Search

BACKGROUND: TROP2 (TACSTD2) expression is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) in some solid tumors, and the TROP2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan has been approved in breast and urothelial carcinomas. We aimed to explore the multi-omic landscape associated with TACSTD2 gene expression in various solid tumors to identify patients most likely to benefit from this approach. METHODS: Breast (N = 11 246), colorectal (N = 15 425), hepatocellular (N = 433), pancreatic (N = 5488), and urothelial (N = 4125) tumors were stratified into quartiles by TACSTD2 gene expression, analyzed by next-generation DNA sequencing, whole transcriptome sequencing, and immunohistochemistry at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). Survival data were obtained from insurance claims, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for molecularly defined cohorts. RESULTS: Several pathogenic mutations were associated with TACSTD2-high tumors, including TP53 in breast, colorectal (CRC), pancreatic, and hepatocellular cancers; KRAS in pancreatic and CRC cancers; ARID1A and FGFR3 in urothelial cancer; and CTNNB1 in hepatocellular cancer. TACSTD2-low breast tumors were enriched for copy number amplifications in CCND1 and FGF/R family member genes. TACSTD2 high was generally associated with more immune cell infiltration and greater T-cell inflammation scores. Patients with TACSTD2-high breast, CRC, and pancreatic cancers demonstrated a significantly shorter OS than TACSTD2-low tumors. This was restricted to CRC with microsatellite stable tumors and patients with pancreatic cancer with KRAS-mutant tumors. Patients with breast cancer with TACSTD2-high tumors also experienced significantly worse OS following immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: TACSTD2 expression is associated with key driver alterations and a more active immune microenvironment, suggesting possible combinatorial strategies with TROP2-targeting ADCs plus immunotherapy in various solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Non-canonical WNT family (WNT5A pathway) signaling via WNT5A through ROR1 and its partner, ROR2, or Frizzled2 (FZD2) is linked to processes driving tumorigenesis and therapy resistance. We utilized a large dataset of urothelial carcinoma (UC) tumors to characterize non-canonical WNT signaling through WNT5A, ROR1, ROR2, or FZD2 expression. METHODS: NextGen Sequencing of DNA (592 genes or WES)/RNA (WTS) was performed for 4125 UC tumors submitted to Caris Life Sciences. High and low expression of WNT5A, ROR1, ROR2, and FZD2 was defined as ≥ top and

Simple Summary: In the era of precision medicine, translational oncology seeks to identify new, targeted therapies for tumors with rare genetic mutations. Patients receiving targeted therapy are known to have better outcomes (i.e., live longer and better) compared to those receiving non-targeted therapies. In this analysis, we retrospectively analyzed 63,873 tumor tissues to better understand the rare HRAS mutation. We found that only 0.8% of tumors are HRAS mutant, and these tumors look different at the molecular level and behave differently on a clinical level. Targeted therapies for patients with HRAS mutations, such as tipifarnib, currently exist and are being tested in various tumor types. Our study seeks to add to the limited information currently known about this rare genetic mutation. Tipifarnib is the only targeted therapy breakthrough for HRAS-mutant (HRASmt) recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The molecular profiles of HRASmt cancers are difficult to explore given the low frequency of HRASmt. This study aims to understand the molecular co-alterations, immune profiles, and clinical outcomes of 524 HRASmt solid tumors including urothelial carcinoma (UC), breast cancer (BC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, and HNSCC. HRASmt was most common in UC (3.0%), followed by HNSCC (2.82%), melanoma (1.05%), BC (0.45%), and NSCLC (0.44%). HRASmt was absent in Her2+ BC regardless of hormone receptor status. HRASmt was more frequently associated with squamous compared to non-squamous NSCLC (60% vs. 40% in HRASwt, p = 0.002). The tumor microenvironment (TME) of HRASmt demonstrated increased M1 macrophages in triple-negative BC (TNBC), HNSCC, squamous NSCLC, and UC; increased M2 macrophages in TNBC; and increased CD8+ T-cells in HNSCC (all p < 0.05). Finally, HRASmt was associated with shorter overall survival in HNSCC (HR: 1.564, CI: 1.16–2.11, p = 0.003) but not in the other cancer types examined. In conclusion, this study provides new insights into the unique molecular profiles of HRASmt tumors that may help to identify new targets and guide future clinical trial design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Targeted therapy in folate receptor alpha (FOLR1)-positive high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is now a mainstay for platinum-resistant disease. However, the rate of FOLR1-positivity in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is not well documented. Less common than HGSOC, LGSOC tends to respond poorly to traditional platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens, particularly in recurrence. Thus, there is an urgent need to identify molecular targets that may assist in identifying more efficacious treatments for LGSOC. In this work, we assessed the genomic and transcriptomic landscapes in FOLR1-positive/negative LGSOC compared to its high-grade counterpart., Methods: Using a large precision oncology database, next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry was performed on a cohort of 281 LGSOC and 5086 HGSOC. Associated MAPK activation was calculated based on NGS results and patient survival analysis was completed stratified by molecular alteration., Results: Compared with LGSOC (24.6 %), HGSOC tumors have significantly higher prevalence of FOLR1+ status (43.5 %) and significantly higher PD-L1+ status. Conversely, LGSOC had higher prevalence of KRAS and NRAS mutations, with a near exclusivity for BRAF mutation compared to HGSOC. FOLR1- LGSOC and HGSOC had similar prevalences of T cell-inflamed tumors, though FOLR1+ LGSOC had a significantly lower prevalence of T-Cell inflamed tumors than FOLR1+ HGSOC. MAPK activation, quantified via MAPK activation score (MPAS), was significantly higher in low-grade tumors compared to HGSOC, yet no difference between FOLR1+ vs FOLR1- LGSOC was observed., Conclusions: Though less than in high-grade disease, a notable portion of low-grade tumors were FOLR1+, suggesting FOLR1 expression in LGSOC could be a viable target for this rare histology, particularly in the recurrent setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: The new CAP guideline published in August 2022 recommends using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to test for mismatch repair defects in gastroesophageal (GE), small bowel (SB), or endometrial carcinoma (EC) cancers over next-generation sequencing assessment of microsatellite instability (NGS-MSI) for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy eligibility and states there is a preference to use IHC over NGS-MSI in colorectal carcinoma (CRC)., Methods: We assessed the concordance of NGS-MSI and IHC-MMR from a very large cohort across the spectrum of solid tumors., Results: Of the over 190,000 samples with both NGS-MSI and IHC-MMR about 1,160 were initially flagged as discordant. Of those samples initially flagged as discordant, 50.9% remained discordant after being reviewed by an additional pathologist. This resulted in a final discordance rate of 0.31% (590/191,767). Among CRC, GE, SB and EC, 55.4% of mismatch repair proficient/MSI high (MMRp/MSI-H) tumors had at least one somatic pathogenic mutation in an MMR gene or POLE . Mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite stable (MMRd/MSS) tumors had a significantly lower rate of high tumor mutational burden than MMRp/MSI-H tumors. Across all solid tumors, MMRd/MSI-H tumors had significantly longer overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.47, P < .001) and post-ICI survival (HR, 1.82, P < .001) as compared with MMRp/MSS tumors. The OS for the MMRd/MSS group was slightly worse compared to the MMRp/MSI-H tumors, but this difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.73, P = .058), with a similar pattern when looking at post-ICI survival (HR, 0.43, P = .155)., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that NGS-MSI is noninferior to IHC-MMR and can identify MSI-H tumors that IHC-MMR is unable to detect and conversely IHC-MMR can identify MMRd tumors that NGS-MSI misses.