161 results on '"Krepler C"'
Search Results
2. A-458 - InterPATH-001 trial in progress: Adjuvant V940 (mRNA-4157) with pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with high-risk stage II-IV melanoma
- Author
-
Weber, J.S., Luke, J.J., Carlino, M.S., Khattak, M.A., Meehan, R., Brown, M., Zhang, J., Krepler, C., Duic, J.P., and Long, G.V.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. 76P Safety profile of adjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and renal cell carcinoma (RCC): Pooled analysis of phase III clinical trials
- Author
-
Luke, J.J., primary, Long, G.V., additional, Robert, C., additional, Carlino, M.S., additional, Choueiri, T.K., additional, Haas, N.B., additional, O'Brien, M.E.R., additional, Paz-Ares, L., additional, Peters, S., additional, Powles, T.B., additional, Leiby, M.A., additional, Lin, J., additional, Zhao, Y., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Perini, R.F., additional, Pietanza, M.C., additional, Samkari, A., additional, Gruber, T., additional, Ibrahim, N., additional, and Eggermont, A.M.M., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Survie sans métastases à distance avec pembrolizumab versus placebo en traitement adjuvant du mélanome de stade IIB ou IIC : étude de phase III KEYNOTE-716
- Author
-
Grob, J.J., primary, Long, G., additional, Luke, J., additional, Khattac, A., additional, Merino, L. De La Cruz, additional, Del Vecchio, M., additional, Rutkowski, P., additional, Spagnolo, F., additional, Mackiewicz, J., additional, Chiarion-Sileni, V., additional, Kirkwood, J.M., additional, Robert, C., additional, De Galitiis, F., additional, Schadendorf, D., additional, Carlino, M.S., additional, Wu, X.L., additional, Kalabis, M., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Eggermont, A., additional, and Ascierto, P.A., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. LBA44 Pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: Long-term quality of life analysis results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blinded phase III trial
- Author
-
Bottomley, A., primary, Kicinski, M., additional, Long, G.V., additional, Mandala, M., additional, Atkinson, V.G., additional, Blank, C.U., additional, Haydon, A.M., additional, Dalle, S., additional, Khattak, A., additional, Carlino, M.S., additional, Meshcheryakov, A., additional, Sandhu, S.K., additional, Sarda, S.S. Puig, additional, Coens, C., additional, Suciu, S., additional, Grebennik, D., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Lorigan, P., additional, Robert, C., additional, and Eggermont, A.M.M., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. 1095P Pembrolizumab versus placebo after a complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: 7-year results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blind phase III trial
- Author
-
Eggermont, A.M.M., Kicinski, M., Blank, C.U., Mandalà, M., Long, G.V., Atkinson, V.G., Dalle, S., Haydon, A.M., Meshcheryakov, A., Khattak, M.A., Carlino, M.S., Sandhu, S.K., Puig Sarda, S., Ascierto, P.A., Lorigan, P., Grebennik, D., Krepler, C., Marreaud, S.I., Suciu, S., and Robert, C.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. 1083P KEYMAKER 02B: A randomized trial of pembrolizumab (pembro) alone or with investigational agents as first-line treatment for advanced melanoma
- Author
-
Dummer, R., Shapira, R., Pigozzo, J., Ascierto, P.A., Gaudy Marqueste, C., Portnoy, D., Del Vecchio, M., Bar-Sela, G., Cohen, J.E., Di Giacomo, A.M., Ribas, A., Dutriaux, C., Belli, C., Cohen, G., Dokhan, R., Jing, N., Lal, R., Krepler, C., and Long, G.V.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. 1078MO Pembrolizumab (pembro) vs placebo as adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II melanoma: Long-term follow-up, rechallenge, and crossover in KEYNOTE-716
- Author
-
Luke, J.J., Ascierto, P.A., Khattak, M.A., Rutkowski, P., Del Vecchio, M., Spagnolo, F., Mackiewicz, J., Cruz Merino, L. de la, Chiarion Sileni, V., Kirkwood, J.M., Robert, C., Schadendorf, D., De Galitiis, F., Carlino, M.S., Odeleye-Ajakaye, A., Kalabis, M., Krepler, C., Eggermont, A.M.M., and Long, G.V.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. 1082O KEYMAKER-U02 substudy 02C: Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (pembro) and investigational agents followed by adjuvant pembro for stage IIIB-D melanoma
- Author
-
Long, G.V., Robert, C., Hill, A.G., Gaudy Marqueste, C., Portnoy, D., Shapira, R., Cohen, J.E., Khattak, M.A., Lebbe, C., Menzies, A.M., Markel, G., Bar-Sela, G., Sharfman, W.H., Pages, C., Hamid, O., Mehnert, J.M., Jing, N., Kalabis, M., Krepler, C., and Dummer, R.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. A stress-induced early innate response causes multidrug tolerance in melanoma
- Author
-
Ravindran Menon, D, Das, S, Krepler, C, Vultur, A, Rinner, B, Schauer, S, Kashofer, K, Wagner, K, Zhang, G, Bonyadi Rad, E, Haass, N K, Soyer, H P, Gabrielli, B, Somasundaram, R, Hoefler, G, Herlyn, M, and Schaider, H
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. MEK inhibition affects STAT3 signaling and invasion in human melanoma cell lines
- Author
-
Vultur, A, Villanueva, J, Krepler, C, Rajan, G, Chen, Q, Xiao, M, Li, L, Gimotty, P A, Wilson, M, Hayden, J, Keeney, F, Nathanson, K L, and Herlyn, M
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. A stress-induced early innate response causes multidrug tolerance in melanoma
- Author
-
Menon, Ravindran D, Das, S, Krepler, C, Vultur, A, Rinner, B, Schauer, S, Kashofer, K, Wagner, K, Zhang, G, Rad, Bonyadi E, Haass, N K, Soyer, H P, Gabrielli, B, Somasundaram, R, Hoefler, G, Herlyn, M, and Schaider, H
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. 1048P Baseline and post-treatment biomarkers of resistance to anti-PD-1 (aPD1) therapy in acral and mucosal melanoma
- Author
-
Lee, J., primary, Liu, X.Q., additional, Zhao, Q., additional, Kim, K-M., additional, Kim, S.T., additional, Sun, Y., additional, Yearley, J., additional, Choudhury, T., additional, Webber, A., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Cristescu, R., additional, and Shui, I., additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): health-related quality-of-life results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial
- Author
-
Bottomley, A., Coens, C., Mierzynska, J., Blank, C. U., Mandalà, M., Long, G. V., Atkinson, V. G., Dalle, S., Haydon, A. M., Meshcheryakov, A., Khattak, A., Carlino, M. S., Sandhu, S., Puig, S., Ascierto, P. A., Larkin, J., Lorigan, P. C., Rutkowski, P., Schadendorf, D., Koornstra, R., Hernandez-Aya, L., Di Giacomo, A. M., van den Eertwegh, A. J. M., Grob, J. -J., Gutzmer, R., Jamal, R., van Akkooi, A. C. J., Krepler, C., Ibrahim, N., Marreaud, S., Kicinski, M., Suciu, S., Robert, C., Eggermont, A. M. M., EORTC Melanoma Group, Lesimple, T., Maio, M., Linette, G., Mortier, L., Svane, I. M., Schachter, J., Brown, M., Hersey, P., Barrow, C., Kudchadkar, R., Dutriaux, C., Song, X., Quaglino, P., Queirolo, P., Meier, F., Stroyakovskiy, D., Guillot, B., Romero, P. L. O., Bastholt, L., Garbe, C., Grange, F., Mohr, P., Algazi, A., Bechter, O., Hernberg, M., Loquai, C., Meiss, F., Chiarion Sileni, V., Bar-Sela, G., Fitzharris, B., Saiag, P., Arnault, J. -P., Simon, J. -C., Stephens, R., Baurain, J. -F., Lebbe, C., Combemale, P., Dummer, R., Hauschild, A., Parente, P., Yamazaki, N., Milhem, M., Leccia, M. -T., Geoffrois, L., Kretschmer, L., Dunwoodie, E., Walker, J., Lotem, M., Hendler, D., Mackiewicz, A., Sekulovic, L., Dzienis, M., Hospers, G. A. P., Siano, M., Hassel, J., Corrie, P., Passos, M. -J., Levin, M., Hoeller, C., Machet, L., Hallmeyer, S., Waterston, A., Descamps, V., Kiecker, F., Aarts, M., Schmidt, H., Raimundo, A., Nyakas, M., Lacour, J. -P., Berking, C., Ferrucci, P. F., Jameson, M., Kim, K., Yokota, K., Kerger, J., Aubin, F., Groenewegen, G., Kapiteijn, H., Boehncke, W. -H., Utikal, J., Casasola, R., Marshall, E., Ferraresi, V., Richtig, E., Matkovic, S., Inozume, T., Crook, T., Mcneil, C., Kiyohara, Y., Avril, M. -F., Hein, R., Terheyden, P., Nathan, P., Aoi, J., Skytta, T., Jouary, T., Takenouchi, T., Straume, O., Martins, C., Mukhametshina, G., Boehncke, Wolf-Henning, Internal medicine, CCA - Cancer Treatment and quality of life, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [Bruxelles] (EORTC), European Cancer Organisation [Bruxelles] (ECCO), Ospedale 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' = University Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia', The University of Sydney, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, University of Queensland [Brisbane], Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon], Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (UNICANCER/CRCL), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Edith Cowan University (ECU), Universitat de Barcelona (UB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust [Manchester, Royaume-Uni], Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology (MCMCC), Radboud University Medical Center [Nijmegen], Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Washington University in Saint Louis (WUSTL), University Hospital of Siena, Amsterdam UMC - Amsterdam University Medical Center, Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] (TIMONE), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le Cancer (FNCLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hannover Medical School [Hannover] (MHH), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Université de Montréal (UdeM), Merck & Co. Inc, AP-HP. Université Paris Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), University Medical Center [Utrecht], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Université de Montpellier (UM), Merck Sharp & Dohme., and Guided Treatment in Optimal Selected Cancer Patients (GUTS)
- Subjects
Male ,Skin Neoplasms ,Medizin ,Skin Neoplasms / drug therapy ,Pembrolizumab ,law.invention ,Cancer development and immune defence Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 2] ,MESH: Aged, 80 and over ,0302 clinical medicine ,Melanoma / pathology ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Monoclonal ,80 and over ,Clinical endpoint ,MESH: Double-Blind Method ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Humanized ,Melanoma ,MESH: Aged ,ddc:616 ,Aged, 80 and over ,education.field_of_study ,MESH: Middle Aged ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ,Neoplasm Staging ,Quality of Life ,Double-Blind Method ,Adult ,Aged ,Middle aged ,Humans [MeSH] ,Hazard ratio ,MESH: Neoplasm Staging ,Middle Aged ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Humans ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Melanoma / psychology ,Skin Neoplasms / psychology ,MESH: Melanoma ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized / therapeutic use ,Population ,[SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer ,Placebo ,Antibodies ,Melanoma / mortality ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Adjuvant therapy ,education ,Skin Neoplasms / pathology ,MESH: Humans ,Melanoma / drug therapy ,business.industry ,MESH: Skin Neoplasms ,MESH: Quality of Life ,MESH: Adult ,Skin Neoplasms / mortality ,MESH: Male ,Clinical trial ,MESH: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ,business ,MESH: Female - Abstract
