healthcare expenditures, mortality, length-of-stay, readmissions, and category-specific costs between telehealth-subscribing and control hospitals. Results: The results of this work will demonstrate the extent to which telehealth use is associated with total healthcare expenditures for sepsis care. Conclusion: These findings will be important to inform future policy initiatives to improve sepsis care in rural EDs. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05072145 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), not all patients are admitted directly to an emergency department (ED) with 24/7/365 pPCI capabilities. This is partly due to a lack of a national system of known pPCI-capable EDs. Our objective was to create a unified, national database of confirmed 24/7/365 pPCI centers co-located in hospitals with EDs.We compiled all hospitals designated as Chest Pain Centers with Primary PCI by the American College of Cardiology's (ACC) National Clinical Data Registry (NCDR), all STEMI Receiving Centers designated by the American Heart Association's (AHA) Mission: Lifeline registry, and all state-designated pPCI-capable hospitals and designation criteria from state departments of health. We matched ACC, AHA, and state-designated facilities to those in the 2019 National ED Inventory (NEDI)-USA database to identify all EDs in pPCI-capable hospitals.Overall, 467 hospitals were recognized as Chest Pain Centers with Primary PCI by ACC, 293 hospitals were recognized as being STEMI Receiving Centers by AHA, and 827 hospitals were confirmed to be pPCI-capable by state designations and operated 24/7/365. Together, there were 1,178 EDs (21% of 5,587 total) co-located in pPCI-capable hospitals operating 24/7/365.There is substantial heterogeneity in cardiac systems of care, with large regional systems existing alongside local state-led initiatives. We created a unified national database of confirmed 24/7/365 pPCI centers co-located in hospitals with EDs. This data set will be valuable for future cardiac systems research and improving access to pPCI.

OBJECTIVES Our objective was to estimate the emergency medicine board-certified emergency physician (EMBC EP) workforce supply and demand by U.S. state. METHODS To estimate state demand, we applied the methodology from our 2005 analysis to calculate full-time equivalent (FTE) EMBC EP demand for each emergency department (ED). The 2017 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA provided visit volumes for all EDs, while the American Board of Medical Specialties supplied the 2017 number of EMBC EPs per state. Assuming that at least one EMBC EP should be present 24/7 in each ED (requiring 5.35 FTEs minimum), we calculated the total FTEs required by dividing each ED's visit volume by the estimated average visits seen by an EMBC EP (3,548 visits per year) and then summed FTEs by state. The U.S. Census Bureau provided state demographic characteristics. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association between state demographics and the density of EMBC EPs per state and compared 2017 results to our prior 2005 analysis. RESULTS There were 40,716 total EMBC EPs in 2017, fulfilling 77% of the estimated national demand. This was a substantial increase from 23,035 total EMBC EPs fulfilling 58% of demand in 2005. The 2017 supply ranged from 24% of demand in North Dakota to 142% in Hawaii. A lower density of EMBC EPs was associated with states in the Midwest and South (p

Introduction: The American Hospital Association (AHA) has hospital-level data, while the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has patient-level data. Merging these with other distinct databases would permit analyses of hospital-based specialties, units, or departments, and patient outcomes. One distinct database is the National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI), which contains information about all EDs in the United States. However, a challenge with merging these databases is that NEDI lists all US EDs individually, while the AHA and CMS group some EDs by hospital network. Consolidating data for this merge may be preferential to excluding grouped EDs. Our objectives were to consolidate ED data to enable linkage with administrative datasets and to determine the effect of excluding grouped EDs on ED-level summary results. Methods: Using the 2014 NEDI-USA database, we surveyed all New England EDs. We individually matched NEDI EDs with corresponding EDs in the AHA and CMS. A “group match” was assigned when more than one NEDI ED was matched to a single AHA or CMS facility identification number. Within each group, we consolidated individual ED data to create a single observation based on sums or weighted averages of responses as appropriate. Results: Of the 195 EDs in New England, 169 (87%) completed the NEDI survey. Among these, 130 (77%) EDs were individually listed in AHA and CMS, while 39 were part of groups consisting of 2–3 EDs but represented by one facility ID. Compared to the individually listed EDs, the 39 EDs included in a “group match” had a larger number of annual visits and beds, were more likely to be freestanding, and were less likely to be rural (all P

