Search

Integrated water resources management is one of the major bottom-up alternatives that emerged during the 1980s in North America as part of the trend towards more holistic and participatory styles of environmental governance. It aims to protect surface and groundwater resources by focusing on the integrated and collaborative management of land and water resources and interests on a watershed basis. In this paper, we draw on the policy network perspective on governance to shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of watershed-based processes of collaboration and integration for water quality protection in agricultural areas. The policy network perspective focuses on the interaction of actors, institutions and ideas within and among policy sectors to capture the intricacies of the policy process in increasingly complex and fragmented societies. Empirically, this study is based on the analysis of agro-environmental strategies for water quality protection in the Province of Ontario over the last 15 years. The contamination of a rural municipal well in Ontario in 2000, with its tragic consequences, translated into an ongoing pluralistic debate and strong attempts to fundamentally change the provincial policy style for addressing drinking water threats, especially agricultural pollution. Based on our analysis, we suggest that meaningful scales for collaboration and integration of land and water resources and interests at the local level, from the point of view of Ontario's agricultural policy network, do not currently include the watershed. We conclude that, instead of forcing watershed-based governance structures, the exploration and examination of more creative and flexible ways of linking watershed imperatives to existing socially and politically meaningful scales in agricultural areas of Ontario and elsewhere is warranted.

The article supports strengthening the role of local watershed authorities in groundwater resource management, as they are well positioned to identify needs and trends and facilitate cooperation and communication within their specific regions.

THE Great Lakes shoreline is a significant, complex, and dynamic natural resource system providing opportunities for recreational, residential, commercial, and industrial development. Including connecting channels and islands, the Great Lakes [...]

Using the location, data, and water levels from flood events along the Canadian shore of the Great Lakes, flood damage thresholds were determined to identify and compare water levels at which static and storm-induced high water impact shoreline interests on several shore reaches of Lakes Erie, Huron, Ontario, and St. Clair. Spatial differences identified may be related to several factors, including: 1) nearshore bathymetries; 2) extent of residential development along low-lyingshorelines; 3) degree of riparian adjustment to flooding; and 4) location relative to dominant wind or storm directions. Correlation analyses found that flood damage levels are more closely correlated to fluctuations in static levels on Lakes Ontario, Huron, and St. Clair, while flood damage levels are more closely correlated to maximum instantaneous water levels on Lake Erie. Correlation analyses of individual gauge data identified locations possibly more susceptible to storm surges. A conservative approach to determining flood damage thresholds is suggested, being based on a standard deviation below the mean ofmaximum instantaneous flood levels for a given gauge. The standard deviation threshold, while lower than current "critical levels" used in management, is more representative of the majority of flood damage levels than thresholds based on lowest maximum instantaneous lake levels. However, caution is urged in applying any critical level solely based on water level gauge information as Great Lakes flooding is a highly site-specific phenomenon influenced by meteorologic factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]