Background: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 trial in patients with resected, high-risk stage III melanoma demonstrated improved recurrence-free survival with adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo (hazard ratio 0·57 [98·4% CI 0·43-0·74]; pMethods: This double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 123 academic centres and community hospitals across 23 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated histologically confirmed stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC resected cutaneous melanoma, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or 0 were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a central interactive voice-response system on the basis of a minimisation technique stratified for stage and geographic region to receive intravenously 200 mg pembrolizumab or placebo. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks for 1 year, or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint of the trial was recurrence-free survival (reported elsewhere). HRQOL was a prespecified exploratory endpoint, with global health/quality of life (GHQ) over 2 years measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 as the primary analysis. Analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362594, and EudraCT, 2014-004944-37, and long-term follow-up is ongoing.Findings: Between Aug 26, 2015, and Nov 14, 2016, 1019 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n=514) or placebo (n=505). Median follow-up was 15·1 months (IQR 12·8-16·9) at the time of this analysis. HRQOL compliance was greater than 90% at baseline, greater than 70% during the first year, and greater than 60% thereafter for both groups. Because of low absolute compliance numbers at later follow-up, the analysis was truncated to week 84. Baseline GHQ scores were similar between groups (77·55 [SD 18·20] in the pembrolizumab group and 76·54 [17·81] in the placebo group) and remained stable over time. The difference in average GHQ score between the two groups over the 2 years was -2·2 points (95% CI -4·3 to -0·2). The difference in average score during treatment was -1·1 points (95% CI -3·2 to 0·9) and the difference in average score after treatment was -2·2 points (-4·8 to 0·4). These differences are within the 5-point clinical relevance threshold for the QLQ-C30 and are therefore clinically non-significant.Interpretation: Pembrolizumab does not result in a clinically significant decrease in HRQOL compared with placebo when given as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, high-risk stage III melanoma. These results support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in this setting. placebo when given as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, high-risk stage III melanoma. These results support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in this setting. placebo when given as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, high-risk stage III melanoma. These results support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in this setting.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Reply to E. Hindié
- Author
-
Eggermont, A.M., Blank, C.U., Mandala, M., Long, G.V., Atkinson, V.G., Dalle, S., Haydon, A.M., Meshcheryakov, A., Khattak, A., Carlino, M.S., Sandhu, S., Larkin, J., Puig, S., Ascierto, P.A., Rutkowski, P., Schadendorf, D., Koornstra, R.H., Hernandez-Aya, L., Giacomo, A.M. Di, Eertwegh, A.J. van den, Grob, J.J., Gutzmer, R., Jamal, R., Lorigan, P.C., Akkooi, A.C. van, Krepler, C., Ibrahim, N., Marreaud, S., Kicinski, M., Suciu, S., Robert, C., Eggermont, A.M., Blank, C.U., Mandala, M., Long, G.V., Atkinson, V.G., Dalle, S., Haydon, A.M., Meshcheryakov, A., Khattak, A., Carlino, M.S., Sandhu, S., Larkin, J., Puig, S., Ascierto, P.A., Rutkowski, P., Schadendorf, D., Koornstra, R.H., Hernandez-Aya, L., Giacomo, A.M. Di, Eertwegh, A.J. van den, Grob, J.J., Gutzmer, R., Jamal, R., Lorigan, P.C., Akkooi, A.C. van, Krepler, C., Ibrahim, N., Marreaud, S., Kicinski, M., Suciu, S., and Robert, C.
- Abstract
Item does not contain fulltext
- Published
- 2021
16. Crossover and rechallenge with pembrolizumab in recurrent patients from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 phase III trial, pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma
- Author
-
Eggermont, AMM, Meshcheryakov, A, Atkinson, V, Blank, CU, Mandala, M, Long, G, Barrow, C, Di Giacomo, AM, Fisher, R, Sandhu, S, Kudchadkar, R, Romero, PLO, Svane, IM, Larkin, J, Puig, S, Hersey, P, Quaglino, P, Queirolo, P, Stroyakovskiy, D, Bastholt, L, Mohr, P, Hernberg, M, Chiarion-Sileni, V, Strother, M, Hauschild, A, Yamazaki, N, van Akkooi, AC, Lorigan, P, Krepler, C, Ibrahim, N, Marreaud, S, Kicinski, M, Suciu, S, Robert, C, Eggermont, AMM, Meshcheryakov, A, Atkinson, V, Blank, CU, Mandala, M, Long, G, Barrow, C, Di Giacomo, AM, Fisher, R, Sandhu, S, Kudchadkar, R, Romero, PLO, Svane, IM, Larkin, J, Puig, S, Hersey, P, Quaglino, P, Queirolo, P, Stroyakovskiy, D, Bastholt, L, Mohr, P, Hernberg, M, Chiarion-Sileni, V, Strother, M, Hauschild, A, Yamazaki, N, van Akkooi, AC, Lorigan, P, Krepler, C, Ibrahim, N, Marreaud, S, Kicinski, M, Suciu, S, and Robert, C
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the phase III double-blind European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial, pembrolizumab improved recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma with complete resection of lymph nodes. In the pembrolizumab group, the incidence of grade I-V and of grade III-V immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 37% and 7%, respectively. METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive intravenous (i.v.) pembrolizumab 200 mg (N = 514) or placebo (N = 505) every 3 weeks, up to 1 year. On recurrence, patients could enter part 2 of the study: pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks up to 2 years, for crossover (those who received placebo) or rechallenge (those who had recurrence ≥6 months after completing 1-year adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy). For these patients, we present the safety profile and efficacy outcomes. RESULTS: At the clinical cut-off (16-Oct-2020), in the placebo group, 298 patients had a disease recurrence, in which 155 (52%) crossed over ('crossover'). In the pembrolizumab group, 297 patients completed the 1-year treatment period; 47 had a recurrence ≥6 months later, in which 20 (43%) entered the rechallenge part 2 ('rechallenge'). In the crossover group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7-15.2) and the 3-year PFS rate was 32% (95% CI 25-40%). Among 80 patients with stage IV evaluable disease, 31 (39%) had an objective response: 14 (18%) patients with complete response (CR) and 17 (21%) patients with partial response. The 2-year PFS rate from response was 69% (95% CI 48-83%). In the rechallenge group, the median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.6-NE). Among 9 patients with stage IV evaluable disease, 1 had an objective response (CR). Among the 175 patients, 51 (29%) had a grade I-IV irAE and 11 (6%) had a grade III-IV irAE. CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab treatment after crossover yielded an overall 3-year PFS rate of 32%
- Published
- 2021
17. An early innate response resulting in melanoma cancer stemness precedes acquired drug resistance: P083
- Author
-
Menon, D. R., Krepler, C., Vultur, A., Rinner, B., Zhang, G., Somasundaram, R., Hoefler, G., Herlyn, M., Soyer, P. H., Gabrielli, B., and Schaider, H.
- Published
- 2014
18. Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Recurrence-Free Survival Among Patients With Stage III Melanoma Randomized to Receive Pembrolizumab or Placebo A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
- Author
-
Eggermont, AMM, Kicinski, M, Blank, CU, Mandala, M, Long, GV, Atkinson, V, Dalle, S, Haydon, A, Khattak, A, Carlino, MS, Sandhu, S, Larkin, J, Puig, S, Ascierto, PA, Rutkowski, P, Schadendorf, D, Koornstra, R, Hernandez-Aya, L, Di Giacomo, AM, van den Eertwegh, AJM, Grob, J-J, Gutzmer, R, Jamal, R, Lorigan, PC, Krepler, C, Ibrahim, N, Marreaud, S, van Akkooi, A, Robert, C, Suciu, S, Eggermont, AMM, Kicinski, M, Blank, CU, Mandala, M, Long, GV, Atkinson, V, Dalle, S, Haydon, A, Khattak, A, Carlino, MS, Sandhu, S, Larkin, J, Puig, S, Ascierto, PA, Rutkowski, P, Schadendorf, D, Koornstra, R, Hernandez-Aya, L, Di Giacomo, AM, van den Eertwegh, AJM, Grob, J-J, Gutzmer, R, Jamal, R, Lorigan, PC, Krepler, C, Ibrahim, N, Marreaud, S, van Akkooi, A, Robert, C, and Suciu, S
- Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Whether immune-related adverse events (irAEs) indicate drug activity in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between irAEs and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the double-blind EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 clinical trial comparing pembrolizumab therapy and placebo for the treatment of patients with high-risk stage III melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1019 adults with stage III melanoma were randomly assigned on a 1:1 ratio to receive treatment with pembrolizumab therapy or placebo. Eligible patients were adults 18 years and older with complete resection of cutaneous melanoma metastatic to lymph nodes, classified with stage IIIA (at least 1 micrometastasis measuring >1 mm in greatest diameter), IIIB, or IIIC (without in-transit metastasis) cancer. Patients were randomized from August 26, 2015, to November 14, 2016. The clinical cutoff for the data set was October 2, 2017. Analyses were then performed on the database, which was locked on November 28, 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were scheduled to receive 200 mg of pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses for approximately 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxic effects, major protocol violation, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The association between irAEs and RFS was estimated using a Cox model adjusted for sex, age, and AJCC-7 stage, with a time-varying covariate that had a value of 0 before irAE onset and 1 after irAE onset. RESULTS: Of 1011 patients who began treatment with pembrolizumab therapy or placebo, 622 (61.5%) were men and 389 (38.5%) were women; 386 patients (38.2%) were aged 50 to 64 years, 377 (37.3%) were younger than 50 years, and 248 (24.5%) were 65 years and older. Consistent with the reported main analysis in the intent-to-treat population, RFS was longer in the pembrolizumab arm compared with the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56
- Published
- 2020
19. Longer Follow-Up Confirms Recurrence-Free Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in High-Risk Stage III Melanoma: Updated Results From the EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 Trial
- Author
-
Eggermont, AMM, Blank, CU, Mandala, M, Long, GV, Atkinson, VG, Dalle, S, Haydon, AM, Meshcheryakov, A, Khattak, A, Carlino, MS, Sandhu, S, Larkin, J, Puig, S, Ascierto, PA, Rutkowski, P, Schadendorf, D, Koornstra, R, Hernandez-Aya, L, Di Giacomo, AM, van den Eertwegh, AJM, Grob, J-J, Gutzmer, R, Jamal, R, Lorigan, PC, van Akkooi, ACJ, Krepler, C, Ibrahim, N, Marreaud, S, Kicinski, M, Suciu, S, Robert, C, Eggermont, AMM, Blank, CU, Mandala, M, Long, GV, Atkinson, VG, Dalle, S, Haydon, AM, Meshcheryakov, A, Khattak, A, Carlino, MS, Sandhu, S, Larkin, J, Puig, S, Ascierto, PA, Rutkowski, P, Schadendorf, D, Koornstra, R, Hernandez-Aya, L, Di Giacomo, AM, van den Eertwegh, AJM, Grob, J-J, Gutzmer, R, Jamal, R, Lorigan, PC, van Akkooi, ACJ, Krepler, C, Ibrahim, N, Marreaud, S, Kicinski, M, Suciu, S, and Robert, C
- Abstract
PURPOSE: We conducted the phase III double-blind European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial to evaluate pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma. On the basis of 351 recurrence-free survival (RFS) events at a 1.25-year median follow-up, pembrolizumab prolonged RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P < .0001) compared with placebo. This led to the approval of pembrolizumab adjuvant treatment by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration. Here, we report an updated RFS analysis at the 3.05-year median follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,019 patients with complete lymph node dissection of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (seventh edition; AJCC-7), stage IIIA (at least one lymph node metastasis > 1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC (without in-transit metastasis) cutaneous melanoma were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab at a flat dose of 200 mg (n = 514) or placebo (n = 505) every 3 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. The two coprimary end points were RFS in the overall population and in those with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. RESULTS: Pembrolizumab (190 RFS events) compared with placebo (283 RFS events) resulted in prolonged RFS in the overall population (3-year RFS rate, 63.7% v 44.1% for pembrolizumab v placebo, respectively; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.68) and in the PD-L1-positive tumor subgroup (HR, 0.57; 99% CI, 0.43 to 0.74). The impact of pembrolizumab on RFS was similar in subgroups, in particular according to AJCC-7 and AJCC-8 staging, and BRAF mutation status (HR, 0.51 [99% CI, 0.36 to 0.73] v 0.66 [99% CI, 0.46 to 0.95] for V600E/K v wild type). CONCLUSION: In resected high-risk stage III melanoma, pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy provided a sustained and clinically meaningful improvement in RFS at 3-year median follow-up. This improvement was consistent across subgroups.