Objective Telemedicine is used by emergency departments (EDs) to connect patients with specialty consultation and resources not available locally. Despite its utility, uptake of telemedicine in EDs has varied. We studied characteristics associated with telemedicine adoption during a 4‐year period. Methods We analyzed data from the 2014 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)–New England survey and follow‐up data from 2016 and 2017 NEDI‐USA and 2018 NEDI‐New England surveys, with data from the Center for Connected Health Policy. Among EDs not using telemedicine in 2014, we examined characteristics associated with adoption by 2018. Results Of the 159 New England EDs with available data, 80 (50%) and 125 (79%) reported telemedicine receipt in 2014 and 2018, respectively. Among the 79 EDs without telemedicine in 2014, academic EDs were less likely to adopt by 2018 (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.46). State policy environment was not associated with likelihood of adoption. In 2018, all 7 freestanding EDs received telemedicine, whereas only 1 of 9 academic EDs (11%) did. Conclusions Telemedicine use by EDs continues to grow rapidly and by 2018, >3 quarters of EDs in our sample were receiving telemedicine. From 2014 to 2018, the initiation of telemedicine receipt was less common among higher volume and academic EDs.

The receipt of telemedicine for the management of mental illness, also known as telepsychiatry, is being adopted in emergency departments (EDs), but little is known about this approach. This study investigated the prevalence and applications of telepsychiatry in general EDs in the United States.All 5,375 U.S. EDs were surveyed to characterize emergency care in 2016. From the EDs that reported receiving telepsychiatry services, a 15% random sample was selected for a second survey that confirmed telepsychiatry use in 2017 and collected data on emergency psychiatric services and applications of telepsychiatry in each ED.The 2016 national survey (4,507 of 5,375; 84% response) showed that 885 (20%) EDs reported receiving telepsychiatry. Characteristics associated with higher likelihood of ED telepsychiatry receipt included higher annual total visit volumes, rural location, and Critical Access Hospital designation. Characteristics associated with lower likelihood of telepsychiatry receipt included being an autonomous freestanding ED. In the second survey (105 of 130; 81% response), 95 (90%) EDs confirmed telepsychiatry use. Most (59%) of these reported telepsychiatry as their ED's only form of emergency psychiatric services, and 25% received services at least once a day. The most common applications of telepsychiatry were in admission or discharge decisions (80%) and transfer coordination (76%).In 2016, 20% of EDs received telepsychiatry services, and most receiving telepsychiatry had no other emergency psychiatric services. The latter finding suggests that telepsychiatry is used to fill a critical need. Further studies are warranted to investigate barriers to implementing telepsychiatry in EDs without access to emergency psychiatric services.

Study objective Telemedicine has potential to add value to the delivery of emergency care in rural emergency departments (EDs); however, previous work suggests that it may be underused. We seek to understand barriers to telemedicine implementation in rural EDs, and to describe characteristics of rural EDs that do and do not use telemedicine. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of data from the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory survey, identifying rural EDs that did and did not use telemedicine in 2016. All rural EDs that did not use telemedicine were administered a follow-up survey asking about ED staffing, transfer patterns, and perceived barriers to telemedicine use. We used a similar instrument to survey a sample of EDs that did use telemedicine, but we replaced the question about barriers with questions related to telemedicine use. Data are presented with descriptive statistics. Results We identified 977 rural EDs responding to the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory–USA survey; 453 (46%; 95% confidence interval 43% to 50%) did not use telemedicine. Among rural nonusers, 374 EDs (83%; 95% confidence interval 79% to 86%) responded to our second survey. Of the 177 rural EDs using telemedicine that we surveyed, 153 responded (86%; 95% confidence interval 80% to 91%). Among rural EDs not using telemedicine, 235 (67%) reported that their ED, hospital, or health system leadership had considered it. Cost was the most commonly cited reason for lack of adoption (n=86; 37%). Conclusion Among US rural EDs, cost is a commonly reported barrier that may be limiting the extent of telemedicine adoption.