- Published
- 2020
20. BRAF inhibition pushes macrophages from passenger to driver for melanoma cell growth and survival
- Author
-
Wang, T., Xiao, M., Ge, Y., Krepler, C., Zhang, G., Azuma, R., Xu, George X., Halloran, M., Herlyn, M., and Kaufman, R.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Three-dimensional melanoma cultures improve the preclinical drug evaluation of MAPK and PI3K inhibitors
- Author
-
Vultur, A., Villanueva, J., Krepler, C., Rajan, G., Shannan, B., Schultz, D., Chen, Q., Gimotty, P., and Herlyn, M.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. 1116P Real-world clinical outcomes with pembrolizumab (pembro) for treatment of advanced melanoma: Evidence from the United States community oncology setting
- Author
-
Cowey, C.L., primary, Boyd, M., additional, Aguilar, K.M., additional, Beeks, A., additional, Krepler, C., additional, and Scherrer, E., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. LBA46 Pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: Final results regarding distant metastasis-free survival from the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote 054 double-blinded phase III trial
- Author
-
Eggermont, A.M.M., primary, Blank, C.U., additional, Mandala', M., additional, Long, G.V., additional, Atkinson, V., additional, Dalle, S., additional, Haydon, A.M., additional, Meshcheryakov, A., additional, Khattak, A., additional, Carlino, M., additional, Sandhu, S., additional, Sarda, S. Puig, additional, Ascierto, P.A., additional, van Akkooi, A.C.J., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Ibrahim, N., additional, Marreaud, S.I., additional, Kicinski, M., additional, Suciu, S., additional, and Robert, C., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. LBA44 Lenvatinib (len) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) for advanced melanoma (MEL) that progressed on a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor: Initial results of LEAP-004
- Author
-
Fernandez, A.M. Arance, primary, O'Day, S.J., additional, Merino, L. de la Cruz, additional, Petrella, T., additional, Jamal, R., additional, Ny, L., additional, Carneiro, A., additional, Berrocal, A., additional, Márquez-Rodas, I., additional, Spreafico, A., additional, Victoria Atkinson, V., additional, Costa Svedman, F., additional, Smith, A.D., additional, Chen, K., additional, Diede, S.J., additional, Krepler, C., additional, and Long, G.V., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Melanomstammzellen: S24/02
- Author
-
Krepler, C, Strommer, S, Willheim, M, and Pehamberger, H
- Published
- 2009
26. Antibodies Generated by Vaccination with a HMW-MAA Mimotopes Suppress Human Melanoma Tumor Growth in SCID Mice
- Author
-
Hafner, C, Wagner, S, Krepler, C, Wiedermann, U, Scheiner, O, Pehamberger, H, and Breiteneder, H
- Published
- 2006
27. Whole Body Irradiation Abrogates Anti-Tumor Effect of CpG Oligonucleotides in SCID Mice
- Author
-
Krepler, C, Strommer, S, Pehamberger, H, and Wacheck, V
- Published
- 2006
28. Alternative splicing of IL-24 in melanocytes by deletion of exons 3 and 5
- Author
-
Allen, M., Pratscher, B., Krepler, C., Frei, K., Schöfer, C., Pehamberger, H., Müller, M., and Lucas, T.
- Published
- 2005
29. Erratum: A stress-induced early innate response causes multidrug tolerance in melanoma
- Author
-
Menon, D Ravindran, Das, S, Krepler, C, Vultur, A, Rinner, B, Schauer, S, Kashofer, K, Wagner, K, Zhang, G, Rad, E Bonyadi, Haass, N K, Soyer, H P, Gabrielli, B, Somasundaram, R, Hoefler, G, Herlyn, M, and Schaider, H
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Enforced polarization of melanoma cells towards a JARID1B-high phenotype exhausts tumour fitness
- Author
-
Chauvistre, H., Shannan, B., Vogel, F., Krepler, C., Picard, D., Remke, M., Haass, N., Daignault, S., Keminer, O., Gul, S., Sechi, A., Lorberg, N., Zarschler, D., Hoewner, A., Becher, C., Liu, Q., Herlyn, M., Dirk Schadendorf, Roesch, A., and Publica
- Published
- 2017
31. Targeting the ATR-Chk1 axis with PARP inhibition results in tumor regression in BRCA mutant models
- Author
-
George, E., primary, Kim, H., additional, Ragland, R., additional, Rafail, S., additional, Zhang, R., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Morgan, M.A., additional, Herlyn, M., additional, Brown, E., additional, and Simpkins, F., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Capitalizing on synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient high-grade serous ovarian cancers with a novel ATR inhibitor
- Author
-
George, E., primary, Kim, H., additional, Ragland, R., additional, Brown, E., additional, Butler, L., additional, Gilad, O., additional, Tanyi, J.L., additional, Zhang, R., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Lee, R., additional, Morgan, M.A., additional, Burger, R.A., additional, Ko, E.M., additional, Kim, S.H., additional, Herlyn, M., additional, and Simpkins, F., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. A stress-induced early innate response causes multidrug tolerance in melanoma
- Author
-
Ravindran Menon, D, primary, Das, S, additional, Krepler, C, additional, Vultur, A, additional, Rinner, B, additional, Schauer, S, additional, Kashofer, K, additional, Wagner, K, additional, Zhang, G, additional, Bonyadi Rad, E, additional, Haass, N K, additional, Soyer, H P, additional, Gabrielli, B, additional, Somasundaram, R, additional, Hoefler, G, additional, Herlyn, M, additional, and Schaider, H, additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. 93 A stress induced early innate response causes multi-drug tolerance in melanoma
- Author
-
Menon, D.R., primary, Das, S., additional, Krepler, C., additional, Vultur, A., additional, Rinner, B., additional, Schauer, S., additional, Kashofer, K., additional, Wagner, K., additional, Zhang, G., additional, Rad, E. Bonyadi, additional, Soyer, H.P., additional, Gabrielli, B., additional, Somasundaram, R., additional, Hoefler, G., additional, Herlyn, M., additional, and Schaider, H., additional
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. MEK inhibition affects STAT3 signaling and invasion in human melanoma cell lines
- Author
-
Vultur, A, primary, Villanueva, J, additional, Krepler, C, additional, Rajan, G, additional, Chen, Q, additional, Xiao, M, additional, Li, L, additional, Gimotty, P A, additional, Wilson, M, additional, Hayden, J, additional, Keeney, F, additional, Nathanson, K L, additional, and Herlyn, M, additional
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Reduction of Human Melanoma Tumor Growth in Severe Combined Immunodeficient Mice by Passive Transfer of Antibodies Induced by a High Molecular Weight Melanoma-Associated Antigen Mimotope Vaccine
- Author
-
Wagner, S., primary, Krepler, C., additional, Allwardt, D., additional, Latzka, J., additional, Strommer, S., additional, Scheiner, O., additional, Pehamberger, H., additional, Wiedermann, U., additional, Hafner, C., additional, and Breiteneder, H., additional
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Targeting RRM2 and mutant BRAF is a novel combinatorial strategy for melanoma
- Author
-
Fatkhutdinov N., Sproesser K., Krepler C., Liu Q., Brafford P., Herlyn M., Aird K., Zhang R., Fatkhutdinov N., Sproesser K., Krepler C., Liu Q., Brafford P., Herlyn M., Aird K., and Zhang R.
- Abstract
© 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.The majority of patients with melanoma harbor mutations in the BRAF oncogene, thus making it a clinically relevant target. However, response to mutant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) is relatively short-lived with progression-free survival of only 6 to 7 months. Previously, we reported high expression of ribonucleotide reductase M2 (RRM2), which is rate-limiting for de novo dNTP synthesis, as a poor prognostic factor in patients with mutant BRAF melanoma. In this study, the notion that targeting de novo dNTP synthesis through knockdown of RRM2 could prolong the response of melanoma cells to BRAFi was investigated. Knockdown of RRM2 in combination with the mutant BRAFi PLX4720 (an analog of the FDA-approved drug vemurafenib) inhibited melanoma cell proliferation to a greater extent than either treatment alone. This occurred in vitro in multiple mutant BRAF cell lines and in a novel patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model system. Mechanistically, the combination increased DNA damage accumulation, which correlated with a global decrease in DNA damage repair (DDR) gene expression and increased apoptotic markers. After discontinuing PLX4720 treatment, cells showed marked recurrence. However, knockdown of RRM2 attenuated this rebound growth both in vitro and in vivo, which correlated with maintenance of the senescence-associated cell-cycle arrest. Implications: Inhibition of RRM2 converts the transient response of melanoma cells to BRAFi to a stable response and may be a novel combinatorial strategy to prolong therapeutic response of patients with melanoma.
38. Targeting RRM2 and mutant BRAF is a novel combinatorial strategy for melanoma
- Author
-
Fatkhutdinov N., Sproesser K., Krepler C., Liu Q., Brafford P., Herlyn M., Aird K., Zhang R., Fatkhutdinov N., Sproesser K., Krepler C., Liu Q., Brafford P., Herlyn M., Aird K., and Zhang R.
- Abstract
© 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.The majority of patients with melanoma harbor mutations in the BRAF oncogene, thus making it a clinically relevant target. However, response to mutant BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) is relatively short-lived with progression-free survival of only 6 to 7 months. Previously, we reported high expression of ribonucleotide reductase M2 (RRM2), which is rate-limiting for de novo dNTP synthesis, as a poor prognostic factor in patients with mutant BRAF melanoma. In this study, the notion that targeting de novo dNTP synthesis through knockdown of RRM2 could prolong the response of melanoma cells to BRAFi was investigated. Knockdown of RRM2 in combination with the mutant BRAFi PLX4720 (an analog of the FDA-approved drug vemurafenib) inhibited melanoma cell proliferation to a greater extent than either treatment alone. This occurred in vitro in multiple mutant BRAF cell lines and in a novel patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model system. Mechanistically, the combination increased DNA damage accumulation, which correlated with a global decrease in DNA damage repair (DDR) gene expression and increased apoptotic markers. After discontinuing PLX4720 treatment, cells showed marked recurrence. However, knockdown of RRM2 attenuated this rebound growth both in vitro and in vivo, which correlated with maintenance of the senescence-associated cell-cycle arrest. Implications: Inhibition of RRM2 converts the transient response of melanoma cells to BRAFi to a stable response and may be a novel combinatorial strategy to prolong therapeutic response of patients with melanoma.
39. Pembrolizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Recurrent Locally Advanced or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Results from the Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase III KEYNOTE-913 Study.
- Author
-
Mortier L, Villabona L, Lawrence B, Arance A, Butler MO, Beylot-Barry M, Saiag P, Samimi M, Ascierto PA, Spada F, De Pontville M, Maio M, Berrocal A, Espinosa E, Capdevila J, Levin M, Das D, Krepler C, Grebennik D, and Chiarion-Sileni V
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Treatment Outcome, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Merkel Cell drug therapy, Carcinoma, Merkel Cell mortality, Carcinoma, Merkel Cell pathology, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Skin Neoplasms mortality, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Progression-Free Survival, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: The phase III KEYNOTE-913 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)., Objective: The aim was to report results from the primary analysis of KEYNOTE-913., Patients and Methods: Patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 treatments (~ 2 years). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, overall survival (OS), and safety and tolerability., Results: Fifty-five patients were treated with pembrolizumab. The median time from first dose to data cutoff (February 15, 2024) was 50.3 months (range 38.7-59.4). The ORR was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 35-63), with 12 complete responses and 15 partial responses. The median DOR was 39.8 months (range 4.8-52.5+), and the 24-month DOR rate was 69%. The median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI 3-26), and the 24-month PFS rate was 39%. The median OS was 24.3 months (95% CI 12.4 to not reached), and the 24-month OS rate was 51%. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 38 patients (69%); 13 patients (24%) experienced grade 3-5 AEs. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (n = 12 [22%]), pruritus (n = 12 [22%]), and lipase increase (n = 10 [18%]). One patient died of treatment-related Guillain-Barré syndrome., Conclusions: Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity and promising survival and had a manageable safety profile in patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic MCC, supporting its use in this population., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03783078., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): long-term, health-related quality-of-life results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.
- Author
-
Bührer E, Kicinski M, Mandala M, Pe M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Blank CU, Haydon A, Dalle S, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Meshcheryakov A, Sandhu S, Puig S, Schadendorf D, Jamal R, Rutkowski P, van den Eertwegh AJM, Coens C, Grebennik D, Krepler C, Robert C, and Eggermont AMM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Double-Blind Method, Middle Aged, Aged, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Adult, Time Factors, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma pathology, Melanoma surgery, Quality of Life, Neoplasm Staging, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Skin Neoplasms surgery, Skin Neoplasms mortality
- Abstract
Background: In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054 study, adjuvant pembrolizumab improved recurrence-free survival and distant-metastasis-free survival in patients with resected stage III melanoma. Earlier results showed no effect of pembrolizumab on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Little is known about HRQOL after completion of treatment with pembrolizumab, an important research area concerning patients who are likely to become long-term survivors. This study reports long-term HRQOL results., Methods: This double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial compared adjuvant pembrolizumab with placebo in patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC resected cutaneous melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or 0, recruited from 123 academic centres and community hospitals in 23 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a minimisation technique stratified for stage and geographical region to receive 200 mg of intravenous pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 18 doses. Investigators, patients, and those collecting or analysing data were masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint of the trial was recurrence-free survival (reported elsewhere). HRQOL was a prespecified exploratory endpoint, measured with the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. All patients with a baseline HRQOL evaluation available who were alive 108 weeks from randomisation were included in this analysis of long-term HRQOL. Long-term HRQOL included assessments measured every 6 months between 108 weeks and 48 months after randomisation. The threshold of clinical relevance for all HRQOL scales used was an average change of 5 points. The trial is ongoing, recruitment is completed, and HRQOL data collection is finalised. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362594, and EudraCT, 2014-004944-37., Findings: Between Aug 26, 2015, and Nov 14, 2016, 1019 patients were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab (n=514) or placebo (n=505). Completion of the HRQOL evaluation at baseline exceeded 90% (481 [94%] patients in the pembrolizumab group and 467 [92%] in the placebo group), and ranged between 60% and 90% for post-baseline timepoints. Among patients with a baseline HRQOL evaluation, 365 (39%) were female and 583 (61%) were male. The mean change from baseline to long-term HRQOL was -0·56 (95% CI -2·33 to 1·22) in the pembrolizumab group and 1·63 (-0·12 to 3·38) in the placebo group. The difference between the two groups was -2·19 (-4·65 to 0·27, p=0·081). Differences for all other scales were smaller than 5 and not statistically significant., Interpretation: Adjuvant pembrolizumab did not have a significant impact on long-term HRQOL compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma. These findings, together with earlier results on efficacy and HRQOL, support the use of pembrolizumab in this setting., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EB's spouse and daughter hold shares in Sandoz, Galenica, Alcon, Roche, and Novartis. MK reports study funding paid to the institution by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) since the initial planning of the work, and study funding paid to the institution from Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Immunocore, Johnson & Johnson, and Pierre Fabre in the past 36 months. MM reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma. GVL reports consulting fees from Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics, IOBiotech, Immunocore, Innovent Biologics USA, MSD, Novartis, PHMR, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Scancell, and SkylineDX BV. VA reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from BMS, MSD, Novartis; support from BMS for attending meetings or travel; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Immunocore; CUB reports personal fees from MSD, grants and personal fees from Novartis and BMS, personal fees from Roche, GSK, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMAB, Pierre Fabre, and Third Rock ventures, grants from NanoString and 4SC, during the conduct of the study. CUB has patents pending (WO 2021/177822 A1 and WO 2023/022596 A1), and reports stock ownership: co-founder of Immagene BV and Signature Oncology. AH reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, MSD, and Novartis; payments for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with BMS, MSD, and Novartis. SD reports research funding from BMS, MSD, and Pierre Fabre to the institution; payment or honoraria to the institution for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS and MSD; support for attending meetings or travel from BMS and MSD; trim 24 patent pending; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board at BMS and MSD, with payments made to the institution; spouse being a Sanofi employee. AK reports consulting fees for an advisory role at Moderna and speaker honorarium from MSD. MSC reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from BMS, MSD and Novartis; having served on advisory boards for Amgen, BMS, Eisai, Ideaya, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Oncosec, Pierre-Fabre, Qbiotics, Regeneron, Roche, Merck, and Sanofi. AM reports support of scientific and educational conference from Janssen. SS reports grants or contracts from Novartis/Advanced Accelerator Applications (AAA), AstraZeneca, MSD, Genentech, Senhwa, and Pfizer; funding goes to the institution to undertake investigator initiated clinical trial and translational research. SS reports participation on advisory boards for MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca—fees for attending go to research funds at the institution. SS is the chair of DSMB for two Novartis/AAA sponsored phase 3 trials—no fee accepted for chair role. SP reports payment or honoraria to her and her institution for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, MSD, and Novartis, and to her partner and her institution from Amgen and Phylogen; payments to her institution for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with MSD; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid from GEM, EORTC melanoma group, and ASEICA. DS reports research grants to his institution from Amgen, Array/Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Roche; consulting fees paid personally from 4SC, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Haystack, Immunocore, InFlarX, Innovent, Labcorp, Merck Serono, MSD, Nektar, Neracare, Novartis OncoSec, Pfizer, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Replimune, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Sun Pharma; personal payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and SunPharma; personal support for attending meetings or travel from BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, and Pierre Fabre; personal payments for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board at 4SC, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Haystack, Immunocore, InFlarX, Merck Serono, MSD, Nektar, Neracare, Novartis, OncoSec, Pfizer, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Replimune, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Sun Pharma; leadership or fiduciary role, paid or unpaid, at Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group, German Cancer Society, Hiege Stiftung, Deutsche Hautkrebsstiftung, Nationale Versorgungskonferenz Hautkrebs eV, and European Melanoma Registry; drug supply (nivolumab, ipilimumab) from BMS. RJ reports research funding from Iovance Biotherapeutics; honoraria for advisory role or speaker presentation from Merck, BMS, Medison, Pfizer, and Novartis. PR reports consulting fees paid to himself from MBS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, and Pfizer; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events paid to himself from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, MSD, and AstraZeneca; speakers bureau Pfizer, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD, and BMS paid to himself; support for attending meetings or travel from Orphan Europe and Pierre Fabre paid to himself; research funding to his institution from Novarits, Pfizer, Roche, and BMS. AJMvdE reports study grants from BMS and Idera; travel expenses from Ipsen; advisory board from BMS, MSD Oncology, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre, and Janssen Cilag BV. CC reports support for attending meetings or travel from Orphan Europe and Pierre Fabre. DG reports stock or stock options from Merck & Co. CK reports stock or stock options from Merck & Co and being an employee of Merck & Co. CR reports consulting fees (payments made to her) from BMS, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, MSD, Merck, Sunpharma, Ultimovacs, Regeneron, Egle, Philogen, Maat Pharma, and IO Biontech; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events (payments made to her) from Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, BMS, MSD, and Novartis; support for attending meetings or travel from Pierre Fabre; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board (payments made to her) with BMS, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, MSD, Merck, Sunpharma, Ultimovacs, Regeneron, Egle, Philogen, and Maat Pharma. AMME reports honoraria for scientific advisory board or independent data monitoring committee functions from Agenus, BioInvent, BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Brenus, CatalYm, Ellipses, EikonTX, Eurobio, Galecto, IO Biotech, IQVIQ, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, MSD, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Scorpion TX, Sairopa, Sellas, SkylineDX, TigaTx, and Trained Therapeutics Discovery; honoraria from Acetra, GenOway, GSK, Moderna, and Trained Immunity Tx; equity from IO Biotech, Sairopa, and SkylineDx; being the Editor in Chief of the European Journal of Cancer. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Relationships between survival and real-world recurrence-free survival or distant metastasis-free survival among patients with completely resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma.