Background: Optimal care for patients with stroke relies on timely recognition and rapid transport to appropriate treatment, often by emergency medical services (EMS). Our primary objective was to describe EMS time intervals for patients with suspected stroke in the United States. We also sought to quantify the variation in EMS time intervals by geographic location and urbanicity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMS 9-1-1 activations (ie, calls for service) included in the 2018 and 2019 National EMS Information System datasets. We included ground or air EMS activations for a 9-1-1 scene response where a patient aged ≥18 years with suspected stroke was treated and transported by EMS. Time intervals for dispatch, response, scene, transport, and total prehospital time (ie, from dispatch to hospital arrival) were calculated, stratified by ground and air transport type. Results: A total of 410 187 activations for suspected stroke were included, of which 98% were a ground transport. The median total prehospital time for ground transports was 35 minutes (interquartile range, 27–45, 90th percentile 58). Median total prehospital time for air transports was substantially longer at 56 minutes (interquartile range, 43–70, 90th percentile 86). Times varied by Census division and urbanicity with the shortest ground total prehospital times in the East North Central division and urban areas and longest times in the East South Central and rural and frontier areas. Conclusions: Timely EMS response and transport is critical for optimizing care of patients with suspected stroke. Using a large, national dataset of EMS activations, we found variations by geographic location and urbanicity in total prehospital time for ground and air EMS activations for patients with stroke.

Backgound: In 2011, nearly 20% of Americans lacked timely access to alteplase-capable hospitals. We update this work by assessing access to stroke centers and emergency departments (EDs) with telestroke capacity. Our objectives are to identify all US EDs with acute stroke capabilities (i.e., in a confirmed stroke center or with telestroke capacity), and to characterize the proportion of the US population with access to an ED with either capacity. Methods: We used the 2019 National ED Inventory-USA to identify all US EDs and characterize stroke capabilities by hospital stroke center status (none, acute stroke ready hospital [ASRH], primary stroke center [PSC], thrombectomy-capable or comprehensive stroke center [TSC/CSC]) and telestroke capacity. We used 2020 US Census data for census block group population and centroid. For each block group, we used ArcGIS to assess whether an ED with stroke expertise was within a 60 minute (min) response and transport time by ground emergency medical services (EMS). To determine the transport time, we used data from actual EMS stroke transports using the 2019 National EMS Information System with median EMS dispatch, response, and scene times in access calculations. Results: Of 5,587 US EDs, 2,563 (46%) were in a stroke center (691 ASRH, 1,505 PSC, 367 TSC/CSC); of these, 55% also had telestroke capacity. Of the 3,024 (54%) that were not a confirmed stroke center, 36% had telestroke. We estimate that 91% of the US population is within 60 min of a confirmed stroke center by ground EMS and 96% is within 60 min of a confirmed stroke center or telestroke ED (Figure). The percentage of the population without access to a confirmed stroke center or telestroke ED varied by region, from 1% in the Middle Atlantic to 9% in the West Mountain. Conclusion: Relative to previous reports, an increasing proportion of the US population has access to acute stroke expertise. While geographic disparities in access remain, telestroke plays an important role in filling this gap.