- Author
-
Samlowski W, Silver MA, Hohlbauch A, Zhang S, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Krepler C, Wang Y, Sruti I, and Jiang R
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Adult, Disease-Free Survival, Neoplasm Metastasis, Melanoma surgery, Melanoma mortality, Melanoma pathology, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Skin Neoplasms surgery, Skin Neoplasms mortality, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology
- Abstract
Long follow-up time is needed for overall survival (OS) data to mature for early-stage melanoma. This retrospective study aimed to describe the relationships between OS and two intermediate endpoints - real-world recurrence-free survival (rwRFS) and real-world distant metastasis-free survival (rwDMFS) - for patients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma that was completely resected from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017, with follow-up to 31 December 2020. We used three different approaches to describe the relationships: estimates of correlation using Kendall τ rank correlation; comparisons of all-cause survival with/without recurrence or distant metastasis using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models; and landmark analyses of all-cause survival stratified by recurrence status at 1-5 years. During a 39-month median follow-up from surgical resection, 223/567 patients (39%) experienced recurrence, among whom 171/567 patients (30%) developed distant metastasis. Median OS from surgical resection was 117.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 104.7-not reached], median rwRFS was 49.8 months (95% CI, 39.6-61.0), and median rwDMFS was 70.9 months (95% CI, 58.4-89.1). We observed strong correlations between rwRFS and OS, and between rwDMFS and OS (Kendall τ of 0.73 and 0.82, respectively). Risk of death was significantly greater after recurrence (all-cause survival adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 7.48; 95% CI, 4.55-12.29) or distant metastasis (adjusted HR, 11.00; 95% CI, 6.92-17.49). Risk of death remained significantly elevated with recurrence or distant metastasis by landmark years 1, 3, and 5 after surgical resection. These findings support the use of recurrence/rwRFS and distant metastasis/rwDMFS as surrogate endpoints for OS after complete resection of stage IIB or IIC melanoma., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Safety of pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy in a pooled analysis of phase 3 clinical trials of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma.
- Author
-
Luke JJ, Long GV, Robert C, Carlino MS, Choueiri TK, Haas NB, O'Brien M, Paz-Ares L, Peters S, Powles T, Leiby MA, Lin J, Zhao Y, Krepler C, Perini RF, Catherine Pietanza M, Samkari A, Gruber T, Ibrahim N, and Eggermont AMM
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Aged, Middle Aged, Adult, Young Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Adolescent, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Renal Cell drug therapy, Carcinoma, Renal Cell pathology, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma pathology, Kidney Neoplasms drug therapy, Kidney Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
- Abstract
Background: The safety profile of adjuvant pembrolizumab was evaluated in a pooled analysis of 4 phase 3 clinical trials., Methods: Patients had completely resected stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC melanoma per American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, criteria (AJCC-7; KEYNOTE-054); stage IIB or IIC melanoma per AJCC-8 (KEYNOTE-716); stage IB, II, or IIIA non-small cell lung cancer per AJCC-7 (PEARLS/KEYNOTE-091); or postnephrectomy/metastasectomy clear cell renal cell carcinoma at increased risk of recurrence (KEYNOTE-564). Patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo every 3 weeks for approximately 1 year. Adverse events (AEs) were summarized for patients who received ≥ 1 dose of treatment., Results: Data were pooled from 4125 patients treated with pembrolizumab (n = 2060) or placebo (n = 2065). Median (range) duration of treatment was 11.1 months (0.0-18.9) with pembrolizumab and 11.2 months (0.0-18.1) with placebo. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 78.6 % (1620/2060) of patients in the pembrolizumab group (grade 3-5, 16.3 % [336/2060]) and 58.7 % (1212/2065) in the placebo group (grade 3-5, 3.5 % [72/2065]). Immune-mediated AEs (e.g. adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, and thyroiditis) occurred in 36.2 % (746/2060) of patients in the pembrolizumab group (grade 3-5, 8.6 % [177/2060]) and 8.4 % (174/2065) in the placebo group (grade 3-5, 1.1 % [23/2065]). Of patients with ≥ 1 immune-mediated AE or infusion reaction, systemic corticosteroids were required for 35.2 % (268/761) and 20.2 % (39/193) of patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo groups, respectively., Conclusions: Adjuvant pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile that was comparable to prior reports in advanced disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jason J. Luke reports grants or contracts from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, MSD, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimmune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, and Xencor; consulting fees from 7 Hills, Bright Peak, Exo, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio, Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, Tempest, AbbVie, Alnylam, Atomwise, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Cugene, Curadev, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Endeavor, Flame, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, Glenmark, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Inzen, Immatics, Immunocore, Incyte, Instil, IO Biotech, Macrogenics, MSD, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Partner, Pfizer, Pioneering Medicines, PsiOxus, Regeneron, Ribon, Roivant, Servier, STINGthera, Synlogic, and Synthekine; patents planned, issued, or pending for Serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy) and PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof) (both provisional); participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Immutep, and Evaxion; a leadership or fiduciary role at the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer; and stock or stock options in Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, and Tempest. Georgina V. Long reports consulting fees and participating on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Agenus Inc, Amgen Inc, Array Biopharma, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion Biotech A/S, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics S.L., Innovent Biologics USA Inc, MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, OncoSec Medical Australia, Pierre Fabre, Provectus Australia, Qbiotics Group Limited, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pierre Fabre. Caroline Robert reports support for medical writing for the present manuscript from MSD; consulting fees from BMS, Roche, MSD, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma, Pfizer, and Regeneron; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board from Ultimovacs and Regeneron; and stock or stock options in Ribonexus. Matteo S. Carlino reports consulting fees from Amgen, BMS, Eisai, Ideaya, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Oncosec, Pierre Fabre, Qbiotics, Regeneron, Roche, SMD, and Sanofi; and honoraria for lectures from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi. Toni K. Choueiri reports support from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Circle Pharma, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVA, Infiniti, Ipsen, Kanaph, Lilly, MSD, Nikang, Novartis, Nuscan, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, and CME events (Peerview, PER, MJH Life Sciences, Research to Practice, France Foundation, Springer, WebMed, ASiM Ce, Caribou Publishing, and others); grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Aveo, Arcus, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, MSD, Nikang, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, and Takeda; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Circle Pharma, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Infiniti, Ipsen, Kanaph, Lilly, MSD, Nikang, Novartis, Nuscan, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Surface Oncology, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, and CME events (Peerview, PER, MJH Life Sciences, Research to Practice, France Foundation, Springer, WebMed, ASiM Ce, Caribou Publishing); payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Aravive, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKline, IQVIA, Infiniti., Ipsen, Kanaph, Lilly, MSD, Nikang, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Takeda, Tempest, Up-To-Date, CME events (Peerview, PER, MJH Life Sciences, Research to Practice, France Foundation, Springer, WebMed, ASiM Ce, Caribou Publishing); a patent planned, issued, or pending related to ctDNA and biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors; participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Aravive; a leadership or fiduciary role with KidneyCan, ASCO, ESMO, NCCN, GU, and NCI; stock or stock options in Pionyr, Tempest, Precede Bio, Osel, Curesponse, Immdura, and Primium; and other financial or non-financial interests including support from the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE (2P50CA101942–16) and Program 5P30CA006516–56, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, Pan-Mass Challenge, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Fund and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at DFC. Naomi B. Haas reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD, Eisai, and Exelixis. Mary O’Brien reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca and MSD; support for attending ESMO from AstraZeneca; and participation on an IDMC. Luis Paz-Ares reports grants or contracts from MSD, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, and PharmaMar; consulting fees from Lilly, MSD, Roche, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS, Mirati, GSK, Janssen, Takeda, and Regeneron; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Lilly, MSD, Roche, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS, Mirati, GSK, Janssen, Takeda, and Regeneron; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Lilly, MSD, Roche, PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bayer, BMS, Mirati, GSK, Janssen, Takeda, and Regeneron; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Altum Sequencing and Stab Therapeutics; and stock or stock options in Altum Sequencing and Stab Therapeutics. Solange Peters reports support for the present manuscript from MSD; grants or contracts from Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, iTeos, MSD, Mirati, Pharma Mar, Promontory Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, and Seattle Genetics; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BerGenBio, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Hutchmed, Illumina, Incyte, Ipsen, iTeos, Janssen, MSD, Merrimack, Mirati, Nykode Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure, Pharma Mar, Promontory Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, GSK, Illumina, Ipsen, MSD, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, and Takeda; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BerGenBio, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Hutchmed, Illumina, Incyte, Ipsen, iTeos, Janssen, MSD, Merrimack, Mirati, Nykode Therapeutics, Novartis, Novocure, Pharma Mar, Promontory Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda; and a leadership or fiduciary role with Galenica SA. Thomas Powles reports support for the present manuscript from Astellas and Open Health; grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, and Eisai; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Astellas, Johnson & Johnson, Eisai, and Mashup Ltd; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche, Pfizer, MSD, AstraZeneca, and Ipsen. Melanie A. Leiby, Jianxin Lin, Clemens Krepler, Rodolfo F. Perini, M. Catherine Pietanza, Todd Gruber, and Nageatte Ibrahim report employment at Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and stock ownership in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Ayman Samkari and Yujie Zhao reports employment at Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. Alexander M. M. Eggermont reports support for the present manuscript from Merck & Co; consulting fees from Alcetra, Agenus, BioInvent, Brenus, CatalYm, Ellipses, Epics, GSK, IO Biotech, IQVIA, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Inc., MSD, Oncimmune, Pierre Fabre, Sairopa, Scorpion, Sellas, Skyline, TigaTX, and Trained Immunity TTC; payment or honoraria for lectures from IO Biotech, BMS, Merck & Co., Inc./MSD; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer; and stock or stock options in IO Biotech, Sairopa, and SkylineDX., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Stage IIB or IIC Melanoma: Final Analysis of Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in the Phase III KEYNOTE-716 Study.