Introduction: Prehospital recognition and rapid transport of stroke patients by emergency medical services (EMS) is critical to optimize access to time-sensitive care. We aimed to describe EMS time intervals for suspected stroke patients in the U.S. and to quantify variation in EMS time intervals by geographic location and urbanicity. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMS 9-1-1 activations (i.e., calls for service) included in the 2018 and 2019 National EMS Information System. We included ground and air EMS activations for a scene response where a patient aged ≥18 years old with suspected stroke (EMS impression of I60-I63 or G45) was treated and transported by EMS. Time intervals for dispatch, response, scene, transport, and total prehospital time were calculated, stratified by ground and air transport type. Results: A total of 415,342 activations for suspected stroke were included, of which 98% were a ground transport. The overall median total prehospital time for ground transports was 35 minutes (IQR 27-45, 90 th percentile 58; Table). Median total prehospital time for air transports was substantially longer at 56 minutes (IQR 43-70, 90 th percentile 86). Times varied by census division and urbanicity with the shortest median total prehospital time of ground transports in the East North Central division (31 min, IQR 25-40) and urban areas (34 min, IQR 27-43) and longest times in the East South Central (39 min, IQR 30-52), rural (40 min, IQR 28-56), and frontier (44 min, IQR 29-63) areas. Conclusions: With ongoing focus on optimizing time-to-treatment for acute stroke interventions, prehospital transport can be targeted for quality improvement. While some variation is expected due to geographical constraints, we found substantial variation in prehospital transport times for suspected stroke that may present opportunities for future improvement. These findings may inform health services research and policy efforts to improve stroke care access.

Stroke centers are essential for the optimal care of patients with acute stroke. However, there is no universally applied standard for stroke center certification/designation and no unified list of confirmed US stroke centers. Multiple national organizations, and some state governments, certify/designate hospitals as stroke centers of various levels, but discrepancies exist between these systems. We aimed to create a unified, easily accessible, national stroke center database.Lists of confirmed stroke centers were obtained from national certifying bodies (The Joint Commission [TJC], Det Norske Veritas, and Healthcare Facilities Accreditation Program) and each state government. Lists were reconciled to a common standard based on TJC requirements and incorporated into the 2018 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA database, which includes all emergency departments (EDs).Among 5533 US EDs, we confirmed 2446 (44%) as stroke centers, including 297 Comprehensive Stroke Centers, 14 Thrombectomy-capable Stroke Centers, 1459 Primary Stroke Centers, and 678 Acute Stroke Ready Hospitals. Compared with EDs without stroke centers, EDs with stroke centers had higher annual visit volumes, were more often academic, and were more often located in hospitals that had trauma or burn centers.We report the consolidation of multiple stroke center designation groups with varying criteria into a unified list of all confirmed US stroke centers linked to a comprehensive, national ED database. This data set will be valuable for future stroke systems research and improving access to emergency stroke care for patients. These data have the potential to further optimize the emergency care of patients with stroke.

Background Telehealth for emergency stroke care delivery (telestroke) has had widespread adoption, enabling many hospitals to obtain stroke center certification. Telehealth for pediatric emergency care has been less widely adopted. Objective Our primary objective was to determine whether differences in policy or certification requirements contributed to differential uptake of telestroke versus pediatric telehealth. We hypothesized that differences in financial incentives, based on differences in patient volume, prehospital routing policy, and certification requirements, contributed to differential emergency department (ED) adoption of telestroke versus pediatric telehealth. Methods We used the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory–USA to identify EDs that were using telestroke and pediatric telehealth services. We surveyed all EDs using pediatric telehealth services (n=339) and a convenience sample of the 1758 EDs with telestroke services (n=366). The surveys characterized ED staffing, transfer patterns, reasons for adoption, and frequency of use. We used bivariate comparisons to examine differences in reasons for adoption and use between EDs with only telestroke services, only pediatric telehealth services, or both. Results Of the 442 EDs surveyed, 378 (85.5%) indicated use of telestroke, pediatric telehealth, or both. EDs with both services were smaller in bed size, volume, and ED attending coverage than those with only telestroke services or only pediatric telehealth services. EDs with telestroke services reported more frequent use, overall, than EDs with pediatric telehealth services: 14.1% (45/320) of EDs with telestroke services reported weekly use versus 2.9% (8/272) of EDs with pediatric telehealth services (P Conclusions In 2016, more US EDs had telestroke services than pediatric telehealth services; among EDs with the technology, consults were more frequently made for stroke than for pediatric patients. The most frequently indicated reason for adoption among all EDs was related to clinical care.