- Author
-
Luke JJ, Ascierto PA, Khattak MA, de la Cruz Merino L, Del Vecchio M, Rutkowski P, Spagnolo F, Mackiewicz J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Kirkwood JM, Robert C, Grob JJ, de Galitiis F, Schadendorf D, Carlino MS, Wu XL, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Krepler C, Eggermont AMM, and Long GV
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Adult, Disease-Free Survival, Aged, 80 and over, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma mortality, Melanoma pathology, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Neoplasm Staging, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Skin Neoplasms mortality, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use
- Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy was shown to significantly improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma in earlier analyses of the randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-716 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03553836). We report results of the protocol-specified final analysis of DMFS for KEYNOTE-716. Overall, 976 patients were randomly allocated to pembrolizumab (n = 487) or placebo (n = 489). As of January 4, 2023, median follow-up was 39.4 months (range, 26.0-51.4 months). The median DMFS was not reached in either treatment group, and the estimated 36-month DMFS was 84.4% for pembrolizumab and 74.7% for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.79]). The median RFS was not reached in either treatment group, and the estimated 36-month RFS was 76.2% for pembrolizumab and 63.4% for placebo (HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79]). DMFS and RFS results were consistent across most prespecified subgroups, including stage IIB and stage IIC melanoma. The safety profile of pembrolizumab was manageable and consistent with previous reports. These results continue to support the use of pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma: Outcomes in histopathologic subgroups from the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial.
- Author
-
Schadendorf D, Luke JJ, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Rutkowski P, Khattak A, Del Vecchio M, de la Cruz-Merino L, Mackiewicz J, Sileni VC, Kirkwood JM, Robert C, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Carlino MS, Zhao Y, Kalabis M, Krepler C, Eggermont A, and Scolyer RA
- Subjects
- Humans, Adjuvants, Immunologic therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized pharmacology, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Combined Modality Therapy, Adolescent, Adult, Melanoma pathology, Skin Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Background: Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) versus placebo in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study of resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. At the prespecified third interim analysis (data cut-off, January 4, 2022), the HR for RFS in the overall population was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.84) and the HR for DMFS was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). We present a post hoc analysis of efficacy by subtypes defined by histopathologic characteristics., Methods: Patients aged ≥12 years with newly diagnosed, resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo. The primary end point was RFS per investigator review; DMFS per investigator review was secondary. Subgroups of interest were melanoma subtype (nodular vs non-nodular), tumor thickness (≤4 mm vs >4 mm), presence of ulceration (yes vs no), mitotic rate (<5 per mm
2 (median) vs ≥5 per mm2 ), and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs; absent vs present)., Results: Between September 23, 2018, and November 4, 2020, 976 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489). Median follow-up was 27.4 months (range, 14.0-39.4). The HR (95% CI) for RFS was 0.54 (0.37 to 0.79) for nodular and 0.77 (0.53 to 1.11) for non-nodular melanoma; 0.57 (0.37 to 0.89) for thickness ≤4 mm and 0.69 (0.50 to 0.96) for >4 mm; 0.66 (0.50 to 0.89) for ulceration and 0.57 (0.32 to 1.03) for no ulceration; 0.57 (0.35 to 0.92) for mitotic rate <5 per mm2 and 0.57 (0.40 to 0.80) for ≥5 per mm2 ; and 0.89 (0.52 to 1.54) for TILs absent and 0.51 (0.34 to 0.76) for TILs present. DMFS results were similar. In a Cox multivariate analysis, treatment arm, tumor thickness, and mitotic rate were significant independent factors for RFS, and treatment arm and mitotic rate were significant independent factors for DMFS., Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis, the benefit of pembrolizumab was largely consistent with the overall study population regardless of histopathologic characteristics. These results support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DS reports being an invited speaker for BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; having advisory board roles with BMS, Immunocore, MSD, Neracare, Novartis, Pfizer, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi/Regeneron; research grants from BMS and MSD; being a steering committee member for BMS, MSD, and Novartis; being a coordinating PI for BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; being a local PI for Philogen and Sanofi; and being member of the board of directors for EORTC-MG (non-financial). JJL reports grants or contracts from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, and Xencor; consulting fees from 7 Hills, Bright Peak, Exo, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio, Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, Tempest, AbbVie, Alnylam, Atomwise, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Cugene, Curadev, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Endeavor, Flame, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, Glenmark, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Inzen, Immatics, Immunocore, Incyte, Instil, IO Biotech, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Partner, Pfizer, Pioneering Medicines, PsiOxus, Regeneron, Ribon, Roivant, Servier, STINGthera, Synlogic, and Synthekine; having two provisional patents (serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy) and PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof)); participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Immutep, and Evaxion; having leadership or a fiduciary role in the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer; and having stock or stock options in Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, and Tempest. PAA reports grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer, and Sanofi; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Sandoz, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Pfizer, Lunaphore, Medicenna. Bio-Al Health, ValoTx, Replimmune, and Bayer; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, Bio-Al Health, and Replimmune; and participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Oncosec, Nouscom, Seagen, iTeos, and Erasca. GVL is consultant advisor for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BioNTech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics S.L., IO Biotech, Immunocore, Innovent Biologics USA, MSD, Novartis, PHMR Ltd, Pierre Fabre, and Regeneron. PR reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, Philogen, and Blueprint Medicine; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, AstraZeneca, Philogen and Blueprint Medicine. AK reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing or educational events from MSD and support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD. MDV reports consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Immunocore; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Immunocore. LdlC-M reports grants or contracts from Roche, Celgene, and MSD; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, MSD-Merck, Novartis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Incyte, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead. JM reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Novartis; support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis. VCS reports consulting fees from Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Merck-Serono, and Bristol Myers Squibb; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pierre Fabre and Bristol Myers Squibb; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Merck Sharp and Dohme and Pierre Fabre. JMK reports consulting fees from Amgen Inc., Ankyra Therapeutics, Applied Clinical Intelligence LLC, Becker Pharmaceutical Consulting, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cancer Network, Cancer Study Group, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, DermTech, Fenix Group International, Harbour BioMed, Immunocore LLC, iOnctura, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Istari Oncology, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc., Magnolia Innovation LLC, Merck, Natera Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, OncoCyte Corporation, OncoSec Medical Inc, PathAI Inc, Pfizer Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Replimune Inc, Scopus BioPharma Inc, SR One Capital Management LP, and Takeda; research trial support to institution from Amgen Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Harbour BioMed, Immvira Pharma Co, Immunocore Ltd, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Lion Biotechnologies Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Verastem Inc; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, BMS, Regeneron, Ankyra Therapeutics, and Iovance Biotherapeutics; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Axio Research and IQVIA. CR reports consulting fees from BMS, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sanofi, Merck, MSD, Sun Pharma, and AstraZeneca; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for BMS, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Merck, MSD, and AstraZeneca; and stock or stock options in Ribonexus. J-JG reports grants or contracts from Pierre Fabre (institution); consulting fees from Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, Sanofi, and Philogen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Novartis, MSD, and Pierre Fabre; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and Philogen. RD reports consulting fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Sanofi, Caralym, Second-Genome, Regeneron, Alligator, T3 Pharma, MaxiVAX SA, Pfizer, and TouchIME; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Sanofi, Caralym, Second-Genome, Regeneron, Alligator, T3 Pharma, MaxiVAX SA, Pfizer, and touchIME. MSC reports consulting fees from MSD, BMS, Novartis, Amgen, Eisai, Ideaya, Nektar, Oncosec, Pierre-Fabre, Qbiotics, Regeneron, Roche, Merck, and Sanofi; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from MSD, BMS, and Novartis. YZ reports employment at Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA, and stock ownership in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA. MK reports employment at Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA, and stock ownership in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA. CK reports employment at Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA, and stock ownership in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA. AE reports consulting fees from Agenus, BioInvent, BioNTech, Brenus, CatalYm, Clover Pharmaceuticals, Ellipses, Galecto, GenOway, IO Biotech, IQVIA, ISA Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Scorpion Pharmaceuticals, Sairopa, Sellas, SkylineDX, TigaTx, and Trained Therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureau, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS and MSD; support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for BioNTeck, IQVIA, and Pfizer; and stock or stock options in IO Biotech, Sairopa, and SkylineDX. RAS reports consulting fees from MetaOptima Technology Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Evaxion, Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Australia, Qbiotics, Novartis, MSD, NeraCare, Amgen Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Myriad Genetics, and GlaxoSmithKline., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Seven-Year Follow-Up of the Phase III KEYNOTE-006 Study: Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma.
- Author
-
Robert C, Carlino MS, McNeil C, Ribas A, Grob JJ, Schachter J, Nyakas M, Kee D, Petrella TM, Blaustein A, Lotem M, Arance A, Daud AI, Hamid O, Larkin J, Anderson J, Krepler C, Grebennik D, and Long GV
- Subjects
- Humans, Follow-Up Studies, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Ipilimumab adverse effects, Ipilimumab therapeutic use, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma pathology, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use
- Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have led to unprecedented prolongation of overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced melanoma. Five-year follow-up of KEYNOTE-006 showed pembrolizumab prolonged survival versus ipilimumab. Efficacy results with 7-year follow-up are presented. At data cutoff (April 19, 2021), median follow-up was 85.3 months (range, 0.03-90.8 months). Median OS was 32.7 months for pembrolizumab versus 15.9 months for ipilimumab (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.83); 7-year OS was 37.8% and 25.3%, respectively. OS HRs favored pembrolizumab regardless of BRAF status or prior BRAF/MEK-inhibitor treatment and prognostic characteristics (elevated lactate dehydrogenase, large tumor size, and brain metastasis). Median modified progression-free survival (mPFS) was 9.4 months for pembrolizumab versus 3.8 months for ipilimumab; 7-year mPFS was 23.8% and 13.3%, respectively. In patients who completed ≥94 weeks of pembrolizumab, the 5-year OS was 92.9% and the 5-year mPFS was 70.1%. The objective response rate with second-course pembrolizumab (n = 16) was 56% (95% CI, 30 to 80) and the 2-year mPFS was 62.5%. These findings confirm that pembrolizumab provides long-term survival benefit in advanced melanoma.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab as an Adjuvant Treatment of Resected Stage IIB or IIC Melanoma in the United States.