BACKGROUND Telehealth for emergency stroke care delivery (telestroke) has had widespread adoption, enabling many hospitals to obtain stroke center certification. Telehealth for pediatric emergency care has been less widely adopted. OBJECTIVE Our primary objective was to determine whether differences in policy or certification requirements contributed to differential uptake of telestroke versus pediatric telehealth. We hypothesized that differences in financial incentives, based on differences in patient volume, prehospital routing policy, and certification requirements, contributed to differential emergency department (ED) adoption of telestroke versus pediatric telehealth. METHODS We used the 2016 National Emergency Department Inventory–USA to identify EDs that were using telestroke and pediatric telehealth services. We surveyed all EDs using pediatric telehealth services (n=339) and a convenience sample of the 1758 EDs with telestroke services (n=366). The surveys characterized ED staffing, transfer patterns, reasons for adoption, and frequency of use. We used bivariate comparisons to examine differences in reasons for adoption and use between EDs with only telestroke services, only pediatric telehealth services, or both. RESULTS Of the 442 EDs surveyed, 378 (85.5%) indicated use of telestroke, pediatric telehealth, or both. EDs with both services were smaller in bed size, volume, and ED attending coverage than those with only telestroke services or only pediatric telehealth services. EDs with telestroke services reported more frequent use, overall, than EDs with pediatric telehealth services: 14.1% (45/320) of EDs with telestroke services reported weekly use versus 2.9% (8/272) of EDs with pediatric telehealth services (PP=.003). CONCLUSIONS In 2016, more US EDs had telestroke services than pediatric telehealth services; among EDs with the technology, consults were more frequently made for stroke than for pediatric patients. The most frequently indicated reason for adoption among all EDs was related to clinical care.

Importance Employment in operating rooms (ORs) may involve exposure to several inhaled agents, including surgical smoke and disinfectants, which are associated with adverse respiratory health effects. However, the association of long-term employment in ORs and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unknown. Objective To examine the association of working in an OR with incidence of COPD among female nurses in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used data from the Nurses’ Health Study for US female registered nurses who provided information on questionnaires regarding OR employment history in 1984 and job type in 1982 and who had no history of COPD in 1984 (baseline). Data analyses were conducted from April 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021. Exposures Duration of nursing in the OR and job type. Main Outcomes and Measures The associations of any employment as an OR nurse, duration of employment, and duration and job type with incidence of self-reported, physician-diagnosed COPD. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by age and calendar year. Models were adjusted for covariates, with model 1 adjusting for age, model 2 also adjusting for cigarette smoking status and pack-year of smoking, and model 3 also adjusting for race and ethnicity, US Census region, and body mass index. Results Among 75 011 female nurses included in the analyses, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 50.5 (7.2) years; 29% had a history of employment in an OR, and 3% had 15 or more years of OR experience. In model 3, employment in an OR for 15 or more years was associated with a 46% increased risk of developing COPD compared with no history of OR employment (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.10-1.93). Compared with nurses who never worked in an OR and had an administrative or nursing education function or a nonnursing job in 1982, the risk of developing COPD was greater among nurses who provided outpatient care (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47) and nurses employed in inpatient units (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.59) who had no history of OR employment and was 69% greater among nurses with OR experience of 15 years or more (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.25-2.28). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, OR employment of 15 years or more was associated with an increased risk of developing COPD among female nurses. Additional studies with more recent and direct environmental monitoring data of multiple occupational exposures are needed to assess the relative role of exposure to surgical smoke and disinfectants in the observed association.

Objective Health services research on the differences in care between pediatric and general emergency departments (EDs) is limited by ambiguity regarding the definition of a pediatric ED. Our goal was to determine the proportion of EDs captured by commonly used definitions of pediatric ED. Methods We linked data for 2016 from two databases from New York State – the State Emergency Department Database and State Inpatient Database (SEDD/SID) and the National Emergency Department Inventory‐USA (NEDI‐USA). We examined the following 4 common definitions of pediatric ED: (1) admission capability, (2) physically distinct pediatric area in the ED, (3) membership in the Children's Hospital Association, and (4) volume of pediatric ED visits (patients

International audience; Background: Exposure to disinfectants among healthcare workers has been associated with respiratory health effects, in particular, asthma. However, most studies are cross-sectional and the role of disinfectant exposures in asthma development requires longitudinal studies. We investigated the association between occupational exposure to disinfectants and incident asthma in a large cohort of U.S. female nurses. Methods: The Nurses’ Health Study II is a prospective cohort of 116 429 female nurses enrolled in 1989. Analyses included 61 539 participants who were still in a nursing job and with no history of asthma in 2009 (baseline; mean age: 55 years). During 277 744 person-years of follow-up (2009-2015), 370 nurses reported incident physician-diagnosed asthma. Occupational exposure was evaluated by questionnaire and a Job-Task-Exposure Matrix (JTEM). We examined the association between disinfectant exposure and subsequent asthma development, adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, smoking status, and body mass index. Results: Weekly use of disinfectants to clean surfaces only (23% exposed) or to clean medical instruments (19% exposed) was not associated with incident asthma (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] for surfaces, 1.12 [0.87-1.43]; for instruments, 1.13 [0.87-1.48]). No association was observed between high-level exposure to specific disinfectants/cleaning products evaluated by the JTEM (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, bleach, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol quats, or enzymatic cleaners) and asthma incidence. Conclusions: In a population of late career nurses, we observed no significant association between exposure to disinfectants and asthma incidence. A potential role of disinfectant exposures in asthma development warrants further study among healthcare workers at earlier career stage to limit the healthy worker effect.

Awareness about food allergy and food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA) has increased dramatically over the past decade. It remains unclear, however, whether concordance with guidelines for FIA management has improved over time.Our objective was to describe changes in emergency department (ED) concordance with guidelines for FIA management.We analyzed data from 2 multicenter retrospective studies of patients with food-related acute allergic reactions seen in 1 of 17 EDs during 2 time periods: 1999 to 2001 and 2013 to 2015. Visits were identified similarly across years-for example, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 693.1, 995.60, 995.61-995.69, 995.0, and 995.3. Anaphylaxis was defined as an acute allergic reaction with involvement of 2+ organ systems or hypotension. We compared concordance between time periods for 4 guideline recommendations: (1) treatment with epinephrine, (2) discharge prescription for an epinephrine autoinjector (EAI), (3) referral to an allergist/immunologist, and (4) instructions to avoid offending allergen.We compared 290 patients with FIA during 1999 to 2001 and 459 during 2013 to 2015. Any treatment with epinephrine (pre-ED or in the ED) for patients with FIA increased over time (38% vs 56%; P.001). Prescriptions for EAI at discharge (24% vs 54%; P.001) and documentation for referral to an allergist/immunologist (14% vs 24%; P = .001) approximately doubled, whereas instructions to avoid the offending allergen did not change significantly (37% vs 43%; P = .08). Receipt of 3+ guideline recommendations remained low but almost quadrupled over the study interval (6% vs 23%; P.001).Over the nearly 15-year study interval, we observed clinically and statistically significant increases in ED concordance with epinephrine-related guidelines for FIA. Management gaps remain and interventions to standardize care still appear warranted.