- Author
-
Zhang S, Bensimon AG, Xu R, Jiang R, Greatsinger A, Zhang A, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, and Krepler C
- Subjects
- Humans, United States, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local prevention & control, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma surgery, Melanoma pathology
- Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab was approved in the US as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma post-complete resection, based on prolonged recurrence-free survival vs. placebo in the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs. observation as adjuvant treatment of stage IIB or IIC melanoma from a US health sector perspective., Methods: A Markov cohort model was constructed to simulate patient transitions among recurrence-free, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death. Transition probabilities from recurrence-free and locoregional recurrence were estimated via multistate parametric modeling based on patient-level data from an interim analysis (data cutoff date: 04-Jan-2022). Transition probabilities from distant metastasis were based on KEYNOTE-006 data and network meta-analysis. Costs were estimated in 2022 US dollars. Utilities were based on applying US value set to EQ-5D-5L data collected in trial and literature., Results: Compared to observation, pembrolizumab increased total costs by $80,423 and provided gains of 1.17 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 1.24 life years (LYs) over lifetime, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $68,736/QALY and $65,059/LY. The higher upfront costs of adjuvant treatment were largely offset by reductions in costs of subsequent treatment, downstream disease management, and terminal care, reflecting the lower risk of recurrence with pembrolizumab. Results were robust in one-way sensitivity and scenario analyses. At a $150,000/QALY threshold, pembrolizumab was cost-effective vs. observation in 73.9% of probabilistic simulations that considered parameter uncertainty., Conclusion: As an adjuvant treatment of stage IIB or IIC melanoma, pembrolizumab was estimated to reduce recurrence, extend patients' life and QALYs, and be cost-effective versus observation at a US willingness-to-pay threshold., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. A distinct pattern of growth and RAC1 signaling in melanoma brain metastasis cells.
- Author
-
Stejerean-Todoran I, Gimotty PA, Watters A, Brafford P, Krepler C, Godok T, Li H, Bonilla Del Rio Z, Zieseniss A, Katschinski DM, Sertel SM, Rizzoli SO, Garman B, Nathanson KL, Xu X, Chen Q, Oswald JH, Lotem M, Mills GB, Davies MA, Schön MP, Bogeski I, Herlyn M, and Vultur A
- Subjects
- Humans, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor Microenvironment, rac1 GTP-Binding Protein metabolism, Melanoma pathology, Skin Neoplasms, Brain Neoplasms genetics
- Abstract
Background: Melanoma, the deadliest of skin cancers, has a high propensity to form brain metastases that are associated with a markedly worsened prognosis. In spite of recent therapeutic advances, melanoma brain lesions remain a clinical challenge, biomarkers predicting brain dissemination are not clear and differences with other metastatic sites are poorly understood., Methods: We examined a genetically diverse panel of human-derived melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) and extracranial cell lines using targeted sequencing, a Reverse Phase Protein Array, protein expression analyses, and functional studies in vitro and in vivo., Results: Brain-specific genetic alterations were not detected; however, MBM cells in vitro displayed lower proliferation rates and MBM-specific protein expression patterns associated with proliferation, DNA damage, adhesion, and migration. MBM lines displayed higher levels of RAC1 expression, involving a distinct RAC1-PAK1-JNK1 signaling network. RAC1 knockdown or treatment with small molecule inhibitors contributed to a less aggressive MBM phenotype in vitro, while RAC1 knockdown in vivo led to reduced tumor volumes and delayed tumor appearance. Proliferation, adhesion, and migration were higher in MBM vs nonMBM lines in the presence of insulin or brain-derived factors and were affected by RAC1 levels., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that despite their genetic variability, MBM engage specific molecular processes such as RAC1 signaling to adapt to the brain microenvironment and this can be used for the molecular characterization and treatment of brain metastases., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Phase II LEAP-004 Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab for Melanoma With Confirmed Progression on a Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 or Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitor Given as Monotherapy or in Combination.
- Author
-
Arance A, de la Cruz-Merino L, Petrella TM, Jamal R, Ny L, Carneiro A, Berrocal A, Márquez-Rodas I, Spreafico A, Atkinson V, Costa Svedman F, Mant A, Khattak MA, Mihalcioiu C, Jang S, Cowey CL, Smith AD, Hawk N, Chen K, Diede SJ, Krepler C, and Long GV
- Subjects
- Humans, B7-H1 Antigen, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins therapeutic use, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors therapeutic use, Melanoma drug therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: Effective treatments are needed for melanoma that progresses on inhibitors of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1). We conducted the phase II LEAP-004 study to evaluate the combination of the multikinase inhibitor lenvatinib and the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in this population (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03776136)., Methods: Eligible patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma with confirmed progressive disease (PD) within 12 weeks of the last dose of a PD-1/L1 inhibitor given alone or with other therapies, including cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, received lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus ≤ 35 doses of pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, version 1.1, by independent central review., Results: A total of 103 patients were enrolled and treated. The median study follow-up was 15.3 months. ORR in the total population was 21.4% (95% CI, 13.9 to 30.5), with three (2.9%) complete responses and 19 (18.4%) partial responses. The median duration of response was 8.3 months (range, 3.2-15.9+). ORR was 33.3% in the 30 patients with PD on prior anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival in the total population were 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.8 to 7.1) and 14.0 months (95% CI, 10.8 to not reached), respectively. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47 (45.6%) patients, most commonly hypertension (21.4%); one patient died from a treatment-related event (decreased platelet count)., Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab provides clinically meaningful, durable responses in patients with advanced melanoma with confirmed PD on prior PD-1/L1 inhibitor-based therapy, including those with PD on anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapy. The safety profile was as expected. These data support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a potential regimen for this population of high unmet need.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (KEYNOTE-716): distant metastasis-free survival results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.
- Author
-
Long GV, Luke JJ, Khattak MA, de la Cruz Merino L, Del Vecchio M, Rutkowski P, Spagnolo F, Mackiewicz J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Kirkwood JM, Robert C, Grob JJ, de Galitiis F, Schadendorf D, Carlino MS, Mohr P, Dummer R, Gershenwald JE, Yoon CH, Wu XL, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Krepler C, Eggermont AMM, and Ascierto PA
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Child, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Double-Blind Method, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma surgery, Melanoma pathology, Skin Neoplasms drug therapy, Skin Neoplasms surgery, Testicular Neoplasms
- Abstract
Background: Patients with stage IIB or IIC melanoma who undergo surgery alone are at a substantial risk for disease recurrence. Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival versus placebo in stage IIB or IIC melanoma in the first interim analysis of the KEYNOTE-716 trial. Here, we report results from the secondary endpoint of distant metastasis-free survival (prespecified third interim analysis), and recurrence-free survival with longer follow-up., Methods: KEYNOTE-716 is a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover or rechallenge, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 160 academic medical centres and hospitals across 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 12 years and older with newly-diagnosed, completely resected, and histologically confirmed stage IIB (T3b or T4a) or IIC (T4b) cutaneous melanoma; negative sentinel lymph node biopsy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 200 mg of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg up to a maximum of 200 mg in paediatric patients) or placebo, both intravenously, every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (part 1) or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Eligible patients with disease recurrence could receive further treatment with pembrolizumab in the part 2 crossover or rechallenge phase. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and stratified by T category and paediatric status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (assessed here with longer follow-up), and we report the prespecified third interim analysis of distant metastasis-free survival (secondary endpoint). Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who were randomly assigned, according to assigned group) and safety was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of trial treatment, according to the treatment received. KEYNOTE-716 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03553836, and has completed recruitment., Findings: Between Sept 23, 2018, and Nov 4, 2020, 976 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=487) or placebo (n=489). At a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 23·1-31·7), median distant metastasis-free survival was not reached (95% CI not reached [NR]-NR) in either group. Pembrolizumab significantly improved distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64, 95% CI 0·47-0·88, p=0·0029) versus placebo. Median recurrence-free survival was 37·2 months (95% CI NR-NR) in the pembrolizumab group and not reached in the placebo group (95% CI NR-NR). The risk of recurrence remained lower with pembrolizumab versus placebo (HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·50-0·84). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (16 [3%] of 483 patients in the pembrolizumab group vs 17 [4%] of 486 patients in the placebo group), diarrhoea (eight [2%] vs one [<1%]), rash (seven [1%] vs two [<1%]), autoimmune hepatitis (seven [1%] vs two [<1%]), and increased lipase (six [1%] vs eight [2%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 49 (10%) patients in the pembrolizumab group and 11 (2%) patients in the placebo group. No treatment-related deaths were reported., Interpretation: Adjuvant pembrolizumab is an efficacious treatment option for resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma, with significant improvement in distant-metastasis free survival versus placebo and continued reduction in the risk of recurrence with an adverse event profile consistent with previous studies of pembrolizumab. The overall benefit-risk of pembrolizumab continues to be positive in the adjuvant setting., Funding: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GVL reports research funding to their institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co; fees for consulting or advisory roles for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, Boehringer Ingelheim International, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion Biotech, Hexal (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics, MSD (Australia), Novartis, Oncosec Medical Australia, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Qbiotics, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and honoraria for speaker's bureau from Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and Pierre Fabre. JJL reports research funding to the institution for clinical studies from MSD, AbbVie, Agios, Array, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimmune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, and Xencor; membership on data safety monitoring board for AbbVie and Immutep; membership on scientific advisory boards for 7 Hills, Bright Peak, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, and Xilioo; stocks for Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, Pyxis, and Tempest; compensation for consultancy with AbbVie, Alnylam, Bayer, BMS, CheckMate, Codiak, Crown, Cstone, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Flame, Genentech, Gilead, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Immunocore, Incyte, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Ribon, Rublus, Silicon, Synlogic, Synthekine, TRex, Werewold, and Xencor; and patents (provisional) for cancer immunotherapy (PCT/US18/36052; microbiome biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 responsiveness: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic uses thereof). MAK, J-JG, FdG, and CHY report research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD. LdlCM reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from Celgene, MSD, and Roche; reimbursement for travel expenses from Roche; and consultant or advisory roles for BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Roche. MDV reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD and honoraria as a consultant or advisor for Novartis, BMS, MSD, and Pierre Fabre. PR reports research funding to their institution from MSD and Pfizer; honoraria for lectures and advisory board participation for MSD, BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Merck, Philogen, and Blueprint Medicines. FS reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD; and fees for consulting and honoraria for speakers bureaus from MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Philogen, Sun Pharma, Merck, and BMS. JM reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD; honoraria from BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; and consultant or advisory roles for BMS and MSD. VC-S reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD; reimbursement for travel and accommodation for medical congress from Novartis and Pierre Fabre; and honoraria for advisory board participation for Novartis, Pierre Fabre, BMS, and Merck-Serono. JMK reports research funding to their institution from MSD, Amgen, BMS, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Immunocore, Iovance Biotherapies, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Castle Biosciences, and Merck; fees from Amgen, Ankyra Therapeutics, Axios Research Instil Bio, BMS, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, DermTech, Elsevier, Harbour BioMed, Immunocore, Iovance Biotherapies, Istari Oncology, Millenium Pharmaceuticals or Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Natera, Novartis Pharmaceutical, OncoCyte Corporation, OncoSec Medical, Pfizer, Scopus BioPharma, and Merck. CR reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD and fees as a consultant or advisor for Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi. DS reports research finding to their institution for clinical studies from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, and Array; patient fees to their institution from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Merck–EMD, Philogen, Pfizer, Array, InflarX, OncoSec, Replimune, Neracare, Nektar, Sun Pharma, Sandoz, and UltimoVacs; reimbursement for travel from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Merck-EMD, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, InflarX, NeraCare, and Nektar; and non-financial support from BMS, MSD, Novartis, Merck-EMD, Pierre-Fabre, InFlarX, Neracare, Nektar, Sun Pharma, and Sandoz. MSC reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies for MSD and honoraria for consulting from BMS, Eisia, IDEAYA Biosciences, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Oncosec, Pierre Fabre, Qbiotics, Roche, and Sanofi. PM reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD, Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Genentech (Roche Group), and Sanofi; consulting or advisory roles for Amgen, BMS, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Sanofi; fees for speakers bureau from Amgen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; and reimbursement for travel, accommodations, and expenses from Amgen, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma. RD reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD and consulting or advisory roles with MSD, Novartis, Roche, BMS, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron, Alligator, T3 Pharma, MaxiVAX, Pfizer, and touchIME. JEG reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from Merck; royalties for content contribution to UpToDate; consulting or advisory roles for Merck, Regeneron, Syndax, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; fees for speakers bureau for Banner MD Anderson Phoenix; reimbursement for travel to meetings from American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), American College of Surgeons, Melanoma Research Alliance, and Bridges Melanoma meeting; and leadership roles for AJCC and Melanoma Research Alliance. XLW, MF-K, and CK are employees of and own stock in MSD. AMME reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies from MSD; fees for advisory board membership for Merck, Agenus, Biocad, BioInvent, BioNTech, BMS, CatalYm, Ellipses, Galecto, GSK, IO Biotech, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Merck, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Sellas, SkylineDX, TigaTx, and TxDiscovery; fees for independent data monitoring committee for Biocad, GSK, Pfizer, and Novartis;fees for speakers bureau from Biocad, BMS, and Merck; and equity in IO Biotech and SkylineDX. PAA reports research funding to their institution for clinical studies by MSD, BMS, Genentech (Roche Group), Sanofi, and Pfizer or Array BioPharma; fees as a consultant or advisor from BMS, Genentech (Roche Group), MSD, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Sandoz, 4SC, Nektar, Italfarmaco, Pfizer or Array BioPharma, Lunaphore, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, and ValoTx; and participation on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for BMS, Genentech (Roche Group), MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Immunocore, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Oncosec, and ITeos., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage II melanoma: Health-related quality of life from the randomized phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study.