Objective Telemedicine has the potential to improve the delivery of emergency medical care: however, the extent of its adoption in United States (US) emergency departments is not known. Our objective was to characterise the prevalence of telemedicine use among all US emergency departments, describe clinical applications for which it is most commonly used, and identify emergency department characteristics associated with its use. Methods As part of the National Emergency Department Inventory-USA survey, we queried all 5375 US emergency departments open in 2016. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified characteristics associated with emergency department receipt of telemedicine services. Results Overall, 4507 emergency departments (84%) responded to our survey, with 4031 responding to both telemedicine questions (75%). Although 1694 emergency departments (42%) reported no telemedicine in 2016, most did: 1923 (48%) emergency departments received telemedicine services, 149 (4%) emergency departments received telemedicine services and were in hospitals that provided telemedicine, and 265 emergency departments (7%) did not receive telemedicine but were in hospitals that provided telemedicine services. Among emergency departments receiving telemedicine, the most common applications were stroke/neurology (76%), psychiatry (38%), and paediatrics (15%). In multivariable analysis, telemedicine-receiving emergency departments had higher annual total visit volume for adults and lower annual total visit volume by children; were less likely to be academic or freestanding; and varied by region. In multivariable analysis, emergency departments in telemedicine-providing hospitals had higher annual total visit volume for adults and children, were more likely to be academic and were less likely to be freestanding. Conclusion In 2016, telemedicine was used in most US emergency departments (58%), especially for stroke/neurology and psychiatry. Future research is needed to understand the value of telemedicine for different clinical applications, and the barriers to its implementation.

Importance Given the mortality disparities among children and adolescents in rural vs urban areas, the unique health care needs of pediatric patients, and the annual emergency department volume for this patient population, understanding the availability of pediatric emergency physicians (EPs) is important. Information regarding the available pediatric EP workforce is limited, however. Objective To describe the demographic characteristics, training, board certification, and geographic distribution of the 2020 clinically active pediatric EP workforce in the US. Design, setting, and participants This national cross-sectional study of the 2020 pediatric EP workforce used the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile database, which was linked to American Board of Medical Specialties board certification information. Self-reported training data in the database were analyzed to identify clinically active physicians who self-reported pediatric emergency medicine (EM) as their primary or secondary specialty. The Physician Masterfile data were obtained on March 11, 2020. Main outcomes and measures The Physician Masterfile was used to identify all clinically active pediatric EPs in the US. The definition of EM training was completion of an EM program (inclusive of both an EM residency and/or a pediatric EM fellowship) or a combined EM program (internal medicine and EM, family medicine and EM, or pediatrics and EM). Physician location was linked and classified by county-level Urban Influence Codes. Pediatric EP density was calculated and mapped using US Census Bureau population estimates. Results A total of 2403 clinically active pediatric EPs were working in 2020 (5% of all clinically active emergency physicians), of whom 1357 were women (56%) and the median (interquartile range) age was 46 (40-55) years. The overall pediatric EP population included 1718 physicians (71%) with EM training and 641 (27%) with pediatric training. Overall, 1639 (68%) were board certified in pediatric EM, of whom 1219 (74%) reported EM training and 400 (24%) reported pediatrics training. Nearly all pediatric EPs worked in urban areas (2369 of 2402 [99%]), and pediatric EPs in urban compared with rural areas were younger (median [interquartile range] age, 46 [40-55] years vs 59 [48-65] years). Pediatric EPs who completed their training 20 years ago or more compared with those who completed training more recently were less likely to work in urban settings (633 [97%] vs 0-4 years: 440 [99%], 5-9 years: 547 [99%], or 10-19 years: 723 [99%]; P = .006). Three states had 0 pediatric EPs (Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming), and 3 states had pediatric EPs in only 1 county (Alaska, New Mexico, and North Dakota). Less than 1% of counties had 4 or more pediatric EPs per 100 000 population. Conclusions and relevance This study found that almost all pediatric EPs worked in urban areas, leaving rural areas of the US with limited availability of pediatric emergency care. This finding may have profound implications for children and adolescents needing emergency care.