- Author
-
Khattak MA, Luke JJ, Long GV, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Robert C, Grob JJ, de la Cruz Merino L, Del Vecchio M, Spagnolo F, Mackiewicz J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Carlino MS, Mohr P, De Galitiis F, Ross MI, Eroglu Z, Chen K, Jiang R, Fukunaga-Kalabis M, Krepler C, Eggermont AMM, and Kirkwood JM
- Subjects
- Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Adjuvants, Immunologic therapeutic use, Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant, Quality of Life, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma surgery
- Abstract
Background: Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) versus placebo in resected stage IIB and IIC melanoma in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results are reported., Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg (2 mg/kg, patients ≥12 to <18 years) Q3W or placebo for ≤17 cycles or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) was a prespecified exploratory end point. Change in EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning, symptom, and single-item scales, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) were also summarized. Primary analyses were performed at week 48 to ensure adequate completion/compliance. The HRQoL population comprised patients who received ≥1 dose of treatment and completed ≥1 assessment., Results: The HRQoL population included 969 patients (pembrolizumab, n = 483; placebo, n = 486). Compliance at week 48 was ≥80% for both instruments. EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores were stable from baseline to week 48 in both arms, with no clinically meaningful decline observed. Scores did not differ significantly between pembrolizumab and placebo. EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores remained stable through week 96 in both arms., Conclusions: HRQoL was stable with adjuvant pembrolizumab, with no clinically meaningful decline observed. Change from baseline in HRQoL was similar between arms. These results, in conjunction with the improved RFS and manageable safety previously reported, support the use of adjuvant pembrolizumab for high-risk stage II melanoma., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: MK has no conflicts of interest to declare. JJL reports advisory/consultancy roles with AbbVie, Immutep, Evaxion, 7 Hills, Bright Peak, Exo, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio, Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, Pyxis, STipe, Tempest, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Day One, Duke St, EMD Serono, Endeavor, Flame, Genentech, Gilead, Glenmark, HotSpot, Kadmon, Janssen, Ikena, Immunocore, Incyte, IO Biotech, Macrogenics, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Partner, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roivant, Servier, STINGthera, Synlogic, and Synthekine; stock ownership in Actym, AlphamabOncology, Arch Oncology, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc.AI, OncoNano, Pyxis, STipe, and Tempest; research grants/funding to their institution from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimmune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, and Xencor; travel, accommodation, and/or expenses from Castle; and the following provisional patents: Serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy), PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof). GVL is consultant advisor for Agenus, Amgen, Array Biopharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion, Hexal AG (Sandoz Company), Highlight Therapeutics S.L., Innovent Biologics USA, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Novartis, OncoSec, PHMR Ltd, Pierre Fabre, Provectus, Qbiotics, Regeneron. PAA reports grants or contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer/Array, and Sanofi; consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, MSD, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Sandoz, 4SC, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Pfizer/Array, Lunaphore, and Medicenna.Bio-Al Health; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, MSD, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Immunocore, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Oncosec, Nouscom, Seagen, and iTeos. PR reports advisory/consultancy roles with MSD, BMS, Merck, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Blueprint Medicines, and Philogen; speaker bureau for BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Merck, and Sanofi; research grant/funding to their institution from Pfizer; and officer/board of director roles with ASCO, ESMO, and the Polish Oncological Society. DS reports advisory/consultancy roles with 4SC, Amgen, Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Haystack, Immunocore, InFlarX, Innovent, Labcorp, Merck Serono, MSD, Nektar, Neracare, Novartis, OncoSec, Pfizer, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Replimune, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi/Regeneron, and Sun Pharma; speaker bureau for BMS, Merck/MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; research grant/funding to their institution from Amgen, Array/Pfizer, BMS, MSD, Novartis, and Roche; travel, accommodation, and/or expenses from BMS, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, and Sanofi; officer/board of director role with WTZ; and the following nonremunerated activities: EORTC-MG, member of board of directors; coordinating PI for 4SC, BMS, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; local PI for Philogen, Roche, and Sanofi. CR worked in a consulting/advisory role for BMS, Roche, Amgen, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Sanofi, Biothera, CureVac, and Merck. MAP worked in a consulting/advisory role for BMS, Merck, Eisai, Novartis, Incyte, NewLink Genetics, Aduro, and Pfizer; received research/grant support from BMS, Merck, Novartis, Array BioPharma, RGenix, Infinity, and AstraZeneca. JJG reports advisory/consultancy roles with BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Amgen, Merck, and Pfizer; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from BMS and Pierre Fabre. LDLCM reports advisory/consultancy roles with Roche, BMS, and MSD-Merck; research grant/funding to their institution from Roche, Celgene, and MSD; and travel, accommodation, and/or expenses from Gilead. MDV reports honoraria and advisory/consultancy roles with Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, MSD, and Pierre Fabre. FS reports honoraria from BMS, Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Merck; and advisory/consultancy roles with Novartis, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, and Philogen. JM reports honoraria from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Novartis; advisory/consultancy roles with MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb; and travel, accommodations, and/or expenses from MSD, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Novartis. VCS reports travel, accommodation, and/or expenses from Pierre-Fabre and Novartis; and nonremunerated activities for BMS, Pierre-Fabre, and Merck-Serono. MSC reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, and Novartis; and advisory/consultancy roles with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ideaya, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Oncosec, Pierre Fabre, Qbiotics, Regeneron, and Roche. PM reports honoraria and advisory/consultancy roles with Pierre Fabre, GSK, MSD, Merck Germany, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Sanofi, and Immunocore; research grant/funding from BMS, Novartis, and MSD; and travel, accommodation, and/or expenses from Pierre Fabre, MSD, Merck Germany, and Roche. FDG reports advisory/consultancy roles with BMS and Novartis; and research grant/funding to their institution from Novartis. MR reports advisory/consultancy roles with MSD; and travel, accommodation, and/or expenses from MSD. ZE reports advisory/consultancy roles with Pfizer, Novartis, Genentech, Regeneron, OncoSec, Natera, and Eisai; and research grant/funding to their institution from Pfizer and Novartis. KC is an employee of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA. RJ, MFK, and CK are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA, and are stockholders of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA. AE reports honoraria from Agenus, Biocad, BioInvent, BioNTech, Brenus, CatalYm, Clover, Ellipses, Galecto, GSK, IO Biotech, IQVIA, Merck/MSD, Nektar, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sairopa, Sellas, SkylineDx, TigaTx, and TTxDiscovery; advisory/consultancy roles with Agenus, Biocad, BioInvent, BioNTech, Brenus, CatalYm, Clover, Ellipses, Galecto, GSK, IO Biotech, IQVIA, Merck/MSD, Nektar, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sairopa, Sellas, SkylineDx, TigaTx, and TTxDiscovery; speaker bureau for Biocad, BMS, and Merck/MSD; a leadership role with the European Academy of Cancer Sciences; stock ownership in IO Biotech and SkylineDx; and nonremunerated activities for the European Academy of Cancer Sciences (EACS) and the Fondation Cancer (FOCA). JMK reports advisory/consultancy roles with Applied Clinical Intelligence LLC, Amgen Inc., Ankyra Therapeutics, Axio Research/Instil Bio, Becker Pharmaceutical Consulting, Bristol Myers Squibb, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, DermTech, Fenix Group International, Harbour BioMed, Immunocore LLC, Intellisphere LLC/Cancer Network, Iovance Biotherapeutics, IQVIA, Istari Oncology, Merck, Millennium Pharmaceuticals/Takeda Pharmaceutical, Natera Inc, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, OncoCyte Corporation, OncoSec Medical Inc., Pfizer, Replimune, Scopus BioPharma, and SR One Capital Management; and research grant/funding to their institution from Amgen Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Castle Biosciences Inc, Checkmate Pharmaceuticals, Harbour BioMed, Immvira Pharma Co., Immunocore LLC, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Merck, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Schering-Plough, Takeda, and Verastem Inc., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s), Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.,. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.