Background: Emergency care is an essential part of a health system. Ecuador has recognized emergency medicine as a specialty and has two emergency medicine residency training programs. However, little has been published about emergency department characteristics and capabilities in Ecuador. Objective: We described the characteristics and capabilities of emergency departments (EDs) in Quito, Ecuador, in 2017, using the National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI) survey. Methods: The 23-item survey included questions pertaining to ED characteristics, including: visit volume, physical and administrative structure, clinical capabilities, technological resources, and consult personnel availability. This study included all EDs in Quito operating 24 hours/day, 7 days/week, and serving all patients seeking care. One representative from each ED was asked to complete the survey based on calendar year 2017. Findings: Thirty EDs met the inclusion criteria, and 26 completed the survey (87% response). The median number of ED beds was 17 (range 2–61). Median annual visit volume was 22,580 (range 1,680 to 129,676). All but two EDs provided care for both children and adults. Cardiac monitors were available in 88% of EDs, CT scanners in 68%, and rooms for respiratory isolation in 31%. Most EDs could manage patients with general medicine (92%), general surgery (92%), and gynecology (88%) emergencies 24/7. Fewer were able to provide hand surgery (45%) and dental (28%) care 24/7. Typical length of stay was 1–6 hours in 65% and >6 hours in 31% of EDs. Half of EDs reported operating at full capacity and 27% reported operating over their capacity. When compared to private EDs, government EDs (public and social security) had a higher mean number of visits per year (50,090 government vs. 13,968 private, p < 0.001), higher mean number of ED beds (36 government vs. 9 private, p = 0.002), and higher length of stay (58% of patient stays > 6 hours in government EDs vs. 86% of patient stays 1–6 hours in private EDs, p = 0.009). Conclusions: EDs in Quito varied widely with respect to annual visit volume, ability to treat different pathologies 24/7, and resources. Most EDs are functioning at or over capacity, and a substantial number have long lengths of stay. Further research and investment in emergency care could help increase the capacity and efficiency of EDs in Ecuador.

Background: Most data on spoke emergency departments (EDs) using telestroke come from single academic hub-and-spoke networks. Our objective was to describe characteristics of EDs using telestroke in a national sample. Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of 366 EDs among those who self-identified as using telestroke on the 2016 National ED Inventory (NEDI)-USA, which goes to all US EDs. Surveys were mailed to ED directors, with follow-up phone calls to non-responders. The survey characterized ED staffing, transfer patterns, in-person consultant availability, alteplase use, and frequency of telestroke consultations. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results: Of the 4,410 EDs responding to the NEDI-USA telemedicine question, 1,824 (41%) reported using telestroke. Compared to non-surveyed telestroke EDs (n=1458), the 366 surveyed EDs had lower annual ED visit volume, and were more often rural and critical access hospitals. Of these, 320 (91%) affirmed use of telestroke on our secondary survey. Many were rural (n=157, 49%); few were academic (n=4, 1%). Only 132 EDs (41%) reported that > 80% of attending physicians were board certified or board eligible in emergency medicine. Joint Commission Stroke Center certification was reported by 101 EDs (32%) and alternative certification by another 53 (17%). Fifty-two EDs (16%) reported availability of an in-person neurologist, with 32 (10%) available within 30 minutes, and 29 (9%) available 24/7. Frequency of telestroke consultation varied (Figure). Most EDs administered alteplase in the past year (n=261, 82%); some reported alteplase administration without telestroke consultation (n=94, 30%). EDs frequently admitted TIA and stroke patients without thrombolysis (78% and 55% respectively), but fewer (24%) admitted alteplase-treated patients. Conclusions: Telestroke is frequently used in US EDs. Of those surveyed, many had non-emergency medicine attending staffing and use the technology regularly.